Pinned Tweet
Soy dev convertido en fundador. Pasé más de 10 años en Big Tech construyendo productos y sistemas de crecimiento a escala (Meta, Microsoft).
Si eres un dev con mentalidad de producto, o un PM con alma de dev, comparto análisis técnicos sobre desarrollo de productos.
Si eres un dev con mentalidad de producto, o un PM con alma de dev, comparto análisis técnicos sobre desarrollo de productos.
11
3
183
83,493
Alan retweeted
Immigration policy must be driven by the present, not the past, and business leaders are too terrified of the left AND the right to acknowledge this.
Recent H1B discourse revolves around a longstanding immigration sleight-of-hand. H1B proponents point to exceptional people who came here decades ago as if they represent the current state of the program in the same way that advocates for low-skill/illegal immigration point to very favorable immigrant crime/welfare/education/etc statistics that do, in truth, have them beating native-born Americans on many fronts.
It is all a sham. The world that created those statistics, people, and businesses no longer exists. Brilliant but desperate Vietnamese fathers who fled communism have nothing in common with young men from Honduras, and the crime rates/economic acccomplishments/integration of the former should not be used to justify mass migration of the latter.
Nor should the accomplishments of people who managed to get an H1B visa in the 90s (when the program was capped to just 65,000 visas) be used to justify staffing agencies and tech companies using the program to replace American jobs for less money. The obvious abuse going on is politically suicidal and something that even the most ardent supporters of the visa should want to crack down on, no immigration program can possibly survive the obvious and widely known reality of what is going on. I am a longtime outspoken advocate for stealing the best people from other countries to make our own better, runaway abuse of existing programs robs the government of the worker trust required to do so.
Lots of people in the tech space know this. Even the dumb people are smart enough to see it. Nobody actually believes these are all incredible people with unique talents performing jobs no American can. Everyone knows the guy in Cubicle Bay 7 doing mediocre but functional web design for half the salary of his American peers is no savant and doesn't meet the statutory requirements for his H-1B visa.
Unfortunately, most people with power or profile are terrified that any public statement or acknowledgement will get them attacked by the right (You guys have been screwing over American workers for years with visa abuse, you damn hypocrite!) or the left (You are racist, sexist, misogynist, and sucking up to this fascist administration!). Or, more likely, both. I know too many tech execs in particular who feel trapped, like the only winning move is to stay silent.
JD is blowing the whole thing wide open by putting facts and stats front and center that nobody wants to engage with. Critics will talk about anything and everything else but these damning facts and this obvious truth, that H1B visas serve neither their original purpose, legal purpose, invented purpose, or the American people.
Recent H1B discourse revolves around a longstanding immigration sleight-of-hand. H1B proponents point to exceptional people who came here decades ago as if they represent the current state of the program in the same way that advocates for low-skill/illegal immigration point to very favorable immigrant crime/welfare/education/etc statistics that do, in truth, have them beating native-born Americans on many fronts.
It is all a sham. The world that created those statistics, people, and businesses no longer exists. Brilliant but desperate Vietnamese fathers who fled communism have nothing in common with young men from Honduras, and the crime rates/economic acccomplishments/integration of the former should not be used to justify mass migration of the latter.
Nor should the accomplishments of people who managed to get an H1B visa in the 90s (when the program was capped to just 65,000 visas) be used to justify staffing agencies and tech companies using the program to replace American jobs for less money. The obvious abuse going on is politically suicidal and something that even the most ardent supporters of the visa should want to crack down on, no immigration program can possibly survive the obvious and widely known reality of what is going on. I am a longtime outspoken advocate for stealing the best people from other countries to make our own better, runaway abuse of existing programs robs the government of the worker trust required to do so.
Lots of people in the tech space know this. Even the dumb people are smart enough to see it. Nobody actually believes these are all incredible people with unique talents performing jobs no American can. Everyone knows the guy in Cubicle Bay 7 doing mediocre but functional web design for half the salary of his American peers is no savant and doesn't meet the statutory requirements for his H-1B visa.
Unfortunately, most people with power or profile are terrified that any public statement or acknowledgement will get them attacked by the right (You guys have been screwing over American workers for years with visa abuse, you damn hypocrite!) or the left (You are racist, sexist, misogynist, and sucking up to this fascist administration!). Or, more likely, both. I know too many tech execs in particular who feel trapped, like the only winning move is to stay silent.
JD is blowing the whole thing wide open by putting facts and stats front and center that nobody wants to engage with. Critics will talk about anything and everything else but these damning facts and this obvious truth, that H1B visas serve neither their original purpose, legal purpose, invented purpose, or the American people.
Vice President JD Vance breaks down the data:
"If you are working as an H-1B visa in the United States of America, you’re earning $20,000 less than an American citizen hired in the same position. If you were brought in by one of these foreign outsourcing firms, you’re making erican citizen in a similar position. So I’m sure that everybody here understands the game that is being played. You bring in indentured servants from outside the country, you lay off American workers and, if you’re a corporation, you make a ton of money by under cutting the wages of American workers, replacing them with people who frankly shouldn’t be in the United States of America to begin with."
781
3,652
26,235
968,861
he visto que X en español se amplifica mucho a los pesimistas y negativos, y a los que comparten información útil siempre llegan los pendejazos con IQ de un dígito a decir “EsTo No Es LinkeDiN”
@bitforth twitter tiene buenos programadores con buenos tweets. twitter tech MX es todo lo contrario jajajaja
3
1
38
1,558
My heuristica es la opuesta 😅
Si no está al tanto de todo lo que de habla en X, automáticamente asumo que está desactualizado
Si no está al tanto de todo lo que de habla en X, automáticamente asumo que está desactualizado
Crean más en las personas que sí laboran como programadores, personas que poco o nada usan redes sociales, no creas en chalio3456 que dice cualquier cosa por buscar polémicas en X.
3
0
31
2,231
Quizá suene exagerado, pero los que están súper AI-pilled, si se acerca mucho al concepto de religiones. El comportamiento es muy similar.
Hay una corriente que cree que la IA es todo poderosa, que puede hacer absolutamente todo, esta corriente parece una secta, y aseguro que pronto van a comenzar a adorar a la IA como un dios (o ya). También estos mismos si ven a otro usando IA, creen que no son dignos de usarla.
4
2
51
2,214
Alan retweeted
Who’s going to tell the old school coders that there’s going to be nothing but vibe coding in like 6 months. All companies will need are people who can describe what they want properly, and someone to look it over. These tweets that make vibe coding seem stupid, are naive.
302
38
1,127
97,107
Alan retweeted
Things population genetics have proven in recent years:
- Out of Africa theory was wrong
- "West Eurasians" (White people) were selected for intelligence (Akbari et al., 2026)
- Sub-Saharan Africans have a signficiant percentage of "ghost DNA" belonging to a now extinct hominid species (Durvasula & Sankararaman, 2020)
- The ancestors of modern Northern Europeans invaded India and established Vedic civilization (Narasimhan et al., 2019)
The supposedly debunked "race science" of the early 20th C. was far more correct than post-war anthropology. Normie discourse is decades behind.
- Out of Africa theory was wrong
- "West Eurasians" (White people) were selected for intelligence (Akbari et al., 2026)
- Sub-Saharan Africans have a signficiant percentage of "ghost DNA" belonging to a now extinct hominid species (Durvasula & Sankararaman, 2020)
- The ancestors of modern Northern Europeans invaded India and established Vedic civilization (Narasimhan et al., 2019)
The supposedly debunked "race science" of the early 20th C. was far more correct than post-war anthropology. Normie discourse is decades behind.
Dr. Eleanor Scerri of Max Planck Institute says the idea that humans originated in Southern Africa based on the fact that the oldest haplogroups are located there is unlikely. gea.mpg.de/person/52339/2…
367
2,781
22,167
479,773
Yo salí de un cbtis 🙋♂️
Hay de todo, y si hay mucho bandido y malandro, pero también hay un chingo de gente trabajadora.
La mayoría de mi salón trabajaba, estudiaba y apoyaba en su casa. A los 16-17 muchos ya nos habíamos comprado nuestro propios coches, si, ya casi para la basura, pero eran nuestros.
Al final del día eso forja carácter y acompañado con oportunidades y un poquito de inteligencia/visión puedes llegar bien lejos
Hay de todo, y si hay mucho bandido y malandro, pero también hay un chingo de gente trabajadora.
La mayoría de mi salón trabajaba, estudiaba y apoyaba en su casa. A los 16-17 muchos ya nos habíamos comprado nuestro propios coches, si, ya casi para la basura, pero eran nuestros.
Al final del día eso forja carácter y acompañado con oportunidades y un poquito de inteligencia/visión puedes llegar bien lejos
Que buen calladón de hocico les dieron a estos weyes, y a todo mundo quienes hayamos replicado estos prejuicios alguna vez.
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
10
3
133
5,823
Alan retweeted
first time trying out jev for industry classification
client handed me 180k websites with no industries. paying per record in clay or open ai/etc to enrich all of that gets expensive fast, so i'm testing jev as the cheap classifier.
the flow:
- python loads the homepage, pulls , page text + tech stack signals
- if the homepage fails (cloudflare, dead site), fall back to serper google results
- jev returns industry + confidence, ecommerce y/n, dynamic site, parked or dead
- csv, then into clay
starting with 10k to check the failure rate before running the rest. the real goal is figuring out the shape of their account list and which verticals to actually target.
client handed me 180k websites with no industries. paying per record in clay or open ai/etc to enrich all of that gets expensive fast, so i'm testing jev as the cheap classifier.
the flow:
- python loads the homepage, pulls , page text + tech stack signals
- if the homepage fails (cloudflare, dead site), fall back to serper google results
- jev returns industry + confidence, ecommerce y/n, dynamic site, parked or dead
- csv, then into clay
starting with 10k to check the failure rate before running the rest. the real goal is figuring out the shape of their account list and which verticals to actually target.
20
5
63
4,342
Hice este video sin abrir Blender, un editor de video ni una herramienta de modelado 3D. Lo dirigí desde una terminal, escribiendo prompts y viendo previews.
Llegar a este punto fue menos automático de lo que lo hago sonar originalmente. Hubo caras que se estiraban al caminar, ientas mal agarradas y música tan fuerte que tapaba la narración.
Cada preview terminaba en notas sobre encuadre, movimiento, iluminación o sonido. Y cuando un plano ya estaba aprobado, también tuve que insistir en dejar de tocarlo porque cuando queria re-ajustar la escena 6, mis agentes insistian en renderizar todo otra vez.
En el proceso, he desarrollado un montón de skills para organizar las ideas, realizar las ediciones, seleccionar efectos de sonido y ajustar el volumen y los picos optimizados para social media. Tambien un monton de sub-agentes para escribir titulos, descripciones, para generar thumbnails, y que el titulo, la descripcion, el thumbnail, el video y la narrativa todo trabaje junto.
Está lejos de ser edición de clase mundial. Pero con cada iteración me acerco un poco más a resultados profesionales de expertos.
El experimento anterior, de 51s consiguió 1.6K vistas y 6 suscriptores nuevos en menos de 24 horas. El 64.7% decidió quedarse a verlo en vez de saltarlo, y el tiempo promedio de reproducción fue de 38 segundos.
Son resultados iniciales, pero me dan ganas de seguir iterando. Mi hipótesis es que este nuevo video va a retener mejor y ayudarnos a llegar a más gente.
Veremos qué dicen los números.
Vamos a seguir publicándolos en YouTube y contando el proceso, incluidos los errores, en nuestro newsletter.
Dejo ambos enlaces abajo.
Llegar a este punto fue menos automático de lo que lo hago sonar originalmente. Hubo caras que se estiraban al caminar, ientas mal agarradas y música tan fuerte que tapaba la narración.
Cada preview terminaba en notas sobre encuadre, movimiento, iluminación o sonido. Y cuando un plano ya estaba aprobado, también tuve que insistir en dejar de tocarlo porque cuando queria re-ajustar la escena 6, mis agentes insistian en renderizar todo otra vez.
En el proceso, he desarrollado un montón de skills para organizar las ideas, realizar las ediciones, seleccionar efectos de sonido y ajustar el volumen y los picos optimizados para social media. Tambien un monton de sub-agentes para escribir titulos, descripciones, para generar thumbnails, y que el titulo, la descripcion, el thumbnail, el video y la narrativa todo trabaje junto.
Está lejos de ser edición de clase mundial. Pero con cada iteración me acerco un poco más a resultados profesionales de expertos.
El experimento anterior, de 51s consiguió 1.6K vistas y 6 suscriptores nuevos en menos de 24 horas. El 64.7% decidió quedarse a verlo en vez de saltarlo, y el tiempo promedio de reproducción fue de 38 segundos.
Son resultados iniciales, pero me dan ganas de seguir iterando. Mi hipótesis es que este nuevo video va a retener mejor y ayudarnos a llegar a más gente.
Veremos qué dicen los números.
Vamos a seguir publicándolos en YouTube y contando el proceso, incluidos los errores, en nuestro newsletter.
Dejo ambos enlaces abajo.
3
3
9
1,121
I haven't found a single humanizer skill, model, agent, or whatever else that can reliably beat @pangram without fundamentally altering the substance of my writing.
the thing is... the thoughts are mine.
I use AI to refine the flow, structure, and clarity of what I've already written.
AI produces overly mechanical prose, so what I get is usually a rough draft that's about 80% of the way there. The remaining 20% comes down to my own taste, judgment, and editorial decisions.
And yet, even after I've gone through the initial draft, that final 20% of editorial work myself, @pangram will confidently flag the entire piece as AI-generated.
At this point, I've stopped trying to beat Pangram. I'm more interested in preserving my voice and the substance of my arguments than in rewriting perfectly good sentences to satisfy a detector.
the thing is... the thoughts are mine.
I use AI to refine the flow, structure, and clarity of what I've already written.
AI produces overly mechanical prose, so what I get is usually a rough draft that's about 80% of the way there. The remaining 20% comes down to my own taste, judgment, and editorial decisions.
And yet, even after I've gone through the initial draft, that final 20% of editorial work myself, @pangram will confidently flag the entire piece as AI-generated.
At this point, I've stopped trying to beat Pangram. I'm more interested in preserving my voice and the substance of my arguments than in rewriting perfectly good sentences to satisfy a detector.
5
0
8
972
Ahora a cual “santo” le van a ir a rezar los “puristas”? Torvald está AI-pilled.
Me van a tratar de decir que ellos saben mucho de JavaScript y ninguna AI es mejor que ellos, mientras Torvald le dice a Claude “LGTM merge it”
Me van a tratar de decir que ellos saben mucho de JavaScript y ninguna AI es mejor que ellos, mientras Torvald le dice a Claude “LGTM merge it”
Linus Torvalds to the anti-AI crowd: stop using compilers if you want to prove they’re REAL programmers. LOL.
“you had better not use an editor to write that commit message either.
The kind of expectations *I* have is that people do their best and I expect people to understand ut that understanding has very little to do with what tools they use.
And quite honestly, in my experience, the people I respect and call intelligent are not the ones that shy away from using new and interesting tools.”
10
5
51
3,801