Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @petejkim
the problem is unfortunately universal across SaaS. they start out as an opinionated, streamlined alternative to the incumbent, but as they get bigger and start selling to enterprises, they try to do everything and end up becoming the very thing they swore to destroy.
0
0
2
238
Replying to @mxlcolm
@mxlcolm rip destiny
1
0
2
96
Replying to @disconcision
@disconcision we've opened pandora's box, haven't we?
0
0
1
809
Replying to @josephdelong
@josephdelong the flip side is that this proposal could make certain counterfactual use cases of eip-7702 much more inconvenient and possibly less secure
0
0
1
174
Replying to @qp2q6s
@qp2q6s good work
1
0
0
436
every project management software starts out really nice but eventually gets JIRA-fied as they add more and more features I really don't care about. I switch to a new one, and then the same thing happens.
12
1
28
2,987
Replying to @hosseeb
@hosseeb All these stolen tokens can get market dumped into oblivion, are you sure there is no need to panic?
1
0
1
659
Replying to @petejkim
The exploit smart contract has these functions:
• authorizedCaller()
• withdrawETH(address recipient, uint256 amount)
• withdrawToken(address,address,uint256)
• sweep(address recipient, address[] assets)
• execute(address target, uint256 value, bytes data)
1
1
8
1,044
The Binance hacker used EIP-7702 to delegate Binance's EOA hot wallets to a smart contract wallet deployed at etherscan.io/address/0x63e8… enabling them to sweep multiple tokens in a single transaction.
3
5
49
9,296
Replying to @kevin_t_ngo
0
0
0
66
Replying to @worm_emoji
@worm_emoji all LLMs give the names, maya, dex, kai, rio, lyra, etc...
0
0
1
92
Replying to @dhh
@dhh @theo when do we get official omarchy aarch64 ISOs, @dhh?
2
0
2
334
Replying to @pedrouid
@pedrouid @Mudit__Gupta but your certs are supposed to contain 384 bits of entropy, surely this is how to do it, amirite? rand() % 384
0
0
0
21
Replying to @Heyy_Alvi
@Heyy_Alvi yep, the models will always manufacture some work despite the prompt stating "where necessary". it's basically analogous to models hallucinating and making up facts instead of saying "I don't know".
1
0
1
23
it's true, try "/goal audit the entire codebase and refactor code where necessary."

AI will always find something to refactor and most of it will be garbage
The thing with working with ai is that you can keep telling them to do something, tighten this writing, improve the style, make it better...

..and no matter how rounds you do, they will keep doing it until the result is absolute garbage.

they never push back that I could but it doesn't seem like a good idea. it's like the opposite of capable human who would just tell you no, you're being dumb, what you actually want is...

(i know I could prompt this this way, but the human bias/the tools kind of just expect you to command them what you want, not really trying to understand what the purpose is, and push back on when the task no longer makes sense)
2
0
5
777
we're screwed
3
0
14
826
Replying to @0xAishwary
@0xAishwary @abbaskhan @sammyaudits If you are gonna build it, keep it simple. Dex backend on Polygon with a simple fiat on/off ramp (using OMS?). @sandeepnailwal
1
0
1
61
Replying to @pedrouid
@pedrouid @Mudit__Gupta hey don't post my private key
1
0
3
58
Replying to @LefterisJP
@LefterisJP you should try south korea
1
0
0
188
Replying to @kevin_t_ngo
@kevin_t_ngo what effort level did you use?
1
0
0
103