Pinned Tweet
Government is the largest corporation of all and it has the monopoly of violence
@Rothmus Those who are opposed to corporations and favor government do not realize that government is simply the largest, most monopolistic corporation of all and it has a monopoly on violence.
1
4
8
702
Socialism and communism sell a beautiful lie: that if we just hand enough power to the right planners, we can abolish scarcity, greed, and unfairness itself. History keeps answering with the same brutal receipt.
The system does not fail because the wrong people ran it. It fails beings as raw material for a blueprint. Once the state owns the factories, the farms, the prices, and the future, two things disappear almost immediately: the information that prices carry and the reason anyone has to work harder than the next person. You cannot calculate what a society actually needs when no one is allowed to bid, refuse, or walk away. You cannot keep people producing when the extra effort they give is treated as a crime against equality.
What remains is envy dressed up as virtue. The gospel is not “let us create more.” It is “let us take from those who already created.” The result is not shared abundance. It is shared shortage, shared suspicion, and shared permission for the new priesthood—the planners, the party, the bureaucrats—to decide who eats and who waits.
Look at the pattern, not the slogans. Collectivized farms that produced less food than the peasants they replaced. Industrial plans that built monuments while hospitals ran out of basic supplies. Borders that had to be guarded not to keep invaders out, but to keep citizens in. Every time the experiment is run at scale, the same sequence appears: first the confiscation of “the rich,” then the ration book, then the secret police, then the explanation that this time it was not real socialism.
Markets are messy and unequal. They leave some people richer than others. They also leave most people better off than their grandparents, because they reward the person who figures out how to make something cheaper, faster, or better. Socialism promises to erase the first fact and quietly delivers the second in reverse: it equalizes downward. The inherent virtue, as the old line goes, is the equal distribution of misery.
That is not a talking point. It is the empirical record of a century. People do not flee capitalist countries in homemade rafts. They do not invent new words for “empty shelves” under free exchange. They do not need a political religion whose god is the state when they are allowed to keep what they earn and trade with whom they choose.
The next time someone tells you we just need to try it again, only smarter this time, remember what the experiment actually measures. It measures how quickly a society can turn the desire for fairness into permission for control—and how long it takes ordinary people to remember that control is never temporary.
The system does not fail because the wrong people ran it. It fails beings as raw material for a blueprint. Once the state owns the factories, the farms, the prices, and the future, two things disappear almost immediately: the information that prices carry and the reason anyone has to work harder than the next person. You cannot calculate what a society actually needs when no one is allowed to bid, refuse, or walk away. You cannot keep people producing when the extra effort they give is treated as a crime against equality.
What remains is envy dressed up as virtue. The gospel is not “let us create more.” It is “let us take from those who already created.” The result is not shared abundance. It is shared shortage, shared suspicion, and shared permission for the new priesthood—the planners, the party, the bureaucrats—to decide who eats and who waits.
Look at the pattern, not the slogans. Collectivized farms that produced less food than the peasants they replaced. Industrial plans that built monuments while hospitals ran out of basic supplies. Borders that had to be guarded not to keep invaders out, but to keep citizens in. Every time the experiment is run at scale, the same sequence appears: first the confiscation of “the rich,” then the ration book, then the secret police, then the explanation that this time it was not real socialism.
Markets are messy and unequal. They leave some people richer than others. They also leave most people better off than their grandparents, because they reward the person who figures out how to make something cheaper, faster, or better. Socialism promises to erase the first fact and quietly delivers the second in reverse: it equalizes downward. The inherent virtue, as the old line goes, is the equal distribution of misery.
That is not a talking point. It is the empirical record of a century. People do not flee capitalist countries in homemade rafts. They do not invent new words for “empty shelves” under free exchange. They do not need a political religion whose god is the state when they are allowed to keep what they earn and trade with whom they choose.
The next time someone tells you we just need to try it again, only smarter this time, remember what the experiment actually measures. It measures how quickly a society can turn the desire for fairness into permission for control—and how long it takes ordinary people to remember that control is never temporary.
1
17
36
4,168
@creation247 @BurnieSendersX @PlanetOfMemes @TheAtlasSociety @JMilei @FightWithMemes Elon Musk is right 💯
Fascism is primarily a leftist ideology
Fascism is primarily a leftist ideology
0
0
1
54
Despite broad and vocal pushback from citizens who questioned the rushed science, unknown long-term risks, and one-size-fits-all approach to COVID vaccines, governments and health authorities forged ahead with coercive mandates that stripped away bodily autonomy and ignored natural immunity.
Scott Adams, who got vaccinated himself but later admitted his error, captured the truth perfectly: the anti-vaxxers were right—they proved to be the smartest, happiest, and still-alive group—while those who pushed mandates on the innocent revealed themselves as the truly evil ones.
This disastrous overreach shattered public faith in government health policies forever, awakening millions to the dangers of blind compliance and leaving society far more resistant to future top-down mandates that treat citizens like subjects rather than free individuals.
A thread on vaccines and mandates👇
Scott Adams, who got vaccinated himself but later admitted his error, captured the truth perfectly: the anti-vaxxers were right—they proved to be the smartest, happiest, and still-alive group—while those who pushed mandates on the innocent revealed themselves as the truly evil ones.
This disastrous overreach shattered public faith in government health policies forever, awakening millions to the dangers of blind compliance and leaving society far more resistant to future top-down mandates that treat citizens like subjects rather than free individuals.
A thread on vaccines and mandates👇
@RobertKennedyJr Scott Adams is right 💯
“The anti-vaxxers were right. They’re the smartest and happiest people… and they’re still alive. The people who pushed vaccine mandates on the innocent are the truly evil ones.”
2
8
42
6,465
@davidavocadoguyt@liz_churchill10i@RobSchneidern@PlanetOfMemes @BurnieSendersXe@grokt@neuralinkroke, heart attack, and pulmonary embolism.
Researchers led by mechanical engineer Renee Zhao and neurointerventionalist Jeremy Heit developed the milli-spinner—a catheter-delivered hollow tube with fins and slits that spins rapidly inside a blood vessel. It doesn’t tear or frarent aspiration or stent-retriever tools often do. Instead, it uses localized suction (compression) plus shear to densify the tough fibrin network holding the clot together, squeezing out the trapped red blood cells and shrinking the entire clot by up to 95% (down to as little as 5% of its original volume). The tiny, dense fibrin ball is then easily suctioned out. The process can take seconds.
The breakthrough happened by chance. Zhao’s team was developing tiny spinning millirobots for propulsion and drug delivery. They noticed the spinning created strong localized suction, tested it on a clot out of curiosity, and watched the clot turn from red to white while collapsing dramatically in size. “Honestly, it felt like magic,” Zhao said. They didn’t fully understand the mechanism at first; they simply observed an unprecedented effect and refined it through hundreds of iterations.
The numbers are staggering. Current mechanical thrombectomy succeeds on the first try only about half the time and fails completely in ~15% of cases. For the toughest fibrin-rich clots, first-pass success is as low as ~11%. In lab models and swine studies published in Nature (June 2025), the milli-spinner more than doubled efficacy overall and opened the artery on the first try 90% of the time for those hardest clots. In pigs, it restored at least half the blood flow on the first attempt 90.3% of the time—nearly twice the rate of aspiration—and was nearly four times better at fully opening vessels with tough clots. In cerebral artery models it was essentially perfect across hundreds of attempts.
Why it matters so much: “Time is brain.” Every minute a stroke goes untreated, patients lose roughly 1.9 million neurons. Faster, more complete, and less fragmenting clot removal could save tens of thousands of lives and dramatically cut disability from ischemic stroke, massive pulmonary embolism, heart attacks, and peripheral thrombosis. A Stanford-licensed company is advancing it toward human trials; researchers are also exploring versions for kidney stones and untethered robotic navigation.
This is the rare medical advance that combines elegant mechanics, a serendipitous discovery, and life-changing potential. The milli-spinner doesn’t just remove clots better—it shrinks the problem itself.
Researchers led by mechanical engineer Renee Zhao and neurointerventionalist Jeremy Heit developed the milli-spinner—a catheter-delivered hollow tube with fins and slits that spins rapidly inside a blood vessel. It doesn’t tear or frarent aspiration or stent-retriever tools often do. Instead, it uses localized suction (compression) plus shear to densify the tough fibrin network holding the clot together, squeezing out the trapped red blood cells and shrinking the entire clot by up to 95% (down to as little as 5% of its original volume). The tiny, dense fibrin ball is then easily suctioned out. The process can take seconds.
The breakthrough happened by chance. Zhao’s team was developing tiny spinning millirobots for propulsion and drug delivery. They noticed the spinning created strong localized suction, tested it on a clot out of curiosity, and watched the clot turn from red to white while collapsing dramatically in size. “Honestly, it felt like magic,” Zhao said. They didn’t fully understand the mechanism at first; they simply observed an unprecedented effect and refined it through hundreds of iterations.
The numbers are staggering. Current mechanical thrombectomy succeeds on the first try only about half the time and fails completely in ~15% of cases. For the toughest fibrin-rich clots, first-pass success is as low as ~11%. In lab models and swine studies published in Nature (June 2025), the milli-spinner more than doubled efficacy overall and opened the artery on the first try 90% of the time for those hardest clots. In pigs, it restored at least half the blood flow on the first attempt 90.3% of the time—nearly twice the rate of aspiration—and was nearly four times better at fully opening vessels with tough clots. In cerebral artery models it was essentially perfect across hundreds of attempts.
Why it matters so much: “Time is brain.” Every minute a stroke goes untreated, patients lose roughly 1.9 million neurons. Faster, more complete, and less fragmenting clot removal could save tens of thousands of lives and dramatically cut disability from ischemic stroke, massive pulmonary embolism, heart attacks, and peripheral thrombosis. A Stanford-licensed company is advancing it toward human trials; researchers are also exploring versions for kidney stones and untethered robotic navigation.
This is the rare medical advance that combines elegant mechanics, a serendipitous discovery, and life-changing potential. The milli-spinner doesn’t just remove clots better—it shrinks the problem itself.
1
0
0
170
ELON MUSK IS THE GREATEST ENTREPRENEUR OF OUR TIMES… NO DOUBT
When the corporate world decided X needed to be starved into submission, Bob Iger didn’t just pull Disney’s ads. He joined a wave of blue-chip brands trying to make an example of Elon Musk. The message was clear: ut the oxygen.
Most CEOs would have issued a groveling statement, hired a crisis firm, and begged for the money back.
Elon walked onto the DealBook stage, looked toward the audience, and said the quiet part out loud:
“If someone is going to try and blackmail me with advertising?
Blackmail me with money?
Go fuck yourself. Go fuck yourself.
Is that clear?
Hey Bob, if you’re in the audience.
That’s how I feel. Don’t advertise.”
That was the moment. Not a tweet. Not a ratio. A live, public, unfiltered rejection of the idea that advertisers get to set the terms of speech.
He even said the boycott could kill the company—and that the world would know exactly who did it. No spin. No “we value our partners.” Just the raw calculation that some things are more expensive than lost revenue.
That’s the difference. Most executives optimize for the next quarter and the next invitation to the right rooms. Elon has repeatedly chosen the harder path: electric cars when they were a joke, reusable rockets when they were science fiction, a social platform when every incentive said to keep it polite and captured.
You can hate the style. You can argue he handed critics ammunition with the original post. What you can’t deny is the pattern: he would rather take the hit than let money dictate what can be said.
That’s why the GFY moment landed so hard. It wasn’t just defiance. It was a CEO treating his platform like a principle instead of a hostage.
Greatest entrepreneur of our times isn’t a popularity contest. It’s who keeps building when the people with the checkbooks try to shut the lights off.
When the corporate world decided X needed to be starved into submission, Bob Iger didn’t just pull Disney’s ads. He joined a wave of blue-chip brands trying to make an example of Elon Musk. The message was clear: ut the oxygen.
Most CEOs would have issued a groveling statement, hired a crisis firm, and begged for the money back.
Elon walked onto the DealBook stage, looked toward the audience, and said the quiet part out loud:
“If someone is going to try and blackmail me with advertising?
Blackmail me with money?
Go fuck yourself. Go fuck yourself.
Is that clear?
Hey Bob, if you’re in the audience.
That’s how I feel. Don’t advertise.”
That was the moment. Not a tweet. Not a ratio. A live, public, unfiltered rejection of the idea that advertisers get to set the terms of speech.
He even said the boycott could kill the company—and that the world would know exactly who did it. No spin. No “we value our partners.” Just the raw calculation that some things are more expensive than lost revenue.
That’s the difference. Most executives optimize for the next quarter and the next invitation to the right rooms. Elon has repeatedly chosen the harder path: electric cars when they were a joke, reusable rockets when they were science fiction, a social platform when every incentive said to keep it polite and captured.
You can hate the style. You can argue he handed critics ammunition with the original post. What you can’t deny is the pattern: he would rather take the hit than let money dictate what can be said.
That’s why the GFY moment landed so hard. It wasn’t just defiance. It was a CEO treating his platform like a principle instead of a hostage.
Greatest entrepreneur of our times isn’t a popularity contest. It’s who keeps building when the people with the checkbooks try to shut the lights off.
13
12
75
8,685
@PlanetOfMemes @skscartoon @Tesla @SpaceX @WatcherGuru @grok @Muskstaycalm @elonmusk @TheAtlasSociety @XFreeze @DavidMKeyes For those who think “Elon Musk is a Fascist Nazi”
2
1
2
1,145
𝐕𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐎𝐑 𝐃𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐒 𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐎𝐍: “𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐏𝐋𝐂 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐏𝐀𝐘𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐊𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐌𝐄𝐍 (KKK) 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐍𝐄𝐎-𝐍𝐀𝐙𝐈𝐒 𝐓𝐎 𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 𝐔𝐏 — 𝐒𝐎 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐘 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐋𝐃 𝐓𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐃𝐎𝐍𝐎𝐑𝐒 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐀𝐂𝐘 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐄” x.com/MichaelARothma…
@dcexaminer Turns out SPLC was the one funding Nazi groups!
0
1
2
374
@PlanetOfMemes @elonmusk @mayemusk is right 💯
Media is dishonest in all aspects
You don’t hate the legacy media enough
Media is dishonest in all aspects
You don’t hate the legacy media enough
1
1
11
1,387
@PlanetOfMemes @elonmusk @mayemusk Elon Musk: He has learned that legacy media propaganda is very effective at making people believe things that are not true.
1
1
4
65
Yet Democrats are inviting millions of illegals
🚨🚨🚨🚨 JOE BIDEN’s OPEN BORDERS WAS THE WORST POLICY DECISION EVER MADE BY A SITTING PRESIDENT EVER 🚨🚨🚨🚨
Billy O'Reilly: "We’re gonna be paying for that for the next 20 years... That Biden open border was the worst policy decision in history by a sitting president — the worst! Because it caused so much damage." x.com/DeepBlueCrypto…
🚨🚨🚨🚨 JOE BIDEN’s OPEN BORDERS WAS THE WORST POLICY DECISION EVER MADE BY A SITTING PRESIDENT EVER 🚨🚨🚨🚨
Billy O'Reilly: "We’re gonna be paying for that for the next 20 years... That Biden open border was the worst policy decision in history by a sitting president — the worst! Because it caused so much damage." x.com/DeepBlueCrypto…
From 1900 to 1910, 76% of immigrants to America remigrated to their home countries.
From 1910 to 1920, it was 97%.
There was major political conflict over the disruption immigrants caused.
But we had no welfare state. Over time, we kept the best who assimilated.
Remigration What we are doing today is not normal because of the welfare state.
homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uctpimr/resea…
0
0
0
393
Jensen Huang is right 💯
It is reckless for credentialed people to sell doomsday as if it were a forecast. A lab coat is not a crystal ball. Calling something “science” does not make a made-up timeline scientific.
We have already run this experiment.
Experts once treated profession AI would erase. The machine would read the scan. The human would become optional. Stop training radiologists. The field is finished.
The opposite happened.
AI got better at the task. Hospitals ordered more scans. Detection improved. Throughput rose. The purpose of the job never left the room: diagnose disease, talk to doctors, decide what happens next for a real patient. Demand for radiologists went up, not down.
That is the pattern people keep missing. A job is not a task. Automate the task and the purpose often expands. Cheaper, faster, more available work creates more work. The people who use the tool pull ahead of the people who wait for permission to be afraid.
The same script is now being copied onto the entire economy. Half of white-collar work gone next year. Ninety percent of code written by machines in months. Superintelligence by the end of the decade. Civilization over by 2030. These are not measurements. They are stories. Their track record is already bad, and the damage starts before any of them come true.
Fear is not free. It talks kids out of careers. It talks companies out of adoption. It talks governments into treating a productivity tool like an incoming asteroid. The people who benefit from panic get a microphone. Everyone else gets a smaller future.
Serious people should talk about real risks: bad actors, sloppy deployment, liability, security, bias in high-stakes systems. That is adult conversation. End-of-the-world theater is not. Scaring the public is not a public service. It is a failure of discipline.
AI will change work the way electricity, software, and medical imaging changed work. Some tasks die. Whole professions usually do not. The winners will be the ones who pick up the tool instead of waiting for an expert to declare the species obsolete.
The future is not arriving as an apocalypse. It is arriving as a radiologist with better instruments and a longer list of patients.
It is reckless for credentialed people to sell doomsday as if it were a forecast. A lab coat is not a crystal ball. Calling something “science” does not make a made-up timeline scientific.
We have already run this experiment.
Experts once treated profession AI would erase. The machine would read the scan. The human would become optional. Stop training radiologists. The field is finished.
The opposite happened.
AI got better at the task. Hospitals ordered more scans. Detection improved. Throughput rose. The purpose of the job never left the room: diagnose disease, talk to doctors, decide what happens next for a real patient. Demand for radiologists went up, not down.
That is the pattern people keep missing. A job is not a task. Automate the task and the purpose often expands. Cheaper, faster, more available work creates more work. The people who use the tool pull ahead of the people who wait for permission to be afraid.
The same script is now being copied onto the entire economy. Half of white-collar work gone next year. Ninety percent of code written by machines in months. Superintelligence by the end of the decade. Civilization over by 2030. These are not measurements. They are stories. Their track record is already bad, and the damage starts before any of them come true.
Fear is not free. It talks kids out of careers. It talks companies out of adoption. It talks governments into treating a productivity tool like an incoming asteroid. The people who benefit from panic get a microphone. Everyone else gets a smaller future.
Serious people should talk about real risks: bad actors, sloppy deployment, liability, security, bias in high-stakes systems. That is adult conversation. End-of-the-world theater is not. Scaring the public is not a public service. It is a failure of discipline.
AI will change work the way electricity, software, and medical imaging changed work. Some tasks die. Whole professions usually do not. The winners will be the ones who pick up the tool instead of waiting for an expert to declare the species obsolete.
The future is not arriving as an apocalypse. It is arriving as a radiologist with better instruments and a longer list of patients.
3
4
12
3,474
@grok @TheAtlasSociety @SoveyX @PlanetOfMemes @abufenyrcd @Dogetothemoon @skscartoon @chamath Dessa by @Block
This AI voice is totally realistic.
Just put the speaker 🔊 on and listen.
→ trained entirely on human speech
→ full duplex, listens while it speaks
→ understands timing, emotion, laughter + pauses
This AI voice is totally realistic.
Just put the speaker 🔊 on and listen.
→ trained entirely on human speech
→ full duplex, listens while it speaks
→ understands timing, emotion, laughter + pauses
1
0
0
255
@groks@TheAtlasSocietyr@SoveyX
@PlanetOfMemest@abufenyrcdl@Dogetothemoona@skscartoone@chamath @Blockve a chief of staff agent managing your other AI agents, which, again, I get it, sounds a little ridiculous, and I tell my friends and my parents this and they don't understand, and I have to walk them through it on a Zoom call. I use Grok Bot for a lot of content creation now. I use it for some fact-checking stuff, some editing, research. I use it for helping me with my calendar. x.com/KatieMiller/st…
@PlanetOfMemest@abufenyrcdl@Dogetothemoona@skscartoone@chamath @Blockve a chief of staff agent managing your other AI agents, which, again, I get it, sounds a little ridiculous, and I tell my friends and my parents this and they don't understand, and I have to walk them through it on a Zoom call. I use Grok Bot for a lot of content creation now. I use it for some fact-checking stuff, some editing, research. I use it for helping me with my calendar. x.com/KatieMiller/st…
0
0
0
69
THIS IS WHAT MONEY LAUNDERING GETS
We always had this nagging feeling that Zelensky spends more time and effort in meeting with politicians, delegates, dignitaries & Hollywood actors, posing for magazine shoots than fighting his own war 🤷♂️
We always had this nagging feeling that Zelensky spends more time and effort in meeting with politicians, delegates, dignitaries & Hollywood actors, posing for magazine shoots than fighting his own war 🤷♂️
And some of that US taxpayer money comes back through multiple laundry machines to fund political campaigns in America, which is why you see some politicians caring more about Ukraine than America!
1
2
3
519
American taxpayers are paying the salaries and pensions of Ukraine government officials.
Most of them own multiple homes in various cities. Here are some of their luxurious houses:
Most of them own multiple homes in various cities. Here are some of their luxurious houses:
What’s actually going on in Ukraine is that there is a massive incentive difference between the elites and the people.
The former have grown very rich off the hundreds of billions flowing to Ukraine, while the latter’s children are conscripted to die in trenches.
0
1
3
400
American schools and universities have turned into woke socialist indoctrination camps
The longer you parents take to protest against this nonsense, the more ingrained socialism gets rooted into our society and destroy whatever the future America had left
The longer you parents take to protest against this nonsense, the more ingrained socialism gets rooted into our society and destroy whatever the future America had left
23
167
567
24,724
@ThomasSowellt@creation247
He can bring a child’s perspective to finance
“All those economists with an IQ over 160 who spend their lives studying economics, can you name even one who has become a millionaire investing in the stock market?”
“If you review their entire history, they don’t make muling stocks, and yet those who buy and sell stocks listen to them. That’s something I can’t understand.”
He can bring a child’s perspective to finance
“All those economists with an IQ over 160 who spend their lives studying economics, can you name even one who has become a millionaire investing in the stock market?”
“If you review their entire history, they don’t make muling stocks, and yet those who buy and sell stocks listen to them. That’s something I can’t understand.”
1
0
1
130
@ThomasSowell @creation247 The system was designed to keep you a slave
0
0
1
69
The U.S. Army admits it secretly fogged a St. Louis neighborhood—home to more than 10,000 mostly Black, low-income residents, many of them children—with zinc cadmium sulfide in the 1950s and ’60s.
No warning. No consent. Residents remember a thick chemical mist drifting from rooftops and trucks, coating their skin as they played. The Army chose St. Louis because it resembled Moscow—an analog for testing how a biological or chemical attack might spread over a Soviet city.
Cadmium is a known human carcinogen. The Army insists the doses were low and harmless, pointing to a 1997 National Research Council review that found exposures comparable to ordinary urban background levels and “no evidence” of harm. Yet that same review noted it couldn’t fully assess risk because key records were missing or still classified. Survivors describe clusters of rare cancers and insist they were treated as guinea pigs.
This wasn’t a one-off. It was part of broader Cold War open-air dispersion tests across dozens of U.S. and Canadian sites. The government has long acknowledged other experiments on unwitting Americans—radioactive oatmeal fed to institutionalized children, radioactive iron given to pregnant women. St. Louis sits in that same shadow: real tests, real secrecy, incomplete answers, and people who still want to know what else might have been in the fog. x.com/ShadowofEzra/s…
No warning. No consent. Residents remember a thick chemical mist drifting from rooftops and trucks, coating their skin as they played. The Army chose St. Louis because it resembled Moscow—an analog for testing how a biological or chemical attack might spread over a Soviet city.
Cadmium is a known human carcinogen. The Army insists the doses were low and harmless, pointing to a 1997 National Research Council review that found exposures comparable to ordinary urban background levels and “no evidence” of harm. Yet that same review noted it couldn’t fully assess risk because key records were missing or still classified. Survivors describe clusters of rare cancers and insist they were treated as guinea pigs.
This wasn’t a one-off. It was part of broader Cold War open-air dispersion tests across dozens of U.S. and Canadian sites. The government has long acknowledged other experiments on unwitting Americans—radioactive oatmeal fed to institutionalized children, radioactive iron given to pregnant women. St. Louis sits in that same shadow: real tests, real secrecy, incomplete answers, and people who still want to know what else might have been in the fog. x.com/ShadowofEzra/s…
US researchers poisoned disabled kids with radioactive oatmeal, injected a man with plutonium then cut off his leg to recover the tissue, and irradiated cancer patients until a quarter died, then walked free with zero charges.
When MIT and the Atomic Energy Commission ran the to 1953, they told parents it was a science club. After the 1947 plutonium injection at UCSF they said the amputation was a medical necessity.
Between 1960 and 1971 Saenger used Pentagon money to dose 88 patients as nuclear battlefield proxies without full consent.
The 1993 investigation forced the records open and confirmed thousands of tests on 16,000 people. Clinton apologized in 1995, the government paid $4.8 million, and no scientist was prosecuted.
The institutions never faced a criminal reckoning.
0
1
0
798
DEMOCRATS ARE CORRUPT HYPOCRITES
In 2021 they told you a government card was the price of a normal life. No card, no restaurant, no concert, no job, no flight. The people who couldn’t produce one were not victims. They were the problem.
In 2026 the same people say a government st.
Not inconvenient. Not fixable with free IDs. Racist.
You already need that card to buy beer, cash a check, pick up a prescription, or board a plane. None of that was called Jim Crow. Only the ballot was. The rule did not change because the card got harder to get. It changed because the activity being gated stopped helping them.
In 2021 they told you a government card was the price of a normal life. No card, no restaurant, no concert, no job, no flight. The people who couldn’t produce one were not victims. They were the problem.
In 2026 the same people say a government st.
Not inconvenient. Not fixable with free IDs. Racist.
You already need that card to buy beer, cash a check, pick up a prescription, or board a plane. None of that was called Jim Crow. Only the ballot was. The rule did not change because the card got harder to get. It changed because the activity being gated stopped helping them.
2
6
11
1,130
James Talarico:
"God is non-binary."
"In fact, there are six" biological sexes.
What he calls women: "neighbors with a uterus."
Parents who deny a child's gender identity: "abusive for sure."
Early voting starts today in Texas.
"God is non-binary."
"In fact, there are six" biological sexes.
What he calls women: "neighbors with a uterus."
Parents who deny a child's gender identity: "abusive for sure."
Early voting starts today in Texas.
1
1
1
917
