David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

11h

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

12h

Rut asked Ray "Cash" Care how you find peace in the everyday pain of your life. Ray did not give a motivational speech. He said he is a pain coach, and that every minute is a mission. He also explains how life is like BUD/S and how he found his true voice.

00:00 — "How do you day pain of your life?"
00:38 — Ray "Cash" Care is back
02:24 — Why David went dark after COVID
05:23 — Why warriors can't sit still
09:50 — 400 SEALs selling leadership: the saturated market
11:47 — "I was a fraud": how Ray found his own voice
14:59 — Inside Rob O'Neill's Operators Collective
17:44 — The Apex Protocol: Las Vegas, Nov 20–23
20:43 — AI vs. real human connection
30:51 — The bro-vet war: why veterans attack each other
39:19 — Stop yelling: how Ray changed his message
46:08 — Why vulnerability is strength
51:34 — How do you find peace in pain?
53:21 — "I'm not a motivational coach. I'm a pain coach."
56:36 — Needs before wants
58:24 — "If I died right now, I'd die happy"
1:00:43 — Where to find Ray

@teamfroglogic @RayCashCare

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 28

Noah B. Price

@TrueOnX

Oct 26

It was never supposed to be Republican against Democrat, conservative against liberal, Black against white, Christian against Muslim, American against Iranian, immigrant against citizen, or one struggling human being against another.

And perhaps one of the greatest tragedies of e have spent so much of our lives fighting people whose suffering looks remarkably similar to our own, without ever stopping long enough to consider who benefits from our inability to recognize ourselves in one another.

Think about that for a moment...

Somewhere in America, a father is working 70 hours a week, missing the childhood of the very children he is working so desperately to provide for, while being told that the reason he cannot afford a home is because of people who crossed a border.

Somewhere else, a mother is standing in a grocery store, quietly calculating which necessities she can put back on the shelf because the money in her account will not stretch far enough to feed her family until payday. And somewhere along the way, she has been persuaded that the person responsible for her suffering is another mother who happens to vote differently, worship differently, or speak a different language.

Across an ocean, another father is holding his child beneath the remains of a building, wondering whether the next explosion will take away the only person he has left in this world. He has never met the people who consider him their enemy. He has never sat across from them, heard their children laughing, learned what keeps them awake at night, or discovered how many of their prayers sound almost identical to his own.

Yet somehow, millions of people who have never harmed one another have been taught to fear, despise, and sometimes even celebrate the suffering of people whose only crime was being born on the opposite side of a line drawn on a map.

And I cannot help but wonder how differently the history of humanity might have unfolded if, at some point, we had collectively questioned why the people making the decisions so rarely seem to be the ones paying the greatest price for them.

Because while we have been arguing over political parties, people with extraordinary financial influence have continued financing campaigns, lobbying lawmakers, shaping public narratives, acquiring essential resources, and positioning themselves to benefit from decisions that ordinary families will spend generations living with.

While we have been encouraged to blame one another for economic hardship, enormous concentrations of wealth have accumulated alongside communities where parents are working multiple jobs and still struggling to afford the basic necessities of existence.

And while we have been taught to regard distant populations as threats, those who profit from weapons manufacturing, political instability, resource extraction, and the machinery of conflict have often remained comfortably removed from the human consequences.

Of course, political disagreements are real. Cultural differences are real. Governments make consequential decisions, and conflicts have complicated histories that cannot honestly be reduced to a single explanation. There are genuine injustices that must be confronted, and genuine differences in values that deserve thoughtful examination.

But what troubles me is how readily those differences can be exploited by people and institutions whose interests are served when the public remains too divided to question the distribution of power.

Consider how extraordinary it is that someone earning barely enough to survive can be convinced that another struggling person is the greatest threat to their future, while decisions affecting the cost of housing, healthcare, food, education, and employment are being made in rooms neither of them will ever enter.

Consider how often we are invited to become furious over the latest inflammatory statement, the latest manufactured controversy, the latest political spectacle, while policies with consequences lasting decades receive a fraction of the attention.

Consider how many friendships have ended, how many families have stopped speaking, how many people have come to despise complete strangers because they have been conditioned to associate an entire human being with a political label.

And then consider who is left standing when the argument is over.

The landlord still expects the rent. The hospital still expects payment. The employer still controls the wages. The lender still collects the interest. The child still needs dinner. The elderly still need care. And the parents who have sacrificed so much of their lives trying to provide for their families are still wondering whether they will ever experience the freedom they were promised if they simply worked hard enough.

I wonder how many people have spent their entire lives defending political figures who would not recognize their faces, protecting institutions that would never make the same sacrifices for them, and fighting neighbors who might have been the first to help them if their house caught fire.

Imagine the sheer magnitude of what we have lost through this division.

How many friendships were never formed? How many discoveries were never made? How many communities never came together to solve problems because the people within them had already been persuaded to regard one another with suspicion?

How many children grew up hearing that entire populations were dangerous, inferior, immoral, or undeserving, only to carry those inherited prejudices into adulthood without ever having met the people they had been taught to hate?

How many mothers have buried their children beneath flags that were supposed to represent freedom, while other mothers buried theirs beneath different flags, both having been assured that the suffering was necessary?

And how many of those children, had they been given the opportunity to meet, might have become friends?

That is the part I find almost unbearable.

Because beneath all these arguments, beneath the political affiliations and national identities and religious differences, there are billions of human beings who want remarkably similar things...

They want to know that their children will be safe.

They want to be able to care for their parents as they grow older.

They want to love someone without constantly fearing that the world will take that person away.

They want enough food, somewhere warm to sleep, access to care when they are sick, and the opportunity to spend some meaningful portion of their brief existence actually experiencing life rather than exhausting themselves simply trying to survive it.

They want to feel that their existence matters.

And I wonder what would happen if we began to recognize how much more we have in common with the struggling families on the other side of the world than we do with some of the extraordinarily powerful individuals who claim to speak on our behalf.

A working class American and a working class Iranian may have been taught vastly different stories about one another, yet both may know what it feels like to worry about their children, to struggle under rising costs, to distrust political promises, and to wonder why the decisions of a relatively small number of powerful people can so profoundly determine the circumstances of millions.

A conservative father and a liberal mother might disagree about almost everything they hear on television, yet both may be sacrificing the same precious hours of their lives to afford the same necessities, while quietly fearing the same uncertain future.

And perhaps, if they ever stopped shouting long enough to listen, they would discover that the person they had been taught to oppose was carrying burdens they understood all too well.

This is what I believe we have been failing to recognize.

The deepest division in our societies is not always the one receiving the most attention. Beneath many of our loudest cultural and political conflicts are questions about who possesses power, who exercises influence, who benefits from existing arrangements, who bears their costs, and why so many ordinary people have so little meaningful control over decisions that shape their lives.

And these are questions that should concern people across every political affiliation...

Because concentrated power does not suddenly become harmless when it belongs to someone whose political opinions we happen to share.

Corruption does not become acceptable because the person committing it belongs to our preferred party.

The suffering of innocent people does not become less significant because they were born beneath another flag.

And exploitation does not become justice merely because those benefiting from it have learned to describe themselves as our protectors...

I think about the extraordinary amount of human potential that has been consumed by this endless struggle.

Think about a child born with an astonishing capacity to understand mathematics, medicine, music, or engineering, whose gifts may never be discovered because the family cannot afford the education, nutrition, or stability that would allow those abilities to flourish.

Think about a brilliant young mind growing up in a war torn community, whose entire childhood is spent learning how to survive circumstances created long before that child was born.

Think about the millions of people who could have contributed something beautiful to humanity but instead spent their lives fighting poverty, preventable illness, displacement, discrimination, or the consequences of decisions over which they had almost no control.

We speak so often about the cost of living, yet I wonder how frequently we consider the cost of the lives we are never given the opportunity to live.

The years parents lose with their children.

The dreams abandoned because survival became more urgent.

The relationships strained beneath financial desperation.

The elderly who worked throughout their youth only to discover that old age offered them little security.

The people who spend decades waiting for life to become easier, only to look back one day and realize that the years they were waiting through ended up being their entire lives.

And meanwhile, we continue arguing about which ordinary people deserve our resentment.

There is something profoundly heartbreaking about the possibility that humanity possesses enough knowledge, creativity, productive capacity, and collective intelligence to alleviate an extraordinary amount of unnecessary suffering, yet continues to organize so much of its political and economic life around competition, exclusion, and the preservation of concentrated advantage.

I am not suggesting that every wealthy person is malicious, that every institution is corrupt, or that all suffering originates from a single coordinated conspiracy. Reality is far more complicated than that, and reducing it to another simplistic enemy would only reproduce the very thinking I am questioning.

What I am asking is whether we have become so accustomed to the structures surrounding us that we have stopped questioning the human consequences of maintaining them.

Whether we have confused economic growth with human flourishing.

Whether we have mistaken political victory for meaningful progress.

Whether we have allowed our identities to become so entangled with competing narratives that we sometimes care more about proving another person wrong than understanding why that person is suffering.

And whether the greatest beneficiaries of our division are sometimes the people least affected by its consequences.

Because when an ordinary person loses a political argument, they may lose a friend.

When an ordinary family loses an economic struggle, they may lose their home.

When powerful institutions make disastrous decisions, however, the consequences can be distributed across entire populations, while those responsible may remain insulated by wealth, influence, and legal protections unavailable to the people who suffer most.

That imbalance deserves far more scrutiny than it receives...

And I cannot help but think about how much courage it would take for us to finally question the stories we have inherited, including the ones that make us feel righteous, comfortable, and certain that the problem has always been somebody else.

Perhaps the most difficult realization is that we have all, at one point or another, participated in the very divisions that have weakened our ability to care for one another.

Perhaps we have repeated things we never investigated, condemned people we never understood, defended institutions we never examined, or allowed our compassion to become conditional upon whether somebody agreed with us.

I know how easy it is to become angry when confronted with injustice. There are things happening throughout this world that should disturb every person capable of empathy.

But I also believe that anger becomes dangerous when it is directed indiscriminately at entire populations rather than carefully toward the decisions, systems, and individuals actually responsible for causing harm.

A child does not deserve suffering because of a government's actions.

A family does not deserve contempt because of its nationality.

A struggling person does not become our enemy because of a different political opinion.

And a human life does not become less valuable because the person living it belongs to a group we have been conditioned to distrust...

If we truly want accountability, we must become capable of distinguishing responsibility from association, evidence from propaganda, and genuine wrongdoing from the convenience of having someone to blame.

We must be willing to scrutinize powerful people even when we admire them, challenge institutions even when we depend upon them, and recognize injustice even when acknowledging it makes our own side uncomfortable.

And above all, we must refuse to surrender our humanity in the process...

Because I think one of the most devastating things that can happen to a society is for its people to become so consumed with fighting one another that they lose the capacity to recognize the suffering unfolding directly in front of them.

A hungry child should not need to belong to the correct political party to deserve food.

A grieving mother should not need to possess the correct nationality to deserve compassion.

A person working themselves into exhaustion should not need to agree with us about every political issue before we can recognize that something about their circumstances deserves our concern.

And someone who has lost everything should not have to prove that they are worthy of being treated as a human being.

We have spent generations inheriting conflicts, prejudices, and grievances from people who are no longer alive, carrying forward resentments whose origins many of us have never personally investigated, and teaching our children to continue battles that have already consumed more human life than any of us could possibly comprehend.

Imagine what might become possible if even a fraction of the energy we spend defending these divisions were redirected toward understanding one another and holding power accountable.

Imagine what could happen if people stopped asking only which political party was winning and began asking whether ordinary families were actually living better.

If we judged economic success by whether people could afford to live with dignity.

If we measured progress by the children who were fed, the suffering that was prevented, the opportunities that became accessible, and the amount of life people were finally free to spend with those they loved.

If we cared as deeply about the consequences of decisions as we do about the personalities making them.

And if we understood that the dignity of another human being is not something we lose by acknowledging it...

Perhaps then we would begin to see that the person across the street, across the border, or across the political divide was never necessarily standing between us and a better future.

Perhaps that person was struggling toward the same future, carrying different experiences, different fears, and different understandings of how to get there.

And perhaps the tragedy is that we could have been helping one another all along.

I want you to think about something before you scroll away...

Of all the people you have been encouraged to hate throughout your lifetime, how many have ever personally done anything to harm you?

And of all the people whose decisions have materially affected your opportunities, your financial security, your healthcare, your wages, your housing, and your future, how many have you ever been given the opportunity to hold directly accountable?

Those 2 questions deserve serious consideration...

Because there is an enormous difference between having an enemy and being given one.

There is an enormous difference between protecting your community and being persuaded to despise another.

And there is an enormous difference between a society that is genuinely free and one in which people are permitted to argue endlessly while having remarkably little influence over the structures governing their lives.

I don't believe the answer is to replace one form of hatred with another, or to divide humanity into the wealthy and everyone else as though every person within either group possesses identical intentions...

I believe the answer begins with recognizing that wealth should never place anyone beyond accountability, poverty should never deprive anyone of dignity, and political power should never exempt anyone from responsibility for the human consequences of their decisions.

We should be asking who benefits, who suffers, what the evidence demonstrates, what alternatives exist, and why so many people continue to experience preventable hardship in a world capable of extraordinary abundance.

And perhaps most importantly, we should be asking what kind of world we are preparing to leave behind for children who have not yet had the opportunity to choose any of the divisions they will inherit.

Because long after today's politicians have left office, long after the latest controversy has been forgotten, and long after the people profiting from today's arrangements have passed away, those children will still be living with the consequences of what we allowed to continue...

They will inherit our institutions, our debts, our damaged relationships, our unresolved injustices, and whatever remains of our willingness to care for one another.

And perhaps one day, future generations will look back at us and wonder how a civilization possessing unprecedented wealth, knowledge, and resources could allow children to fall asleep hungry, parents to sacrifice their lives simply trying to keep their families alive, and millions to endure suffering we already possessed the means to prevent.

How we could unravel the human genome yet allow people to suffer because they could not afford medical care.

How we could connect billions of people across the world yet become increasingly incapable of understanding one another.

How we could study centuries of corruption, exploitation, and abuse of power yet remain so reluctant to question the very systems governing our own lives.

And how we could spend so much of our brief, irreplaceable existence deciding who deserved compassion, when another human being's suffering should have been reason enough to care.

I hope that when those generations examine the history we are writing today, they discover that some of us recognized these contradictions and tried to change them.

That we refused to let our differences justify cruelty.

That we questioned authority without abandoning reason, pursued accountability without condemning the innocent, and confronted injustice without losing our humanity.

That we recognized how much human potential had been sacrificed to divisions that powerful interests could exploit.

And that we finally began treating the lives of others as being just as precious as our own.

Because when I look at this world, I do not see billions of enemies separated by borders, religions, skin colors, or political affiliations.

I see billions of human beings trying to understand an existence none of us chose, carrying burdens others cannot see, loving people we are terrified of losing, and sacrificing precious years in the hope of giving those we love a better tomorrow.

And it breaks my heart that we have been persuaded to fight one another while sharing so many of the same fears and hopes.

Think of the lives already lost, the years wasted, the friendships never formed, and the suffering we might have prevented had we learned to understand one another.

And none of us knows how much time remains to do things differently.

So before deciding that someone who disagrees with you is your enemy, consider that they, too, may be exhausted, frightened, struggling, and desperately hoping that the people they love will be okay.

Perhaps they have been given a different explanation for their suffering.

Perhaps neither of you has been told the whole truth.

And perhaps discovering it requires more courage than defending what you have always believed.

Because after everything humanity has endured, I cannot help but wonder whether we have been asking the wrong question all along...

Perhaps it was never supposed to be about which side would win, but whether the human beings on every side would ever have the opportunity to truly live.

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 28

Carina Hong

@CarinaLHong

Oct 27

The periodic table of mathematics has just been proven by machine

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 28

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 28

David Rutherford got called a USED CAR salesman for his Radio Rut voice 😂

"Who is the used car salesman that makes me want to scratch my brain out every time he talks."

@teamfroglogic
@victorywithnik

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 27

Axiom

@axiommathai

Oct 27

The largest math proof in human history is now computer-verified.

Today, Axiom announces a complete Lean auto-formalization of the Classification of Finite Simple Groups, the "periodic table of symmetry."

About 15,000 pages, built by over 100 mathematicians across generations.

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 27

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 27

David Rutherford on the Vietnam Marine who gave him the REAL talk before he enlisted 🇺🇸

"He pours me a Crown on the rocks and he's like, 'Drink it.' ... And he says, 'So, you want to go to war, huh?'"

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 26

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 26

David Rutherford reacts to a US Ambassador saying the quiet part OUT LOUD on Iran

"Listen to what he just said...the imminent nuclear threat is gone." @teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 26

Mario Nawfal

@MarioNawfal

Oct 26

🇧🇷 While the left celebrates their win for "democracy," Brazilian journalists are calling BS...

Malu Gaspar says ALL Superior Electoral Court ministers were AGAINST extending the voting in Brazil by 2 hrs.

Lula was granted his unprecedented request by a judge who "coincidentally" was his fmr. personal attorney...

As others have said, this would be like SCOTUS ordering polls to reopen only in Democratic strongholds...

Everyone with a brain knows this is crooked as hell!!!

Source: @BonillaJL / Writer: Michael x.com/Jakelyneloiola…

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 26

Lara Logan

@laralogan

Oct 24

100th EPISODE! ELECTION INTEGRITY SPECIAL | Going Rogue with Lara Logan

For our milestone 100th episode of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, we went LIVE before a studio audience at the America First Warehouse in Long Island, New York, for a special investigation into one of the es facing America ahead of the 2026 midterms.

From Venezuela to America’s voting systems, Lara and an extraordinary panel of intelligence experts, investigators, and election integrity advocates examine election manipulation, the vulnerabilities in our voting infrastructure, and the national security implications.

Featuring Gary Berntsen, Ralph Pezzullo, Martin Rodil, Mark Cook, Dr. Andrew Paquette, Ed Solomon, Joe Hoft, and Tina Peters.

00:00:00 Opening clips and introduction of the Going Rogue 100th episode live event
00:01:13 Lara Logan introduces panelists Gary Berntsen, Martin Rodil, and Ralph Pezzullo
00:06:32 Origins of voting machine concerns: HAVA, Venezuela, and Smartmatic
00:15:19 Smartmatic ownership shuffling and the 2025 Liberty Vote sale
00:17:18 Recruiting software engineers abroad and building a lab in the Bahamas and Switzerland
00:23:00 Violence against a witness's family and cartel involvement
00:28:09 Tina Peters' forensic images and source code obtained
00:30:37 U.S. intelligence and law enforcement penetration and inaction
00:39:12 USAID, CEPPS, and funding foreign use of Smartmatic technology
00:43:00 Machines are compromised without internet connection
00:44:45 FBI scrutiny of the panelists and hybrid warfare against the U.S.
00:49:35 intelligence community, media, and what citizens can do
00:55:50 Cartel de los Soles and Tren de Aragua
01:00:07 China's role, fentanyl, and unrestricted warfare
01:02:25 Panel calls to action and discussion of leadership and Venezuela policy
01:14:34 Second panel introduced: Mark Cook, Andrew Paquette, Ed Solomon, Joseph Hoft
01:17:24 Mark Cook outlines two requirements for fair elections and the stages of manipulation
01:26:41 Andrew Paquette on duplicate and "clone" voter registrations and the "spiral algorithm"
01:38:46 Ed Solomon presents cast vote record analysis and "synchronized rates of change"
01:51:48 Joseph Hoft on auditing standards, California voter rolls, and sampling in Orange County
01:58:34 Panelists' practical advice: vote in person on Election Day, hand counts, and reporting
02:06:46 Closing thoughts and case references from Paquette and Solomon
02:23:00 Introduction of Tina Peters
02:30:00 Peters on prison, her conviction, and her plan to petition the U.S. Supreme Court
02:44:00 Peters on White House meetings, hand-count plans, and reform proposals
03:00:00 Audience Q&A: spreading the word and collecting cast vote records
03:07:00 Discussion of a "clean slate," the administrative state, and subversion
03:14:00 Connecticut lawsuit and the role of cast vote records
03:21:00 How Trump won in 2016 and shifts in tactics since
03:36:00 Audience tributes and a question on journalism careers
03:49:00 Closing remarks, a gift to Logan, and final calls to action

@americafirstwh
@RalphPezzullo
@KingSolomon006
@realtinapeters
@PatriotMarkCook
@realJoeHoft
@GaryBerntsen
@GoingRoguewLara

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 24

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 24

David Rutherford's BUD/S classmate Jimmy Graham on extraordinary vs EXCEPTIONAL men

"I know a lot of extraordinary team guys. I don't know a lot of exceptional men."

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 22

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 22

Coach Matt Rhule says the most powerful word in the English language is US, and toxic people kill it

"You have to be willing sometimes to walk away from toxic people. Like toxic people kill that."

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 22

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 22

Author Matthew Ehret says the left vs right fight was CONCOCTED, and that the French Revolution shows how to break out of it 🤔

"that's the way to break out of the false left versus right game that's been like concocted"

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 21

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 21

Matthew Ehret joins David Rutherford to explain the Fabian Society: a club founded in 1880s London that, he says, won by playing a 2,000 year old long game. What were they really after, and is it still running today?

0:00 Why Should Americans Care About the Fabian Society?
1:52 ow?
9:45 How the American Revolution Scared an Empire
17:39 The Fabius Maximus Playbook
43:45 Where Do Left and Right Really Come From?
46:17 Why Did the French Revolution Fail?
1:00:13 Did the CIA Push Modern Art?
1:05:46 Are AI Cults Already Here?
1:16:18 What Is the Rising Tide Foundation?

Sponsor: ☕️ Black Rifle Coffee:
blackriflecoffee.com

@teamfroglogic
@ehret_matthew

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 21

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 20

David Rutherford plays a cartel video and reveals where it was really filmed 🤔

"That was not in South America, everybody. That video was taken in Ukraine."

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 21

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 21

A-10 pilot Dale Stark says pilot training MELTS your ego and finds the weakness you hid

"If you have a weakness that you kind of papered over previously... they're going to find it and exploit it and crush you and wash you out because of it."

@DaleStarkA10

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 20

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 20

David Rutherford breaks down the Russia diesel deal and the numbers DON'T add up 🤦

"The initial tranche of diesel promised to the US is less than one day's US transport diesel usage. So make that make sense to me."

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 20

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 20

David Rutherford says Tulsi Gabbard's comeback is NO accident 🤔

"She just magically shows up right before elections... I believe ultimately Tulsi Gabbard is going to run for office."

@teamfroglogic

David Rutherford

@teamfroglogic

Oct 19

The David Rutherford Show

@drutherfordshow

Oct 19

Weeks before the midterms, Washington opened the door to Russian diesel, Tulsi Gabbard stepped back onto a national stage, and reports say cartel linked fighters have been learning drone warfare in Ukraine. Rut connects all three and asks what is really coming home.

✅ Sponsor - blackriflecoffee.com

0:00 Tulsi, Diesel And Cartels: How Does It All Tie Together?
3:38 What Did Tulsi Gabbard Tell The Texas Youth Summit?
7:31 Why Did Tulsi Resurface Right Before The Midterms?
11:08 Is Tulsi Gabbard Getting Ready To Run?
14:18 The Trump Putin Diesel Deal
16:32 What's Actually In The Diesel Deal?
17:54 Is The First Shipment Less Than One Day Of US Diesel?
19:35 How Much Fuel Has Russia Sold Europe Since The War Began?
22:06 How Did Zelensky Answer?
23:13 A Proxy War And A Deal At The Same Time?
26:50 What Just Happened In Brazil?
28:15 Why Are US Forces Joining Cartel Raids In Ecuador?
32:19 What Is Joint Task Force Western Hemisphere?
34:53 The Video Rut Says Was Filmed In Ukraine
36:04 Why Are Cartel Fighters Learning Drone War In Ukraine?
39:31 What Does It All Mean Before The Midterms?

@teamfroglogic