At peak, Lovable creates 250 new repos per second on code.storage.
Simultaneously they improved fetch latency 230% from a more purely object storage solution.
If you’re a product builder and it’s scale and speed that you’re after, signups are now open.
D
Simultaneously they improved fetch latency 230% from a more purely object storage solution.
If you’re a product builder and it’s scale and speed that you’re after, signups are now open.
D
Aug 24, 2026 · 5:55 PM UTC
22
32
574
411,588
@kevincodexi@martinwoodwardthe read performance degrades so much that you need several CPU cores just doing maintenance full time to keep up. I don't think it's a realistic target for a live repository, nobody is pushing that much code and nobody will for a long time! These are synth tests!
My advice would be focusing on reliability and repository health instead of a synthetic number of pushes you can ingest. The most important thing in a live repository is how well maintained the auxiliary data structures are (midxes, bitmaps, reverse indexes, etc). That is what dictates the performance of the rest of the operations in the system. GitHub does this very well! (we spent many years working on just that :))
1
1
21
9,885
@kevincodex commits per second is to a single repo, which is a very different metric fwiw
1
0
22
4,255
@kostyniuk00 @jonathangrahl many folks saying we go crazystyle on git tbh
2
0
15
6,663
@saiiffff8 we’ve got some work to do to make this economically viable, but it’s on the list!
0
0
3
330
@joaoqalves We’re not a consumer github product, but we do make diffs and trees so products like codex desktop can add code-reviews in place.
Check out diffshub.com
Check out diffshub.com
0
0
2
299
@pierrecomputer what about having ci/cd on there. what’s your take on it?
1
0
0
4,803
@YossiEliaz can you say more about what you’re thinking? at the moment, we’re a code hosting platform but don’t offer compute products like ci/cd. but many companies use us as the origin in their ci/cd pipeline or in their sandboxes.
1
0
2
3,984
@pierrecomputer @jonathangrahl You folks are doing great, that’s inspiring.
0
0
3
1,315
@pierrecomputer You're saying @Lovable creates 25 times more *new* repos a second than GitHub who is at 9.3/s?
That seems hard to believe.
theregister.com/devops/2026/08…
That seems hard to believe.
theregister.com/devops/2026/08…
2
0
13
2,070
@pierrecomputer I was a bit skeptical of Lovable at first since for anyone with a bit of experience coding, claude code or codex is better, but fuck me they are actually going crazy still.
0
0
4
1,959
@pierrecomputer This is great example on how much these automations stress existing infrastructure
0
0
0
30
@pierrecomputer for how long? 250/sec for 0.5 seconds or 10 hours?
0
0
0
219
@pierrecomputer i almost always cant read shit on your site...can you make the fonts human readable please
0
0
0
371
