😭 🪈

We had to remind the minority—again—that under House rules, they don’t have oversight authority.

Only the majority does.

Yelling “reclaiming my time” doesn’t change that.

Legacy media is one big psy op

@CoffeyTimeNews so utterly clueless about economics that they think having every foreign creditor demand immediate repayment of the United States eight point five trillion dollar debt is a brilliant idea. You must be sitting there, smugly believing you have cracked some grand financial code, while the rest of the world marvels at your breathtaking ignorance. Do you honestly think Japan, China, and the United Kingdom, holding billions in Treasury securities, would orchestrate a global economic suicide pact just to stick it to the United States? The sheer stupidity of your proposal would tank bond markets faster than a toddler throwing a tantrum in a china shop, sending yields through the roof and making borrowing costs for the United States government astronomical. The dollar would plummet, turning your grocery bill into a luxury expense as import prices soar, and inflation would hit like a freight train, wiping out savings and making your morning coffee cost more than your rent. You would be handing creditors like China and Japan a financial guillotine, slashing their own economies as they try to sell off assets in a collapsing market, all because you thought this was some clever chess move.

Your genius plan would not just kneecap the United States; it would send shockwaves through every corner of the global economy, dragging down countries like Canada and Brazil, whose trade depends on a stable dollar. Banks would teeter, stock markets would crater, and the Federal Reserve would be forced to print money like it is going out of style, risking hyperinflation that would make your paycheck feel like pocket change. And for what? So you could pat yourself on the back for a half baked idea that ignores how Treasury securities actually work, with their fixed maturities and market realities? The embarrassment of floating this idea should haunt you every time you open your mouth about economics. It is not just that you are wrong; it is that your suggestion is a masterclass in self destructive nonsense, the kind of thing that makes actual economists wince and wonder how you manage to tie your shoes without causing a national crisis. Next time, leave the financial strategizing to people who understand that the world is not a playground for your dangerously naive fantasies.

@RepKamlagerDovei@RepJudyChu-@RepMarkTakanor@RepLindaSanchezm@RepLuzRivasgress conducting "oversight" on behalf of people who violated federal immigration law! Your concern for your "constituents" in ICE detention is touching, though I'm curious about your definition of constituents since these individuals are detained precisely because they lack legal status to be in your district.

Let me help with those "answers" you're seeking: ICE raids targeting individuals who entered or remain in the country illegally are entirely legal under federal law. ICE doesn't need judicial warrants for immigration violations – they operate under administrative warrants, can make warrantless arrests based on probable cause, and have clear statutory authority under 8 USC 1357. Perhaps you missed that day in civics class when they covered federal supremacy in immigration matters?

Your confusion about "legality" is particularly fascinating given that immigration enforcement is explicitly federal jurisdiction under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. Maybe between your performative outrage tours and press releases, you could review the Immigration and Nationality Act, which clearly outlines ICE's enforcement authority.

It's also worth noting that other elected officials who've interfered with ICE operations – like Brad Lander in New York – have been arrested for obstruction of federal agents. Even judges who've harbored illegal immigrants are facing federal charges. The law applies equally, regardless of political posturing.

Here's a revolutionary concept: instead of "fighting" against legal federal law enforcement, perhaps focus on your actual constitutional role as a House representative – like legislation, appropriations, and oversight of federal agencies rather than obstructing their lawful duties.

But what do I know? I just understand the separation of powers and federal jurisdiction – concepts apparently too complex for someone whose political identity depends on conflating legal immigration enforcement with injustice.

#FederalSupremacy #ImmigrationLaw #SeparationOfPowers #LegalEnforcement #ConstitutionalAuthority #ICEAuthority #FederalJurisdiction #LawAndOrder #ActualOversight #ReadTheConstitution

Next time you hear someone complain about Trump cutting funds or eliminating departments, play them this video.

@iAnonPatriot I seem to have to keep posting this...

@SenWarren We don’t believe any of your propaganda Elizabeth.

@elonmusk Mayhem 👀

@SenBrianSchatz 🤷‍♂️

Perfect…

Stephen Miller torches the media and calls them out on now knowing how the government works:

'I'm glad for an opportinty for a brief civics lesson.'

I loved every second of this.🔥🔥🔥

According to the Social Security database, these are the numbers of people in each age bucket with the death field set to FALSE!

Maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security 🤣🤣

@DailyFellaNews @DemocraticWins