They are the ones. The 4 who opened Europe to the Islamic invasion. Look them straight in the face. Top left Merkel. Top right von der Leyen. Bottom left Macron. Bottom right Sanchez. They are the ones responsible. They opened the borders. They signed the Migration Pact. They star hotel for those who arrive illegally. Merkel in 2015 said "they are all welcome". Von der Leyen from Brussels imposed quotas and mandatory solidarity. Macron and Sanchez applauded and threw open the doors of their countries. The result you see every day in your cities. Chaos, insecurity, Islamic invasion. This photo is the photo of the guilty. Sooner or later they will have to answer.

This demonic goblin, @GretaThunberg, a petulant narcissistic idiot, is a stain on our public conscience. She is an affront to all that is decent in a human being.

Alberta once again showing the rest of Canada how it's done. As of January 4th, only the Alberta flag and the Canadian flag will be permitted outside schools.

It's incredible that the flag representing the most atrocious medical crime in history was ever flown outside Canadian alling that the school is a "safe space" for vulnerable youth, what flying this flag actually says is that students are at risk of having their heads filled with a dangerous, incoherent political ideology that could confuse them into thinking they need healthy body parts amputated.

How long before the rest of Canada wakes up to the danger this ideology poses to children?

Britain’s debt is now more than £3 trillion.

The Government is borrowing just to pay the interest bill.

Burnham’s EU fantasy is nothing but a distraction.

But what has gone unnoticed by the Remainer media is the fact that the UK’s dire finances would rule out rejoining!

EU rules state that national debt should be below 60% of GDP; the UK’s is approaching 100%.

And the EU’s deficit limit is 3%. The UK’s is 4.2%.

When these rules were drawn up, the concerns centred on Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain – the so-called ‘PIGS’.

Today, the UK Government pays higher interest rates on its borrowing than any of them.

Sadly, we are now at the bottom of the sty…

Ok admit it, who has offered Rachel a job in their complaints department?

Paywall free: telegraph.co.uk/gift/8bdce5087…
The BBC isn't fit for purpose. The licence fee should be scrapped and they should have to rely on voluntary subscriptions like any other station.
'Lucie Kon, whose work for the BBC won awards including an Oscar and an Emmy, says she was victimised in the wake of the Oct 7 terrorist attacks in Israel by colleagues who said Zionists such as her were “evil”.'

This is one of the most blatant examples of gaslighting you’ll ever see.

This clip sums up the Labour Party. It sums up Angela Rayner. And, frankly, it sums up too most politicians.

Laura Kuenssberg asks Rayner about Andy Burnham opening the door to a return to freedom of movement. He’s started the debate by talking about it.

Kuenssberg: “The Labour manifesto in 2024 said in black and white ‘there will be no return to freedom of movement’. You stood on that manifesto. Andy Burnham promised to stick to that manifesto. He’s breaking that promise, isn’t he?”

Then this from Rayner: “No he isn’t, because he’s been really clear that this Parliament, that manifesto, we are clear we are not reopening that debate.”

Unbelievable. Even by her standards.

Kuenssberg put her right immediately: “He’s literally just reopened this debate. It’s exactly what’s just happened.”

She denies the debate has been reopened in the same breath as it is being reopened. They will say anything, no matter how obviously contradictory.

We watch car crash after car crash from Labour ministers, yet they keep rising in the polls. No wonder the country is in such a mess. x.com/BBCPolitics/st…

I finally got a reply from Bridget Phillipson’s team to my many questions about her new Labour Class War unit and the abolition of the Social Mobility Commission.

It took them 6 weeks to give me the same reply to every question, no matter the content. Take a look at the one sically says in not mentioning costs at all - “we haven’t got a clue.”

It is now painfully clear. The Government has announced something with no idea of the costs, how they will implement it or the impact it will have. Utterly hopeless way to govern.

Bridget wrecked our education system by putting ideology before evidence in every decision she took. She’s doing exactly the same in Women and Equalities.

If male doctor disagrees that he’s a man, I disagree that he is a doctor.

The thing is, Mike, we aren't that fussed when we are in the queue at Tesco. We are a bit more worried if the person with a penis is in the locked female psychiatric ward, prison, changing room.

I KNOW! Context is really hard to understand.

When President Macron recognised a Palestinian state, he didn’t realise that Paris would be its capital. The intifada has come to France, says Philippe Karsenty

Read our latest coverage of the French riots – paywall-free all of this week:
buff.ly/bDVFvVL

The party that vowed to remove the ideological claptrap of SOGI from BC’s schools just won a super majority.

Sanity and child safeguarding is gradually being restored, bit by bit, even in Canada.

Note to Chancellor: This Wednesday get taxes down. Arthur Laffer and I write in @Daily_Express

Only men think biological sex is irrelevant to everyday life.

Agreed. Covid was the tipping point for a lot of people. Me first.

You know the story of the frog in the pot. Turn up the heat slowly and it never jumps. It just cooks.

Since the 70s, the West was that frog. The water was warm, 35, 40 degrees. Uncomfortable but bearable. Most ost people didn't want to notice.

Then came the hubris.

The globalist class, WEF, Davos, Gates, Soros, that whole borderless elite that sees humanity as a system to be managed rather than people to be free, got impatient. Lockdowns. Curfews. Health passes. Papers to leave your home. Papers to drink a coffee. In a few months they took the water from 40 to 80.

And the frog jumped out.

That was their fatal mistake. Had they kept turning the dial slowly, they might have won. Instead they woke up hundreds of millions of people at once. People who now see the pot, the stove, and the hand on the dial.

You don't put that frog back in.

So now it's a fight to the death for what the West is. When I say Elon is in that fight, I mean it. And he's not alone. Millions of us are ready to give everything, our lives included, for Western civilization. I'm one of them.

And here's the thing: they've already lost. Not because we're stronger today, but because history doesn't run backward. Free people who have seen the cage never forget it.

The frog is out of the pot. And it remembers.

'Children playing games would tell her, 'If you lose, you're a Jew!''

'There were teachers telling her she should support Palestine'

Journalist Hilary Freeman reveals she had to take her daughter out of primary school over antisemitic abuse

This has been going on for years. Let us not forget Sonia Appleby, (also a safeguarding lead) at the Tavistock raising extremely similar problems years ago.

Look at the election result in British Columbia. A landslide victory for Conservatives.

Every political party that insists on teaching kids gender identity doctrine and denying the sex-based rights of women and girls has just received a reality check.

Looking at you, US Democrats!

The voters do not want these policies. Not even in British Columbia.

"Jason Arday was lynched and Nathan Cofnas was the hangman"
Extraordinarily irresponsible and dishonest - even by the low standards of Jolyon.
In the context this is strongly encouraging violence. Disgusting.

To understand why Western leaders all sound the same, you need to understand how a system that has captured its own institutions keeps producing elites aligned on the worst possible line.

In 2004, Klaus Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders. Every year, the WEF eople under 40. You don't apply. You get nominated by people already inside and vetted by people already inside. Then come the annual summits, Davos, and a two-week executive program at Harvard Kennedy School built around global governance, climate, global health and "21st century leadership."

Emmanuel Macron: class of 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. Gabriel Attal: listed by the WEF itself among its notable members. In 2017, at Harvard, Schwab bragged that his network "penetrates the cabinets" of governments. His words, not mine.

Now here's the mistake most critics make. They imagine a brainwashing camp. Two weeks at Harvard don't rewire anyone. The YGL program doesn't create the mindset. It certifies it.

The capture happened upstream. The formatting starts at 18. Sciences Po, ENA, Harvard, Columbia, Yale Law. Ten years of being graded by people who already hold the consensus. You learn fast that the reward doesn't go to whoever is right, but to whoever restates the room's beliefs most elegantly. Every essay, every oral exam, every internship in a ministry or a consulting firm teaches the same lesson: the frame is given, your job is to optimize inside it.

Obama never went through YGL. He didn't need to. Columbia, Harvard Law, president of the Law Review. Same factory, American edition.

So by the time the WEF calls, the product is finished. The program just adds the final layer: flattery. You're told you're one of the few people under 40 who will shape the world. You spend your summers with ministers, CEOs, royals and Nobel laureates who all agree with each other. Imagine what that does to a 35-year-old ego.

That's the profile it produces. Very high verbal intelligence, very low dissent. Brilliant at defending the frame, never trained to question it. And a narcissism fed by a network that confirms, year after year, that you belong to the elect. Combine the two and you get leaders who are never punished for being wrong, as long as they're wrong together.

Immigration is the perfect test case. Obama, Macron, Attal can tighten a law, announce deportation numbers, harden their tone before an election. Obama deported more people than any president before him. But listen to how they talk about it. For them, immigration is never a civilizational question. It's a flow to manage, a labor shortage to fill, a demographic curve to correct, a moral duty to perform. Whether a nation has the right to remain itself never even enters the frame. Not because they've answered the question. Because their education taught them it isn't a legitimate one.

That's why the voter who says "my town has changed and I'm worried" gets a lecture instead of an answer. The leader isn't even lying to him. It's worse: he genuinely cannot see what the voter sees. Twenty years of formatting taught him that this perception is a bias to correct, not a reality to address.

That's the real problem with captured institutions. Not a secret plot. A monoculture. Same schools, same summits, same Davos panels, same vocabulary from Paris to Ottawa to Washington. When every leader is selected by the consensus and rewarded by the consensus, the consensus stops being tested against reality.

And a ruling class that never gets confronted with reality ends up governing a country that only exists in its own slide decks.

Before you vote, ask one question about every candidate: who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?