My iPhone duo arrived right as I got on a flight to NYC 😭
If you’re building something in New York in AI/bio/health. I’ll be around this week!
If you’re building something in New York in AI/bio/health. I’ll be around this week!
3
0
22
1,738
This page is epic!
Integrating with Epic just got easier.
Developers can now connect their agents to open.epic documents, Playbooks, API specs, and more with the new open.epic MCP.
fhir.epic.com/documentation?…
3
1
60
11,257
Max and Taieb from @verahealthai are featured in WSJ VC today, talking about their global expansion!
Give it a read (h/t @ychernova)
wsj.com/pro/venture-ca…
Give it a read (h/t @ychernova)
wsj.com/pro/venture-ca…
0
1
10
575
Andrew Brackin retweeted
We are very excited about infrastructure for bio at Gradient; following our investments in polyphron.com (@thematthewosman), @GamowLabs, and @KernaLabs
1
3
15
550
. @katmdavis included me in this story on Anthropic's ambitious drug development plans axios.com/pro/biotech-de…
1
4
17
1,165
We are very excited about infrastructure for bio at Gradient; following our investments in polyphron.com (@thematthewosman), @GamowLabs, and @KernaLabs
1
3
15
550
Andrew Brackin retweeted
Put them on your radar! 800,000 physicians use this platform including 1 in 4 in Spain & Italy! They now have more daily active users then monthly active users within months! Built with a team of 12 they are the most downloaded app for clinicians.
Every month since June, Vera has been the most downloaded clinical app in the world.
We now have more daily active users than we had monthly active users just a few months ago, when we raised this Series A.
0
1
9
1,551
Vera announced their Series A today. Thrilled to have led their first round of funding
Now, over 800K doctors are using Vera as part of their clinical practice
Up to 1 in 4 doctors in some countries
Special thanks to Daniel for all of the encouragement along the way
Now, over 800K doctors are using Vera as part of their clinical practice
Up to 1 in 4 doctors in some countries
Special thanks to Daniel for all of the encouragement along the way
4
3
115
4,096
A very important company for the AI era
Today, we’re announcing Infisical’s $40M Series B at a $600M valuation, led by @eladgil.
AI has made it 10x easier to write code, 10x easier to find vulnerabilities, and given autonomous agents access to some very sensitive systems.
The problem is that much of today’s security uilt for any of this.
We’re changing this with @infisical. Today, over 1,300 organizations trust us to secure their infrastructure, including Airbus, First American Financial, Hugging Face, OpenRouter, and Wise.
Proud of what our team has built so far. Even more excited about what we have ahead of us.
Back to work.
1
1
18
1,493
Andrew Brackin retweeted
Congrats @infisical on their $40M Series B led by @eladgil 🚀
Psyched to be the lead seed investor @GradientVC the leading platform for agent security!
Psyched to be the lead seed investor @GradientVC the leading platform for agent security!
We’re excited to announce we have raised a $40M Series B!
This next round of funding lets us continue to strengthen our secrets, certificate, and access management products.
We'll also expand the capabilities of Agent Vault, so engineers adopting AI agents can give them access e underlying credentials.
Thank you to @eladgil, @GradientVC, @ycombinator, and our other investors, as well as our customers, community, and team for helping us get here!
2
6
28
1,436
Andrew Brackin retweeted
Anthropic cofounder, Chris Olah, was a 2012 Thiel Fellow alongside Dylan Field, the 2nd class...
Chris started with 3D printing + open-source design software.
But the Fellowship's whole thing is a bet on people, not just their first idea.
The program has an insane hit rate...
Chris started with 3D printing + open-source design software.
But the Fellowship's whole thing is a bet on people, not just their first idea.
The program has an insane hit rate...
47
83
1,727
189,050
Andrew Brackin retweeted
Imagine knowing these circumstances and deciding to green light this ad anyway. We are so numb to the gutter politics of this era that it’s sometimes hard to shock but I have a feeling Mike DeWine and John Kasich Republicans are going to be disgusted with Ramaswamy on this one and it costs him more votes than Acton.
184
432
2,886
133,641
Andrew Brackin retweeted
Introducing RecruiterBench, the people-search benchmark most aligned with recruiting workflows.
At Wrangle, when developing our internal models, we realized that all existing people-search benchmarks (that we’ve seen) are flawed:
- They only score 10 candidates
Real recruiting ing through 100 or more profiles to make a hire. Evaluating accuracy across 10 people doesn’t provide an adequate picture of how a tool will perform on a req.
RecruiterBench measures precision over 200 returned candidates for each role, which we believe accurately represents search capabilities and performance.
- The queries are overly simplistic and contrived
Accuracy over “Product managers in Austin” doesn’t matter when you’re looking for someone with a specific skillset.
We built RecruiterBench on 290 complete active reqs on Ashby, spanning 58 unique industries. This also allows us to find unique insights, such as what industries and role types each tool excels or struggles with.
For example, some strong points we identified are:
Wrangle deep on AI infrastructure: p@50 of 60.4%, versus Metaview 39.6%, Wrangle Turbo 52.2%, Exa 21.8%, and Treg 9.6%.
Wrangle deep on food/agriculture: p@50 of 79.4%, versus Wrangle Turbo and Metaview at 56%, Exa 24.6%, and Treg 9.2%.
Juicebox on legal: on the same three roles, p@50 was 82.7%, ahead of Turbo 76.3%, Metaview 65.7%, Exa 55.7%, and Treg 11.7%. Wrangle Deep still led at 93.3%.
Metaview on Advertising/marketing tech: p@50 was 78.2%, leading Wrangle Deep's 77.8%, Wrangle Turbo’s 73.8%, Exa’s 45.6%, and Treg’s 17.6%..
- They evaluate with a single LLM judge, without nuance about must-have, dealbreaker, and nice-to-have criteria
RecruiterBench uses a two-part LLM scoring system to first disqualify candidates based on must-haves, dealbreakers, location mismatches, and over/underqualification. Then we use a second judge to determine relevance and give no/partial/full credit.
We’re excited to continue developing more accurate benchmarks, and to build the best recruiting tool in the world!
Check out RecruiterBench on Github: github.com/john-c-10/Recr….
At Wrangle, when developing our internal models, we realized that all existing people-search benchmarks (that we’ve seen) are flawed:
- They only score 10 candidates
Real recruiting ing through 100 or more profiles to make a hire. Evaluating accuracy across 10 people doesn’t provide an adequate picture of how a tool will perform on a req.
RecruiterBench measures precision over 200 returned candidates for each role, which we believe accurately represents search capabilities and performance.
- The queries are overly simplistic and contrived
Accuracy over “Product managers in Austin” doesn’t matter when you’re looking for someone with a specific skillset.
We built RecruiterBench on 290 complete active reqs on Ashby, spanning 58 unique industries. This also allows us to find unique insights, such as what industries and role types each tool excels or struggles with.
For example, some strong points we identified are:
Wrangle deep on AI infrastructure: p@50 of 60.4%, versus Metaview 39.6%, Wrangle Turbo 52.2%, Exa 21.8%, and Treg 9.6%.
Wrangle deep on food/agriculture: p@50 of 79.4%, versus Wrangle Turbo and Metaview at 56%, Exa 24.6%, and Treg 9.2%.
Juicebox on legal: on the same three roles, p@50 was 82.7%, ahead of Turbo 76.3%, Metaview 65.7%, Exa 55.7%, and Treg 11.7%. Wrangle Deep still led at 93.3%.
Metaview on Advertising/marketing tech: p@50 was 78.2%, leading Wrangle Deep's 77.8%, Wrangle Turbo’s 73.8%, Exa’s 45.6%, and Treg’s 17.6%..
- They evaluate with a single LLM judge, without nuance about must-have, dealbreaker, and nice-to-have criteria
RecruiterBench uses a two-part LLM scoring system to first disqualify candidates based on must-haves, dealbreakers, location mismatches, and over/underqualification. Then we use a second judge to determine relevance and give no/partial/full credit.
We’re excited to continue developing more accurate benchmarks, and to build the best recruiting tool in the world!
Check out RecruiterBench on Github: github.com/john-c-10/Recr….
2
5
16
666
congrats @AirSpaceIntel! ✈
Huge congratulations to @AirSpaceIntel on raising $325M at a $3B valuation led by @sparkcapital @Citadel @MeritechCapital! We’re thrilled to have led the pre-seed @GradientVC from the beginning and continue to be blown away by @pbuckendorf and team 🚀
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
0
1
16
1,070
Andrew Brackin retweeted
Unbelievable. At 9 PM on a Friday night, Trump just waived nearly every sanction the Lindsey Graham bill imposed on Russia. whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
610
3,928
10,991
739,437
this is cool - need more evals for real work
AI progress becomes economic progress when models can reliably do the work people need done.
Today, we’re launching evals built with practitioners on real-world work from the 75+ businesses that are part of @ThriveHoldings.
evals.thriveholdings.com
2
0
10
1,503
