AIG retweeted
Allah said _"Kill them wherever you find them..."_ Qur'an 2:191
Christians always quote this verse, but they never ask the simple question: WHO IS "THEM"?
You cannot know who "THEM" if you don't read the verse before it.
Qur'an 2:190 says:
_"Fight in the way of Allah THOSE WHO FIGHT YOU but do not transgress."_
So "THEM" in 191 is NOT Christians. "THEM" is NOT innocent people. "THEM" is NOT your neighbours.
"THEM" Means The people who were fighting the Muslims, who expelled them from their homes in Makkah, who tortured and killed them.
That is why 191 itself says:
"Expel them from wherever they have expelled you.", so it's a counter attack and self defense.
Did Christians expel Muslims from Makkah? No.
Did Christians torture Muslims in Makkah? No.
That was the Quraysh idol-worshippers.
And they also hide the verse AFTER it.
Qur'an 2:192 says:
_"And if they cease, then indeed Allah is Forgiving and Merciful."_
Even with those attackers, the moment they STOP, we must STOP.
That is Islam.
And Allah makes it even clearer in another Surah:
Qur'an 4:90:
"So if they withdraw from you, and do not fight you, and offer you peace, then Allah has NOT given you any way to fight against them.
No way. No excuse. No permission, Islam did never ever give any Muslim right to kill any non muslim just like that.
The verses clearly said if they don't fight you and they offer peace, Allah has closed the door for you to fight them.
And this is how Allah commands us to treat Christians who live in peace with us:
Qur'an 60:8:
"Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes- from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly."
Allah Even praise Christians in Qur'an 5:82
"You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the muslims [to be] the Jews and those who associate others with Allah; and you will find the nearest of them in affection to the Muslims are those who say, 'We are Christians.' That is because among them are priests and monks and because they are not arrogant."
They are the "nearest in affection" to the believers. Because among them are priests and monks who are "not arrogant" unlike the Jews.
So don't let anyone fool you with one verse cut in half.
190 tells you WHO to fight.
191 tells you to defend yourself against them.
192 tells you to STOP when they stop.
4:90 tells you you have NO RIGHT to fight those who offer peace.
60:8 tells you to be KIND and JUST to Christians who don't fight you.
STOP INSULTING MUSLIMS and ISLAM
Christians always quote this verse, but they never ask the simple question: WHO IS "THEM"?
You cannot know who "THEM" if you don't read the verse before it.
Qur'an 2:190 says:
_"Fight in the way of Allah THOSE WHO FIGHT YOU but do not transgress."_
So "THEM" in 191 is NOT Christians. "THEM" is NOT innocent people. "THEM" is NOT your neighbours.
"THEM" Means The people who were fighting the Muslims, who expelled them from their homes in Makkah, who tortured and killed them.
That is why 191 itself says:
"Expel them from wherever they have expelled you.", so it's a counter attack and self defense.
Did Christians expel Muslims from Makkah? No.
Did Christians torture Muslims in Makkah? No.
That was the Quraysh idol-worshippers.
And they also hide the verse AFTER it.
Qur'an 2:192 says:
_"And if they cease, then indeed Allah is Forgiving and Merciful."_
Even with those attackers, the moment they STOP, we must STOP.
That is Islam.
And Allah makes it even clearer in another Surah:
Qur'an 4:90:
"So if they withdraw from you, and do not fight you, and offer you peace, then Allah has NOT given you any way to fight against them.
No way. No excuse. No permission, Islam did never ever give any Muslim right to kill any non muslim just like that.
The verses clearly said if they don't fight you and they offer peace, Allah has closed the door for you to fight them.
And this is how Allah commands us to treat Christians who live in peace with us:
Qur'an 60:8:
"Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes- from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly."
Allah Even praise Christians in Qur'an 5:82
"You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the muslims [to be] the Jews and those who associate others with Allah; and you will find the nearest of them in affection to the Muslims are those who say, 'We are Christians.' That is because among them are priests and monks and because they are not arrogant."
They are the "nearest in affection" to the believers. Because among them are priests and monks who are "not arrogant" unlike the Jews.
So don't let anyone fool you with one verse cut in half.
190 tells you WHO to fight.
191 tells you to defend yourself against them.
192 tells you to STOP when they stop.
4:90 tells you you have NO RIGHT to fight those who offer peace.
60:8 tells you to be KIND and JUST to Christians who don't fight you.
STOP INSULTING MUSLIMS and ISLAM
451
2,198
7,585
236,041
AIG retweeted
Seeing Nigerian bigots this helpless, convulsing and imagining they know better than the Americans who made their electoral choices gives me immense joy. Imagine your idea of freedom being to force another woman to abandon her choice of dress. What a spectacularly brainless twat!
No matter how progressive a Muslim man is, once I see his wife in hijab, I immediately disbelieve him. This here being the case in point.
Glad he won on that healthcare level but... 🌚
3
151
400
16,529
AIG retweeted
If there is anything that the elections in Serbia, Brazil, Israel and United States have taught us, it is that when the people are determined to make a change, nothing can stop them - @Olusegunverdict
Indeed, history has shown that no force is greater than the will of a people.
Indeed, history has shown that no force is greater than the will of a people.
0
3
3
69
AIG retweeted
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
29,529
76,478
402,423
96,071,229
Let me add a little clarity to this trending issue.
Shortly after the demise of the Prophet (SAW), new sects began to emerge with strange ideologies. This necessitated the need for the Ummah to distinguish itself from these misguided sects.
Shortly after the demise of the Prophet (SAW), new sects began to emerge with strange ideologies. This necessitated the need for the Ummah to distinguish itself from these misguided sects.
When Saudi Arabia found oil they set aside 100 Billion dollars to spread their wahabi ( salafism) version of Islam across the world .
They started with humanitarianism building mosques mostly and giving scholarships to come to Madina university where doctrines were changed and after graduation they become agents in different parts of the world.
The result is ISIS, Alqaeda, Boko Haram, Alshabab, Lakurawa etc.
@grok
1
2
3
870
And in Nigeria today, there is no doubt that Salafism is a mainstream Islamic ideology, because majority of all the known Islamic scholars are of Salafist learning.
1
0
0
65
Lastly, it would have been a better idea for public commentators to focus more on intellectual push-back against Salafism if they find it faulty, rather than subjective name-calling or misleading propositions.
0
0
0
61
Normalisation of a sin is gravier than the sin itself, that is why the Prophet (SAW) said Allah will forgive every sinner except those who publicise (normalise) their sins. As for those (Shayatina Ins [human devils]) encouraging this normalisation with positive engagements...
I noticed this with people on social media; Once they cross a line on modesty, they only get worse. It usually starts with one post where they should have felt too shy to make such public, but they do. Rather than get cautioned, people laugh under the post. Then they get more and more emboldened to be shameless....
Abu Imrān
1
3
4
345
your Lord is waiting for you at the appointed time. As for those who strive to codemn this evil normalisation, regardless of the provocations (eg; moral police) of human devils, Allah's reward awaits you. Allahul Musta'aan. Amin.
0
0
1
51
AIG retweeted
Like I used to say, time will definitely reveal the truth. The truth will always outlast those who are hellbent on distorting it.
This is another proof. It is either you embrace the truth now or you get left behind. For those who are still searching for the truth, I pray the Almighty guides you to the light of Islam.
Congratulations to William Troost-Ekong. You are welcome to the household. You have won with this.
May the Almighty keep you steadfast. Congratulations Champ 👏🏿👏🏿
This is another proof. It is either you embrace the truth now or you get left behind. For those who are still searching for the truth, I pray the Almighty guides you to the light of Islam.
Congratulations to William Troost-Ekong. You are welcome to the household. You have won with this.
May the Almighty keep you steadfast. Congratulations Champ 👏🏿👏🏿
🇳🇬 Nigerian footballer William Troost-Ekong embraces Islam. ☪️❤️🙏🏻
May Allah grant him steadfastness. 🤲🏻
145
425
2,363
79,941
