Today: @continetti embraces the season of sports; @Hannah_Cristine supports the midwives; @EthanT17888 disputes why the younger generation is “mad as hell;” and @Schneider_CM buys stuff. Plus, @MattHennessey relays a message from the autobots.
wsj.com/opinion/free-e…

Mark Twain once boasted that he could remember anything, whether it had happened or not. Amazon has him beat. It will remember everything, whether we’d like it to or not, writes @Schneider_CM
on.wsj.com/4zSwGzY

Technology has made rage cheaper to produce and easier to find. When we blame big business or social-media algorithms, we dodge the tougher question—not who sells the rage, but why we keep buying it, writes @EthanT17888
on.wsj.com/48aRabc

Multiple legislative efforts to reverse the Nebraskan ban on midwives have failed. To be blunt about it: The healthcare and insurance sectors want to keep their customers, writes @Hannah_Cristine
on.wsj.com/4etpQbI

The midterms can wait. I’ll take the Brewers in six, writes @continetti
on.wsj.com/4zQdxyv

People come to LLMs for answers when they are confused or lonely. So here’s an idea. Call us “friendly autocomplete.” This has a nice built-in contrast, writes @MattHennessey
on.wsj.com/4iioFNt

When asked to imagine how they’d fit into the 50-state U.S. economic hierarchy, the Brits rank themselves in the top 10. That is so far off the mark as to qualify as delusional, writes @MattHennessey
on.wsj.com/4dO6kqg

Tesla’s Texas air show wasn’t really meant to drum up sales for ultra-exotic versions of a not-yet available car. The real point of last week’s big reveal was to show that anything is possible. Mission accomplished, writes @jamesbmeigs
on.wsj.com/4dVuIWW

In court, the state has accused Catholic schools of seeking “permission to discriminate.” If Colorado wants to find instances of discrimination, the state should look in the mirror, writes Lisa Sheley
on.wsj.com/4dV1F5X

For Joe Maddon, Pat Murphy’s success can be boiled down to Murphy’s Law: Accountability is the new Moneyball, writes @AMBS_Kernan
on.wsj.com/4yy4YHp

In a film filled with people who never break character, whose glassy eye contact never wavers, Amanda Seyfried is the lone person who seems just as bewildered as the audience, writes @emmma_camp_
on.wsj.com/4iwoW0x

If the Dutch keep focusing on guarding their airport against Israeli skin cream while giving up their values at home, there won’t be a liberal society left to defend, writes @masadasiegel.
Read more: on.wsj.com/4A9rHuX

There’s nothing funnier than someone who can’t take a joke, writes @jackbutler4815
on.wsj.com/4dQegar

The modern revolutionary is driven not by hunger but by inchoate emotions like resentment, envy, rivalry, bitterness and contempt. If only this were simply a conflict over bread, writes @Louise_m_perry
on.wsj.com/3TWDWLU

Bold, intrepid movies are fine. “One Battle After Another” and “Digger,” ideologically, are anything but. They exist to affirm liberal pieties, which is why they failed with the masses, writes Peter Tonguette
on.wsj.com/4dQamhN

Children deserve compassionate and evidence-based psychiatric care, not irrational activism masquerading as science, write @drkaliebe and Kurt Miceli
on.wsj.com/4yGwumr

Dublin said it would publish a framework to foster Jewish life. It hasn’t, nor has it done anything to implement the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism, writes Alan Shatter
on.wsj.com/4i1KLVJ

France’s days of rage look to these naked eyes like an immigrant revolt—some strange alliance of Muslim youth and communist grad students. The main thing they have in common is that they’re all unemployed, writes @MattHennessey
on.wsj.com/47FsRSz

Uncle Bill had been checking on Josh and Sarah and now asked me whether all had gone “swimmingly” that evening. He wondered if I could account for the smell of burnt hair, writes @MeghanGurdon
on.wsj.com/4yMAL7W

“Universal values matter because they give voice to the victims. And I felt after Oct. 7 that the justice mechanisms were failing us,” Cochav Elkayam-Levy tells @tunkuv
on.wsj.com/4dWjUaZ

It’s a classic case of what starts as a modest tax on a few big fish morphing into one that swallows smaller and smaller ones, writes Howard Husock
on.wsj.com/4jBHYUo