Sasho Cirovski retweeted
3
14
107
18,976
RT @DaCostaEric: Committee approval. Cabinet review. Sent back for clarification. Committee reaffirmation. Cabinet approval.

The flex mode…
0
10
0
16
The Intercollegiate Men’s Lacrosse Coaches Association is making an effort to rescind the innovative split-season model that will improve student-athlete well being. Swipe to see my response.
10
8
56
16,158
This is what NGB leadership looks like! Thank you @ussoccer for advocating for the players and for the game of NCAA D1 Men’s Soccer! A must read for everyone @NCAASoccer and @NCAA , especially the D1 AD's lobbying against a student athlete first proposal.
A note from our COO Dan Helfrich about why U.S. Soccer believes the men's college soccer model should evolve and current modernization proposals should advance.
1
9
51
3,201
In the last 4 champs 16 College Cup berths went to 16 diff programs. That includes Furman, Vermont, Marshall, Denver, Creighton and Saint Louis. Evidence that reaching the nat semis isn't limited to the traditional ACC and Big 10 powers. This is your effort to minimize us. 👎🤥
7
8
86
13,722
Thank you Dan for your leadership!! 🙏🏻👊
For the players and for the game!
A must read! 👇
@ussoccer strongly supports the proposed new model for D1 men’s college soccer. Given ongoing debate, we wanted to share why this matters, how we engaged in the process, how feedback/concerns influenced the final model, and what happens next. Here’s to growing the game together.
3
8
49
5,793
None! Consistently over 92% of our coaches have been in favor!
Has there been any coaches at this level of men's soccer come out against this proposal?
2
2
24
5,621
Well said Bob!! 👏
The soccer proposal is not being portrayed accurately. Most importantly, the students want it.

The five spring contests are already in your budget: officials, trainers, turf, and travel. Rescinding the proposal doesn't save that money; it just means you spend it with nothing to show for it.

What the revised proposal actually requires is a minimum of three spring contests for postseason eligibility. Three. Not five, not ten. Schools are currently permitted five exhibition matches each spring, so three is fewer than programs already schedule.

Conferences can still hold their championships in the fall for the automatic bid. The only new pieces are a May national championship and one 15-day transfer window.

That's the whole trade: the same spring costs, with real upside. This is the accurate information. Rescinding the proposal makes no sense, either for the athletes or for the budget.

@SeanTFrazier @FortWayneAD @DetroitAD @MKE_ADBraun @MattGlovaski @katiearcuri @Stags_AD @vandermerwe63 @DrakeADHardin @EvansvilleAD @JamieBoggsJD @HowardAD_KD
2
2
27
4,195
Sorry, I completely disagree. The proposed model will strain our overworked support staff. It will add to our budget challenges due to travel and indoor facility rental. And who is asking for outdoor soccer matches in the Midwest in February?! I ask D1 ADs to join me at Club 241.
18
21
180
41,910
Sasho Cirovski retweeted
Carlos Somoano (men's coach at @UNCmenssoccer ) makes the ironclad argument for upholding men's @NCAASoccer calendar reform — splitting their compressed fall season into two — in this article by @danwoog

socceramerica.com/university-pre…
2
10
31
6,133
Congratulations to @MissyMeharg!!🐢
YOUR 2026 BIG TEN CHAMPS! 🤟🐢

📰 go.umd.edu/2hdk

#bestofthebest
0
1
13
1,160
Well said Coach Brookins!! Helps the players and grows the game!!
Coach Brookins on how the Year-Round Calendar would benefit NCAA Men's Soccer:
2
5
69
12,994
Sasho Cirovski retweeted
The schools that don’t sponsor men’s soccer need to worry about who and what they support, not men’s soccer.

Put the student-athletes first.
31
60
590
213,849
With about one week left in the effort to rescind the D1 men’s soccer model, please read my updated statement below.
24
67
349
174,647
Replying to @SashoCirovski
2
1
10
2,599
Replying to @SashoCirovski
1
0
2
1,179
Replying to @SashoCirovski
0
0
6
1,201