Pinned Tweet
@CDCgov we have simple question. Where are the statistics on #VAERS reports found to be causal? Why are there unrelated reports that remain in the public facing data? @JeffereyJaxen @AaronSiriSG @CDCDirector @VigilantFox @JesslovesMJK @SenRonJohnson @HighWireTalk #2SetsofBooks
45
213
565
87,701
Oh my…
@OpenVAERS @VPrasadMDMPH @TracyBethHoeg Thanks for telling me about the MedDRA codes. Here's the full write-up. My V-safe analysis puts it at about 67,000 excess thoracic aortic aneurysms across the US and nearly 30,000 deaths within 5 years.
x.com/NickKottenstet…
1
13
31
3,452
OpenVAERS retweeted
In 1959 a study in California started freezing the blood of 20,000 pregnant women, and half a century later that freezer answered the question everyone is still arguing about: what DDT did to people.
DDT was never hidden from you. It was the opposite. In June 1947 Pennsalt ran a e with a chorus line of a housewife, an apple, a cow, a potato and a dog all singing DDT is good for me-e-e. You could buy it as wallpaper for the nursery, ready pasted, just dip in water and hang. You could buy a lampshade soaked in it, so the heat of the bulb spread it invisibly round the room. The adverts said to comb it through a child's hair for lice. The trucks fogged the streets and the children ran in the cloud.
The man who found what it did to insects got a Nobel Prize in 1948. The line was that it was harmless to warm-blooded animals, and it was repeated with total confidence for 25 years. Plenty of people are still repeating it.
In Oakland, from 1959 to 1967, the Child Health and Development Studies enrolled about 20,000 pregnant women, drew their blood, and put it in a freezer. Then it waited. It followed the babies, who grew up in the peak years of American DDT use, and it followed their babies.
In 2015 the daughters were in their fifties, and 118 of them had breast cancer. The researchers went back to the freezer and measured the DDT in their mothers' blood from the week they were born. The daughters whose mothers carried the most were 3.7 times more likely to have the disease than those whose mothers carried the least. The thing was in them before they drew breath.
In 2021 they went down another generation. 365 granddaughters, born long after the ban. The ones whose grandmothers carried the most DDT in pregnancy were fatter and had started their periods younger, both of which raise the risk of the cancer their mothers got. Half of the eggs that became those granddaughters were already inside the grandmother when the fog came down the street.
A pregnant woman is three generations at once. Her, the baby, and the eggs in the baby. The spray truck got all three in one pass.
Harmless to warm-blooded animals. The warm-blooded animals took 54 years to answer, and the answer is in a freezer in California with a name on every tube.
DDT was never hidden from you. It was the opposite. In June 1947 Pennsalt ran a e with a chorus line of a housewife, an apple, a cow, a potato and a dog all singing DDT is good for me-e-e. You could buy it as wallpaper for the nursery, ready pasted, just dip in water and hang. You could buy a lampshade soaked in it, so the heat of the bulb spread it invisibly round the room. The adverts said to comb it through a child's hair for lice. The trucks fogged the streets and the children ran in the cloud.
The man who found what it did to insects got a Nobel Prize in 1948. The line was that it was harmless to warm-blooded animals, and it was repeated with total confidence for 25 years. Plenty of people are still repeating it.
In Oakland, from 1959 to 1967, the Child Health and Development Studies enrolled about 20,000 pregnant women, drew their blood, and put it in a freezer. Then it waited. It followed the babies, who grew up in the peak years of American DDT use, and it followed their babies.
In 2015 the daughters were in their fifties, and 118 of them had breast cancer. The researchers went back to the freezer and measured the DDT in their mothers' blood from the week they were born. The daughters whose mothers carried the most were 3.7 times more likely to have the disease than those whose mothers carried the least. The thing was in them before they drew breath.
In 2021 they went down another generation. 365 granddaughters, born long after the ban. The ones whose grandmothers carried the most DDT in pregnancy were fatter and had started their periods younger, both of which raise the risk of the cancer their mothers got. Half of the eggs that became those granddaughters were already inside the grandmother when the fog came down the street.
A pregnant woman is three generations at once. Her, the baby, and the eggs in the baby. The spray truck got all three in one pass.
Harmless to warm-blooded animals. The warm-blooded animals took 54 years to answer, and the answer is in a freezer in California with a name on every tube.
29
417
1,217
24,697
Watch this. Try to guess Kerry Kennedy’s age. Try not to puke at her stupidity. Who is older her or RFK jr? Now look it up.
Now which should we listen to about health?
instagram.com/reel/DfGG6rPCk…
Now which should we listen to about health?
instagram.com/reel/DfGG6rPCk…
3
3
12
1,737
OpenVAERS retweeted
The year is 1873. Your wife tires easily and reads too much. The doctor prescribes the rest cure: six weeks flat in bed, no books, no visitors, fed on milk, forbidden to sit up without his permission. The man who devised it is the most famous nerve specialist in America, and the ieter, which is taken as the cure.
The year is 1915. The hospital has a new way of delivering your child. Morphine, then scopolamine, and the mother wakes two days later with a baby she cannot remember having. They call it twilight sleep. The women are strapped into padded cots so they do not hurt themselves while they scream, and the straps are the modern part. The babies arrive blue and slow to breathe.
The year is 1945. The truck comes down your street fogging DDT, and the children run behind it in the white cloud because the man on the back says it is harmless. At the beach it is sprayed over the bathers on their towels. It goes on the cattle, over the barn, and across the kitchen table.
The year is 1948. Your son has trouble with his ears. The doctor slides a rod tipped with radium up each nostril and holds it there for the best part of ten minutes, and you bring him back three more times. Hundreds of thousands of American children get the same treatment. The cancers arrive in their fifties.
The year is 1962. The health visitor tells you breastfeeding is old-fashioned and the formula is scientific. By 1972 fewer than one American baby in four is breastfed at all. The formula is skimmed milk and sugar, with the milk fat taken out and vegetable oil put in.
The year is 1971. The family planning clinic fits a small plastic crab called the Dalkon Shield. Its tail is a bundle of fibres that wicks bacteria up into the womb. 2.8 million are fitted in America before it is withdrawn, and the company goes bankrupt under the claims. It had been sold as safe and superior.
The year is 1983. The doctor says your arteries are the butter's fault. The dripping tin goes in the bin, the yolks go to the dog, the margarine goes in the fridge, and you have the heart attack anyway, on skimmed milk, having done everything right.
The year is 2001. Your 15-year-old is low, and the doctor prescribes Paxil, because the trial in the journal says it is effective and well tolerated in adolescents. The raw data, reanalysed 14 years later, shows more suicidal thinking on the drug than on the sugar pill. The company pays $3 billion to settle. Nobody rings the house.
The year is 2009. The government has spent around £500 million stockpiling Tamiflu for the pandemic, on the strength of the manufacturer's trials. When the trials are finally prised loose five years later, the drug shortens flu by about half a day and nothing shows it keeps anyone out of hospital. The stockpile goes out of date in a warehouse.
The year is 2026. The doctor has ten minutes and a screen. The number is high, so the tablet is for life. The weight is high, so the injection is for life. The meat is bad for the planet and the oil is good for the heart, and the person in the chair is as certain as everyone who ever sat in it.
Every one of those was settled, by a committee, in a journal, with a doubter somewhere being laughed at. The rest cure, the straps, the fog, the rod, the formula, the crab, the margarine, the trial, the stockpile. All of it certain, all of it printed, all of it done to somebody who had asked for help.
You were never the one who was wrong. You were the one it was done to, and the only person in the story who did as they were told every single time.
The apology comes a generation late, in a footnote, addressed to nobody.
The next one is being drafted now.
The year is 1915. The hospital has a new way of delivering your child. Morphine, then scopolamine, and the mother wakes two days later with a baby she cannot remember having. They call it twilight sleep. The women are strapped into padded cots so they do not hurt themselves while they scream, and the straps are the modern part. The babies arrive blue and slow to breathe.
The year is 1945. The truck comes down your street fogging DDT, and the children run behind it in the white cloud because the man on the back says it is harmless. At the beach it is sprayed over the bathers on their towels. It goes on the cattle, over the barn, and across the kitchen table.
The year is 1948. Your son has trouble with his ears. The doctor slides a rod tipped with radium up each nostril and holds it there for the best part of ten minutes, and you bring him back three more times. Hundreds of thousands of American children get the same treatment. The cancers arrive in their fifties.
The year is 1962. The health visitor tells you breastfeeding is old-fashioned and the formula is scientific. By 1972 fewer than one American baby in four is breastfed at all. The formula is skimmed milk and sugar, with the milk fat taken out and vegetable oil put in.
The year is 1971. The family planning clinic fits a small plastic crab called the Dalkon Shield. Its tail is a bundle of fibres that wicks bacteria up into the womb. 2.8 million are fitted in America before it is withdrawn, and the company goes bankrupt under the claims. It had been sold as safe and superior.
The year is 1983. The doctor says your arteries are the butter's fault. The dripping tin goes in the bin, the yolks go to the dog, the margarine goes in the fridge, and you have the heart attack anyway, on skimmed milk, having done everything right.
The year is 2001. Your 15-year-old is low, and the doctor prescribes Paxil, because the trial in the journal says it is effective and well tolerated in adolescents. The raw data, reanalysed 14 years later, shows more suicidal thinking on the drug than on the sugar pill. The company pays $3 billion to settle. Nobody rings the house.
The year is 2009. The government has spent around £500 million stockpiling Tamiflu for the pandemic, on the strength of the manufacturer's trials. When the trials are finally prised loose five years later, the drug shortens flu by about half a day and nothing shows it keeps anyone out of hospital. The stockpile goes out of date in a warehouse.
The year is 2026. The doctor has ten minutes and a screen. The number is high, so the tablet is for life. The weight is high, so the injection is for life. The meat is bad for the planet and the oil is good for the heart, and the person in the chair is as certain as everyone who ever sat in it.
Every one of those was settled, by a committee, in a journal, with a doubter somewhere being laughed at. The rest cure, the straps, the fog, the rod, the formula, the crab, the margarine, the trial, the stockpile. All of it certain, all of it printed, all of it done to somebody who had asked for help.
You were never the one who was wrong. You were the one it was done to, and the only person in the story who did as they were told every single time.
The apology comes a generation late, in a footnote, addressed to nobody.
The next one is being drafted now.
993
7,168
33,019
2,971,892
This 💯. And they were charged with doing it. The closest anyone got to doing this job at FDA was @VPrasadMDMPH and @TracyBethHoeg.
Now gone.
Now gone.
If NIH and CDC practiced this, we would be a healthy nation.
It's very easy. They know how to do this. They claim to do this. But they do just the opposite and they make sure that no one can do this.
They hide, obscure, and keep locked away the evidence that would solve the debate in 2 weeks.
3
14
31
3,663
Jacobson vs. Mass. has not only been the basis for much of the mandatory vaccination bad rulings in this country it was also the basis for Buck vs. Bell, one of the most disgusting laws on the books. Ever.
Justice Holmes cited Jacobson to justify forced sterilization, writing that “the principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” Critics of expansive readings of Jacobson (and of modern vaccine mandates) often invoke Buck precisely because of this, treating it as a cautionary example of how public-health deference can be stretched too far.
We have much shame to lay at the feet of the Jacobson ruling in this country.
Justice Holmes cited Jacobson to justify forced sterilization, writing that “the principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” Critics of expansive readings of Jacobson (and of modern vaccine mandates) often invoke Buck precisely because of this, treating it as a cautionary example of how public-health deference can be stretched too far.
We have much shame to lay at the feet of the Jacobson ruling in this country.
On the second of May 1927 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a twenty-year-old Virginia girl should be sterilised against her will on the grounds that she, her mother and her baby daughter were all feeble-minded, and four years later the baby daughter was on the Carrie Buck had been taken from her mother at three and given to a foster family in Charlottesville, who kept her out of school from the sixth grade to do their housework. At seventeen she was raped by the family's nephew and fell pregnant, and the family, rather than have the thing spoken of, had her committed to the state colony for epileptics and the feeble-minded as incorrigible and promiscuous. Her mother was already in it. Carrie's baby, Vivian, was taken from her and given to the same foster family that had covered up the rape.
The colony's superintendent had a new law he wanted tested, and Carrie was the test. Virginia's sterilisation statute needed a case to go all the way to the Supreme Court so that it could be copied by every other state, and the colony chose the quiet girl with the illegitimate child and the mother in the ward. It gave her a lawyer, who had sat on the colony's board and was a close friend of the superintendent, and who called no witnesses and put up no fight. A social worker testified that the baby, at seven months, had a look about her that was not quite normal. That was the evidence for the third generation.
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinion for eight of the nine justices, and the sentence in it is the most notorious in the Court's history: three generations of imbeciles are enough. Carrie was sterilised at the colony that October. Over the following fifty years the number of Americans sterilised under laws her case had upheld climbed past sixty thousand, and Nazi defendants cited it in their own defence at Nuremberg.
Vivian went to school in Charlottesville, was marked average or better, and made the honour roll in 1931. She died of an illness the next year, aged eight. Carrie was released, married twice, read the newspaper every day, and was traced in 1980 after she and her husband had been found malnourished in their home near Charlottesville, lucid and ordinary, and angry to the end. They done me wrong, she said. They done us all wrong. Her sister Doris had been sterilised at the same colony at sixteen and told it was an appendix operation, and had spent her marriage trying for children and wondering.
Buck v. Bell has never been overturned. It is still cited.
The father figure who should have protected her was a foster home that handed her to the state. The expert was a superintendent with a law to test. The daughter who was the proof of the family's defect brought home a report card, and it was good.
1
5
22
2,207
OpenVAERS retweeted
On the sixteenth of December 1960 a twelve-year-old boy was put on a table in a San Jose hospital, given electric shocks until he was unconscious, and had an ice pick hammered through the thin bone above each eye and swept from side to side through the front of his brain, because the doctor he was defiant. The doctor's fee was two hundred dollars.
Howard Dully was a big, clumsy, daydreaming boy whose mother had died when he was five, and his father had married a woman called Lou who could not stand him. She took him to six psychiatrists. All six told her the problem was not the boy. The seventh was Walter Freeman, who had performed more lobotomies than any man alive, who drove between state hospitals in a van he called the lobotomobile doing them by the dozen in an afternoon, with no gloves and no surgical training, and who had once done twenty-five in a day. Freeman's notes on Howard, which Howard did not read for forty-four years, record the symptoms. He objects to going to bed. He turns the lights on when there is broad daylight. He does not react to love or to punishment. He has a savage streak. On that evidence, and Lou's signature, and two hundred dollars, Freeman wrote that the boy would benefit from a transorbital lobotomy and did it four days later.
Howard remembers the table. He remembers waking with two black eyes and a fever and no idea what had been done to him, because nobody told him, then or ever. His father never spoke of it. Lou put him into a state institution the following year, and the boy with the holes in his brain spent the next forty years in and out of asylums, juvenile halls, a jail, halfway houses and the street, drinking, drifting, never quite able to say why he was the way he was, with a photograph that existed somewhere of a doctor in a suit standing over a child with a steel spike in each eye socket.
At fifty-six, driving a school bus, he went to find out. He found his file in Freeman's archive at a university in Washington, in the doctor's own handwriting, and read for the first time what his stepmother had said and what the doctor had agreed to. He went to see his father, who was eighty, and asked him why he had let it happen, and his father said he had been bullied into it. Howard told the story on the radio in 2005 and five million people listened to a man weep over a piece of paper.
Walter Freeman was not a quack. He was a professor of neurology, the man who had brought the lobotomy to America, and the operation had won its inventor the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1949. The journals published him. The hospitals booked him. The newspapers called it a miracle. He did it to three and a half thousand people, nineteen of them children, and he kept doing it until 1967, when a patient died on the table and the hospital took his privileges away, and he spent his last years driving the country in the van looking up his old patients to prove it had worked.
That is what settled science looked like from inside, to a twelve-year-old. A mother's complaint, an expert's confidence, a procedure with a prize behind it, two hundred dollars, and a lifetime nobody could give back.
The same institutions now tell you what your child should eat, in the same voice, with the same certainty, and the leaflet has a logo on it. Howard Dully is in his seventies and still cannot say what was taken. Nobody ever apologised.
Howard Dully was a big, clumsy, daydreaming boy whose mother had died when he was five, and his father had married a woman called Lou who could not stand him. She took him to six psychiatrists. All six told her the problem was not the boy. The seventh was Walter Freeman, who had performed more lobotomies than any man alive, who drove between state hospitals in a van he called the lobotomobile doing them by the dozen in an afternoon, with no gloves and no surgical training, and who had once done twenty-five in a day. Freeman's notes on Howard, which Howard did not read for forty-four years, record the symptoms. He objects to going to bed. He turns the lights on when there is broad daylight. He does not react to love or to punishment. He has a savage streak. On that evidence, and Lou's signature, and two hundred dollars, Freeman wrote that the boy would benefit from a transorbital lobotomy and did it four days later.
Howard remembers the table. He remembers waking with two black eyes and a fever and no idea what had been done to him, because nobody told him, then or ever. His father never spoke of it. Lou put him into a state institution the following year, and the boy with the holes in his brain spent the next forty years in and out of asylums, juvenile halls, a jail, halfway houses and the street, drinking, drifting, never quite able to say why he was the way he was, with a photograph that existed somewhere of a doctor in a suit standing over a child with a steel spike in each eye socket.
At fifty-six, driving a school bus, he went to find out. He found his file in Freeman's archive at a university in Washington, in the doctor's own handwriting, and read for the first time what his stepmother had said and what the doctor had agreed to. He went to see his father, who was eighty, and asked him why he had let it happen, and his father said he had been bullied into it. Howard told the story on the radio in 2005 and five million people listened to a man weep over a piece of paper.
Walter Freeman was not a quack. He was a professor of neurology, the man who had brought the lobotomy to America, and the operation had won its inventor the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1949. The journals published him. The hospitals booked him. The newspapers called it a miracle. He did it to three and a half thousand people, nineteen of them children, and he kept doing it until 1967, when a patient died on the table and the hospital took his privileges away, and he spent his last years driving the country in the van looking up his old patients to prove it had worked.
That is what settled science looked like from inside, to a twelve-year-old. A mother's complaint, an expert's confidence, a procedure with a prize behind it, two hundred dollars, and a lifetime nobody could give back.
The same institutions now tell you what your child should eat, in the same voice, with the same certainty, and the leaflet has a logo on it. Howard Dully is in his seventies and still cannot say what was taken. Nobody ever apologised.
262
2,500
9,697
227,094
Someone finally saying the quiet part out loud. Effectiveness rates have ALWAYS been inflated by maternal antibodies from natural infection in the larger population. As we increasingly vaccinated a larger and larger percentage and the people with natural immunity died off, effective rates had to wane. In fact, the unvaccinated were protecting the vaccinated and not the other way around, as is often claimed. The bulwark of naturally “immunized” people are almost entirely gone now.
The solution is not monclonals. The solution is to restore natural immunity in the population.
The solution is not monclonals. The solution is to restore natural immunity in the population.
Wow… The Babies are No Longer Protected Against Measles
Moms antibodies used to give 6-9 months of Ab protection to infants
Now, protection is gone by ~4 months
Neutralizing Ab titers = 0 by 6m
And… if we give MMR early to fill the gap it can drive a long-term problem
1/
3
23
68
2,144
OpenVAERS retweeted
@JohnBeaudoinSr knew deaths were occurring yet chose to hide behind methodological loopholes to protect the public narrative. Obfuscation of facts was their playbook. My son died of an aortic dissection but had I not done histological, serum and DNA analysis the cause of his dissection would be unknown and ascribed to a natural death. It was anything but. The work of his grieving parents over years via forensic investigation found myocarditis, pericarditis, and spike protein in the aorta which decimated it and led to his dissection. Negative nucleocapsid test confirmed spike was vaccine derived and these findings were ultimately part of a peer reviewed and published case study linking his death to the vaccine. Despite frantic calls to the CdC after not following up my Vaers report ( full data not known at the time) and testifying before Dr. Peter Marks of the FDA about my sons death, these agencies did nothing to find the true cause of death despite assuring us that all deaths were thoroughly investigated. This was a lie- Cursory review of paperwork does Not constitute deep forensic investigation. Looking at data without looking at tissue and serum allowed these regulatory agencies to maintain “plausible deniability “ - after all you can’t find what you don’t look for. These failures caused the death of my son and countless others as had they forensically investigated immediately these deaths they would have found the link to the vaccine that his grieving parents found. Not only did they not investigate, but Fauci and others actively discouraged autopsies and histology. These actions were reckless endangerment with depraved indifference to human life; they were complicit by omission knowing deaths were occurring. It is time they be held accountable as plausible deniability can only be used so far. People died needlessly to protect their precious “safe and effective “ narrative.
@JohnBeaudoinSr @SenRonJohnson @ChildrensHD @AdhesionsOrg @Amothersanthem @React19org @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra
opastpublishers.com/open-access-ar…
@JohnBeaudoinSr @SenRonJohnson @ChildrensHD @AdhesionsOrg @Amothersanthem @React19org @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra
opastpublishers.com/open-access-ar…
0
13
17
727
Maybe if you focussed less on “public trust” and more on fraud and censorship, conflict of interest and admitting mistakes and negative consequences you wouldn’t need to have talks about public trust.
🧐What is the scientific community’s role toward restoring the public’s trust in health sciences research following the COVID-19 pandemic?
@HHSGov Chief Science and Data Officer Dr. Martin Kulldorff and I will examine this and other issues on Oct. 28 at 1:30pm ET, during the edom Lecture.
Webcast link in the replies.
4
16
65
3,805
OpenVAERS retweeted
MAHA is unable to get modest food reforms across the line because the White House is so completely captured by industry. When even CALLEY MEANS cannot stand the corruption any longer, you know you've got a problem.
EXCLUSIVE - Top RFK Jr. ally and adviser Calley Means has quit the Trump administration.
Means was frustrated by White House delays of some of Kennedy’s popular food policies and blamed others in the administration for allowing food companies and special interests to have too much sway, people familiar with the matter said.
One of them described him as “disillusioned.” wsj.com/politics/polic…
73
221
1,077
29,147
This is so BAD @SecKennedy @jeffreytucker @NIHDirector_Jay @CDCgov
Working with the V-Safe data and discovered the following confirmed by @SiriGlimstad:
The CDC "accidentally" left some of the free text fields too long, but when they discovered that they truncated them. The n the motion with @ICANdecide . But here's the thing. The CDC either redefined the table column that collected the data OR sent ICAN truncated fields when exporting. But what they didn't do was change the field definition in the collection form. So people didn't know that what they were writing was being cut off. Here is an example of someone who clearly had more to say about an obviously severe adverse event.
This person had issues from dose 1, was trying to report on a pulmonary embolism after dose 3. And then they kept getting vaccinated and no one told them to stop! After the 4th dose they almost died.
WHY did you stop people from telling you what happened?? Why would you limit free text and symptom fields to so few characters. It's almost like you didn't want to know what people were experiencing. There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for this!
@React19org @aravindmohanoor @NickKottenstet1
registrant XLH-71429-16616
Working with the V-Safe data and discovered the following confirmed by @SiriGlimstad:
The CDC "accidentally" left some of the free text fields too long, but when they discovered that they truncated them. The n the motion with @ICANdecide . But here's the thing. The CDC either redefined the table column that collected the data OR sent ICAN truncated fields when exporting. But what they didn't do was change the field definition in the collection form. So people didn't know that what they were writing was being cut off. Here is an example of someone who clearly had more to say about an obviously severe adverse event.
This person had issues from dose 1, was trying to report on a pulmonary embolism after dose 3. And then they kept getting vaccinated and no one told them to stop! After the 4th dose they almost died.
WHY did you stop people from telling you what happened?? Why would you limit free text and symptom fields to so few characters. It's almost like you didn't want to know what people were experiencing. There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for this!
@React19org @aravindmohanoor @NickKottenstet1
registrant XLH-71429-16616
12
92
247
13,419
Winner of the internets! 🥇
@RxRegAjust seen "You Can See Everything," I asked ChatGPT to use your post to write a comedy bit in the style of Who's on First:
COSTELLO: I hear NIH just opened a new vaccine-injury clinic.
ABBOTT: That's right.
COSTELLO: What's it called?
ABBOTT: The Vaccinology and Immunology Center.
COSTELLO: So it's a center?
ABBOTT: No, it's a study.
COSTELLO: What's a study?
ABBOTT: The center.
COSTELLO: You just said it wasn't a center!
ABBOTT: It's a study called a center.
COSTELLO: Where's the center?
ABBOTT: Inside the Vaccine Research Center.
COSTELLO: There's another center?
ABBOTT: That's the original center. It's been there since 1999.
COSTELLO: So the new center is inside the old center?
ABBOTT: The new study is inside the old center.
COSTELLO: Fine! When does the study open?
ABBOTT: It already opened.
COSTELLO: When?
ABBOTT: October 5. They even had a ribbon-cutting.
COSTELLO: They cut a ribbon for a study?
ABBOTT: No, for the clinic.
COSTELLO: WHAT CLINIC?
ABBOTT: The new one.
COSTELLO: Inside the new center?
ABBOTT: Inside the old center.
COSTELLO: And it's open?
ABBOTT: Officially.
COSTELLO: So patients can enroll?
ABBOTT: Not yet. They're still finalizing the protocol.
COSTELLO: They opened a clinic before deciding what the clinic is going to do?
ABBOTT: They know what it's going to do.
COSTELLO: What?
ABBOTT: Study people with symptoms following vaccination or infection.
COSTELLO: Infection? I thought it was a vaccine-injury clinic!
ABBOTT: That's what they announced.
COSTELLO: So they'll treat vaccine injuries?
ABBOTT: They'll investigate symptoms, explore treatments, and connect patients with care.
COSTELLO: Connect them with care where?
ABBOTT: Appropriate care.
COSTELLO: AT THE CLINIC?
ABBOTT: That's not clear.
COSTELLO: So let me get this straight. NIH held a ribbon-cutting to open a new clinic that's actually a study called a center, located inside another center that's been open since 1999. The new clinic isn't enrolling patients, the study hasn't started, and nobody knows whether the clinic will actually treat anyone?
ABBOTT: That's the current plan.
COSTELLO: What's the ribbon for?
ABBOTT: The opening.
COSTELLO: WHAT OPENED?
ABBOTT: The center.
COSTELLO: WHICH CENTER?!
ABBOTT: The study.
COSTELLO: I thought the study hadn't started!
ABBOTT: Now you're confused.
COSTELLO: NOW I'M CONFUSED?!
ABBOTT: Don't worry. NIH says everything should be underway by the end of the year.
COSTELLO: What should be underway?
ABBOTT: The study.
COSTELLO: In the center?
ABBOTT: At the clinic.
COSTELLO: I'm going to need medical attention.
ABBOTT: I know just the place.
COSTELLO: DON'T YOU DARE.
0
1
10
1,185
OpenVAERS retweeted
The government opened a historic new NIH clinic! Scratch that, a center. Actually, a study with “Center” in its title, under an existing center.
2
4
16
1,521
OpenVAERS retweeted
🚨The FDA knew the vaccine safety early-warning system was disabled because of masking (hiding safety signals).
🚨They were shown a fix.
🚨They ordered the FDA doctor (Ana Szarfman) who presented it to "cease and desist."
In my interview with pharmacovigilance researcher Wiseman, he walks through the explosive internal FDA emails showing that from early February 2021 Dr Szarfman warned CBER about the method used to detect safety signals was broken. She told them how to fix it. They told her to "cease and desist."
🚨They were shown a fix.
🚨They ordered the FDA doctor (Ana Szarfman) who presented it to "cease and desist."
In my interview with pharmacovigilance researcher Wiseman, he walks through the explosive internal FDA emails showing that from early February 2021 Dr Szarfman warned CBER about the method used to detect safety signals was broken. She told them how to fix it. They told her to "cease and desist."
3
72
133
13,036
People who were mandated by their government or employers to take their drug and lied to about safety.
$7.99 million in 6 years for covid vaccine victims from the CICP.
People who at some point made a bad drug choice voluntarily knowing full well the dangers involved.
$96 million for homeless addicts.
$7.99 million in 6 years for covid vaccine victims from the CICP.
People who at some point made a bad drug choice voluntarily knowing full well the dangers involved.
$96 million for homeless addicts.
Recovery starts with treatment. Every American deserves a path to a better life.
In Houston, Texas, @SecKennedy announced 8 communities selected to receive $96 MILLION through HHS' new STREETS program to confront homelessness, addiction, and serious mental illness.
Under reatment directly to Americans living on our streets, connecting them with recovery support, housing, and the resources they need to rebuild their lives.
Through the Great American Recovery, we're working to restore hope, dignity, and independence to Americans who need it most.
0
5
21
1,492
OpenVAERS retweeted
How DARE Ben Shapiro speak on autism to a room full of college kids and tell them vaccines do not cause autism. My son and millions of children around the world REGRESSED after vaccines.
I, as a mother to a son with autism IS NOT WRONG, nor are the countless other parents out there wrong. @SecKennedy is not wrong. The science is not wrong- as the SCIENCE shows vaccines can cause autism.
I am so tired of the gaslighting!! F%& off @benshapiro and your pediatrician wife who is massively brainwashed and refuses to actually READ the science on aluminum and mercury and the mechanisms that cause biological harm.
I, as a mother to a son with autism IS NOT WRONG, nor are the countless other parents out there wrong. @SecKennedy is not wrong. The science is not wrong- as the SCIENCE shows vaccines can cause autism.
I am so tired of the gaslighting!! F%& off @benshapiro and your pediatrician wife who is massively brainwashed and refuses to actually READ the science on aluminum and mercury and the mechanisms that cause biological harm.
At last night’s @TPUSA event, @benshapiro told a brainwashed pre-med student that the Covid shot was efficacious for the elderly and declared vaccines do not cause autism.
55
111
422
6,447
This is the correct take. And even if that clinic actually existed when you opened the door, do you really trust the people who broke you or your kid to fix you? After all the lies? Guinea pigs dont get to travel to a magical farm where they frolic after they are done being studied.
🚨. it is an incentive program for doctors to report data and a system to study the reports, not a program to treat or compensate the injured. ⚠️Watching the federal government package a data-harvesting network as a "victory"—while completely ignoring the immediate financial and medical devastation of the people actually living with these injuries—is deeply infuriating. They are celebrating a database while families are left holding the bills.
hhs.gov/press-room/hhs…
2
11
24
1,611
OpenVAERS retweeted
You always see the same pattern with vax safety monitoring systems. They are heralded as a way to prove safety, then once they show the opposite, they get ghosted and swept under the rug. V-Safe was used to justify an EUA & no testing for the vaccines b/c it overcame VAERS's "shortcomings."
I've spent 10 hours in public reading from the most horrifying nonfiction text I've seen: Cries for Help from V-Safe data. This was the CDC's vaccine safety monitoring system, meant to assure people that the government cares. Defenders of the CDC have said that it was never e. But the website said the exact opposite. They lied. Thank you @React19org
brownstone.org/articles/cries…
5
222
730
17,762