So, basically, 500 million Europeans expect 300 million Americans to protect them from 120 million Russians who can’t even defeat 40 million Ukrainians while those 500 million Europeans don’t even realize they are being conquered by 2 billion Muslims who claim they are being persecuted by 8 million Israelis. Is that about right?

1

Democrats Discover Innovative Strategy Of Promising Free Stuff To Stupid People buff.ly/i4ilS81

Exactly

@GovernorVA Where's the "diversity" you're talking about?

You have an 86% black cabinet in a state that's only 19% black.

You have a 0% white male cabinet in a state than 32% white male.

This may be the one of the least gender/race representative cabinets in Virginia's modern history.

When state tyrants make the national news then the total reputational damage to their party exceeds the local value to them of advancing corruption.

James Talarico is very damaged.

We all know he supports illegals voting.

But I discovered a more disturbing story.

Either Freako himself repeatedly voted illegally and lied about it, or he has been living for years with his mother as an elected official.

I also discovered that he illegally occupied elected office in the Texas House for more than a year.

I am not making this up.

Freako is out of control.

On October 13, 2021 Talarico posted: "I'm excited to move over the county line ... (Yes, I may have to move back with my parents like a true millennial.)"

Texas Constitution article III §23 says, "If any Senator or Representative remove his residence from the district or county for which he was elected, his office shall thereby become vacant."

Now, from 2019 until January 2023, Talarico was a member in the Texas House of Representatives in HD-52, Williamson County.

Yet on November 5, 2021, he registered as a voter at his mother's house, in HD-50.

His campaign says he moved into his mother's residence that day. It provided journalists a U-Haul receipt.

His parents gave his campaign a $1,437.84 in-kind contribution labeled "Moving expenses" in December 2021.

Talarico had moved from HD-52 to HD-50, a completely different district.

He was not living in the district that he represented, yet he never vacated his seat.

Talarico thus illegally occupied elected office, until January 2023, for more than a year, in violation of the Texas Constitution, Article III §23.

Now, in June 9, 2022, Talarico bought a house in Austin, the same HD-50 as his mother's house.

The mortgage that he signed stated that he would "occupy, establish, and use the Property as Borrower's principal residence within 60 days", or August 8, 2022.

On that mortgage, "Non-Homestead Property" is unchecked, while other boxes were checked, indicating that this property was his homestead, or primary residence.

On Aug 8, 2022, the deadline day under this mortgage to move into the new house, he sold his previous house.

Yet the sale deed was signed with his mother's address as his mailing address.

So, he was registered to vote at his mother's house, and he signed his mailing address as his mother's mailing address.

Yet he signed a mortgage requiring him to live at a different house.

What's going on!

Now, on Aug 15, 2022, he refinanced that mortgage. The checked box: "Renewal and Extension of Liens Against Homestead Property."

Tax Code 11.13(j)(1)(D) says a residence homestead must be "occupied as the individual's principal residence."

Yet, he was still registered to vote at his mother's address.

Texas Election Code says:

§11.003. You "may vote only in the election precinct in which the person resides".

§1.015(a). "Residence" means domicile, "one's home and fixed place of habitation to which one intends to return after any temporary absence".

His mother's house must be his primary residence for him to vote in that election precinct, which is in precinct 191.

Yet, according to both the mortgage and its refinancing, he could not be living with his mother, but in the new house, which is in precinct 133.

Which is it?

Because if he was not living with his mother, he was voting illegally.

Now, at every vote, §63.0011(a) requires the election officer to ask each voter whether the address on the list is current and whether they've moved within the county.

If he said he had moved, he had to sign a statement giving his current address, and §15.022(a)(4) then required the registrar to correct his record.

Yet Talarico voted from his mother's address on five separate occasions, November 1, 2022, November 2, 2023, February 28, 2024, April 30, 2024, May 28, 2024.

His registration stayed at his parents' house until Sept 7, 2024.

Either Freako was living with his mother, or he voted illegally five times over the course of nearly two years.

Which is it?

Now, on April 27, 2023, Texas House Bill 1243 proposed to make voting illegally a felony.

On April 27, Talarico voted for Bucy Amendment 1 to gut the bill.

The amendment failed.

On April 27, he then voted for Manuel Amendment 2 to keep voting illegally a class A misdemeanor unless the person had a prior conviction.

That amendment also failed.

On April 27, April 28, and May 28, he then voted three additional times to block the bill.

In total, he voted five times to block the bill to make illegal voting a felony.

But the Bill passed, making voting illegally a felony, taking effect on September 1, 2023.

Talarico voted from his mother's address four more times after the Bill took effect, exposing him to four potential felony counts.

Now, on May 1, 2023, Talarico filed a sworn financial statement with the Texas Ethics Commission that marked the Travis house that he bought in 2022 as his home address.

The one we keep ping-ponging back and forth on.

In Part 7A, real property, he listed two entries:

Round Rock house (Williamson County): marked as sold in 2022 at "NET GAIN at least $47,220 or more".

Home box unmarked.

One Travis County lot: street "REDACTED PER 572.032(a-1), GOV'T CODE".

Box "X CHECK IF FILER'S HOME ADDRESS" marked.

He knew where he lived.

Or did he?

At the Texas Tribune Festival on September 24, 2026, just a month ago, he contradicted himself again.

When he was asked about the reporting about his voter registration, he responded:

"I voted where I lived, in every single election."

Now, we established early that Freako illegally occupied elected office, refusing to vacate in violation of the Texas Constitution.

But which of the following are true:

Did Freako live for years with his mother while serving as a Representative in the Texas House?

Is that why he has said, "What if we ran our world like we run a kindergarten classroom? Because at the end of the day, aren't we all just really big kindergartners?"

Because he lived for years with mommy?

Or, did he not live with his mother, but by registering his mother's address as his home address, engage in felony illegal voting?

Which is it?

And why won't Talafreako be straight with us?

Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo delivered a masterclass response to a lawyer challenging his decision to end four vaccine mandates.

Attorney Simone Chriss claimed it would have a “devastating impact.”

This was his response:

“I understand you’re not a clinician or a ay devastating impact?”

Chriss: “I did.”

Dr. Ladapo: “There are other states in this country that do not mandate three of the vaccines that we’re removing.”

“There are many, many countries that don’t mandate any vaccines.”

“Canada.”

“Australia.”

“Denmark.”

“Sweden.”

“The United Kingdom.”

“Many of these countries actually have life expectancies that are longer than this country has.”

“It’s actually sort of perverse to think that you could separate parental rights from public health.”

“Engaged parents are the reason that children eat healthier diets.”

“Engaged parents are the reason that children exercise.”

“Engaged parents are the reason that children go to school and learn, which is a huge predictor of future health.”

“This idea of a devastating impact, I mean, talk about not supported by evidence.”

Florida is refusing to back down from their plan to end mandates for Hep B, chickenpox, Hib, and pneumococcal shots.

@FLSurgeonGen @HealthyFla

Objectively, outside all consideration of politics, this is pure incompetence. The interviewer poses a question then prohibits the subject of the interview from answering.

Would it make her feel better now if she gave away the money?

Not all X are like that.

Democrats insist that nobody is above the law except for themselves.

In the United States, white people earn significantly more than black people on average.

But as soon as you compare blacks and whites with the same IQ, that gap disappears like magic...

This is one of the clearest pieces of evidence that systemic racism isn't what's driving the arity between the two groups.

If there’s anything Brazil has taught us over the last four years, it’s that Leftists will rig elections, call themselves defenders of democracy while they’re doing it, hijack the courts after they’ve won, use them to convert the country into a soft dictatorship, and then arrest their political enemies, ban free speech, and attack social media platforms they can’t control in order to guarantee that they never lose power ever again.

And with that power they will construct an inverted hierarchy that places troons, third worldists, criminals, drug addicts, and mentally ill lunatics at the top of the social pyramid, all while acting like they’re fighting for equality and just being a heckin’ decent human being.

Is this intentionally or unintentionally a self-parody account?

Nothing says democracy like arresting your opponent

Do you see how it works?

Brazil extends voting hours.

California counts ballots for WEEKS.

Georgia pulls ballots out in the middle of the night.

Michigan removes poll watchers and covers the windows.

and guess who benefits every single time…

Democrats.

In my experience at least, your political opinions don’t actually prevent women from dating you. You can disagree strongly on specific issues, including issues related to feminism or gender roles, and it’s fine. What a lot of right-wing men are mistaking for political exclusion is actually the deep female drive to reject losers and whiners. Rightism is an institutional loser right now, and that’s largely what they’re reacting to. But that doesn’t mean you have to have a loser mindset. Be a little insane. Hold nothing back. Don’t be preemptively defensive about your views. Be loose and casual and good-humored. Be genuinely confident. Don’t be an obnoxious pedant. Just let your truth flow freely from you without grasping or insecurity. Laugh often and well. Trust in fate/God/wyrd. Relax.

What women absolutely will not tolerate is the impression that you’re waiting on someone’s permission to achieve your goals or state your opinion or assert yourself. In the modern environment, as a rightist, not doing this requires being a little bit insane. So be a little insane. Dance madly through the world. Let go of your need for approval, or your need to make a point, and just be. The animal assurance of your confidence is more important than checking off a list of positions.

And it’s more fun anyway! Just live and feel and be free. Shed the shackles of discourse and rationalism and just dance.

Imagine moving to an Islamic nation and lecturing the natives about how they need to serve bacon and stop marrying their first cousins. Islam is the most arrogant of all religions.