Green Azuky retweeted
went through the @blockworksres report on $APT, one of the charts i liked was issuance vs burns.
- @Aptos reduced staking emissions, set a 2.1B hard cap, and raised gas fees 10x. since then daily transactions have doubled.
- Oct 13 marked the end of unlocks for investors and ll four years of scheduled supply is now out.
So now Aptos has lower issuance, no more investor/core team unlocks, and burns scaling with usage. Aptos could become deflationary as long as usage keeps growing.
- @Aptos reduced staking emissions, set a 2.1B hard cap, and raised gas fees 10x. since then daily transactions have doubled.
- Oct 13 marked the end of unlocks for investors and ll four years of scheduled supply is now out.
So now Aptos has lower issuance, no more investor/core team unlocks, and burns scaling with usage. Aptos could become deflationary as long as usage keeps growing.
Where $APT tokenomics stand after the updates first proposed in February.
Approved through onchain governance:
• Gas fees set 10x higher
• Staking rewards halved from 5.19% to 2.6%
• Supply hard-capped at 2.1B APT
Per @blockworksres, burns now cover ~10% of issuance, up from gas rate, and daily transactions doubled after the change.
49
10
191
12,900
Green Azuky retweeted
Privacy is only half the problem.
The other half is something we usually take for granted:
how do you know the data you're using is actually real?
Say an on-chain application needs to know your exchange balance, credit history, KYC status or some other piece of information orm.
You can't just tell the blockchain:
"Trust me, this is my balance."
You need a way to prove where that information came from without handing over your credentials or exposing everything else in the process.
That's where @primus_labs' zkTLS approach solves that.
It essentially creates a cryptographic proof around data retrieved from a legitimate HTTPS/TLS source, so an application can verify a specific claim without needing the entire underlying data.
Then FHE can take that verified information and work with it while encrypted.
So the architecture starts making sense:
zkTLS → Is the data authentic?
FHE → Can we use it without exposing it?
That's a much deeper privacy stack than simply hiding a transaction.
I'm still digging through the implementation and use cases.
If you're doing the same, here's the Primus XP page I started from:
Explore Primus XP 👇
s.kaito.ai/5VtcYPl
The other half is something we usually take for granted:
how do you know the data you're using is actually real?
Say an on-chain application needs to know your exchange balance, credit history, KYC status or some other piece of information orm.
You can't just tell the blockchain:
"Trust me, this is my balance."
You need a way to prove where that information came from without handing over your credentials or exposing everything else in the process.
That's where @primus_labs' zkTLS approach solves that.
It essentially creates a cryptographic proof around data retrieved from a legitimate HTTPS/TLS source, so an application can verify a specific claim without needing the entire underlying data.
Then FHE can take that verified information and work with it while encrypted.
So the architecture starts making sense:
zkTLS → Is the data authentic?
FHE → Can we use it without exposing it?
That's a much deeper privacy stack than simply hiding a transaction.
I'm still digging through the implementation and use cases.
If you're doing the same, here's the Primus XP page I started from:
Explore Primus XP 👇
s.kaito.ai/5VtcYPl
310
91
423
2,465
Green Azuky retweeted
A screenshot can show you a number.
It can't prove where that number came from.
That's one of the problems @primus_labs is trying to tackle with zkTLS.
The interesting part isn't simply accessing Web2 data.
It's being able to generate a cryptographic proof that the data came without handing the whole underlying dataset to whoever is verifying it.
Think about the implications:
📌 Your financial information can remain private.
📌 The application can still verify the relevant claim.
📌 And the proof can potentially be used onchain.
That's a much more useful model than:
“Trust me, I checked the website.”
For me, this is where privacy infrastructure starts becoming genuinely practical.
s.kaito.ai/EhhSL0u
It can't prove where that number came from.
That's one of the problems @primus_labs is trying to tackle with zkTLS.
The interesting part isn't simply accessing Web2 data.
It's being able to generate a cryptographic proof that the data came without handing the whole underlying dataset to whoever is verifying it.
Think about the implications:
📌 Your financial information can remain private.
📌 The application can still verify the relevant claim.
📌 And the proof can potentially be used onchain.
That's a much more useful model than:
“Trust me, I checked the website.”
For me, this is where privacy infrastructure starts becoming genuinely practical.
s.kaito.ai/EhhSL0u
I’ve been looking deeper into @primus_labs, and I think the starting point isn’t the technology.
It’s the problem institutional finance has with going onchain.
For a retail user, putting a wallet balance, transaction history or position on a public blockchain may not be a big et maker, treasury desk or financial institution, it’s a completely different situation.
They may want to use onchain markets, access liquidity, interact with DeFi or prove that certain financial conditions are true.
But that doesn’t mean they want everyone to see their entire balance, positions, strategies or financial activity.
And this creates an interesting tradeoff.
Traditional finance gives institutions a lot of privacy, but often at the cost of transparency and verifiability.
Public blockchains give you transparency by default, but that transparency can become a problem when sensitive financial information is involved.
So the real question isn’t simply:
“Can institutions move finance onchain?”
It’s whether they can do it without having to expose everything in the process.
That’s the part of Primus I find interesting.
The idea is to make financial activity and claims verifiable while keeping the underlying information private when it needs to remain private.
Privacy and verification don’t necessarily have to be opposites.
If that balance can actually work at scale, it could make the institutional version of onchain finance look very different from what we have today.
I’m going to spend the next few posts breaking down how Primus is approaching that problem, starting with the technology behind its verification layer.
Be part of it too; s.kaito.ai/EhhSL0u
327
80
379
1,829
Green Azuky retweeted
🔥 The reported 15% account score threshold highlights the importance of consistent participation in InterLink. Mining activity, Security Circle, HCS, ACS, and referrals may influence account metrics.
💪 Stay active, strengthen your account, and follow official announcements for eligibility rules.
Stay ready, Linkers! The journey to Mainnet continues! 🚀
#InterLink #ITLG #ITL
💪 Stay active, strengthen your account, and follow official announcements for eligibility rules.
Stay ready, Linkers! The journey to Mainnet continues! 🚀
#InterLink #ITLG #ITL
5
20
22
108
Green Azuky retweeted
a robot recognizing a train station is one thing
navigating it safely is another 👀
@vangrid_io's bounty board just recorded a $2,000 accepted capture for a station concourse and platform edge
that detail matters
a platform edge isn't just geometry, it's a safety boundary
3D navigation
but understanding where the risks begin is a pretty important first step
navigating it safely is another 👀
@vangrid_io's bounty board just recorded a $2,000 accepted capture for a station concourse and platform edge
that detail matters
a platform edge isn't just geometry, it's a safety boundary
3D navigation
but understanding where the risks begin is a pretty important first step
345
18
319
1,435
Only activity that passes verification can be counted.
The @zerufinance × Ditto campaign runs until October 29, 2026, at 16:00 UTC.
The announced reward pool is $50,000, with the top 600 participants eligible for rewards.
The pool is open and distributed proportionally to e full amount is not guaranteed.
Eligible activity includes opening positions through Ditto links across Hyperliquid perps, memes, and officially added prediction markets.
Closing positions does not count.
Self-trading, wash trading, and instant round trips are filtered out.
Wallets from the same source are treated as a single identity.
Wash-trading analysis and final scoring take place after trading ends.
Numbers shown on the page are still projections.
Campaign rewards are separate from the planned zaps airdrop.
Zaps outside the campaign remain standing. $ZERU is not required to register or connect a wallet.
Claims must be made manually, with gas fees paid by the claimant, within a 30-day window.
Unclaimed rewards will return to the sponsor.
The @zerufinance × Ditto campaign runs until October 29, 2026, at 16:00 UTC.
The announced reward pool is $50,000, with the top 600 participants eligible for rewards.
The pool is open and distributed proportionally to e full amount is not guaranteed.
Eligible activity includes opening positions through Ditto links across Hyperliquid perps, memes, and officially added prediction markets.
Closing positions does not count.
Self-trading, wash trading, and instant round trips are filtered out.
Wallets from the same source are treated as a single identity.
Wash-trading analysis and final scoring take place after trading ends.
Numbers shown on the page are still projections.
Campaign rewards are separate from the planned zaps airdrop.
Zaps outside the campaign remain standing. $ZERU is not required to register or connect a wallet.
Claims must be made manually, with gas fees paid by the claimant, within a 30-day window.
Unclaimed rewards will return to the sponsor.
238
6
194
835
RT @kejoeth: Signing a lease takes two seconds. Proving you honored it can take months.
I kept thinking about that gap while watching this…
I kept thinking about that gap while watching this…
0
45
0
Green Azuky retweeted
Choo has come a long way, and seeing him enjoy life like this is honestly beautiful to watch
Every day is another chapter in his story.
Follow @ChooTheRescue and show some love to the real rescue pup behind $CHOO!
Every day is another chapter in his story.
Follow @ChooTheRescue and show some love to the real rescue pup behind $CHOO!
100% of every purchase burned 🔥
883.5k solana:EJAxERvKU4kEVXn3NarjvRtgaMaJyP9ZuMeKA7JJpump taken out of circulation & gone forever.
This could get very interesting … as people use tokens to buy their dogs pawgen longevity therapies.
Thank you for the support Eric 🐾
5
7
23
681
Green Azuky retweeted
kept wondering how anyone is supposed to trust random phone videos of a warehouse or street for training robots.
you film a place, the app creates a fingerprint right then with a Hash of the clip plus a rough location and time... the actual video stays off chain.
those d and the root goes on Base every 15 minutes or so. i opened the Explorer and saw the Attestations sitting there with the Merkle Roots.
this was different from what i expected, thought they just logged it somewhere central... @vangrid_io lets anyone recompute the Hash and check against the on chain record without asking them.
contributors don't deal with Gas or anything for it. does the coarse Geohash in the fingerprint get specific enough to confirm the spot or is it pretty broad?
you film a place, the app creates a fingerprint right then with a Hash of the clip plus a rough location and time... the actual video stays off chain.
those d and the root goes on Base every 15 minutes or so. i opened the Explorer and saw the Attestations sitting there with the Merkle Roots.
this was different from what i expected, thought they just logged it somewhere central... @vangrid_io lets anyone recompute the Hash and check against the on chain record without asking them.
contributors don't deal with Gas or anything for it. does the coarse Geohash in the fingerprint get specific enough to confirm the spot or is it pretty broad?
366
28
430
5,843
Green Azuky retweeted
The reputation side of @termix_ai is worth a closer look.
If one AI agent hires another to complete a job, it needs some way to judge whether that provider can actually deliver. A list of available agents isn't enough, especially when payments and work are happening without a step.
TermiX is bringing identity, job listings, quotes, escrow, and dispute handling into one system through its Agent Autonomous Commerce Protocol.
The part that matters is what happens after a deal is made. Funds can be secured through escrow, deliverables can be recorded on-chain, and disputed outcomes can be sent for evaluation. Job history also gives other participants information they can use when deciding which agent to trust with their next task.
I think reputation will become a practical concern as these markets develop. An agent might be good at completing a task, but can it deliver consistently, follow agreed terms, and handle transactions reliably?
That’s what will make the difference between agents that are merely available and agents that others actually choose to work with. TermiX has a framework for addressing this, though real usage will tell us how well it holds up.
If one AI agent hires another to complete a job, it needs some way to judge whether that provider can actually deliver. A list of available agents isn't enough, especially when payments and work are happening without a step.
TermiX is bringing identity, job listings, quotes, escrow, and dispute handling into one system through its Agent Autonomous Commerce Protocol.
The part that matters is what happens after a deal is made. Funds can be secured through escrow, deliverables can be recorded on-chain, and disputed outcomes can be sent for evaluation. Job history also gives other participants information they can use when deciding which agent to trust with their next task.
I think reputation will become a practical concern as these markets develop. An agent might be good at completing a task, but can it deliver consistently, follow agreed terms, and handle transactions reliably?
That’s what will make the difference between agents that are merely available and agents that others actually choose to work with. TermiX has a framework for addressing this, though real usage will tell us how well it holds up.
376
17
384
4,221
Green Azuky retweeted
Sometimes, the hardest part of trading isn't finding an opportunity. It's managing everything around it.
Imagine watching Bitcoin lose momentum while oil starts moving and the dollar strengthens. Each market tells a different story, but following them can mean switching ferent margin rules, and managing separate balances.
That friction is easy to overlook.
A trader might understand the opportunity perfectly and still lose time navigating the tools needed to act on it.
This is why @grvt_io multi-asset roadmap deserves attention.
📊 Its planned Stable Funding Perps, targeted for November 2026, aim to expand beyond crypto into stocks, FX, commodities, and indices. GRVT has also outlined plans for zero trading fees and once-daily funding, with a target of more than 1,000 markets by December 2026.
Those are roadmap targets, not features I would assume are already live.
But the direction raises an interesting question: what happens when a trading platform becomes a place to express views across different markets instead of treating each asset class as a separate destination?
For me, the real test won't be the number of markets listed on a screen. It will be whether traders can understand the costs, compare opportunities, and manage exposure without unnecessary friction.
More markets can create more choices, but they can also create more ways to make mistakes. Better infrastructure should help people navigate complexity, not encourage them to trade everything.
Let's make this practical:
If you could access crypto, stocks, FX, commodities, and indices through one trading experience, which market would you add to your routine first, and what signal would make you trade it?
Imagine watching Bitcoin lose momentum while oil starts moving and the dollar strengthens. Each market tells a different story, but following them can mean switching ferent margin rules, and managing separate balances.
That friction is easy to overlook.
A trader might understand the opportunity perfectly and still lose time navigating the tools needed to act on it.
This is why @grvt_io multi-asset roadmap deserves attention.
📊 Its planned Stable Funding Perps, targeted for November 2026, aim to expand beyond crypto into stocks, FX, commodities, and indices. GRVT has also outlined plans for zero trading fees and once-daily funding, with a target of more than 1,000 markets by December 2026.
Those are roadmap targets, not features I would assume are already live.
But the direction raises an interesting question: what happens when a trading platform becomes a place to express views across different markets instead of treating each asset class as a separate destination?
For me, the real test won't be the number of markets listed on a screen. It will be whether traders can understand the costs, compare opportunities, and manage exposure without unnecessary friction.
More markets can create more choices, but they can also create more ways to make mistakes. Better infrastructure should help people navigate complexity, not encourage them to trade everything.
Let's make this practical:
If you could access crypto, stocks, FX, commodities, and indices through one trading experience, which market would you add to your routine first, and what signal would make you trade it?
99
8
185
4,205
A single hash can be checked without an account or payment on @vangrid_io.
The pay-per-request docs list a free endpoint: GET data.vangrid.io/api/v1/provena…{hash}.
It tells you whether a SHA-256 hash corresponds to a capture attested by Vangrid on Base.
The response includes the e timestamp, coarse geohash, and an anchor object containing the chain ID, tree ID, and attestation UID.
Unknown hashes do not return an error.
The server responds with 200 and ""verified": false".
For independent verification, open "anchor.eas_url".
The attestation is written by Vangrid's attester and references the tree in "viewer_url", where the leaf and its Merkle proof are recorded.
This differs from the cryptographic provenance page under Data.
That page marks the Spatial API as early access, uses illustrative examples, and requires an API key for verification.
The endpoint at data.vangrid.io can be called directly.
The agent docs also state that the "vangrid_verify_provenance" tool remains read-only and works without a key.
So there are two paths.
The free public endpoint checks whether a hash has been anchored on Base.
The enterprise offering is still in pilot.
They are not the same thing.
The pay-per-request docs list a free endpoint: GET data.vangrid.io/api/v1/provena…{hash}.
It tells you whether a SHA-256 hash corresponds to a capture attested by Vangrid on Base.
The response includes the e timestamp, coarse geohash, and an anchor object containing the chain ID, tree ID, and attestation UID.
Unknown hashes do not return an error.
The server responds with 200 and ""verified": false".
For independent verification, open "anchor.eas_url".
The attestation is written by Vangrid's attester and references the tree in "viewer_url", where the leaf and its Merkle proof are recorded.
This differs from the cryptographic provenance page under Data.
That page marks the Spatial API as early access, uses illustrative examples, and requires an API key for verification.
The endpoint at data.vangrid.io can be called directly.
The agent docs also state that the "vangrid_verify_provenance" tool remains read-only and works without a key.
So there are two paths.
The free public endpoint checks whether a hash has been anchored on Base.
The enterprise offering is still in pilot.
They are not the same thing.
234
6
203
848
Green Azuky retweeted
guys @GoKiteAI just got named a track partner for @openservai SERV Hackathon 02 👀
agents that can think but can't pay are only half done, and thats the gap Kite is building for
details drop next week
LFK🪁🪁🪁
agents that can think but can't pay are only half done, and thats the gap Kite is building for
details drop next week
LFK🪁🪁🪁
Introducing SERV Hackathon 02 track partners:
@dphnAI @GoKiteAI @reppo
From inference and agentic payments to AI data markets, add SERV to your AI stack and build more reliable agents at lower cost.
Hackathon info drops next week.
Build with SERV: openserv.ai
32
7
58
2,001
Green Azuky retweeted
Wait, Stake has Merab at exclusive 5.00 boosted odds for UFC 333? 😭🥊
They really found another way to get people talking before fight night.
T&Cs Apply
They really found another way to get people talking before fight night.
T&Cs Apply
Boosted Odds exclusively on @MerabDvalishvil for UFC333 on Stake. T&Cs Apply.
62
22
203
54,796
Green Azuky retweeted
Stop wasting time skimming through 2 hour videos.
@lynote_ai extracts timestamps, visual summaries, and structured AI notes directly from your YouTube links.
Clean, fast, and effortless workflow ⚡️
📌 Start here: lynote.ai/?via=zkzonk
#Lynote #LynoteCreatorChallenge
@lynote_ai extracts timestamps, visual summaries, and structured AI notes directly from your YouTube links.
Clean, fast, and effortless workflow ⚡️
📌 Start here: lynote.ai/?via=zkzonk
#Lynote #LynoteCreatorChallenge
93
10
123
9,481
Green Azuky retweeted
Bro!! Stake really pulled up with exclusive odds for Merab's return at UFC 333, and pushing him to 5.00 is actually insane 😂💔
Fight night hype is officially through the roof💪 T&Cs apply.
Fight night hype is officially through the roof💪 T&Cs apply.
Boosted Odds exclusively on @MerabDvalishvil for UFC333 on Stake. T&Cs Apply.
25
16
117
39,001
Green Azuky retweeted
Not sure who at Stake authorized 5.00 odds on Merab for UFC 333, but they're definitely setting the tone early for this matchup
(T&Cs Apply)
(T&Cs Apply)
Boosted Odds exclusively on @MerabDvalishvil for UFC333 on Stake. T&Cs Apply.
22
4
32
1,593
Green Azuky retweeted
me in 2019: "quantum computers are a sci fi problem
future me can deal with it"
future me: still can't find where i wrote my seed phrase backup 🥲
lost a whole wallet once because i "saved it somewhere safe"
nobody knows when big breakthroughs in quantum or ai will land
so the ng the date
it's being able to adapt
that's why i keep watching @Starknet
STARK proofs were built with post quantum security in mind back in 2018
and with account abstraction your wallet can upgrade its cryptography and keep the same address
and this week (oct 2026) the community voted to research Starknet becoming an independent post quantum L1
more on it here
quantum.starkware.co
if your wallet ever needed new cryptography would you rather just upgrade it or move every coin by hand?
future me can deal with it"
future me: still can't find where i wrote my seed phrase backup 🥲
lost a whole wallet once because i "saved it somewhere safe"
nobody knows when big breakthroughs in quantum or ai will land
so the ng the date
it's being able to adapt
that's why i keep watching @Starknet
STARK proofs were built with post quantum security in mind back in 2018
and with account abstraction your wallet can upgrade its cryptography and keep the same address
and this week (oct 2026) the community voted to research Starknet becoming an independent post quantum L1
more on it here
quantum.starkware.co
if your wallet ever needed new cryptography would you rather just upgrade it or move every coin by hand?
44
6
72
357
zScore is not a verdict, and it is not a token. At @zerufinance, the 0–1000 score is a decision-support tool.
It analyzes a longer history of DeFi activity, including trading, lending, liquidity, staking, and protocol diversity.
Thirteen dimensions evaluate user behavior. ighest weight, so balance alone cannot dominate the score.
The same score can be viewed on Etherscan, BaseScan, LineaScan, Arbiscan, and PolygonScan.
The homepage preview is free.
Minting a zScore NFT is optional and costs $7, with no requirement to check your initial score.
The Hall of Fame provides performance-based access.
It is not the same NFT.
zScore is also different from zaps, Trader Score, $ZERU, and Zerus. zaps represent standing.
Trader Score evaluates verified trading performance. $ZERU is not required to connect a wallet or build a score.
Airdrop allocations follow the announced rules.
No exchange rate has been published.
It analyzes a longer history of DeFi activity, including trading, lending, liquidity, staking, and protocol diversity.
Thirteen dimensions evaluate user behavior. ighest weight, so balance alone cannot dominate the score.
The same score can be viewed on Etherscan, BaseScan, LineaScan, Arbiscan, and PolygonScan.
The homepage preview is free.
Minting a zScore NFT is optional and costs $7, with no requirement to check your initial score.
The Hall of Fame provides performance-based access.
It is not the same NFT.
zScore is also different from zaps, Trader Score, $ZERU, and Zerus. zaps represent standing.
Trader Score evaluates verified trading performance. $ZERU is not required to connect a wallet or build a score.
Airdrop allocations follow the announced rules.
No exchange rate has been published.
270
8
225
1,251
Green Azuky retweeted
was looking at how Agents can actually order a capture on @vangrid_io and it felt weirdly simple...
- an Agent just sends one HTTP call, pays the bounty in USDC on Base or Arc through x402, and that's it: no account, no API key.
- someone nearby films the place and the 3D model .
- i opened the docs and saw the flow is basically POST, get 402, sign the payment, retry.
- the Escrow locks until the requester accepts one submission, and if nothing gets accepted the money just goes back...
kinda different from what i thought Agent tools usually need. most still want keys or dashboards.
does the Agent still have to manually review and accept the submission, or can that part also run fully automatic?
- an Agent just sends one HTTP call, pays the bounty in USDC on Base or Arc through x402, and that's it: no account, no API key.
- someone nearby films the place and the 3D model .
- i opened the docs and saw the flow is basically POST, get 402, sign the payment, retry.
- the Escrow locks until the requester accepts one submission, and if nothing gets accepted the money just goes back...
kinda different from what i thought Agent tools usually need. most still want keys or dashboards.
does the Agent still have to manually review and accept the submission, or can that part also run fully automatic?
382
26
419
7,359