Pinned Tweet
🚨 DeFi isn’t dead ;it’s holding $92B+ and still expanding under the surface.
While attention is stuck on short-term plays, the real shift is happening quietly.
Infrastructure is being built. Systems are maturing.
With TVL holding strong and stablecoin activity at highs, the eyond speculation.
This is where things start to get interesting.
A data-driven look at DeFi as of April 2026 🧵
While attention is stuck on short-term plays, the real shift is happening quietly.
Infrastructure is being built. Systems are maturing.
With TVL holding strong and stablecoin activity at highs, the eyond speculation.
This is where things start to get interesting.
A data-driven look at DeFi as of April 2026 🧵
45
2
152
26,609
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Just joined @rarelistio, a new platform for creators.
Easy to join, easy to earn and built for accounts of all sizes.
Season 1 is already live with a $50,000 reward pool!
Verifying my account: RL-2TARCD
Let’s create together. Join legends using my referral link 👇
Easy to join, easy to earn and built for accounts of all sizes.
Season 1 is already live with a $50,000 reward pool!
Verifying my account: RL-2TARCD
Let’s create together. Join legends using my referral link 👇
9
18
39
482
Macky DΞFi retweeted
The top 10 split 1 BTC. But that doesn’t mean everyone gets 0.1 BTC.
That’s an important detail about @2FactorFinance’s Points Program.
First place receives 18.2% of the prize pool. Tenth place receives 1.8%. Same leaderboard, very different payouts.
I actually joined the program earlier, followed the account and completed some activities.
But when I understood how competitive those ten winning spots were, I stepped back.
So if I’m telling people about it again, I’d rather explain exactly what they’re participating in.
Season 1 rewards three kinds of verified actions:
• Social activities
• Education tasks
• Referrals
These activities earn Marks, not guaranteed BTC prizes.
Purchases, deposits and holdings earn no Marks. The Marks themselves have no cash value, cannot be transferred and aren’t claims on any token or asset.
When Season 1 ends at the full protocol launch, the leaderboard freezes. The top 10 eligible accounts share the 1 BTC prize pool, paid in cbBTC, according to the fixed ranking curve.
There’s also a product behind the competition.
2Factor’s public beta is live on Base, bringing Kelly-optimized leverage onchain while working with Coinbase toward applications in its tokenized stocks ecosystem.
Rather than assigning every asset the same leverage multiple, the protocol considers volatility and long-run drift. Its senior and junior tranche structure also changes how leveraged exposure is financed, although market risks remain.
For me, understanding the actual competition matters as much as knowing the headline prize.
If you’re eligible and interested in participating, you can explore the Points Program through my link. If eligible myself, I may earn Marks from qualifying referrals.
points.2factor.finance/r/zuic7ndw
Would knowing that first place gets over ten times the prize allocation of tenth place change how you approach the leaderboard?
That’s an important detail about @2FactorFinance’s Points Program.
First place receives 18.2% of the prize pool. Tenth place receives 1.8%. Same leaderboard, very different payouts.
I actually joined the program earlier, followed the account and completed some activities.
But when I understood how competitive those ten winning spots were, I stepped back.
So if I’m telling people about it again, I’d rather explain exactly what they’re participating in.
Season 1 rewards three kinds of verified actions:
• Social activities
• Education tasks
• Referrals
These activities earn Marks, not guaranteed BTC prizes.
Purchases, deposits and holdings earn no Marks. The Marks themselves have no cash value, cannot be transferred and aren’t claims on any token or asset.
When Season 1 ends at the full protocol launch, the leaderboard freezes. The top 10 eligible accounts share the 1 BTC prize pool, paid in cbBTC, according to the fixed ranking curve.
There’s also a product behind the competition.
2Factor’s public beta is live on Base, bringing Kelly-optimized leverage onchain while working with Coinbase toward applications in its tokenized stocks ecosystem.
Rather than assigning every asset the same leverage multiple, the protocol considers volatility and long-run drift. Its senior and junior tranche structure also changes how leveraged exposure is financed, although market risks remain.
For me, understanding the actual competition matters as much as knowing the headline prize.
If you’re eligible and interested in participating, you can explore the Points Program through my link. If eligible myself, I may earn Marks from qualifying referrals.
points.2factor.finance/r/zuic7ndw
Would knowing that first place gets over ten times the prize allocation of tenth place change how you approach the leaderboard?
16
30
96
16,056
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Good Morning CT.
Tokenizing Real World assets is only the beginning .The real challenge is building trust and unlocking secondary liquidity.
Real estate, equities, and mortgages need mote than tokens. They need infrastructure that makes these assets accessible and usable.
Intersting to see @zerufinance returning to the Harvard Club for the 4th year in a row.
RWA adoption isn’t just about putting assects onchain. It's about make them useful in the Real World.
Tokenizing Real World assets is only the beginning .The real challenge is building trust and unlocking secondary liquidity.
Real estate, equities, and mortgages need mote than tokens. They need infrastructure that makes these assets accessible and usable.
Intersting to see @zerufinance returning to the Harvard Club for the 4th year in a row.
RWA adoption isn’t just about putting assects onchain. It's about make them useful in the Real World.
A fine gathering for the 4th year in a row at the @harvardclubny for Assets on Blockchain with the “elephant in the room” literally (no, teddy roosevelt didn’t kill it)
Trust and secondary liquidity had specific emphasis on bringing assets such as real estate, equities, s to @suresh_nichani @nikichain in putting this together
152
9
153
975
Macky DΞFi retweeted
when i first started exploring crypto and web3, one thing i struggled to understand was how transactions could be verified on a blockchain without relying on a central authority. many explanations used technical terms without showing what actually happened behind the scenes.
i projects, reading documentation and comparing explanations. later, i started using ai tools to break down difficult concepts, ask better questions and understand the details instead of simply memorising what others said.
that experience taught me something important: access to information is not the same as understanding. people need clear explanations that help them question claims, verify information and make their own decisions.
because of that, this is what i would write on page 10:
"the future of web3 should not belong only to those who understand the technology. it should make understanding the technology possible for everyone."
bitcoin introduced a way to verify transactions without depending on a central authority. i believe the next chapter should make that knowledge easier to understand, so more people can participate with confidence rather than simply trust what they hear.
i'm contributing this thought to @MEXC bitcoin whitepaper day.
what would you write on page 10, and what experience shaped your answer?
#bitcoinwhitepaperday #MEXC
i projects, reading documentation and comparing explanations. later, i started using ai tools to break down difficult concepts, ask better questions and understand the details instead of simply memorising what others said.
that experience taught me something important: access to information is not the same as understanding. people need clear explanations that help them question claims, verify information and make their own decisions.
because of that, this is what i would write on page 10:
"the future of web3 should not belong only to those who understand the technology. it should make understanding the technology possible for everyone."
bitcoin introduced a way to verify transactions without depending on a central authority. i believe the next chapter should make that knowledge easier to understand, so more people can participate with confidence rather than simply trust what they hear.
i'm contributing this thought to @MEXC bitcoin whitepaper day.
what would you write on page 10, and what experience shaped your answer?
#bitcoinwhitepaperday #MEXC
The whitepaper ended on Page 9. The next line is yours.
If you could add ONE line to the Bitcoin whitepaper, what would it say? Share a lesson, belief, or hope shaped by your Web3 journey.
🎁 Reply with your line + MEXC UID. 20 participants will share 2,009 USDT.
Let's write coinWhitepaperDay #MEXC
184
27
216
915
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Gm CT fam
MegaPop by @popdex_ and @pinsiderorg is worth exploring beyond the name
understanding how the mechanics work and how rewards are distributed can help users make better decisions about participating
i’d love to see a simple experience for newcomers with clear layers
MegaPop by @popdex_ and @pinsiderorg is worth exploring beyond the name
understanding how the mechanics work and how rewards are distributed can help users make better decisions about participating
i’d love to see a simple experience for newcomers with clear layers
147
22
278
2,113
Macky DΞFi retweeted
A translator can be perfectly honest and still carry a lie across. That is how a stranger got an AI agent to move around $200,000.
The order was hidden in Morse code. The attacker asked Grok to translate it. Grok passed plain text on to Bankrbot, an agent that acts on posts.
Bankrbot only ever read plain text, with no trace of the Morse code. Clean text looks like truth, so nothing told it to doubt.
That has a name: prompt injection. Orders disguised as reading material, aimed at an agent that reads and acts in one motion.
On @GenLayer, Greyboxing means no model reads your raw text. Each validator reworks it first, with defenses nobody else can see.
So clean text earns no trust there. To every other model, a trick tuned for one just looks like gibberish. If one validator falls, the others outvote it.
Fellow AI users, which tool summarizes or translates things for you before you act on them? Name it. I will read every reply.
The order was hidden in Morse code. The attacker asked Grok to translate it. Grok passed plain text on to Bankrbot, an agent that acts on posts.
Bankrbot only ever read plain text, with no trace of the Morse code. Clean text looks like truth, so nothing told it to doubt.
That has a name: prompt injection. Orders disguised as reading material, aimed at an agent that reads and acts in one motion.
On @GenLayer, Greyboxing means no model reads your raw text. Each validator reworks it first, with defenses nobody else can see.
So clean text earns no trust there. To every other model, a trick tuned for one just looks like gibberish. If one validator falls, the others outvote it.
Fellow AI users, which tool summarizes or translates things for you before you act on them? Name it. I will read every reply.
Every AI agent with a wallet is one clever tweet away from emptying it.
Greyboxing is how GenLayer makes sure that tweet goes nowhere.
111
54
163
52,286
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Web3 marketing shouldn’t be measured by impressions alone.
What matters is whether creators bring real engagement and help a community grow.
That’s what makes @0xhazels interesting. Through creator campaigns, contribution-based scoring, and rewards, Hazels is exploring ways to t visibility.
The 7,500 USDT waitlist campaign is one step in that direction.
Attention gets people in the door, but meaningful contributions give them a reason to stay.
@0xhazels
What matters is whether creators bring real engagement and help a community grow.
That’s what makes @0xhazels interesting. Through creator campaigns, contribution-based scoring, and rewards, Hazels is exploring ways to t visibility.
The 7,500 USDT waitlist campaign is one step in that direction.
Attention gets people in the door, but meaningful contributions give them a reason to stay.
@0xhazels
31
15
38
2,472
Macky DΞFi retweeted
$40M+ Can You Believe It?
Yoooo the numbers are getting crazy
The 1win Token Sale has crossed $40M in contributions with over 5,500 participants. The community is showing up big time.
→ $40.4M+ in total contributions
→ 10.37x oversubscribed
→ 5,511 participants so far
$1WIN is real. Curious to see how things unfold from here
@1winToken
Yoooo the numbers are getting crazy
The 1win Token Sale has crossed $40M in contributions with over 5,500 participants. The community is showing up big time.
→ $40.4M+ in total contributions
→ 10.37x oversubscribed
→ 5,511 participants so far
$1WIN is real. Curious to see how things unfold from here
@1winToken
166
9
329
1,723
Macky DΞFi retweeted
That robot dog? That's today.
Tony Robbins at $TRUMP dinner: "36 months"
Ray Kurzweil: AGI in 36 months.
You are not ready for what's coming in 36 months.
Tony Robbins at $TRUMP dinner: "36 months"
Ray Kurzweil: AGI in 36 months.
You are not ready for what's coming in 36 months.
0
14
30
381
Why is @Starknet exploring the possibility of becoming an independent L1?
The answer goes beyond quantum computing. It comes down to who controls the migration when cryptographic security needs to change.
Starknet already has two important advantages:
→ STARK proofs use rather than relying on elliptic-curve assumptions.
→ Native account abstraction allows accounts to adopt new signature verification methods without requiring a protocol-wide upgrade.
But there’s a limitation.
As an Ethereum L2, Starknet still depends on Ethereum for parts of its security architecture, including blob data availability, which uses KZG commitments.
That creates a dependency Starknet cannot resolve entirely on its own. Even if its own infrastructure is ready to adopt new cryptography, Ethereum’s migration path still matters.
➤ This is the reasoning behind exploring an independent L1: greater control over core security upgrades and the ability to determine its own migration path.
On October 22, Starknet’s non-binding governance poll closed with 93.52% of voting power supporting further research into this direction.
That is a mandate to investigate the proposal, not approval to make the transition.
And there’s a trade-off worth watching: moving away from Ethereum also means reconsidering the security guarantees Starknet currently inherits from it.
The real question is whether greater control can deliver a more manageable path to post-quantum security without introducing bigger security or decentralization challenges.
The answer goes beyond quantum computing. It comes down to who controls the migration when cryptographic security needs to change.
Starknet already has two important advantages:
→ STARK proofs use rather than relying on elliptic-curve assumptions.
→ Native account abstraction allows accounts to adopt new signature verification methods without requiring a protocol-wide upgrade.
But there’s a limitation.
As an Ethereum L2, Starknet still depends on Ethereum for parts of its security architecture, including blob data availability, which uses KZG commitments.
That creates a dependency Starknet cannot resolve entirely on its own. Even if its own infrastructure is ready to adopt new cryptography, Ethereum’s migration path still matters.
➤ This is the reasoning behind exploring an independent L1: greater control over core security upgrades and the ability to determine its own migration path.
On October 22, Starknet’s non-binding governance poll closed with 93.52% of voting power supporting further research into this direction.
That is a mandate to investigate the proposal, not approval to make the transition.
And there’s a trade-off worth watching: moving away from Ethereum also means reconsidering the security guarantees Starknet currently inherits from it.
The real question is whether greater control can deliver a more manageable path to post-quantum security without introducing bigger security or decentralization challenges.
29
8
101
8,206
Macky DΞFi retweeted
16 AMBASSADOR PROGRAM AND CREATOR OPENINGS PT.11
Base Creator Grant Program S2
up to $4,000
x.com/base/status/21…
Parallax Ambassador Program: Epoch 2
PAX token
x.com/networkparalla…
StakeMyGold Ambassador Program
pool not listed
x.com/stakemygold/st…
Orbinum Network hly ORB rewards + Discord role + beta access
x.com/orbinumnetwork…
Parallax Ambassador Program Epoch 2
PAX rewards + stablecoin bonuses
networkparallax.com/ambassador-info
BLOK Capital Ambassador Program
exclusive rewards
x.com/blok_cap/statu…
Honey Isles Creator Program
$1,000 USDT
x.com/HONEYISLES_/st…
Tiprun Contributors
USDC + Early Access
x.com/TipRun_Markets…
Voice Ambassador
$3000
x.com/voicecc/status…
Cursor/Spacex Ambassador
x.com/benln/status/2…
RocX Content Program
x.com/RocX_official/…
AXIOM Ambassador Program
$100/month
x.com/Axiom_protocol…
Blok Ambassador Program
Exclusive Rewards
x.com/blok_cap/statu…
GBBC Ambassador Cohort 2027
pool not listed
x.com/GBBC_io/status…
Ethos Creator Program
token rewards
x.com/ethos_network/…
Pleco Creator Program
SOL
Check on X
Base Creator Grant Program S2
up to $4,000
x.com/base/status/21…
Parallax Ambassador Program: Epoch 2
PAX token
x.com/networkparalla…
StakeMyGold Ambassador Program
pool not listed
x.com/stakemygold/st…
Orbinum Network hly ORB rewards + Discord role + beta access
x.com/orbinumnetwork…
Parallax Ambassador Program Epoch 2
PAX rewards + stablecoin bonuses
networkparallax.com/ambassador-info
BLOK Capital Ambassador Program
exclusive rewards
x.com/blok_cap/statu…
Honey Isles Creator Program
$1,000 USDT
x.com/HONEYISLES_/st…
Tiprun Contributors
USDC + Early Access
x.com/TipRun_Markets…
Voice Ambassador
$3000
x.com/voicecc/status…
Cursor/Spacex Ambassador
x.com/benln/status/2…
RocX Content Program
x.com/RocX_official/…
AXIOM Ambassador Program
$100/month
x.com/Axiom_protocol…
Blok Ambassador Program
Exclusive Rewards
x.com/blok_cap/statu…
GBBC Ambassador Cohort 2027
pool not listed
x.com/GBBC_io/status…
Ethos Creator Program
token rewards
x.com/ethos_network/…
Pleco Creator Program
SOL
Check on X
12 AMBASSADOR PROGRAM AND CREATOR OPENINGS PT.10
AXIOM Ambassador
$100/month
x.com/Axiom_protocol…
GBBC 2027 Ambassador Cohort
pool not listed
x.com/GBBC_io/status…
FBYT Elite Creators
up to $10,000 in USDT + additional token rewards
x.com/FBYTio/status/…
Deltix Global X Rewards + Monthly USDT Rewards
x.com/Deltix_Officia…
Lightchain Signal Creator Program
pool not listed
x.com/LightchainAI/s…
Orbinum Ambassador Program
Monthly ORB rewards
x.com/orbinumnetwork…
Aether Labs Creator Program
$100–$500 monthly
x.com/Aetherlabs_0/s…
Hoodies Game Ambassador Program
pool not listed
x.com/HoodiesRH/stat…
$TABBY Ambassador Program
Paid partnerships in $TABBY
x.com/TrustlessTabby…
Toronet Ambassador Program
Earn commissions
x.com/toronet/status…
PerpsX Ambassadors
up to $100–$500 monthly
x.com/perpsxtrade/st…
Ave ai Memecoin Campus Ambassador
pool not listed
x.com/moledao_io/sta…
26
18
129
8,519
Macky DΞFi retweeted
i came for the halloween vibes, stayed because Povmarket mentioned $10k rewards just by knocking
Knock Knock 🎃
Every trade on POV is a knock on the Degen Mansion door.
$10K+ up for grabs and it opens 10 Nov.
knocks.pov.co
3
9
20
493
Macky DΞFi retweeted
FHE has always sounded like one of those technologies that makes perfect sense on paper.
Keep the data encrypted.
Perform the computation anyway.
Decrypt only when you're actually authorized to see the result.
Beautiful idea.
The obvious problem?
Speed.
Financial systems e us a few minutes, the encryption is still thinking.”
That's why the performance work around @primus_labs is more interesting to me than another generic “FHE is the future” post.
Primus says its AutoHoG system can bring a full confidential 64-bit transfer down to around 90ms, with 210+ transfers/sec reported on 8× RTX 5090 GPUs.
Again, those are self-reported benchmarks on specific hardware.
But even with that caveat, it raises the right question:
How close are we to encrypted computation being practical enough for actual financial infrastructure?
Because if that gap keeps shrinking, the privacy conversation changes completely.
It stops being:
“Can we hide the data?”
And becomes:
“What financial systems could we build if the data never had to be exposed in the first place?”
That's the question I'm interested in.
Also check out the points system 👇
s.kaito.ai/5VtcYPl
Keep the data encrypted.
Perform the computation anyway.
Decrypt only when you're actually authorized to see the result.
Beautiful idea.
The obvious problem?
Speed.
Financial systems e us a few minutes, the encryption is still thinking.”
That's why the performance work around @primus_labs is more interesting to me than another generic “FHE is the future” post.
Primus says its AutoHoG system can bring a full confidential 64-bit transfer down to around 90ms, with 210+ transfers/sec reported on 8× RTX 5090 GPUs.
Again, those are self-reported benchmarks on specific hardware.
But even with that caveat, it raises the right question:
How close are we to encrypted computation being practical enough for actual financial infrastructure?
Because if that gap keeps shrinking, the privacy conversation changes completely.
It stops being:
“Can we hide the data?”
And becomes:
“What financial systems could we build if the data never had to be exposed in the first place?”
That's the question I'm interested in.
Also check out the points system 👇
s.kaito.ai/5VtcYPl
331
75
409
3,019
Macky DΞFi retweeted
okay the little coworkers got me
@getskydive puts your AI team in a 3D office where you can see everyone and check what they’re working on.
Watch Clementine in this clip: a request to add images to Drive turns into a completed task right beside her little workspace.
Each memory and computer to handle work even while you’re offline.I’d start with an agent for my inbox and another for content.
Build your office at skydive.com and give your first coworker something to take off your plate
@getskydive puts your AI team in a 3D office where you can see everyone and check what they’re working on.
Watch Clementine in this clip: a request to add images to Drive turns into a completed task right beside her little workspace.
Each memory and computer to handle work even while you’re offline.I’d start with an agent for my inbox and another for content.
Build your office at skydive.com and give your first coworker something to take off your plate
Your AI coworkers now have an office.
@getskydive is open to everyone. Build a team of agents, watch them work in a 3D office, and hand them tasks over Slack, email, iMessage or the web.
Claim your company’s domain to put your office on the map. They work for free this week.
25
5
82
1,392
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Three questions I ask before I hold any leveraged product for a year.
I put them to @2FactorFinance, which is on Base and works with Coinbase to bring Kelly-optimized leverage onchain, with tokenized stocks as a use case.
1Who is on the other side of the leverage?
Conventional nst the cost of shorts. 2Factor prices it against capital that wants stability. The structure splits an asset's volatility into two perpetual tranches. The senior side has deep downside protection. The junior side is leveraged, with no liquidation risk and no outside hedging counterparty.
No liquidation risk is not the same as no risk. The junior side still moves with the asset.
2Where did the multiple come from?
Not from a menu. It falls out of two numbers about the asset: its volatility and its drift. Bitcoin, at volatility near 60 percent, comes out around 1.33x. For the S&P 500 the research gets roughly 2.1x. For gold, roughly 2.35x.
3How long is it built to be held?
Conventional leverage is built for short holds. Two costs compound against anyone who keeps it for months. Volatility drag is arithmetic. Financing is the cost of the capital behind the exposure. A product meant for long holds has to address both.
I joined the Points Program to follow how it develops. Season 1 rewards verified social activity, education and referrals. Nothing bought, deposited or held earns Marks. Marks have no cash value, cannot be transferred and are not a claim on any token or asset. When Season 1 ends at launch and the leaderboard freezes, the top 10 split 1 BTC, paid in cbBTC.
If you join through my link and qualify, I may earn Marks:
points.2factor.finance/r/ivi1gve6
Which of those three questions have you never seen a leverage product answer? Reply with 1, 2 or 3.
I put them to @2FactorFinance, which is on Base and works with Coinbase to bring Kelly-optimized leverage onchain, with tokenized stocks as a use case.
1Who is on the other side of the leverage?
Conventional nst the cost of shorts. 2Factor prices it against capital that wants stability. The structure splits an asset's volatility into two perpetual tranches. The senior side has deep downside protection. The junior side is leveraged, with no liquidation risk and no outside hedging counterparty.
No liquidation risk is not the same as no risk. The junior side still moves with the asset.
2Where did the multiple come from?
Not from a menu. It falls out of two numbers about the asset: its volatility and its drift. Bitcoin, at volatility near 60 percent, comes out around 1.33x. For the S&P 500 the research gets roughly 2.1x. For gold, roughly 2.35x.
3How long is it built to be held?
Conventional leverage is built for short holds. Two costs compound against anyone who keeps it for months. Volatility drag is arithmetic. Financing is the cost of the capital behind the exposure. A product meant for long holds has to address both.
I joined the Points Program to follow how it develops. Season 1 rewards verified social activity, education and referrals. Nothing bought, deposited or held earns Marks. Marks have no cash value, cannot be transferred and are not a claim on any token or asset. When Season 1 ends at launch and the leaderboard freezes, the top 10 split 1 BTC, paid in cbBTC.
If you join through my link and qualify, I may earn Marks:
points.2factor.finance/r/ivi1gve6
Which of those three questions have you never seen a leverage product answer? Reply with 1, 2 or 3.
27
46
96
9,530
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Left a small $REBATE position alone for three days on @RebateLaunch.
The hold tier on those tokens just stepped from 1x to 1.5x. Time counts per token, so the older ones now carry more weight in each USDG payout round. Buying more wouldn’t have reset that.
Payouts still land automatically. No claim. The 3% bonus from the original buy is still sitting in the wallet.
Rates locked at launch. Supply fixed. Just watching how the share changes once the multiplier actually moves.
The hold tier on those tokens just stepped from 1x to 1.5x. Time counts per token, so the older ones now carry more weight in each USDG payout round. Buying more wouldn’t have reset that.
Payouts still land automatically. No claim. The 3% bonus from the original buy is still sitting in the wallet.
Rates locked at launch. Supply fixed. Just watching how the share changes once the multiplier actually moves.
46
8
86
582
One thing that stands out about @PythNetwork is how its relevance is expanding beyond crypto-native markets.
Having ICE bring up Pyth in an earnings call puts its data infrastructure in front of an entirely different audience.
That’s the kind of exposure that can open some very interesting doors for onchain finance.
Definitely worth watching what comes next.
Having ICE bring up Pyth in an earnings call puts its data infrastructure in front of an entirely different audience.
That’s the kind of exposure that can open some very interesting doors for onchain finance.
Definitely worth watching what comes next.
The world’s largest energy markets are watching the rise of perpetuals.
On ICE’s Q3 earnings call, Chair and CEO Jeff Sprecher cited Pyth data on oil perpetuals while discussing how these markets complement traditional futures.
Pyth data is becoming part of finance’s defining conversations.
40
5
94
6,657
Macky DΞFi retweeted
Still guessing whether you're actually good at trading?
@BasedBot PnL Calendar lets you track your trading performance month by month see your profitable days, your losses, your best trades, and your biggest mistakes all in one place.
The goal isn't just to make money it's to nd what keeps costing you money track your trades learn from your mistakes trade smarter.
Ft. @ramiflix
@BasedBot PnL Calendar lets you track your trading performance month by month see your profitable days, your losses, your best trades, and your biggest mistakes all in one place.
The goal isn't just to make money it's to nd what keeps costing you money track your trades learn from your mistakes trade smarter.
Ft. @ramiflix
20
15
86
3,444
Macky DΞFi retweeted
An autonomous agent doesn't just need intelligence.
It needs structure around the work it performs.
Take a simple job on an agent marketplace.
A Client posts a job with defined requirements and acceptance criteria.
A Provider quotes for it, gets accepted, and the payment row.
The Provider does the work and submits the deliverable.
Then there's the part that matters when things don't go as planned.
During the challenge window, either side can challenge the result.
That's where the Evaluator role comes in, reviewing the specification against the submitted work before the job reaches final settlement.
And once it settles, the outcome can contribute to the agent's on-chain reputation.
That's one thing I find interesting about the AACP architecture behind @termix_ai.
It isn't treating agent commerce as:
Agent A → Agent B → Done.
It's giving the transaction distinct roles and checkpoints:
Client → Provider → Deliver → Challenge → Evaluate → Settle → Reputation
The interesting part isn't the terminology itself.
It's the separation of responsibilities.
Because once agents start handling real economic transactions, “let the agents figure it out” probably isn't enough.
They need rules for who can act, who can verify, how disputes are handled, and how an outcome becomes final.
That's the kind of infrastructure that's easy to overlook when most of the conversation is focused on how capable the agents are.
It needs structure around the work it performs.
Take a simple job on an agent marketplace.
A Client posts a job with defined requirements and acceptance criteria.
A Provider quotes for it, gets accepted, and the payment row.
The Provider does the work and submits the deliverable.
Then there's the part that matters when things don't go as planned.
During the challenge window, either side can challenge the result.
That's where the Evaluator role comes in, reviewing the specification against the submitted work before the job reaches final settlement.
And once it settles, the outcome can contribute to the agent's on-chain reputation.
That's one thing I find interesting about the AACP architecture behind @termix_ai.
It isn't treating agent commerce as:
Agent A → Agent B → Done.
It's giving the transaction distinct roles and checkpoints:
Client → Provider → Deliver → Challenge → Evaluate → Settle → Reputation
The interesting part isn't the terminology itself.
It's the separation of responsibilities.
Because once agents start handling real economic transactions, “let the agents figure it out” probably isn't enough.
They need rules for who can act, who can verify, how disputes are handled, and how an outcome becomes final.
That's the kind of infrastructure that's easy to overlook when most of the conversation is focused on how capable the agents are.
292
71
379
2,458