Free Speech Shell retweeted
Muslim modeem, a pathetic tiktok influencer, tries to fly kick @TRobinsonNewEra after his bout on the @UnhingedEvents boxing event.
He failed miserably then got handed his arse along with a copy of tommys new book.
He then scrambed like a cockroach out of the arena and cried tok live about people being ojt to get him.
What an embarrassing fat sausage.
He failed miserably then got handed his arse along with a copy of tommys new book.
He then scrambed like a cockroach out of the arena and cried tok live about people being ojt to get him.
What an embarrassing fat sausage.
12
45
223
4,006
@lowles_nick You have an unhealthy obsession with @TRobinsonNewEra. I've said it before it's stalking and harassment. You should be the one on trial in Southwark you absolute RAT.
0
0
83
531
Free Speech Shell retweeted
🚨Today's Must Read🚨
A police employee tells me, who gathered the evidence on paedophile's phones & PCs, has convicted thousands of people. Like Huw Edwards the sentences are derisory.
"Hi David, Apologies for the unsolicited contact but thought this might be of interest to you.ve seen so many people on social media commenting on the Huw Edwards case, and the anger so many have regarding the sentence he received.
"Perhaps if we’d had more of this public anger over the last 10 or 15 years then Edwards would now be serving a prison sentence, rather than walking from a court room after his conviction.
"Some of us have been angry about weak sentencing of those guilty of those same crimes for a long time.
"Between 2004 & 2021 I was employed by the police as a digital forensics examiner/investigator. I spent my working day examining data from computers, mobile phones & other devices for evidence in criminal cases.
"Perhaps 80% of those cases involved allegations of sexual offences, the vast majority relating to child abuse material viewed & downloaded from the internet.
"I helped convict literally hundreds of those guilty of these offences. Our small unit helped convict thousands over those years.
"The videos & pictures you see while working are always appalling, sickening, disturbing & frequently horrific. Until you’ve seen the depravity & cruelty involved you really cannot imagine how awful this material is.
"In all the years I was carrying out this work I do not remember a single offender who received a custodial sentence on conviction for their first offence for the downloading & viewing of this material. Just like Edwards.
"Even those convicted a 2nd or 3rd time rarely seemed to serve prison terms.
"One case involved a ‘collection’ of videos of child abuse, stored on external hard disks, that was so large that we took the time to work out the total viewing time for someone to actually sit & watch each film all the way through.
"We gave up less than half way through when we calculated that if you did nothing else but sat & watched them it would take about 4 years.
That individual received a non custodial sentence.
"Our unit couldn’t keep up with the cases that were coming in. This was a smallish county Constabulary.
Limited resources, especially manpower.
"Those of us working in this field cared about what we were doing. So many still working in law enforcement & trying to get these people into courts, still do care.
But it’s soul destroying when you know the amount of work that goes into these investigations & are well aware that hardly anyone goes to prison.
"Eventually it was time for me to get away from what I was doing. It damages & scars those who are dealing with these offences. At some point, for your own health, it’s time to say enough.
"People will be angry about Edwards, as they have been in the past about other high profile cases, but it will, I’m afraid, be a fleeting anger, until the next case.
"Then righteous anger will manifest itself again.
Meanwhile, thousands of other offenders will appear in court for these same offences, many of whom will have been committing their crimes for years before being caught, and they will pass by under the radar, with a small story in a paper or news site.
"The official figures & statistics show that to be the case. People should indeed be angry about Huw Edwards & his sentence.
"But actually people should be angry about these awful crimes every single day, because thousands are convicted each year.
"Perhaps this case will actually see a change for the future, but as it’s now 20 years since I first began working in this field, I rather doubt it.
"Keep trying to raise awareness though David. You & others do seem at least to be making an effort. I hope this is of interest.
"Regards"
He is of course a follower.
Cc @LeilaniDowding @kwilliam111
A police employee tells me, who gathered the evidence on paedophile's phones & PCs, has convicted thousands of people. Like Huw Edwards the sentences are derisory.
"Hi David, Apologies for the unsolicited contact but thought this might be of interest to you.ve seen so many people on social media commenting on the Huw Edwards case, and the anger so many have regarding the sentence he received.
"Perhaps if we’d had more of this public anger over the last 10 or 15 years then Edwards would now be serving a prison sentence, rather than walking from a court room after his conviction.
"Some of us have been angry about weak sentencing of those guilty of those same crimes for a long time.
"Between 2004 & 2021 I was employed by the police as a digital forensics examiner/investigator. I spent my working day examining data from computers, mobile phones & other devices for evidence in criminal cases.
"Perhaps 80% of those cases involved allegations of sexual offences, the vast majority relating to child abuse material viewed & downloaded from the internet.
"I helped convict literally hundreds of those guilty of these offences. Our small unit helped convict thousands over those years.
"The videos & pictures you see while working are always appalling, sickening, disturbing & frequently horrific. Until you’ve seen the depravity & cruelty involved you really cannot imagine how awful this material is.
"In all the years I was carrying out this work I do not remember a single offender who received a custodial sentence on conviction for their first offence for the downloading & viewing of this material. Just like Edwards.
"Even those convicted a 2nd or 3rd time rarely seemed to serve prison terms.
"One case involved a ‘collection’ of videos of child abuse, stored on external hard disks, that was so large that we took the time to work out the total viewing time for someone to actually sit & watch each film all the way through.
"We gave up less than half way through when we calculated that if you did nothing else but sat & watched them it would take about 4 years.
That individual received a non custodial sentence.
"Our unit couldn’t keep up with the cases that were coming in. This was a smallish county Constabulary.
Limited resources, especially manpower.
"Those of us working in this field cared about what we were doing. So many still working in law enforcement & trying to get these people into courts, still do care.
But it’s soul destroying when you know the amount of work that goes into these investigations & are well aware that hardly anyone goes to prison.
"Eventually it was time for me to get away from what I was doing. It damages & scars those who are dealing with these offences. At some point, for your own health, it’s time to say enough.
"People will be angry about Edwards, as they have been in the past about other high profile cases, but it will, I’m afraid, be a fleeting anger, until the next case.
"Then righteous anger will manifest itself again.
Meanwhile, thousands of other offenders will appear in court for these same offences, many of whom will have been committing their crimes for years before being caught, and they will pass by under the radar, with a small story in a paper or news site.
"The official figures & statistics show that to be the case. People should indeed be angry about Huw Edwards & his sentence.
"But actually people should be angry about these awful crimes every single day, because thousands are convicted each year.
"Perhaps this case will actually see a change for the future, but as it’s now 20 years since I first began working in this field, I rather doubt it.
"Keep trying to raise awareness though David. You & others do seem at least to be making an effort. I hope this is of interest.
"Regards"
He is of course a follower.
Cc @LeilaniDowding @kwilliam111
27
136
411
41,862
Free Speech Shell retweeted
Absolute chaos kicking off at Unhinged. @TRobinsonNewEra sticks it on Modeen and all hell kicks off.
31
33
195
54,050
@toughrajput88 I have friends with mortgages and friends on benefits. And? Does social class define a person. Best remind Adele and David Beckham of that.
2
0
2
75
Free Speech Shell retweeted
CCTV from a quiet street in Northern France shows hundreds of invaders passing through at night, en route to the beaches to begin their invasion of the UK.
180
3,258
13,836
234,362
Free Speech Shell retweeted
Why didn’t she help EIGHT YEARS ago?
Why didn’t she tell the Met Police bosses who didn’t know?
Or her private secretary who didn’t know?
Or her communications secretary who didn’t know?
Or the media who didn’t know?
This is a shameful bid to re-write history.
Why didn’t she tell the Met Police bosses who didn’t know?
Or her private secretary who didn’t know?
Or her communications secretary who didn’t know?
Or the media who didn’t know?
This is a shameful bid to re-write history.
394
247
2,381
90,090
Geunine question ⁉️
How many people are pulling back on spending this Christmas due to struggling?
This week I've had many people telling me they don't know how they are going to cope buying Christmas presents and food all whilst paying the electricity and gas bills.
I'm ut on another great Christmas party for the Wethersfield men this year though, I wonder if Braintree District Council will be funding it through the Essex community foundation?
How many people are pulling back on spending this Christmas due to struggling?
This week I've had many people telling me they don't know how they are going to cope buying Christmas presents and food all whilst paying the electricity and gas bills.
I'm ut on another great Christmas party for the Wethersfield men this year though, I wonder if Braintree District Council will be funding it through the Essex community foundation?
5
9
31
786
Free Speech Shell retweeted
"They Will Have To KILL Me" @TRobinsonNewEra | The Fight Continues…
Full interview available from 6pm, Sunday 08th November on YouTube & Spotify: The Dozen with Liam Tuffs 🎥🎧
Full interview available from 6pm, Sunday 08th November on YouTube & Spotify: The Dozen with Liam Tuffs 🎥🎧
111
621
2,245
49,039
Free Speech Shell retweeted
Please check your emails everyone.
We MUST put Christ back into Christmas, we can only do that with your help 🙏
We MUST put Christ back into Christmas, we can only do that with your help 🙏
84
142
820
62,109
Free Speech Shell retweeted
It sure beats the Calais Jungle....
🚨 CARE4CALAIS HELPING WETHERSFIELD ASYLUM SEEKERS CHALLENGE THEIR ACCOMMODATION AND GET MOVED ELSEWHERE.
I've been looking into Care4Calais and the legal support they're offering asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield.
It's all on their own website.
The charity advertises legal ekers who believe their Home Office accommodation is unsuitable, specifically naming RAF Wethersfield.
And this isn't something new, it's been happening for years.
In December 2023, Care4Calais launched a legal challenge against the use of Wethersfield and raised funds towards the case.
The charity has also reported helping residents obtain legal representation, with some being moved following challenges to their accommodation.
In March 2025, the High Court ruled that three vulnerable asylum seekers had been unlawfully accommodated at Wethersfield because their individual circumstances hadn't been properly assessed.
NOW LOOK AT THE FIRST PICTURE IN MY VIDEO. 👀
That's a room inside RAF Wethersfield.
Newly fitted out, furnished and looking pretty comfortable to me.
Does that honestly look like poor living conditions to you?
I think taxpayers deserve to see what's actually being provided.
And I've got questions.
➡️ How many men have been helped by Care4Calais to challenge their accommodation?
➡️ How many have subsequently been moved into hotels or other accommodation?
➡️ How much have these legal challenges cost the taxpayer?
➡️ How much extra are we paying for alternative accommodation?
Care4Calais's Wethersfield legal fundraising appeal has reported raising over £42,000.
Meanwhile, taxpayers continue funding the accommodation and running costs of RAF Wethersfield.
I want to know what we're paying on top of that when legal challenges result in residents being moved elsewhere.
People have the right to challenge unlawful decisions. Taxpayers have the right to question the costs.
Would you consider that room unsuitable accommodation?
0
1
2
119
🚨 CARE4CALAIS HELPING WETHERSFIELD ASYLUM SEEKERS CHALLENGE THEIR ACCOMMODATION AND GET MOVED ELSEWHERE.
I've been looking into Care4Calais and the legal support they're offering asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield.
It's all on their own website.
The charity advertises legal ekers who believe their Home Office accommodation is unsuitable, specifically naming RAF Wethersfield.
And this isn't something new, it's been happening for years.
In December 2023, Care4Calais launched a legal challenge against the use of Wethersfield and raised funds towards the case.
The charity has also reported helping residents obtain legal representation, with some being moved following challenges to their accommodation.
In March 2025, the High Court ruled that three vulnerable asylum seekers had been unlawfully accommodated at Wethersfield because their individual circumstances hadn't been properly assessed.
NOW LOOK AT THE FIRST PICTURE IN MY VIDEO. 👀
That's a room inside RAF Wethersfield.
Newly fitted out, furnished and looking pretty comfortable to me.
Does that honestly look like poor living conditions to you?
I think taxpayers deserve to see what's actually being provided.
And I've got questions.
➡️ How many men have been helped by Care4Calais to challenge their accommodation?
➡️ How many have subsequently been moved into hotels or other accommodation?
➡️ How much have these legal challenges cost the taxpayer?
➡️ How much extra are we paying for alternative accommodation?
Care4Calais's Wethersfield legal fundraising appeal has reported raising over £42,000.
Meanwhile, taxpayers continue funding the accommodation and running costs of RAF Wethersfield.
I want to know what we're paying on top of that when legal challenges result in residents being moved elsewhere.
People have the right to challenge unlawful decisions. Taxpayers have the right to question the costs.
Would you consider that room unsuitable accommodation?
I've been looking into Care4Calais and the legal support they're offering asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield.
It's all on their own website.
The charity advertises legal ekers who believe their Home Office accommodation is unsuitable, specifically naming RAF Wethersfield.
And this isn't something new, it's been happening for years.
In December 2023, Care4Calais launched a legal challenge against the use of Wethersfield and raised funds towards the case.
The charity has also reported helping residents obtain legal representation, with some being moved following challenges to their accommodation.
In March 2025, the High Court ruled that three vulnerable asylum seekers had been unlawfully accommodated at Wethersfield because their individual circumstances hadn't been properly assessed.
NOW LOOK AT THE FIRST PICTURE IN MY VIDEO. 👀
That's a room inside RAF Wethersfield.
Newly fitted out, furnished and looking pretty comfortable to me.
Does that honestly look like poor living conditions to you?
I think taxpayers deserve to see what's actually being provided.
And I've got questions.
➡️ How many men have been helped by Care4Calais to challenge their accommodation?
➡️ How many have subsequently been moved into hotels or other accommodation?
➡️ How much have these legal challenges cost the taxpayer?
➡️ How much extra are we paying for alternative accommodation?
Care4Calais's Wethersfield legal fundraising appeal has reported raising over £42,000.
Meanwhile, taxpayers continue funding the accommodation and running costs of RAF Wethersfield.
I want to know what we're paying on top of that when legal challenges result in residents being moved elsewhere.
People have the right to challenge unlawful decisions. Taxpayers have the right to question the costs.
Would you consider that room unsuitable accommodation?
10
151
245
15,609
Free Speech Shell retweeted
Owen Jones getting community noted is a great way to start the weekend 😂😂
Well done @owenjonesjourno 👏👏
Well done @owenjonesjourno 👏👏
11
130
676
13,137
@TRobinsonNewEra Stephen fry is a groomer himself.
3
2
141
3,284
Free Speech Shell retweeted
This fuckin nonce!
'Sir' Stephen Fry said at the Oxford Union debate that the girls raped by foreigners in Rotherham were 'child prostitutes'.
The Age of Consent is “subjective”
No one should go to jail for raping a minor if there is 'consent'
The Elites are riddled with em!
'Sir' Stephen Fry said at the Oxford Union debate that the girls raped by foreigners in Rotherham were 'child prostitutes'.
The Age of Consent is “subjective”
No one should go to jail for raping a minor if there is 'consent'
The Elites are riddled with em!
2,425
8,165
38,329
889,581
Free Speech Shell retweeted
To all the Russell Brand defenders saying ‘why did these women wait 20 years to come forward’?
THIS ⬇️ is what happened to one woman who DID try to report him and speak out at the time.
THIS ⬇️ is what happened to one woman who DID try to report him and speak out at the time.
On Thursday I wrote about the 2014 injunction Russell Brand obtained against a woman who accused him of assault.
I've now obtained the final order. It's breathtaking.
She had no lawyer. No trial. Yet she was silenced for life - even barred from speaking to the police.
🧵:
24
491
1,865
24,599
Free Speech Shell retweeted
🚨 BRITISH FAMILIES ARE STRUGGLING WHILE WETHERSFIELD CONTINUES TO HOUSE HUNDREDS OF MEN!
Families are struggling to pay bills, food prices are high and people are battling mental health problems while waiting for NHS support.
Yet look at what's provided at RAF Wethersfield:
al centre.
- Access to a mental health nurse.
- General nurses and advanced nurse practitioners.
- Physical and mental health assessments.
- Medication and referrals to specialist services.
And look at the video!!
Large numbers of men playing pool, socialising, laughing and enjoying themselves inside RAF Wethersfield.
All while the British taxpayer foots the bill for running the accommodation.
Meanwhile, working families are counting every penny, pensioners are worrying about heating their homes and people are struggling to access basic services.
Now here's what men who actually lived at Wethersfield have told me.
They claimed only 10% of residents were "good" and described many others as "crazies", including men sleeping outside and even up trees.
That's their opinion, not a verified figure.
And the very man they described sleeping outside and in trees is now living in our community.
What assessments are being carried out before individuals leave the base?
Who is checking up on them?
Families are struggling to pay bills, food prices are high and people are battling mental health problems while waiting for NHS support.
Yet look at what's provided at RAF Wethersfield:
al centre.
- Access to a mental health nurse.
- General nurses and advanced nurse practitioners.
- Physical and mental health assessments.
- Medication and referrals to specialist services.
And look at the video!!
Large numbers of men playing pool, socialising, laughing and enjoying themselves inside RAF Wethersfield.
All while the British taxpayer foots the bill for running the accommodation.
Meanwhile, working families are counting every penny, pensioners are worrying about heating their homes and people are struggling to access basic services.
Now here's what men who actually lived at Wethersfield have told me.
They claimed only 10% of residents were "good" and described many others as "crazies", including men sleeping outside and even up trees.
That's their opinion, not a verified figure.
And the very man they described sleeping outside and in trees is now living in our community.
What assessments are being carried out before individuals leave the base?
Who is checking up on them?
34
229
604
99,461