Pinned Tweet
Jay Jones belongs no where near the office of Attorney General.
SCOOP: In ’22, Jay Jones—Dems ‘25 AG nom—sent a VA lawmaker texts joking about shooting VAGOP Speaker Todd Gilbert🧵
“put Gilbert in the crew with the two worst people you know and he receives both bullets every time,” he said in texts obtained by @NRO
nationalreview.com/news/dem-ag-no…
12
101
561
25,897
Democratic internals in deep red districts be like:
VA-9 (Trump +44)
🔴 Morgan Griffith - 47%
🔵 Joy Powers - 43%
Conducted by SetMoneyOnFire Polling
10/18-10/23 (800 LV)
VA-9 (Trump +44)
🔴 Morgan Griffith - 47%
🔵 Joy Powers - 43%
Conducted by SetMoneyOnFire Polling
10/18-10/23 (800 LV)
7
16
596
38,166
YoungkinWon retweeted
Yeah good luck with that. Turns out that @SenLouiseLucas was as dumb as she looked.
What idiot puts this in writing?
What idiot puts this in writing?
Surreal to be watching all this while out of town but given the numbers of "facts" in this indictment that have already been shown to be wrong within an hour of unsealing... I am completely confident that @SenLouiseLucas will beat these charges in court.
19
82
811
81,148
On my last cruise her office was raided.
I return from this cruise and she is indicted.
I’m going on another one in February to finish the job.
I return from this cruise and she is indicted.
I’m going on another one in February to finish the job.
Here are the charging docs against state Sen. Louise Lucas and her family
virginiascope.com/wp-content/upl…
0
1
22
673
Early vote numbers in VA5 support a close race, but I still think McGuire wins by more than 5 points.
VA-05 POLL (Dem internal)
🟥 John McGuire (inc): 46%
🟦 Tom Perriello: 45%
——
Generic Ballot (with leans)
🟦 Dem: 48%
🟥 GOP: 46%
Expedition Strategies | 400 LV
Trump +12 district | 9/21-24
punchbowl.news/va05_polling_m…
3
2
33
2,562
YoungkinWon retweeted
.@MorganGriffith has had the best campaign signs in Virginia going on 16 years now. Art.
I put up 5 more 4x4 signs for Congressman @MorganGriffith today and another “VOTE NO” sign in Virginia!
This November, let’s elect Republicans and REJECT all 3 ballot referendums!
*Post does not imply endorsement of Richard Cox for Supervisor*
0
2
27
2,398
Becoming quite clear that Youngkin will run for Governor in 2029 if Republicans lose the White House in 2028.
10
6
265
28,455
I guess I’m moving to Bedford county
VIRGINIA: Which member of the Virginia General Assembly are you closest to?
Take our 20-question quiz looking at bills from this year's session. How would you vote?
projects.statenavigate.com/interactives/v…
1
0
6
991
YoungkinWon retweeted
This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
1,815
6,723
32,195
7,074,590
Nothing to worry about! The guy that took millions from one of the companies involved in the merger says we don’t need further review.
“[Speaker] Scott said he doesn't think the General Assembly needs to extend the 180 days state law gives the commission to review utility mergers, as some legislators say.”
richmond.com/news/state-reg…
0
0
0
233