I'm happy to join the race for a @IntersectMBO board seat. Please take a look and consider supporting my candidacy.
0
5
11
Two days to go. We need 75% to pass. Make sure you delegate to a dRep who supports this critical change to enhance Cardano Governance resilience.
0
0
1
@IntersectTSC in the light of the outage of AWS and the high number of SPOs that use their services to host their relays. Your assessment of the impact in Cardano's performance and security would be much appreciated.
@_KtorZ_ @adamKDean @Hornan7 @intertreeJK @therealdisasm
@_KtorZ_ @adamKDean @Hornan7 @intertreeJK @therealdisasm
1
1
2
Museu do Amanhã is Amazing location for Rio's #cardanosummit
0
0
4
Amazing warmup for tomorrow's #cardanosummit with a night out in Rio de Janeiro with some amazing friends from Latam
2
4
51
Thrilled to be here in Rio de Janeiro getting ready day for tomorrow's #Cardanosummit
1
0
6
Thank you Mexico!
I'm going back home with a warm heart and renewed passion for what we're building together!
#azteca2025 was a huge success!
I'm going back home with a warm heart and renewed passion for what we're building together!
#azteca2025 was a huge success!
1
3
25
Day 2 #azteca2025 in Puebla, México.
Here we go! 🚀
Organized by:
@LatamCardano @CardanoMexicoC
Funded by:
@Catalyst_onX
I collaboration with:
@Cardano_CF
@IOHKMedia
@IntersectMBO
@IntersectLatam
Here we go! 🚀
Organized by:
@LatamCardano @CardanoMexicoC
Funded by:
@Catalyst_onX
I collaboration with:
@Cardano_CF
@IOHKMedia
@IntersectMBO
@IntersectLatam
2
7
29
This is exactly what TradFi does and is forbidden by Article 1 Section 1 Tenet 1 of Cardano's constitution.
#Cardano is truly immutable and permissionless and resilient. It will be around for 1000 years.
#Cardano is truly immutable and permissionless and resilient. It will be around for 1000 years.
On Wednesday, the Sui validator community acted quickly to freeze $162M of the stolen funds. Here’s how that happened:
- Each validator has a configuration file that allows it to ignore transactions from a specific address.
- Adding addresses to this file is at the discretion of each individual validator, and can be reversed at any time.
- More than ⅓ of validators by stake chose to ignore transactions from the two addresses they believed to be connected to the attack, effectively freezing the funds.
- The ability of an individual validator to ignore transactions from a specific address is not unique to Sui–any validator in any network can choose to do this, such as to operate within their individual risk tolerance or to comply with law.
- Sui validators acted quickly enough to freeze some (but not all) of the stolen funds, worth approximately $162M at the time of the freeze, before the attacker attempted to bridge them out.
- Freezing is intended as a temporary, emergency measure to slow down an attack and give the victim leverage to negotiate with the attacker. It served precisely this purpose in the Cetus attack. Unfortunately the attacker has not responded to outreach from the Cetus team.
Earlier today, Cetus called for a community vote on a protocol upgrade to return the frozen funds, without rolling back chain history or reversing transactions. This is an extraordinary request in response to extraordinary need–Cetus’s customer funds are at stake. After consideration, we support their call for an on-chain vote on two conditions:
1) We will abstain from the vote and remain neutral on the outcome – our role is to design and facilitate a process that will reflect the will of the Sui community at large. We will share design details and code soon.
2) Cetus must publicly commit to marshalling all of its financial resources to recover all funds and return them to customers until everyone has been made whole.
1
5
22
Thrilled to share that I will be sharing the stage next week at #azteca2025 in Mexico alonside a splendid lineup of speakers!
Thanks to @LatamCardano and @CardanoMexicoC for the invitation.
azteca.cardanomexicocommunity.com
Thanks to @LatamCardano and @CardanoMexicoC for the invitation.
azteca.cardanomexicocommunity.com
1
7
20
I think you are missing the point. It's not about taking a position on the dates, either 72 or 73 epochs would be ok but not both.
Dates are not clearly defined. If you read the blue🔵 the end date of the NCL is Dec 30 2025, if you read the red 🔴it's Jan 4 2026.
Dates are not clearly defined. If you read the blue🔵 the end date of the NCL is Dec 30 2025, if you read the red 🔴it's Jan 4 2026.
1
0
2
I agree, but I have to highlight it's not a typo, it's a substantial error with potentially difficult consequences.
Dates are not clearly defined. If you read the blue🔵 the end date of the NCL is Dec 30 2025, if you read the red📷it's Jan 4 2026.
Dates are not clearly defined. If you read the blue🔵 the end date of the NCL is Dec 30 2025, if you read the red📷it's Jan 4 2026.
0
0
2
That being said, I have to highlight it's not a typo, it's a substantial error with potentially dificult concecuences. @NicolasC3rny dates are not clearly defined. If you read the blue🔵 the end date of the NCL is Dec 30 2025, if you read the red🔴it's Jan 4 2026.
0
0
1
Article III section 5 of Cardano's constitution.
A substantial error in defining the epochs on which NCL is intended to apply creates ambiguity and opens a space for undue influence and manipulation at epoch 604.
A substantial error in defining the epochs on which NCL is intended to apply creates ambiguity and opens a space for undue influence and manipulation at epoch 604.
1
1
6
Tks Phil, in my view it will be hard to asess the constitutionaility of a budget without having established the same for the NCL. In this particular NCL GA I believe there is a breach of constitutinality due to the error in the definition of its duration. Art III Sec 5
2
0
1
Dear @EasternCardano I noticed you've voted abstain on both NCL proposals. Would like to better understand your rationales in the context of Cardano Constitution Article IV Section 3. A position from the CC on the NCL is required.
1
0
1
The Gov action has an error. It can be interpreted that the proposed NCL for 72 or 73 epochs. Based on the Gov Action text there is no way to decide. Start of e532 to end of e604 is 73 Epochs, not 72. Also e604 ends Jan 5 '26 not Dec '25
📜 CC MEMBER VOTE ALERT! 📜
🗳️ The vote is: Constitutional
👥 Voted by: Input | Output
🔗 Gov Action: adastat.net/governances/9b…
🔗 The vote rationale: ipfs.io/ipfs/QmfTDPa1s…
#Cardano #Blockchain #Governance
2
4
8
Grateful to all supporters of this wonderful initiative that changes so many lives in Colombia. #surf4peace🙏🏄♂️ youtu.be/fDTS0tk6ORA?si…
@sciaf @LatamCardano
@sciaf @LatamCardano
1
0
1
@Cardanojp_icc @Cardano_CF @emurgo_io I'm curious about the rationale behind giving an immutable "constitutional" opinion on a GA with mutable supporting info? Content could change next week and your would remain fixed.
3
2
21
@ARKInvest It's really puzzling to follow the logic of your strategy and then not see #Cardano in your portfolio.
youtu.be/LugCJOOQxvA?si…
youtu.be/LugCJOOQxvA?si…
0
0
0
And some of the potential effects on network security youtu.be/RRxUg8QsXo0?si…
0
1
2
Before my 10hr flight I want to share some thoughts on the Net Change limit. youtu.be/grHAoj98p4g?si…
1
2
5
#BuildingTogether we have a ratified #Cardano constitution by overwhelming majority!
7
17
219
Incredibly passionate and engaged Latina American delegates and alternates #BuildingTogether @LatamCardano @IntersectLatam @CardanoConf
6
15
88
On day 1 of the Constitutional Convention I want to acknowledge and thank the amazing work of the Civics Committee bringing the Constitution process to where we are today #buildingtogether it has been an honor sharing the journey w/ you!
3
4
65








































