โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
@BasedSolutions1 This is what we should help people understand... it goes beyond imagination
1
1
1
7
Even for the most red-pilled and most advanced noticers, it's hard to fathom how coordinated and strategic they are.
2
3
5
105
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
Read and watch this.
Wow!
Canadian journalist asks Moshe Feiglin, a former Likud Member of Knesset, if he is concerned about Israel's plummeting global standing.
Feiglin's response is chilling, as it reveals the fundamental supremacist view he and many in Israel hold.
He says that the real moral ael, ie with the people of Israel.
The Bible says, he explains, that those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed. As a result, it's we - Israelis - who get to judge you, rather than you judging us.
And then he adds?
"Are you with the children of God or not?"
27
80
296
6,550
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
"White people have no culture"
Meanwhile, Europe:
Meanwhile, Europe:
23
86
620
4,962
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
This isn't a ratio, it's an absolute obliteration of million-follower Zioslop Barbie.
The whole "White people can't have countries because muh HitIer" bit has run its course.
White guilt just doesn't sell like it used to, sweetheart.
The whole "White people can't have countries because muh HitIer" bit has run its course.
White guilt just doesn't sell like it used to, sweetheart.
This leads to Nazi Germany. Hope people know that.
38
220
3,020
24,491
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
.@grok
1 Mark Walhberg said he has Mossad affiliates?
2 Was he ticketed for the plane that hit the Twin Towers & canceled last minute?
3 Was his agents father Emmanuel a Irgun terrorist who helped found Israel?
Answer yes or no
Follow: @TheVikingNomad
1 Mark Walhberg said he has Mossad affiliates?
2 Was he ticketed for the plane that hit the Twin Towers & canceled last minute?
3 Was his agents father Emmanuel a Irgun terrorist who helped found Israel?
Answer yes or no
Follow: @TheVikingNomad
37
158
779
36,159
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
Happy Hump day from Huntsville! What a beautiful morning! ๐ค๐ฅฐ
5
4
19
672
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
This is what Brazil looked like 117 years ago
27
144
1,441
41,540
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
Creepy as hell and borderline criminal. Americans should not be under constant surveillance by a foreign entity and they certainly shouldn't be censored by it. This clown Jonathan Greenblatt and the ADL are getting a little too big for their britches.
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt: "I have 45 people at ADLโfull-time analystsโ45 full-time intelligence analysts tracking the bad guys across social media, across AI, across video games, podcasts, crypto, you name it."
"[We've built] software to track Wikipedia [editors]โฆ"
34
261
999
14,713
โ โข ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข โ retweeted
I'll leave this here....
Some historical content on communist takeovers in recent history.
In 1848 the jew Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto. Itโs important to understand that communismโs ultimate goal was always a worldwide revolution and worldwide government.
As it was the rich, White West that dominated world affairs at that point in time, it was the West that communists sought to attack, believing (with good reason) that the rest of the world would fall after the West was conquered.
Marx believed that feudalism would lead to capitalism. Capitalism would create massive inequality between the rich and the poor. The workers would all rise up, and overthrow the hated โbourgeoisieโ (the upper class). There would then be a โdictatorship of the proletariatโ (the workers) which would ensure equality. Then that government would wear away and break down, and the world would be left with this utopian, egalitarian society.
jews will infiltrate workers movements.
I talked to AI about communist takeovers. This was it's response.
Your theory perfectly captures how global superpowers, most notably the United States and the Soviet Union (USSR) during the Cold War operated.
They routinely weaponized the legitimate grievances of an oppressed domestic population, financed their rebellion to dismantle the existing government, and then inserted a regime loyal to their own global interests.
The mechanics of how this played out on both sides illustrate exactly what you described:
1. The Soviet Blueprint: Exporting Revolution
The Soviet Union believed that communism was a global movement. They actively looked for countries with deep inequalities where the population felt oppressed.
โข The Strategy: The USSR provided weapons, funding, and guerrilla warfare training (often through the KGB) to local revolutionary groups.
โข The Result: Once the local rebels overthrew the "oppressive" capitalist or colonial government, the Soviet Union quickly moved in to guide the formation of the new government.
They ensured the new leaders were hardline, Moscow-loyal communists, effectively turning the country into a Soviet satellite state.
The Tragedy for the Local Population
Your point about the outside power putting themselves (or their chosen proxies) into control is the exact reason why so many of these revolutions ended in tragedy for the everyday citizen.
The tragedy lies in a harsh reality:
1. The anger of the local people was usually 100% genuine. They were truly poor, starving, or living under brutal dictators.
2. However, because they lacked the money and weapons to win a revolution on their own, they were forced to accept help from an outside superpower.
3. The moment that help was accepted, the revolution ceased to belong to the local people. It became a chess piece in a global game of power, and the old domestic oppressor was simply traded for a new, foreign-backed oppressor.
Some historical content on communist takeovers in recent history.
In 1848 the jew Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto. Itโs important to understand that communismโs ultimate goal was always a worldwide revolution and worldwide government.
As it was the rich, White West that dominated world affairs at that point in time, it was the West that communists sought to attack, believing (with good reason) that the rest of the world would fall after the West was conquered.
Marx believed that feudalism would lead to capitalism. Capitalism would create massive inequality between the rich and the poor. The workers would all rise up, and overthrow the hated โbourgeoisieโ (the upper class). There would then be a โdictatorship of the proletariatโ (the workers) which would ensure equality. Then that government would wear away and break down, and the world would be left with this utopian, egalitarian society.
jews will infiltrate workers movements.
I talked to AI about communist takeovers. This was it's response.
Your theory perfectly captures how global superpowers, most notably the United States and the Soviet Union (USSR) during the Cold War operated.
They routinely weaponized the legitimate grievances of an oppressed domestic population, financed their rebellion to dismantle the existing government, and then inserted a regime loyal to their own global interests.
The mechanics of how this played out on both sides illustrate exactly what you described:
1. The Soviet Blueprint: Exporting Revolution
The Soviet Union believed that communism was a global movement. They actively looked for countries with deep inequalities where the population felt oppressed.
โข The Strategy: The USSR provided weapons, funding, and guerrilla warfare training (often through the KGB) to local revolutionary groups.
โข The Result: Once the local rebels overthrew the "oppressive" capitalist or colonial government, the Soviet Union quickly moved in to guide the formation of the new government.
They ensured the new leaders were hardline, Moscow-loyal communists, effectively turning the country into a Soviet satellite state.
The Tragedy for the Local Population
Your point about the outside power putting themselves (or their chosen proxies) into control is the exact reason why so many of these revolutions ended in tragedy for the everyday citizen.
The tragedy lies in a harsh reality:
1. The anger of the local people was usually 100% genuine. They were truly poor, starving, or living under brutal dictators.
2. However, because they lacked the money and weapons to win a revolution on their own, they were forced to accept help from an outside superpower.
3. The moment that help was accepted, the revolution ceased to belong to the local people. It became a chess piece in a global game of power, and the old domestic oppressor was simply traded for a new, foreign-backed oppressor.
2
13
52
1,689