Bal a Versailles retweeted
Harriet most definitely fits right in with the royal family. She has now even become the patron of Home-Starts Cotswolds. Which helps families that are having difficulties in the Cotswolds with their children. Through arranging home visits to providing mental health support groups.
Here’s also a little video from Harriet’s exclusive photo shoot.
39
73
1,163
30,240
Bal a Versailles retweeted
The media tried to spin the King was extremely upset about the rain and the Queen just left. Neither one was true. The Queen actually laughed it off and so did the King. Video from hello on Instagram.
37
78
765
39,466
Bal a Versailles retweeted
So let’s point out WHY Harry & Meghan are suddenly packing up the kids and heading back to the very country they couldn’t wait to escape. 🤔
1. Harry just suffered a MASSIVE legal defeat.
2. Harry’s U.S. visa saga has followed him for years and it doesn’t look good.
3. Their Amerre never became what Meghan promised.
4. Hollywood certainly hasn’t embraced them the way they expected.
5. Their “brand” has taken massive hits.
6. Then there’s the MONEY question. They’ve got none.
7. Harry has been openly talking about reconciliation.
The biggest asset they still have is… ROYALTY.
Their connection to the Royal Family is what made them globally famous in the first place. Distance themselves from the monarchy all they want, the Sussex brand has never managed to completely stand on its own without that royal connection and never will.
One thing that makes the timing particularly interesting: Harry said after losing his security appeal in 2025 that he couldn’t envision bringing his wife and children back to the UK under those circumstances. Yet now the children are reportedly enrolling in British school. That reversal is absolutely hypocritical!
Am I missing anything else?
#megin
1. Harry just suffered a MASSIVE legal defeat.
2. Harry’s U.S. visa saga has followed him for years and it doesn’t look good.
3. Their Amerre never became what Meghan promised.
4. Hollywood certainly hasn’t embraced them the way they expected.
5. Their “brand” has taken massive hits.
6. Then there’s the MONEY question. They’ve got none.
7. Harry has been openly talking about reconciliation.
The biggest asset they still have is… ROYALTY.
Their connection to the Royal Family is what made them globally famous in the first place. Distance themselves from the monarchy all they want, the Sussex brand has never managed to completely stand on its own without that royal connection and never will.
One thing that makes the timing particularly interesting: Harry said after losing his security appeal in 2025 that he couldn’t envision bringing his wife and children back to the UK under those circumstances. Yet now the children are reportedly enrolling in British school. That reversal is absolutely hypocritical!
Am I missing anything else?
#megin
624
1,093
8,756
757,360
Bal a Versailles retweeted
See! It wasn’t that woman. The hello exclusive was Harriet Phillips! She’s on the cover of their magazine. ☺️
60
78
1,204
19,320
Bal a Versailles retweeted
TEMU ROYALS TAKE NOTE: THIS is how you marry into the Royal Family!!
Peter Phillips's wife Harriet gave her first interview today and says Catherine is the one she would always feel comfortable asking for advice. Meghan told Oprah that Catherine made her cry.
Harriet spent 24 specialising in infant mental health. She married Queen Elizabeth's eldest grandchild in June, lives quietly on Princess Anne's Gatcombe estate, and her very first patronage is Home-Start Cotswolds, a charity that supports young families who are struggling.
Now the public record from the other side:
March 2021: Meghan told Oprah the reverse of the crying story was true, and that Kate had made HER cry before the wedding.
In the same interview she complained there was no class on how to be royal.
January 2020: the Sussexes announced they were stepping back, having already filed to trademark "Sussex Royal".
December 2022: a six-part Netflix series. January 2023: Spare.
Let's think about that.
One woman married in, picked a patronage helping new mothers and found a friend in the future Queen.
The other went on Oprah.
Photo: Samir Hussein/WireImage
Peter Phillips's wife Harriet gave her first interview today and says Catherine is the one she would always feel comfortable asking for advice. Meghan told Oprah that Catherine made her cry.
Harriet spent 24 specialising in infant mental health. She married Queen Elizabeth's eldest grandchild in June, lives quietly on Princess Anne's Gatcombe estate, and her very first patronage is Home-Start Cotswolds, a charity that supports young families who are struggling.
Now the public record from the other side:
March 2021: Meghan told Oprah the reverse of the crying story was true, and that Kate had made HER cry before the wedding.
In the same interview she complained there was no class on how to be royal.
January 2020: the Sussexes announced they were stepping back, having already filed to trademark "Sussex Royal".
December 2022: a six-part Netflix series. January 2023: Spare.
Let's think about that.
One woman married in, picked a patronage helping new mothers and found a friend in the future Queen.
The other went on Oprah.
Photo: Samir Hussein/WireImage
58
167
2,950
98,857
Bal a Versailles retweeted
They at still trying to find the officer the same way we are trying to find the pilot that thanked her for the sacrifice she made to England 🤣🤣. Good luck with that.
Good luck with that then!!! 🤣🤣🤣
#MeghanMarkle BACKTRACKS after criticism.
57
59
607
4,632
Bal a Versailles retweeted
What we KNOW about Thomas Markle Snr:
82 years old.
Lower leg amputated in life saving operation in 2025.
History of heart-attacks and strokes.
Award winning lighting director.
Two children with Roslyn Loveless (Tom Jnr and Samantha), divorced in the 70's.
One child with Doria Ragland (Rachel Meghan), divorced in the 80's.
Was openly praised by RM in the TIG, USA chat shows, even during a speech she gave at the UN Women conference in 2015.
No allegations, or convictions of any kind of crimes.
Not even any rumours.
RM cut him out of her life just weeks before the networking event in May 2018, claiming that the photos of him preparing to walk her down the aisle, upset her. Seriously? This is a woman who has had paps on speed dial since her days as a jobbing actress, and is well known for arranging pap shots of her walking through parking lots just to take the spotlight off our RF.
What we KNOW about RM.
Thomas Snr is her father and Doria is her mother.
Grew up in LA, spent a lot of time with her father and in the studio where he was a lighting director on popular TV shows, because Doria was absent for a chunk of her childhood.
Is on video as a child, acting like a spoilt brat and wearing a crown.
Was a jobbing actress and wrote a blog called the TIG, where she is again, on record, praising her father.
First (or maybe 2nd) marriage was to Trevor Engelson in 2011, two years later, whilst living in Canada and working on Suits, it is rumoured that she returned his rings in the post.
RM lived in Canada, a Commonwealth country, for a number of years whilst filming Suits - but claimed she knew NOTHING about our Royal Family.
As a teenager, she visited London and watched Princess Diana's funeral.
She is photographed holding a magazine with a photo of William and Catherine's wedding on the cover.
There are several versions of how she met the traitor (at the engagement interview he claimed he had never heard of RM, so she decided to claim that she had NEVER heard of him!)
There are several versions of how he proposed, and also of the m-carriage.
Also rumoured is that her first marriage was annulled and that their daughter is now being raised by his family.
Rumoured that she had an hysterectomy before meeting the traitor and had frozen her eggs.
She is photographed holding a magazine with a photo of William and Catherine's wedding on the cover.
There are many rumours of her diva behaviour prior to the networking event, being rude to staff, making demands for special treatment, wanting air-freshers in 500 year old St George's chapel, refusing to involve Queen Elizabeth in the planning process or to follow any Royal protocols.
Filled the chapel with celebrities that admitted had never met her before, only one relative attended, her mother.
The event cost over £30k million, crowds of thousands welcomed her to our Royal Family (and our Royal Family had gone out of their way to make her feel welcomed).
RM refused to follow Royal protocols (based on good manners!), ignored dress codes, barged in front of the traitor to make sure she was first to shake hands, embarrassed people by hugging rather than shaking hands.
Rumour: she never gave birth to child no. 1.
Proof: she never used Royal doctors and no witnesses signed the birth announcement that appeared, for all the world to see, outside Buckingham Palace after the birth. Her names (RM) were removed from the birth certificate, showing mother's name as the DofS - a Royal title is NOT a name.
THE LIES:
Oprah Winfrey - all the lies she told are well documented because they were too easy to investigate and debunk - but the biggest lie was about our RF being 'racist' and claiming that is why he wasn't given a title OR security (no Royal child has their own security!) - but even the traitor knew that was a lie because ONLY the children of the heir automatically have titles at birth, next were the GRANDCHILDREN of the Monarch.
Netflix - the videos used as examples of RM being harassed by the UK press were NOT of RM - one was of a Harry Potter premiere, and the other was of Katie Price arriving at court. She mocked Queen Elizabeth's proudest achievement, the Commonwealth, and also mocked curtseying to the traitor's 'grandmother' - total disrespect towards the woman that had gifted her, via the traitor, of that title that she uses to demand respect. Couldn't make it up.
THE UK PRESS KNOWS THAT RM IS A PROVEN LIAR, AND THERE IS STILL NO PROOF THAT THOMAS SNR COMMITTED ANY CRIME - BUT THEY STILL CHOSE TO PRINT ALLEGATIONS BEFORE ANY POLICE INVOLVEMENT, IN ANY COUNTRY, WHICH LEAVES THEM OPEN TO BEING SUED - INNOCENT UNTIL PROVE GUILTY !!!
WHO ELSE, IN THE HISTORY OF THE UK, GOT AWAY WITH TELLING SO MANY LIES, BEING SO DISRESPECTFUL AND EVEN MAKING $$$$$$ BY ACCUSING OUR ROYAL FAMILY OF BEING RACIST ??
82 years old.
Lower leg amputated in life saving operation in 2025.
History of heart-attacks and strokes.
Award winning lighting director.
Two children with Roslyn Loveless (Tom Jnr and Samantha), divorced in the 70's.
One child with Doria Ragland (Rachel Meghan), divorced in the 80's.
Was openly praised by RM in the TIG, USA chat shows, even during a speech she gave at the UN Women conference in 2015.
No allegations, or convictions of any kind of crimes.
Not even any rumours.
RM cut him out of her life just weeks before the networking event in May 2018, claiming that the photos of him preparing to walk her down the aisle, upset her. Seriously? This is a woman who has had paps on speed dial since her days as a jobbing actress, and is well known for arranging pap shots of her walking through parking lots just to take the spotlight off our RF.
What we KNOW about RM.
Thomas Snr is her father and Doria is her mother.
Grew up in LA, spent a lot of time with her father and in the studio where he was a lighting director on popular TV shows, because Doria was absent for a chunk of her childhood.
Is on video as a child, acting like a spoilt brat and wearing a crown.
Was a jobbing actress and wrote a blog called the TIG, where she is again, on record, praising her father.
First (or maybe 2nd) marriage was to Trevor Engelson in 2011, two years later, whilst living in Canada and working on Suits, it is rumoured that she returned his rings in the post.
RM lived in Canada, a Commonwealth country, for a number of years whilst filming Suits - but claimed she knew NOTHING about our Royal Family.
As a teenager, she visited London and watched Princess Diana's funeral.
She is photographed holding a magazine with a photo of William and Catherine's wedding on the cover.
There are several versions of how she met the traitor (at the engagement interview he claimed he had never heard of RM, so she decided to claim that she had NEVER heard of him!)
There are several versions of how he proposed, and also of the m-carriage.
Also rumoured is that her first marriage was annulled and that their daughter is now being raised by his family.
Rumoured that she had an hysterectomy before meeting the traitor and had frozen her eggs.
She is photographed holding a magazine with a photo of William and Catherine's wedding on the cover.
There are many rumours of her diva behaviour prior to the networking event, being rude to staff, making demands for special treatment, wanting air-freshers in 500 year old St George's chapel, refusing to involve Queen Elizabeth in the planning process or to follow any Royal protocols.
Filled the chapel with celebrities that admitted had never met her before, only one relative attended, her mother.
The event cost over £30k million, crowds of thousands welcomed her to our Royal Family (and our Royal Family had gone out of their way to make her feel welcomed).
RM refused to follow Royal protocols (based on good manners!), ignored dress codes, barged in front of the traitor to make sure she was first to shake hands, embarrassed people by hugging rather than shaking hands.
Rumour: she never gave birth to child no. 1.
Proof: she never used Royal doctors and no witnesses signed the birth announcement that appeared, for all the world to see, outside Buckingham Palace after the birth. Her names (RM) were removed from the birth certificate, showing mother's name as the DofS - a Royal title is NOT a name.
THE LIES:
Oprah Winfrey - all the lies she told are well documented because they were too easy to investigate and debunk - but the biggest lie was about our RF being 'racist' and claiming that is why he wasn't given a title OR security (no Royal child has their own security!) - but even the traitor knew that was a lie because ONLY the children of the heir automatically have titles at birth, next were the GRANDCHILDREN of the Monarch.
Netflix - the videos used as examples of RM being harassed by the UK press were NOT of RM - one was of a Harry Potter premiere, and the other was of Katie Price arriving at court. She mocked Queen Elizabeth's proudest achievement, the Commonwealth, and also mocked curtseying to the traitor's 'grandmother' - total disrespect towards the woman that had gifted her, via the traitor, of that title that she uses to demand respect. Couldn't make it up.
THE UK PRESS KNOWS THAT RM IS A PROVEN LIAR, AND THERE IS STILL NO PROOF THAT THOMAS SNR COMMITTED ANY CRIME - BUT THEY STILL CHOSE TO PRINT ALLEGATIONS BEFORE ANY POLICE INVOLVEMENT, IN ANY COUNTRY, WHICH LEAVES THEM OPEN TO BEING SUED - INNOCENT UNTIL PROVE GUILTY !!!
WHO ELSE, IN THE HISTORY OF THE UK, GOT AWAY WITH TELLING SO MANY LIES, BEING SO DISRESPECTFUL AND EVEN MAKING $$$$$$ BY ACCUSING OUR ROYAL FAMILY OF BEING RACIST ??
27
74
787
37,540
Bal a Versailles retweeted
I think we’re seeing stage one of Prince William’s new-look Royal Family
And I like it!
And I like it!
17
39
374
5,881
Bal a Versailles retweeted
The Monarchy is not responsible for Harry and Meghan or Meghan’s family.
10
25
805
5,090
Bal a Versailles retweeted
The Prince and Princess of Wales on Instagram shared their Autumn rewind. I put it all in one video for your viewing pleasure.☺️
12
131
1,012
10,335
Bal a Versailles retweeted
So remind us Meghan who was stopping you when you stepped away from the RF in Jan 2020?
Who was stopping you the whole time you were courting Oprah, doing interview after interview calling the Royals racist, ridiculing the late Queen, exposing secrets and airing your dirty laundry against the Royals in your Docuseries?
Funny how you wasnt worried about what the Royals, the Met Police or Bodyguards thought then?
Whats interesting if you read the article it actually states they advised her against going "PUBLIC"
However whats weird is Meghan stated when the Met Police informed her of the letter in Jan 2019 apparently she was told they were dealing with it? If this were true anyone would know the Met Police would absolutely advise against going public, so if thats the case why would she then discuss it with Met bodyguards and ask about going public?
So she couldn't be bothered in finding out what was being done about it but she was ok about making it public, even though it was only an allegation?
She just found out her father is accused by his ex wife who waited 40 years and her first thought is to go public?
Its not to find out whether its actually even true, or speak to her father which you would do - unless of course its all part of the set up!
Also even if for some reason she thinks we believe she couldnt do it in 2019 (although I call BS) it most def doesnt explain why she couldn't do anything in 2020 and for the last 6 years!
I think like I have said before, her brother got in there before her and it messed up her timeline in accusing their father.
Now due to the severe backlash she has received, she's now scrambling to reclaim the narrative back to her being a victim.
This is similar to when she allegedly went to HR regarding her alleged suicidal ideation BS!
The media might be buying her lies but we are not!
She had plenty of chances to expose him if it is at all true but for 6/7 years she has said and done NOTHING!
So here is part of my theory, to which il be doing a video on the full version Monday -
This was a set up, the ex wife was in on it imo.
Before Harry - Meghan gushed about her father.
Met Harry - Meghan still had relationship with father.
Engagement - Meghan discarded her Father
Before wedding - A photo shoot was set up between TMS and a journalist.
Later Meghan gave this as the reason for not inviting her father...
Meghan received Backlash
After the wedding.
Aug 2018 - Meghan wrote to her father and she admitted to believing this letter would be made public...
I think this was the first bit to the set up. I think she accused him in this letter, as TMS admitted there were things in this letter to upsetting to talk about. .
(Whatever upsetting things she wrote, she did it with the intention of knowing the public may see it!)
I think the reason she wanted to go public after the 2019 accusation was due to the backlash she received about her father not coming to the wedding and her abandoning him.
The pap shot (that i think was a set up) didnt work enough to sway the public, so she began phase 2 and she had this ready to go in Aug 2018 ..
Meghan then I believe got the letter sent by Ros to the Met Police to put her father on the watch list so he couldnt come to the Uk.
I suspect she wanted to go public, maybe wanting an official statement given to the media to stop the backlash she was receiving but she couldnt risk doing it officially through proper channels so she prob casually spoke to someone, who prob said it wasnt a good idea.
Meghan is now conveniently using this as the excuse but even if this is remotely true it doesnt excuse why she did or said nothing when she left and moved to the states!
Obviously there is so much more to this and I will be unpacking it in my next video.
The other strange thing I want to add - who tipped off the DailyMail?
TMJ?
Meghan?
🤔
#MeghanMarkleExposed
#MeghanMarkle #meghanmarkleisaliar
Who was stopping you the whole time you were courting Oprah, doing interview after interview calling the Royals racist, ridiculing the late Queen, exposing secrets and airing your dirty laundry against the Royals in your Docuseries?
Funny how you wasnt worried about what the Royals, the Met Police or Bodyguards thought then?
Whats interesting if you read the article it actually states they advised her against going "PUBLIC"
However whats weird is Meghan stated when the Met Police informed her of the letter in Jan 2019 apparently she was told they were dealing with it? If this were true anyone would know the Met Police would absolutely advise against going public, so if thats the case why would she then discuss it with Met bodyguards and ask about going public?
So she couldn't be bothered in finding out what was being done about it but she was ok about making it public, even though it was only an allegation?
She just found out her father is accused by his ex wife who waited 40 years and her first thought is to go public?
Its not to find out whether its actually even true, or speak to her father which you would do - unless of course its all part of the set up!
Also even if for some reason she thinks we believe she couldnt do it in 2019 (although I call BS) it most def doesnt explain why she couldn't do anything in 2020 and for the last 6 years!
I think like I have said before, her brother got in there before her and it messed up her timeline in accusing their father.
Now due to the severe backlash she has received, she's now scrambling to reclaim the narrative back to her being a victim.
This is similar to when she allegedly went to HR regarding her alleged suicidal ideation BS!
The media might be buying her lies but we are not!
She had plenty of chances to expose him if it is at all true but for 6/7 years she has said and done NOTHING!
So here is part of my theory, to which il be doing a video on the full version Monday -
This was a set up, the ex wife was in on it imo.
Before Harry - Meghan gushed about her father.
Met Harry - Meghan still had relationship with father.
Engagement - Meghan discarded her Father
Before wedding - A photo shoot was set up between TMS and a journalist.
Later Meghan gave this as the reason for not inviting her father...
Meghan received Backlash
After the wedding.
Aug 2018 - Meghan wrote to her father and she admitted to believing this letter would be made public...
I think this was the first bit to the set up. I think she accused him in this letter, as TMS admitted there were things in this letter to upsetting to talk about. .
(Whatever upsetting things she wrote, she did it with the intention of knowing the public may see it!)
I think the reason she wanted to go public after the 2019 accusation was due to the backlash she received about her father not coming to the wedding and her abandoning him.
The pap shot (that i think was a set up) didnt work enough to sway the public, so she began phase 2 and she had this ready to go in Aug 2018 ..
Meghan then I believe got the letter sent by Ros to the Met Police to put her father on the watch list so he couldnt come to the Uk.
I suspect she wanted to go public, maybe wanting an official statement given to the media to stop the backlash she was receiving but she couldnt risk doing it officially through proper channels so she prob casually spoke to someone, who prob said it wasnt a good idea.
Meghan is now conveniently using this as the excuse but even if this is remotely true it doesnt excuse why she did or said nothing when she left and moved to the states!
Obviously there is so much more to this and I will be unpacking it in my next video.
The other strange thing I want to add - who tipped off the DailyMail?
TMJ?
Meghan?
🤔
#MeghanMarkleExposed
#MeghanMarkle #meghanmarkleisaliar
Meghan 'wanted to go public' with child sex abuse claims against her father Thomas Markle in 2019 - but Met royal bodyguards 'advised her not to' trib.al/BQ296Hj
19
31
270
5,994
Bal a Versailles retweeted
Sorry Meghan, your little ‘I told Palace HR’ lie isn’t going to get you out of trouble this time.
12
54
1,967
27,977
Meghan must have been furious not to be mentioned in Tatler’s Cotswolds special.
She can’t buy class.
She only brings crass.
She can’t buy class.
She only brings crass.
3
8
164
1,768
Bal a Versailles retweeted
I’m not buying this latest narrative surrounding Meghan Markle and her carefully choreographed estrangement from her father.
IMO, Meghan didn’t distance herself from Thomas Markle because of the latest allegations. I believe she was terrified of having him in the same room as the BRF, where he might start talking and expose the skeletons she’d rather keep buried.
And let’s not forget his physical appearance. I suspect he simply didn’t fit the carefully crafted image and narrative she wanted to portray.
This latest explanation looks awfully convenient. I believe her decision to cut him off was about protecting her image, not protecting her children.
That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it.
IMO, Meghan didn’t distance herself from Thomas Markle because of the latest allegations. I believe she was terrified of having him in the same room as the BRF, where he might start talking and expose the skeletons she’d rather keep buried.
And let’s not forget his physical appearance. I suspect he simply didn’t fit the carefully crafted image and narrative she wanted to portray.
This latest explanation looks awfully convenient. I believe her decision to cut him off was about protecting her image, not protecting her children.
That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it.
119
102
1,992
25,385
Bal a Versailles retweeted
What a difference a day makes. Meghan Markle has gone from claiming she was ‘assured there was an investigation’, to ‘I wanted to go public but was told not to’. These fantasy claims are being made to try and ensure she has enough excuses as possible. We see your manipulative games little girl.
73
128
2,502
32,542
Bal a Versailles retweeted
Prince Harry is “mindfully” sitting out public engagements so he doesn’t overshadow William and Kate’s Earthshot trip to India – framed as a respectful olive branch 🌿. 👀 After years of perfectly timed clashes and PR-friendly leaks, does anyone really believe it? 🤔
Prince ure to Kate Middleton | Woman & Home share.google/y4kYXgf1ZM6lIl…
Prince ure to Kate Middleton | Woman & Home share.google/y4kYXgf1ZM6lIl…
163
13
298
14,779
Bal a Versailles retweeted
To Meghan MARKLE:
The fact or otherwise of your father’s alleged abuse, which you admitted in a public statement to having only been made aware of in 2018 (corrected by the police to 2019), did not cause you to become a gold digger who manipulated her way into a meeting with ‘a lier in 2016.
It did not cause you to lie about not knowing about the Royal Family or Harry prior to meeting him and fail to introduce Harry to your father.
It did not cause you to demonise and despise the Royal Family and the Monarchy for no reason other than its rules did not suit your game plan for using it as a vehicle to gain mass attention and creating a lavish luxury lifestyle for yourself and maximizing your personal wealth.
It did not cause you to lie shamelessly and shamefully repeatedly in public about the family, the family members and the nature of the Monarchy in many forms of media.
It did not cause you to target and try to destroy the reputation of a good, decent and beloved woman who suffered from cancer by telling lies about her publicly.
It did not cause you to so gracelessly and ungratefully reject the kindness, goodwill, warm welcome and the offers of assistance of Harry’s family.
It did not cause you marry into a family and situation with which you disapproved entirely, have no interest in and for which you have no respect.
It did not cause you to perform an insulting, ignorant and grossly disrespectful act as you tried to belittle the late Queen and the Monarchy.
It did not cause you to insult, abuse, denigrate and harass two elderly dying people, one of whom had painful bone cancer, who had lived lives of dedicated and tireless service who you objected to because they were standing in the way of your vulgar, materialistic and self serving objectives.
It did not cause you to abuse and harass a good and decent man who is elderly and cancer stricken as he continues to work tirelessly in the service of the greater good.
It did not cause you to lie about racism and abuse and trivialize a serious societal issue suffered by millions to service your selfish and greedy agenda.
It did not cause you to accept an array of unearned and undeserved privileges and opportunities that were only offered to you because you married a prince.
It did not cause you to spend a decade lying about caring about serving others when you quit the perfect role for such a life in disgust gracelessly stating “I can’t believe I’m not getting paid to do this” knowing fully that you were living one of the most privileged lives in the world and that this was the duty expected in the circumstances.
It did not cause you to exploit the vulnerable, abused, sick and suffering to advertise jewellery and clothing for sale for your personal financial gain and free PR while pretending to be doing it for the right reasons.
It did not cause you to use your looks and persuasive ability to manipulatively force a deeply disturbed, drug addicted man of low intelligence away from his life’s work, role and family isolating him from all he knew including his friends all in the service of your agenda.
It did not cause you to publicly insult, belittle and denigrate your family members including excluding them all except for one from your wedding.
It did not cause you to cut your father off and attempt to destroy his reputation long before you saw this ‘letter’.
It did not cause you to plagiarize individuals, organizations and artworks for your speeches and logos.
It did not cause you to use the private moments of two small defenseless children endlessly on social media to promote the sale of products to enrich yourself.
It did not cause you to release a self serving statement the moment your brother sold his story to the media in which you declared this is why you treated your father like dirt for a decade after meeting Prince Harry instead of allowing one, especially one’s own father, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
The fact or otherwise of your father’s alleged abuse, which you admitted in a public statement to having only been made aware of in 2018 (corrected by the police to 2019), did not cause you to become a gold digger who manipulated her way into a meeting with ‘a lier in 2016.
It did not cause you to lie about not knowing about the Royal Family or Harry prior to meeting him and fail to introduce Harry to your father.
It did not cause you to demonise and despise the Royal Family and the Monarchy for no reason other than its rules did not suit your game plan for using it as a vehicle to gain mass attention and creating a lavish luxury lifestyle for yourself and maximizing your personal wealth.
It did not cause you to lie shamelessly and shamefully repeatedly in public about the family, the family members and the nature of the Monarchy in many forms of media.
It did not cause you to target and try to destroy the reputation of a good, decent and beloved woman who suffered from cancer by telling lies about her publicly.
It did not cause you to so gracelessly and ungratefully reject the kindness, goodwill, warm welcome and the offers of assistance of Harry’s family.
It did not cause you marry into a family and situation with which you disapproved entirely, have no interest in and for which you have no respect.
It did not cause you to perform an insulting, ignorant and grossly disrespectful act as you tried to belittle the late Queen and the Monarchy.
It did not cause you to insult, abuse, denigrate and harass two elderly dying people, one of whom had painful bone cancer, who had lived lives of dedicated and tireless service who you objected to because they were standing in the way of your vulgar, materialistic and self serving objectives.
It did not cause you to abuse and harass a good and decent man who is elderly and cancer stricken as he continues to work tirelessly in the service of the greater good.
It did not cause you to lie about racism and abuse and trivialize a serious societal issue suffered by millions to service your selfish and greedy agenda.
It did not cause you to accept an array of unearned and undeserved privileges and opportunities that were only offered to you because you married a prince.
It did not cause you to spend a decade lying about caring about serving others when you quit the perfect role for such a life in disgust gracelessly stating “I can’t believe I’m not getting paid to do this” knowing fully that you were living one of the most privileged lives in the world and that this was the duty expected in the circumstances.
It did not cause you to exploit the vulnerable, abused, sick and suffering to advertise jewellery and clothing for sale for your personal financial gain and free PR while pretending to be doing it for the right reasons.
It did not cause you to use your looks and persuasive ability to manipulatively force a deeply disturbed, drug addicted man of low intelligence away from his life’s work, role and family isolating him from all he knew including his friends all in the service of your agenda.
It did not cause you to publicly insult, belittle and denigrate your family members including excluding them all except for one from your wedding.
It did not cause you to cut your father off and attempt to destroy his reputation long before you saw this ‘letter’.
It did not cause you to plagiarize individuals, organizations and artworks for your speeches and logos.
It did not cause you to use the private moments of two small defenseless children endlessly on social media to promote the sale of products to enrich yourself.
It did not cause you to release a self serving statement the moment your brother sold his story to the media in which you declared this is why you treated your father like dirt for a decade after meeting Prince Harry instead of allowing one, especially one’s own father, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
134
326
2,340
50,687
Bal a Versailles retweeted
Oh, good grief! 🙄 ANOTHER royal exclusive?
What are we in for this time? Another 16 pages of carefully staged photos accompanied by the usual whinging, victimhood, grievances and recycled sob stories?
What haven’t we heard a hundred times already?
At this point, the only uinely shocking is an interview without a single complaint, accusation or attempt to rewrite history.
New photoshoot. Same old victim narrative?
What are we in for this time? Another 16 pages of carefully staged photos accompanied by the usual whinging, victimhood, grievances and recycled sob stories?
What haven’t we heard a hundred times already?
At this point, the only uinely shocking is an interview without a single complaint, accusation or attempt to rewrite history.
New photoshoot. Same old victim narrative?
94
17
304
21,094
Maybe the Hello exclusive is retaliation for Meghan not being mentioned once in this November issue of Tatler.🍁🍂
7
8
116
7,373
Bal a Versailles retweeted
I knew it. I said when this story broke, when a friend of hers said to one outlet that Meghan ‘was advised’ to not say anything, it would be directed back to the Royal Family. Meghan never took advice off anyone, but now we are expected to believe she did this time?
A Royal Protection officer would not look into allegations in a letter and start an investigation. This is Meghan trying to blame the Palace that she was silenced again.
Meghan 'wanted to go public' with Thomas Markle abuse claims in 2019 dailymail.com/news/article-1… via @DailyMail
A Royal Protection officer would not look into allegations in a letter and start an investigation. This is Meghan trying to blame the Palace that she was silenced again.
Meghan 'wanted to go public' with Thomas Markle abuse claims in 2019 dailymail.com/news/article-1… via @DailyMail
383
189
3,392
154,635


























