They have this belief that not helping them equals being against them. Which when you think about it sort od describes why leftists are so prone to things like civil lock down hysteria and gulags.

The Left is prepared for that in Ireland, Europe and much of the US. There is a reason beyond DEI why it is so routine for major cities to have black police chiefs, and it is to ensure 100% political reliability, as well to have leaders who will order firing on white crowds.
4/

the thing about calling DEI 'economic genocide' is that it undersells it

yes, young White men were systematically excluded from careers during their peak marriage years, but that's just first-order effects.

second-order: marriage market collapse. women date across and up. men without careers become invisible to the women who would have married them and disappear. the "eligible bachelor" pool shrinks.

third-order: fertility crisis. fewer marriages, fewer children. but it's worse than just men not marrying or having families. the women who "won" the DEI lottery got careers instead of families, delayed fertility until it was too late. DEI attacked family formation from both sides, excluded men from provider roles AND diverted women from their fertility window. everyone lost.

fourth-order: psychological. young men couldn't even name what was happening to them. the same institutions that excluded them told them they were "privileged", that complaining was proof of weakness. so they internalized failure as personal inadequacy rather than systemic rigging, retreated into depression, video games, porn. the symptoms we then pathologized as "male failure". the system broke them (on purpose) and blamed them for being broken.

fifth-order: institutional trust gone. once you know positions are filled by demographics rather than competence, every credential becomes suspect (if not a priori worthless). is your doctor qualified or a diversity hire? your pilot? your engineer? you can't prove any individual is incompetent, but you can't trust any individual is competent either. medicine skepticism, academic failure, media skepticism, none of this emerged organically. it was manufactured by the DEI hire you can't be sure is qualified to treat you.

sixth-order: reality became unspeakable. noticing any of this was a fireable offense. pointing out the obvious got you called a bigot, deplatformed or fired. pure totalitarian censorship and the problem couldn't even be acknowledged (until now, finally)
men knew they were being cheated but couldn't say it. women sensed something was wrong with the men but couldn't identify it. relationships poisoned by a dynamic neither party could name.

seventh-order: the feedback loop. fewer eligible men means more women competing for a shrinking pool, more women losing the marriage market, more resentment, more "men are trash", more support for DEI, fewer eligible men and the system accelerates itself.

and the worst part is that DEI was just the economic arm. the same people and institutions pushed the complete package
"toxic masculinity" to pathologize male identity
"the future is female" as explicit zero-sum framing delusion
"believe all women" to weaponize trust against men
"men are trash" to normalize open contempt
a coordinated ideological assault on family formation.

and it even had a business model. HR departments exploded (millions of jobs invented to administer the regime). DEI consultants became a multi-billion dollar industry. politicians got voting blocs dependent on racial grievance. established boomers kept their positions while their competition was eliminated.

the architects knew what they were doing
you don't accidentally build a system that specifically targets men during peak marriage years, tells them they deserve it, makes it unspeakable to complain, attacks their identity as toxic, promotes women into career tracks that burn their fertility, then acts confused when society collapses

if you wanted to suppress the fertility of a specific demographic, engineer the breakdown of trust between the sexes, and make it illegal to notice, the playbook would look exactly like this.

DEI should be held responsible for the fertility crisis, the marriage collapse, the epidemic of male depression and suicide, the destruction of institutional trust, the atomization of society, and the manufactured war between men and women

but DEI was the weapon
the people who designed it, funded it, made it mandatory, enforced it through HR, fired anyone who resisted, called all opposition hate and racism, built careers and industries on its maintenance, they knew. and they're the ones who should be remembered as the architects of one of the worst crimes against humanity

Buyers: "How much will this house cost me?"

Sellers: "What's your budget?"

Buyers: "Well, it was 500K, but with these new fifty year mortgages, I think it could stretch to million."

Sellers: "I have an astonishing coincidence to report."

Look, I don't know exactly who's retarded enough to need to hear this, but if you throw money at something, you get more of it.

Which means that if you subsidize demand, you get more demand.

And if you have the same supply, and more demand, price goes up.

This is how the federal Stafford Loan program made college a gateway to permanent debt slavery. Subsidize demand, price goes up.

The reason people don't understand this is that most people are only smart enough to think about individuals, not populations.

They think if you have more money, you can buy more things, as if things come from the item store in a Japanese console RPG, where the store always has infinity stuff to sell you, and infinity money to buy your loot.

People who are capable of thinking about large groups quickly realize that money is just a way of distributing things.

Like, there's a limited supply of things, and you're just choosing who gets them. Having more money doesn't make more things.

Except... it should, shouldn't it?

Eventually?

Like, if apples get super expensive, because somebody invented a new kind of apple that's so delicious that everyone wants them, then the price of those apples goes up, so more people start growing them.

So why doesn't that work with houses and colleges?

Why don't the super-inflated prices of those things inspire profit-minded people to make more?

It's almost as if there were some sort of gatekeeper, whose permission you needed to make a house or a university.

But that's impossible, because this is a totally capitalist country, so you can just do things, right?

The left refuses to condemn murder, terrorism, the weaponization of the government as they jail politicians and lawyers...

The right is combing through private group chats to make sure no one on their side is guilty of thought crimes.

A seriously evil movement.

We can see the alliance of establishment Republicans, many of whom had nothing to say about Jay Jones, clutching their pearls over a private chat where people were called gay retards...

And the left whom gleefully support killing Republicans who will now politicize this leak.

The establishment Republicans are willing to lose on principle. This has been widely known of course.

But, what are those principles? What is so important that they would turn over our nation's to communists?

Weakness. Cowardice. Treachery. Those are their principles.

Iryna Zarutska is dead because of bad policy — bad policy that seemingly spread to every major city all at once.

Why, and how?

Obviously Soros DA’s play a huge role but there’s more.

There’s a group writing the policies for them, and @LELDF broke the full story today…🧵

We all knew that "diversity gains" explicitly came at the expense of white men. They knew it, we knew it. Everyone knew it from the beginning. It was always right out in the open.

But we were expected to pretend that this wasn't the case, that this was not a zero sum game being rigged at the expense of white men. Even opponents of DEI, to remain vaguely respectable, had to avoid mention of the dreaded w-word, and talk about 'merit' and being 'colourblind'. Proponents, of course, would openly curse white men, they would spit out 'white male' like a slur, and they would insist on the necessity for diversity ... while screeching when any given diversity hire was identified as a diversity hire.

"We need DEI so that we can hire diversity (and not white men). Therefore you (white men) will not get hired. And if you point this out, you definitely won't get hired!"

Some of us started openly calling it what it was: systemic bigotry against white men. People got cancelled for speaking so plainly. Nevertheless the angry muttering got louder, became angry shouts. Cancellation only works when you have something to lose. When you've already been locked out? When the game is decided before you even play? They can't do much to you then. What are they going to do, not hire you?

Now they have to say the quiet part out loud. "Diversity" means no white men. "Inclusion" means excluding white men. "Equity" means taking white men's stuff.

They don't get to hide behind a polite agreement not to call their actions what they plainly are, anymore.

🚨India just said out loud what I’ve been saying all along.

❌️The H-1B and other immigration visas India exploits are not about a labor shortage.

❌️India openly admits the mobility of these workers is vital to their services exports.

❌️ That means it’s our jobs on the they created, it’s American jobs repackaged as India’s exports.

❌️Trade with India has only ever given us a deficit.

❌️Because of these visas, Americans have lost jobs and investments while our own companies and universities sold us out.

❌️ We are trillions in debt, yet India’s $280 billion in services exports depend on siphoning opportunity from our workforce.

❌️🇺🇲 Bring that $280 billion in jobs back to the U.S., cut off the aid we send India, and stop the billions in remittances flowing out of America, that alone would help us climb out of debt and rebuild our economy.

❌️🇺🇲Without the trade deficit, without the job drain, with Americans employed and thriving, we restore the middle class.

❌️Any “deal” with India that keeps this pipeline alive is the end of American prosperity.

❌️🇺🇲This isn’t xenophobia. It’s sovereignty. It’s actually business common sense🤷‍♀️

This is outrageous.

Some U.S. companies are using H-1B visas to staff their DEI offices.

I've reviewed numerous examples of hospitals, universities and other employers hiring foreign H-1B workers as DEI bureaucrats.

I'm urging USCIS to work with us to fix this. 🧵

An odd day indeed when Mr Morgan actually calls out the shamelessness of the left.

This paper argues that the shift toward a more liberal immigration policy under Blair was not the result of lobbying by employers, NGOs and similar organized groups, but rather originated from the government itself and Labour's ideological adherence to neoliberalism and ment officials under Blair and Brown saw immigration as both inevitable and intrinsically good.

According to the author, once that shift had been initiated by the government, those groups supported it, but they didn't initiate it and their involvement was a consequence rather than a cause of the shift. I think in general intellectuals have a tendency to downplay the role of ideology in politics, because material explanations are seen as more sophisticated, but it matters a lot.

Amy Biehl was a true believer in the cult of white guilt, a child of the West who went to South Africa to “atone” for a civilization she’d been taught to despise.

Despite being an American anti-apartheid activist and supporter of the ANC, the savages did not care who she was. was enough. They stoned her, beat her with bricks, and stabbed her in the face and chest. She bled out in the street, alone and mutilated. She was 26 years old.

She would never have died like that in the South Africa she protested against.

Her killers were later pardoned and declared agents of “liberation.” Instead of summoning righteous indignation, her parents wept in the name of “reconciliation” and shook hands with the men who tore their daughter apart. They even hired one of them to work for a foundation created in her name.

This is a ritual self-nullification of a people who no longer believe they have the right to exist; a people so broken by guilt, so hollowed by propaganda, that they would rather sanctify their child’s killers than name what truly happened.

Amy died because she believed the lie: that you can embrace the savage and make him your brother; and her parents completed the ritual: White guilt absolving black hatred, and blood spilled to feed the myth.

This is the end point of liberalism: offering your children to the knife, and calling it peace.

I wrote on this over the summer: "The greatest subversion of this effort comes from within our own ranks, from the effeminate and cowardly class of “Christians” who have traded the sword of the Spirit for the flag of surrender. They twist the Gospel into a suicide pact, screeching that the Word of God commands us to meekly accept our own displacement and cultural erasure. This is a damnable lie, a spiritual poison designed to pacify us into oblivion."

Full post: news.gab.com/2025/07/our-fa…

Erika Kirk has forgiven her husband, and father of her children's killer. This is disgusting. It's neither courageous, nor virtuous, just vile. Offering absolution to a politically motivated murderer, Erika Kirk just sent a message to the world that we are weak. There is a time to forego it. This was the latter.

Nothing in excess, and forgiveness cannot be doled out so haphazardly that offering solace and tolerance to those who want us dead becomes dogmatic. And yes, forgiveness is a form of tolerance, as it grants those who have wronged us mercy. It's weakness, especially when given someone who is not is seeking it and would likely reject it.

Has Robinson showed remorse, falling to his knees and begging for the Lord's mercy? No, of course not but let's just forgive the cold blooded unrepentant mutant fucker, because "that's what Jesus would do". Okay, so you want to be like Jesus, why don't you climb up on that cross and I'll grab the hammer.

Imagine marrying a woman, knowing that should you be executed in front of your children, she would go on stage at your memorial with over two hundred thousand people and announce on national television not two weeks after you execution that she forgives the monster who did it. Logically, this also implies that she forgives all of those who danced on her husband's grave following his extremely gory demise. Wow, stunning and brave...

This kind of unmitigated forgiveness only emboldens the enemy. Whether we want to admit it or not she just endangered her children's lives, as well ours as well. This is suicidal Christianity, and it must be vehemently rejected at all costs.

This is an absolutely devastating debunking of the @CatoInstitute's "all murder is right-wing" violence list from @AlexNowrasteh

Nowrasteh intentionally omitted almost every instance of left-wing violence in the last 20 years

x.com/Recursion_Agen…

The left has never played by our rules. Only we play by our rules. Our rules are what keeps our side from winning. We either want to win or we will lose under some delusion that the rules mean anything.

What people on the right needs to understand about the left regarding free speech is very simple. The left is simply lying. They don't believe in these things.

Trying to show them their hypocrisy is a fool's errand, they don't care about that they are mad we are fighting back.

This really annoys me about leftists.

They have been completely dominant for the last 60 years. Everything has moved far to the left.

But they pretend they've never had any power and have never been responsible for anything.

Take responsibility.