Pinned Tweet
I needed some peace and quiet, and improved cogsec.

I will be rebuilding from scratch, so if I unfollowed you please know that it's nothing personal and I probably think you're great馃檹
45
2
161
68,332
Tailscale gonna be a trillion dollar company
0
0
18
719
in toronto you can get a PSL ramen
18
211
4,910
86,891
What did you think the singularity meant?

Vibes? Essays?
I'm tired boss
0
0
10
416
New research from @hlyons_bd

The model that underlies this report is incredible. We can discover and understand things about the nuclear fuel industry that nobody else can.
1/ Uzbekistan鈥檚 15,000 tU uranium target for 2030 depends on five things it doesn鈥檛 control: a sanctioned Russian oil company, a copper smelter, the country鈥檚 fertilizer makers, falling gas output, and its biggest competitor. 馃У馃憞
2
2
9
346
I miss json sometimes
1
0
4
326
TIL that the Soviets used fucking RTGs to power a network of Arctic lighthouses and there was a big international effort to secure the radioactive materials after the fall of the USSR

Fucking lmao
0
0
0
284
ChatGPT deskslop app is completely unusable.

Can't go more than a few mins without it crashing and stopping all of my agents. Kinda incredible that they shipped this.
1
0
0
311
"Nothing from my end"
1
0
4
217
Just fed my son vegetables that I grew and game that I hunted in the same meal.

Feels good man
1
0
21
1,075
NIMBY's are one thing, but you know who I really hate?

People who think they can tell you what you can or cannot put in your OWN backyard.
2
0
6
400
A quirk I have found with gpt-6 is that it's quite enthusiastic about duck hunting

I ask it questions in a neutral tone and all of a sudden it's like "Nice! Wood ducks are my favorite ducks! Does it have a nice layer of yellow fat beneath the skin? Here are some recipes!"
0
0
1
270
I am a humble believer in the fact that you can just explain things. And this is a massive, glorious whitepill.
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had

with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works

already-clean.goodfire.com
0
0
7
335
They don't want you to know this but the hermes agents are free, you can just take them. I have 200 hermes agents at home.
Hermes Agent is yours
0
0
5
426
Gm
This morning I will step away from the slop cannon and attempt to shoot a duck.
0
0
3
268
This morning I will step away from the slop cannon and attempt to shoot a duck.
0
0
2
518
I should go mow my lawn
0
0
4
245
I'm so ready for that mobile app. It really can't come soon enough.
0
0
7
258
Labs will talk about "alignment" and then build products that intentionally obfuscate to the user how they work.

You ever try to talk to a Dot about how it works? It's prompted to hide it from you.

How you gonna align AI to humanity when you're not even close to aligned with me
2
0
5
339
Just wrote some code by hand, just to feel something
1
0
5
400
What did you think "profitability by q3 2027" meant?

Kernels? Vera Rubins?
holy rugpull
0
0
3
391