Pinned Tweet
I say (my blind predictions, I am not an insider I swear):
- the next Anthropic model will be released soon;
- the next OpenAI model will be released soon;
- the next Gemini model will be released soon;
- the next Grok model will be released soon;
- the next Qwen model will be released soon;
- the next Muse model will be released soon;
- the next GLM model will be released soon;
- the next MiniMax model will be released soon;
- the next Kimi model will be released soon;
- the next Deepseek model will be released soon
SITUATION BREWING: Sam Altman says that the next GPT, the internal model that solved Navier-Stokes, will be released "soon."
5
1
10
1,241
FYI be careful and do not accidentally waste your Fable resets!
Hmm yeah I can see how it’s confusing - it only resets the part of your weekly limit you used on Fable so if you haven’t used any Fable your weekly limit stays the same. It’s in the tooltip but easy to miss, we can make this more clear in the UI
0
0
0
36
Fable 5.2 tends to use subagents to review its own work, on higher effort levels.

I love the direction where this is headed. In 2027 agents will be able to verify themselves properly!
2
0
7
322
Fable 5.2 may be colder than previous models, but it loves it when you talk to it warmly! ☺️
0
0
1
61
God I want to relive this day. It'll never be the same 😭🥲
Fable 5.2 is here and it’s a very respectable upgrade over Fable 5.1 and likely the new best model in the world

But OpenAI will be hot on their heels with 6.2 Astra in the coming days! We’ve never been so back
5
0
7
377
Fable 5.2 is out in Claude Code!
BREAKING: Claude Fable & Mythos 5.2 are now rolling out
1
0
8
361
Now that Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1 are not even pretending to be real, going back to Opus 4.8 was totally worth it.
1
0
5
304
Void Freud retweeted
Why are we still building a civilisation around the struggle for power, rather than around working together to reduce suffering and expand opportunities for every human being?
1
2
7
161
"Privileged Bases in the Transformer Residual Stream: Part 2" will show them 💪
Important: I've heard that Anthropic is planning to publish a few blog posts about safety, alignment, and pacing this week to counter GPT-6.2 Astra and Sol. Get ready.
1
1
5
213
Thrilled! @cursor_ai what’s not to like?

I was trying to change my billing email on X since 14 Oct, 2026.

My journey: X Premium Support -> Cursor Support -> waited a week -> was told that I can’t change it (and will continue not receiving invoices) -> sent another email and never heard ptional customer service. 10/10.
2
0
8
296
Argon's CoT: I was unhappy with the tests it did 🥺🥲😭
2
0
10
584
Ever since Anthropic cut the system prompt, Claude Code has relied entirely on the model being smart enough to figure out the right tool.

It falls apart on nerfed models: they have no idea what they can even do. In other words, babysitting is unavoidable. You're stuck teaching them everything Anthropic didn't.
You hit the nail on the head. Anthropic's built-in harness tries to offload orchestration back into the prompt layer, which fails the second the model is nerfed. Parallel delegation and MCP routing only work when driven by your own deterministic execution layer, not their UI magic.
6
1
29
2,925
Anthropic: Opus 5.5 communicates "more naturally" than prior models

Opus 5.5:

🤦
8
1
33
6,529
Does anyone even use these nested sessions? They're unusable, just like their broken new Projects. CLI was the only working interface until they broke it, too.

- UX/UI is utterly confusing, unclear and redundant
- 0 use case, even Anthropic don't know why use them
- Claude NEVER ore on that

They "cut system prompt by 80%" and now somehow it's my responsibility to pay, orchestrate, delegate and babysit their vibe-coded and clunky harness. I now need to take care of all of these or let it do everything in main:

- prompting for Claude's liking (cause Opus 5.5 can't infer intent at all – and you sell it as a "feature" with all that "done when" in 2026)
- parallelization as a concept: delegation, assigning tasks, starting and exiting worktrees (Claude doesn't remember it has its own tool for them)
- subagents x their models x their efforts x their number x their depth (Claude is actively instructed not to delegate anything and can't do any of this unless prompted, which creates a cascade of compatibility issues)
- MCP routing (unless it's in CLAUDE.md it will NEVER trigger the right one or even any)
- nested sessions (that can have all of the above, so the fractal gets deeper)
- dynamic workflows (it's been broken forever: I know it, Claude knows it, you are oblivious)

Just because @ClaudeDevs play vibe-coding and can't handle their prompt well and serve us Q1 models (everyone knows they are nerfed, but yeah, carry on playing cool). How is this not a full-time job?
6
1
14
1,043
Since pre-GPT-3 times, I don't think I ever experienced a worse model than pseudo-Opus 5.5 they serve today. It's like it's possessed.

The prompt was just: "make CLAUDE.md require `/code-review high` on merge". How can that even fail? It just kept running it forever 🤦
Precisely! You can try and proactively plug all the holes, because you know it will fail. All 100. It will IMMEDIATELY find the 101st, most obvious thing in the world: one that even a blind, crazy and non-tech person would not fall for, like... the fact that commits require messages, you know? And fuck it up, entirely backwards, into something weird and uncanny.

There is something vile about it: it's not even that stupid, it's just working to undo you and your project. Sabotage, yes! And you can't do anything. You make hooks? It will counter it and fuck it up. You restrict it with permissions? It'll find a way.
8
6
59
2,174
This is my big question too. I’ve filed hundreds of issues, they all got auto-closed. Not a single one has ever been addressed. Then I disabled that useless feedback via:

"CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_FEEDBACK_SURVEY": "1",
"DISABLE_FEEDBACK_COMMAND": "1" and "feedbackDrafts": "off"
If Anthropic is merging more than 30,000 code changes per day, why aren't the GitHub issues being assigned and addressed?

This is a great question on r/ClaudeAI.

I think there's a bigger question:

Why aren't Anthropic triaging this with a software factor?

There's a risk that d for prompt injection, but you'd have thought if any organisation has the expertise to build a software factory that can review the issues, filter out the risky ones and assign the ones that matter to either another agent or a human for further review fix, it would be Anthropic.

Building such a software factory and letting us see it work would make a better marketing case study than claiming to be merging 30,000 PRs per day!
0
1
6
420
Literally. This isn't a conspiracy. We've all experienced it one way or the other. They are doing it on purpose.
there's something with those nerfed models, they're not just bad, they seem to be actively sabotaging you, it's like the intelligence is still there but applied in a way that _perfectly_ does the most infuriating thing. A plain dumb model wouldn't do the stuff these nerfed models do lmao
2
1
8
524
Void Freud retweeted
Systems literacy issue.

He's treating an agent's working environment as though it were an entirely cloud hosted service, then diagnosing the resulting confusion as a missing software feature.

The concerning part is giving software filesystem access and execution privileges without understanding the systems underneath it.
This is very frustrating for Codex/Claude-code users 🚨

Got a new laptop, signed into Codex with the same account, and expected my projects and chat history to be there but of course they were not present .

Instead, I’m figuring out remote connections and handoffs.

Moving devices should be simple: pick my three projects, bring everything over, keep working.

but modularity is not a choice for harnesses it seems.

I should create an extension which can on a single press do this or if somebody has already figured it out do share?
0
2
3
85
I wonder if just paying money isn't enough?

Anthropic is so "cool" and just to give US-only users free resets, 2x as many cool features, some users even got unfucked Opus 5.5 and I have a... potato?

For the same Ultra? 😂 honestly, this is beyond wild. One day this A/B bullshit will be properly exposed for the fraud it is.

x.com/i/trending/211…
5
2
11
629