Pinned Tweet
அப்பன் நீ, அம்மை நீ, ஐயனும் நீ, அன்புடைய மாமனும் மாமியும் நீ, ஒப்புடைய மாதரும் ஒண்பொருளும் நீ
66
346
1,499
Today is the Gurupooja of Aiyadigal Kadavar Kon Nayanar.
Of the two Pallava kings mentioned in Periya Puranam, Aiyadigal Kadavar Kon Nayanar was easily identified. Some of the ancient manuscripts call him as ‘Pancha pada Simhan’, Sanskrit for Ai (five) Adigal (pada). Further, the father of Bheemavarma.
Based on these two notes, historians identify him with Simhavarman III (550 - 575 CE) who was a Pallava king and father of Simhavishnu & Bheemavarman.
Aiyadigal Kadavar Kon built a number of Shivalayas in north Tamil Nadu and constructed many lakes & tanks.
The Periya Puranam recounts that, wishing to devote himself wholly to Shiva Thondu, the sacred service of Lord Shiva, Aiyadigal Kadavarkon relinquished his crown and entrusted the kingdom to his son Simhavishnu. Freed from the responsibilities of kingship, he travelled from one Shiva temple to another, offering worship and composing a venpa at each sacred shrine. His surviving hymns are collected as Kshetra Thiruvenpa, which forms part of the Eleventh Thirumurai.
Of the two Pallava kings mentioned in Periya Puranam, Aiyadigal Kadavar Kon Nayanar was easily identified. Some of the ancient manuscripts call him as ‘Pancha pada Simhan’, Sanskrit for Ai (five) Adigal (pada). Further, the father of Bheemavarma.
Based on these two notes, historians identify him with Simhavarman III (550 - 575 CE) who was a Pallava king and father of Simhavishnu & Bheemavarman.
Aiyadigal Kadavar Kon built a number of Shivalayas in north Tamil Nadu and constructed many lakes & tanks.
The Periya Puranam recounts that, wishing to devote himself wholly to Shiva Thondu, the sacred service of Lord Shiva, Aiyadigal Kadavarkon relinquished his crown and entrusted the kingdom to his son Simhavishnu. Freed from the responsibilities of kingship, he travelled from one Shiva temple to another, offering worship and composing a venpa at each sacred shrine. His surviving hymns are collected as Kshetra Thiruvenpa, which forms part of the Eleventh Thirumurai.
1
24
86
1,125
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
This is our Finance Minister, Smt .@nsitharaman Ji, visiting revered Shri Cheluvanarayana Swamy Temple in Melukote, Mandya, offering prayers & having temple prasadam like any common person.
Modi Sarkar has always emphasised simplicity, humility & staying connected to Bharat's roots, wMinister himself or his colleagues in the Cabinet.
FM Nirmala Sitharaman Ji, has always shown simplicity in travel, choice of cars, etc, despite being a top minister.
No grand demands, no unnecessary fuss.
Modi Sarkar has always emphasised simplicity, humility & staying connected to Bharat's roots, wMinister himself or his colleagues in the Cabinet.
FM Nirmala Sitharaman Ji, has always shown simplicity in travel, choice of cars, etc, despite being a top minister.
No grand demands, no unnecessary fuss.
73
818
4,024
64,659
Happy to be part of Chennai Lit Fest this year ! Looking forward to meet scholars and distinguished guests for some engaging discussions.
✨ Meet our distinguished speaker, T. S. Krishnan, at Chennai Lit Fest ’26!
📅 14 & 15 November 2026
📍 Welcomhotel by ITC Hotels, Chennai
🌐 Register: chennailitfest.in
.@tskrishnan .@bgopu1973
#ChennaiLitFest2026 #CLF06 #TSKrishnan #MeetOurSpeaker
3
25
136
2,047
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
✨ Meet our distinguished speaker, T. S. Krishnan, at Chennai Lit Fest ’26!
📅 14 & 15 November 2026
📍 Welcomhotel by ITC Hotels, Chennai
🌐 Register: chennailitfest.in
.@tskrishnan .@bgopu1973
#ChennaiLitFest2026 #CLF06 #TSKrishnan #MeetOurSpeaker
📅 14 & 15 November 2026
📍 Welcomhotel by ITC Hotels, Chennai
🌐 Register: chennailitfest.in
.@tskrishnan .@bgopu1973
#ChennaiLitFest2026 #CLF06 #TSKrishnan #MeetOurSpeaker
0
3
14
2,234
Sri Rama is revered as Maryada Purushottama, the embodiment of Dharma, not merely because of his valour or victories, but because of the exemplary manner in which he conducted himself in every relationship and circumstance. The Sārāla copper plates of Vira Rajendra Chola brings ile praising Rama as their ancestor.
पितरि तनयवृत्तिं भ्रातरि भ्रातृवृत्तिं युवतिषु पतिवृत्तिं शत्रवे शत्रुवृत्तिम् (।)
मुनिषु नृपतिवृत्तिं बान्धवे बन्धुवृत्तिं सकलमखिलनाथारिशक्षयामास लोकम् ॥
He conducted himself as a son towards his father, as a brother towards his brothers, as a husband towards women, and as an enemy towards his enemies. Towards sages, he behaved like a king; towards his relatives, he showed the affection of a kinsman. Thus, he taught the entire world the proper way of conduct.
पितरि तनयवृत्तिं भ्रातरि भ्रातृवृत्तिं युवतिषु पतिवृत्तिं शत्रवे शत्रुवृत्तिम् (।)
मुनिषु नृपतिवृत्तिं बान्धवे बन्धुवृत्तिं सकलमखिलनाथारिशक्षयामास लोकम् ॥
He conducted himself as a son towards his father, as a brother towards his brothers, as a husband towards women, and as an enemy towards his enemies. Towards sages, he behaved like a king; towards his relatives, he showed the affection of a kinsman. Thus, he taught the entire world the proper way of conduct.
4
90
277
3,471
Amazing !! Lakshmana seeking forgiveness for cutting Surphanaka's nose. Ravana apparently abducts Sita due to 'revenge', not due to lust and it was Lakshmana who is the reason for Rama-Ravana war.
What is truly abominable is that even the so called 'dharmic warriors' are bending over backwards to defend such distortions in the name of cinematic freedom. Pathetic !
What is truly abominable is that even the so called 'dharmic warriors' are bending over backwards to defend such distortions in the name of cinematic freedom. Pathetic !
Go to the 1:05 mark in the video.
Ranbir: "Rajkumari Shurpanakha ke saath jo hua, woh uchit nahi hua. Kisi bhi stree ke saath aisa nahi hona chahiye." And gives a hint to Ravi Dubey.
Ravi Dubey: "Main apni bhool sweekar karta hoon aur kshama maangta hoon."
According to Namit Malhotra's #Ramayana , the RAM vs RAVANA battle happened because of one mistake made by Lakshman. x.com/iprcRisesAGAIN…
11
82
224
5,140
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
I had a first-time experience today in a High Court proceeding! I attended the bench of Justices GR Swaminathan and MD Sumathi, through online video conference, where the library scam case was being heard. Justice GRS was kind enough to call me to elicit my views and I shared my views.
J GRS was pointed in asking the question who approved the book submissions from Akalvilakku. The Director of Public Libraries said it was the expert committee, consisting of 112 members.
When I was asked my opinion by J GRS, I stated clearly that this was simply impossible. I went on a limb to say that all these are eminent intellectuals, writers and academicians and they would not have done such a thing (even though they may be holding political and social views antithetical to mine).
Apparently, Akalvilakku submitted 2335 titles, of which 1700 were acquired, one copy each to Periyar Arivulagam, amounting to 17 lakhs. So each book was bought at around 1000 Rs!
Based on the High Court order, 3 bank accounts belonging to Mohan (publisher of Akalvilakku, Phoneix and Sigma) have been frozen with around Rs 22+ lakh in them.
The next session is on Monday, 16th November, 2.15 PM and I intend to be there.
J GRS was pointed in asking the question who approved the book submissions from Akalvilakku. The Director of Public Libraries said it was the expert committee, consisting of 112 members.
When I was asked my opinion by J GRS, I stated clearly that this was simply impossible. I went on a limb to say that all these are eminent intellectuals, writers and academicians and they would not have done such a thing (even though they may be holding political and social views antithetical to mine).
Apparently, Akalvilakku submitted 2335 titles, of which 1700 were acquired, one copy each to Periyar Arivulagam, amounting to 17 lakhs. So each book was bought at around 1000 Rs!
Based on the High Court order, 3 bank accounts belonging to Mohan (publisher of Akalvilakku, Phoneix and Sigma) have been frozen with around Rs 22+ lakh in them.
The next session is on Monday, 16th November, 2.15 PM and I intend to be there.
37
129
704
76,044
This was one of the earliest political hit jobs in Tamil Nadu.
VVS Iyer had made it clear that the two Brahmin boys were permitted to dine separately at the request of their parents. That was an exception, not the general practice at the Gurukulam, where students from different castes dined together.
Despite this clarification, Iyer was subjected to a relentless campaign that eventually led to his resignation.
Even now, the D stocks continues to portray Iyer as a casteist, conveniently ignoring the facts. A revolutionary freedom fighter who sacrificed so much for the nation deserves more.
VVS Iyer had made it clear that the two Brahmin boys were permitted to dine separately at the request of their parents. That was an exception, not the general practice at the Gurukulam, where students from different castes dined together.
Despite this clarification, Iyer was subjected to a relentless campaign that eventually led to his resignation.
Even now, the D stocks continues to portray Iyer as a casteist, conveniently ignoring the facts. A revolutionary freedom fighter who sacrificed so much for the nation deserves more.
V.V.S. Iyer, militant nationalist-turned-follower of Gandhi and one of the trendsetting writers of contemporary Tamil literature, was at the centre of controversy, being the head of the Ashrama. His clarification, published by The Hindu, on April 15, 1925, stated that “it is not a fact” that non-Brahmin boys were not allowed to sit for meals with the Brahmin boys. Only two Brahmins were given the permission and “no Brahmacharis hereafter taken in the Gurukula” would be allowed any exemption from the general mess, Iyer explained. But, the campaign went on and Iyer quit his position in the Ashrama a week later.
@the_hindu @THChennai
thehindu.com/news/national/…
6
52
235
7,207
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
WOWOWOWOW! So 17 lakhs from Periyar Arivulagam, now 27 lakh from Tenkasi. With libraries across the state, this may actually turn into multi crore scam.
I am so looking forward to today's hearing in Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court.
I am so looking forward to today's hearing in Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court.
Update on India's first AI scam which allegedly took place during the DMK regime:
A payment of around Rs 27 lakh was made to Agalvilakku publications for supplying fake AI-generated books to Tenkasi Central Library alone.
14
135
460
9,980
Next time, perhaps they should merge Vali and Sugriva into a single character. Vali Vadha is controversial anyway, so eliminating that episode would ensure a seamless flow of the story while saving precious screen time! 🤦🏻♂️
One cannot help but think of K Somu and APN, who so beautifully brought the characters and episodes of the Ramayana to life in Sampoorna Ramayanam, without resorting to any of these convenient excuses.
One cannot help but think of K Somu and APN, who so beautifully brought the characters and episodes of the Ramayana to life in Sampoorna Ramayanam, without resorting to any of these convenient excuses.
Makes perfect cinematic sense
There is little time in a 3 hour screenplay to show rAma visiting all the RSis during his exile
They had to pick one RSi to give the general idea. Agastya gets picked due to his southern connection and southern market. atri less well known than agastya.
Now the legend of sItA getting the garmets gets tacked on to agastya's consort instead of atri. That helps them cover two things without bringing in another RSi
5
30
141
3,405
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
Another intolerant person?
Actor Nitish Bharadwaj, best remembered for playing Lord Krishna in B.R. Chopra’s iconic 1988 television series Mahabharat, has taken a U-turn on his initial reaction to the Ranbir Kapoor-starrer Ramayana.
"The Ramayan is not just a story. It is deeply rooted in the civilizational and spiritual consciousness of Sanatan Bharat. Its heroes, heroine and antagonist are integral to the values and message of this Mahakavya. Their character and significance cannot be casually redefined. Mahavishnu took the Ram Avatar to uphold Dharma, parampara and establish Maryada. By presenting Ravan as an exceptionally liberal, socially just and fair figure, the film, in my view, alters the moral framework of the Ramayan and undermines the very purpose of avataar.”
indianexpress.com/article/entert…
Actor Nitish Bharadwaj, best remembered for playing Lord Krishna in B.R. Chopra’s iconic 1988 television series Mahabharat, has taken a U-turn on his initial reaction to the Ranbir Kapoor-starrer Ramayana.
"The Ramayan is not just a story. It is deeply rooted in the civilizational and spiritual consciousness of Sanatan Bharat. Its heroes, heroine and antagonist are integral to the values and message of this Mahakavya. Their character and significance cannot be casually redefined. Mahavishnu took the Ram Avatar to uphold Dharma, parampara and establish Maryada. By presenting Ravan as an exceptionally liberal, socially just and fair figure, the film, in my view, alters the moral framework of the Ramayan and undermines the very purpose of avataar.”
indianexpress.com/article/entert…
10
33
143
5,201
Today is the Guru Pooja of Poosalar Nayanar, who was an ardent devotee of Lord Shiva. He lived in Thiruninravur.
Though he longed to construct a magnificent temple for Shiva, his poverty prevented him from fulfilling his desire. Undeterred, he resolved to build the temple arefully visualising every detail, from its foundation and walls to the vimana and sanctum, following the prescribed architectural principles.
Having completed this extraordinary temple through his devotion, he fixed an auspicious day for its consecration. On that very day, Pallava king Rajasimha had arranged the consecration of the magnificent Kailasanatha temple at Kanchipuram. However, Shiva appeared in the king’s dream and instructed him to postpone the ceremony, as He wished to attend the consecration of the temple built by Poosalar. Astonished, the king travelled to Thiruninravur, only to discover that the magnificent temple existed solely in the devotee’s heart.
மறைநாவன் நின்றவூர்ப் பூசலார்க்கும் அடியேன்
Though he longed to construct a magnificent temple for Shiva, his poverty prevented him from fulfilling his desire. Undeterred, he resolved to build the temple arefully visualising every detail, from its foundation and walls to the vimana and sanctum, following the prescribed architectural principles.
Having completed this extraordinary temple through his devotion, he fixed an auspicious day for its consecration. On that very day, Pallava king Rajasimha had arranged the consecration of the magnificent Kailasanatha temple at Kanchipuram. However, Shiva appeared in the king’s dream and instructed him to postpone the ceremony, as He wished to attend the consecration of the temple built by Poosalar. Astonished, the king travelled to Thiruninravur, only to discover that the magnificent temple existed solely in the devotee’s heart.
மறைநாவன் நின்றவூர்ப் பூசலார்க்கும் அடியேன்
8
67
271
3,279
Of all the excuses offered by the apologists for the movie, perhaps the most ridiculous is, “There are many versions of the Ramayana, bro. This is just one more.”
Yes, there are many versions and retellings of the Ramayana, with variations in certain episodes, characters and interpretations. These differences are certainly worthy of academic study. But that is not how the Ramayana has lived in the hearts and minds of millions of ordinary people across Bharat.
For thousands of years, the Ramayana has been told and retold across the length and breadth of this country, passed down from grandparents to parents and from parents to children. However, the central moral framework has remained remarkably consistent.
Rama is the embodiment of Dharma. Ravana, despite his extraordinary learning, power, devotion and accomplishments, represents the disastrous consequences of surrendering to lust, arrogance and Adharma.
The Ramayana is fundamentally about the conflict between Dharma and Adharma, between righteousness and evil, and the ultimate triumph of Dharma.
Ravana's virtues are certainly acknowledged. But that is precisely what makes his downfall such a powerful lesson. All his knowledge, scholarship, devotion and strength could not save him once he chose the path of Adharma. The message is not that Ravana lacked greatness in every respect, but that none of his greatness could justify his actions or protect him from their consequences.
This is the essence of the Ramayana that generations of ordinary people have understood, cherished and passed on.
There is no overarching narrative of oppression and suppression in which Ravana must be recast as a victim and Rama as an oppressor. Nor is Rama portrayed as someone burdened by guilt or constantly apologising for upholding Dharma.
It is the attempt to replace the very essence of the Ramayana, while claiming the legitimacy of its tradition, that needs to be called out and criticised, as many people unfamiliar with the original texts may end up accepting it as the truth.
Let that sink in.
Yes, there are many versions and retellings of the Ramayana, with variations in certain episodes, characters and interpretations. These differences are certainly worthy of academic study. But that is not how the Ramayana has lived in the hearts and minds of millions of ordinary people across Bharat.
For thousands of years, the Ramayana has been told and retold across the length and breadth of this country, passed down from grandparents to parents and from parents to children. However, the central moral framework has remained remarkably consistent.
Rama is the embodiment of Dharma. Ravana, despite his extraordinary learning, power, devotion and accomplishments, represents the disastrous consequences of surrendering to lust, arrogance and Adharma.
The Ramayana is fundamentally about the conflict between Dharma and Adharma, between righteousness and evil, and the ultimate triumph of Dharma.
Ravana's virtues are certainly acknowledged. But that is precisely what makes his downfall such a powerful lesson. All his knowledge, scholarship, devotion and strength could not save him once he chose the path of Adharma. The message is not that Ravana lacked greatness in every respect, but that none of his greatness could justify his actions or protect him from their consequences.
This is the essence of the Ramayana that generations of ordinary people have understood, cherished and passed on.
There is no overarching narrative of oppression and suppression in which Ravana must be recast as a victim and Rama as an oppressor. Nor is Rama portrayed as someone burdened by guilt or constantly apologising for upholding Dharma.
It is the attempt to replace the very essence of the Ramayana, while claiming the legitimacy of its tradition, that needs to be called out and criticised, as many people unfamiliar with the original texts may end up accepting it as the truth.
Let that sink in.
28
162
430
12,349
Kamban also deals with this episode in exactly the same manner. Once Vishwamitra explains to Rama that killing Tataka is justified under Kshatriya Dharma, Rama has no hesitation whatsoever.
ஐயன் அங்கு அது கேட்டு, ‘அறன் அல்லவும்
எய்தினால், “அது செய்க!” என்று ஏவினால்,
மெய்ய! நின் உரை வேதம் எனக் கொடு
செய்கை அன்றோ! அறம் செயும் ஆறு’ என்றான்
If Vishwamitra commands it, Rama accepts his words as the authority of the Vedas and considers carrying out his command to be the path of Dharma.
There is absolutely no question of Rama seeking forgiveness or expressing guilt.
The problem with the movie is that it attempts to impose a sense of guilt even upon Rama, the very embodiment of Dharma, for an act that the original texts explicitly establish as righteous. Such distortions only create confusion in the minds of those unfamiliar with the Ramayana, particularly about Rama’s character and his unwavering adherence to Dharma.
This needs to be called out.
ஐயன் அங்கு அது கேட்டு, ‘அறன் அல்லவும்
எய்தினால், “அது செய்க!” என்று ஏவினால்,
மெய்ய! நின் உரை வேதம் எனக் கொடு
செய்கை அன்றோ! அறம் செயும் ஆறு’ என்றான்
If Vishwamitra commands it, Rama accepts his words as the authority of the Vedas and considers carrying out his command to be the path of Dharma.
There is absolutely no question of Rama seeking forgiveness or expressing guilt.
The problem with the movie is that it attempts to impose a sense of guilt even upon Rama, the very embodiment of Dharma, for an act that the original texts explicitly establish as righteous. Such distortions only create confusion in the minds of those unfamiliar with the Ramayana, particularly about Rama’s character and his unwavering adherence to Dharma.
This needs to be called out.
Rama doubting if he should kill a Woman Rakshasi and having a dialogue with Vishwamitra on that topic is documented.
Finally he is convinced by Viswamitra's sagely counsel.
He kills the Rakshasi.
This is the Valmiki Ramayana version to my knowledge. Also what was shown in older Telugu cinema Ramayana classics.
In Nitesh Tiwari version Rama says "Forgive me" and then shoots. That portion on seeking forgiveness for killing a Demon i.e. Rakshasi again seemed like unnecessary to me.
It is a pattern in the film. Trying to soften Rama more than necessary.
6
53
203
5,330
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
In the last 70+ years, the Dravidian ideologues created works like Keemayanam to ridicule Hindu scriptures and beliefs. One of their primary targets was Sri Rama and Sita Devi. On the other hand, they made a hero out of Ravana by exploiting the ignorance of the masses. This slowly transitioned to Brahmin-hatred and Sanskrit-hatred. It has taken decades again, for revered acharyas, and many speakers, to dismantle this fake narrative that they had created. Today, a big movie has wiped away all that work of ours, and made Ravana look like a dharmic person. Trust me, it’s impact will be felt in the years to come especially among the age group of 10 to 25 years, where they will be amazed by Ravana or will have a soft corner for him. Rama, will become their target of questions. I seriously don’t know how this can be tackled. We can only surrender to Sri Ramachandra to show us the way ahead 🙏🏽
115
651
2,022
54,839
திருச்செந்தூர் கோவிலின் வரலாறு !
சூரசம்ஹாரம் வரலாறா? புராணமா? ஆய்வாளர் சொல்லும் புதிய விளக்கம்!
Watch Video: youtu.be/AB3xwybaH1A
#Tiruchendur #KandaSashti2026 #TSKrishnan #Guru
1
22
65
1,166
𑀓𑀺𑀭𑀼𑀱𑁆𑀡𑀷𑁆 🇮🇳 retweeted
சூரசம்ஹாரம் வரலாறா? புராணமா? ஆய்வாளர் சொல்லும் புதிய விளக்கம்!
Watch Video: youtu.be/AB3xwybaH1A
#Tiruchendur #KandaSashti2026 #TSKrishnan #Guru
Watch Video: youtu.be/AB3xwybaH1A
#Tiruchendur #KandaSashti2026 #TSKrishnan #Guru
0
1
1
1,201
At a time when the scientific temper and depth of research in India are often questioned, it is heartening to see such fascinating and in depth scientific work emerging.
This is significant in the times we live in, as such findings can open up new possibilities for treating some serious diseases and improving human lives. Congratulations to @ARanganathan72 ji and the entire research team on this wonderful achievement!
This is significant in the times we live in, as such findings can open up new possibilities for treating some serious diseases and improving human lives. Congratulations to @ARanganathan72 ji and the entire research team on this wonderful achievement!
When CoVID affected our families, snatched our friends from us, both @shailjasingh75 and I, though not virologists, decided we should do something. Here, we report discovery of a mechanism that, when targeted, kills the virus. Link: sciencedirect.com/science/articl… indiatoday.in/science/story/…
1
13
77
1,916