Pinned Tweet
I don't care if you have 3 followers or 200k, I will follow you because your feed seems interesting to me
122
7
603
56,907
Whenever I'm enjoying Twitter/X's timeline these garbage posts start to pop up.
Lead by people with months of let's connect posts and bait questions and idiotic riddles.
Now they are writing it on paper and rehashing these to be counted as original posts.
The obnoxious thing m actual creators and small accounts doing good efforts simply vanish or have to play this attention brainrot.
We shouldn't promote these and the algo should steer those away. There is entertainment and there is brainrot.
Demonetize and flag those accounts please. Those are worse than bots.
Lead by people with months of let's connect posts and bait questions and idiotic riddles.
Now they are writing it on paper and rehashing these to be counted as original posts.
The obnoxious thing m actual creators and small accounts doing good efforts simply vanish or have to play this attention brainrot.
We shouldn't promote these and the algo should steer those away. There is entertainment and there is brainrot.
Demonetize and flag those accounts please. Those are worse than bots.
4
0
16
512
Next step: create a new AI company and claw your way back into Nvidia
JUST IN: Jensen Huang fired by Nvidia $NVDA, according to the Wall Street Journal
3
0
9
617
Jensen Huang has resigned as CEO of Nvidia 🔗 on.wsj.com/4ApW9kr
0
0
0
47
AI interviews are a mess and so have been Leetcode interviews.
I'm currently alpha-testing interviews in dojo.foo - think of a portable take-home/kata/challenge you can run locally with an editor and pair with an agent on the same screen (it uses your local agent whichever you set up).
This agent doesn't give you the solution at all, but it helps you. Can use web search and provides you with all the tooling. The dialog is tracked and once challenge is done happy dialogue eval for the company.
You'd see the transcript of what the candidate did and you see invisible commits being tracked for your edits. You can't cheat your way into it because you'd need to explain what you're doing and pair with ai.
The dialogue, much like in real interviews becomes the source of truth.
I'm currently alpha-testing interviews in dojo.foo - think of a portable take-home/kata/challenge you can run locally with an editor and pair with an agent on the same screen (it uses your local agent whichever you set up).
This agent doesn't give you the solution at all, but it helps you. Can use web search and provides you with all the tooling. The dialog is tracked and once challenge is done happy dialogue eval for the company.
You'd see the transcript of what the candidate did and you see invisible commits being tracked for your edits. You can't cheat your way into it because you'd need to explain what you're doing and pair with ai.
The dialogue, much like in real interviews becomes the source of truth.
Everyone wanted LeetCode to die. Be careful what you wish for 💀
2
0
2
618
Do they even know their phone number?
Their banking pin?
Their spouse's birthdate? Their own?
Politicians don't even know how much gas costs when asked.
Is this some normal thing amongst richer people?!
If you forget anything, what else in what you're saying is made up?
Their banking pin?
Their spouse's birthdate? Their own?
Politicians don't even know how much gas costs when asked.
Is this some normal thing amongst richer people?!
If you forget anything, what else in what you're saying is made up?
If you know where you live, you're ngmi.
4
1
9
907
Oh look...
Everything fun locked behind Mythos 5.2 so only corpos can have their joy. Rest only 1-2pp better than Opus + terrible cost-to-value ratio.
Achieved by degrading their old models just before benchmark values came in.
Groundhog day.
(Cynical =/= I'm tired boss)
Everything fun locked behind Mythos 5.2 so only corpos can have their joy. Rest only 1-2pp better than Opus + terrible cost-to-value ratio.
Achieved by degrading their old models just before benchmark values came in.
Groundhog day.
(Cynical =/= I'm tired boss)
Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges.
They’re capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.
8
0
13
757
> Engineers were pushing out 220% more code, BUT major technical and security incidents jumped 40%. So people spent 70% more time putting out fires.
*caugh* no code review strategy *caugh*
*caugh* no code review strategy *caugh*
It looks like the AI layoff boom has started to backfire.
I was just going through a Reuters investigation on Meta, and holy shit...
They drew up plans to cut some teams by as much as 60% and let AI agents do the work. THEN Zuckerberg called off the next round of layoffs hours before the first one even started.
And when you look at the numbers... they tell you why.
Engineers were pushing out 220% more code, BUT major technical and security incidents jumped 40%.
So people spent 70% more time putting out fires.
AI cranked out way more work, and humans spent way more time cleaning it up.
A different report I saw this week showed something similar.
32% of hiring managers said they brought back the exact jobs they cut for AI.
Think about how dumb that is. You fire people, pay a fortune for AI, then pay again to hire the same people back.
Look, I’m no AI bear. I use AI every single day.
It saves me a shit ton of time and I’m not going back. It’s an incredible tool.
But market forces are still market forces.
Every boom in history has been overhyped, and every CEO wanted to stand up and tell Wall Street he could do more with half the people.
Now from what I’m seeing, reality is kicking in.
It costs way more than they thought, it breaks shit, and you still need people who know what the hell they’re doing.
Even the AI companies are feeling it. Elon just cut Grok’s usage limits and admitted it costs more to run than it brings in.
I still think AI is a great bet, and I’m still buying the companies building the data centers. But you need balance, and the guys who went all in on firing everyone are learning that the hard way.
Be careful out there.
6
3
72
2,105
Why is everyone advocating removing the tests?!
I have 8k tests and they run in under 30sec.
This is one of those side effects you notice when you don't know what the agents are accumulating for a mess.
Review the code.
I have 8k tests and they run in under 30sec.
This is one of those side effects you notice when you don't know what the agents are accumulating for a mess.
Review the code.
I have noticed that as a project goes, what would take clause 5.5 10 minutes now takes 40.
What are some strats to prevent this?
23
0
107
14,416
You can find plenty of game devs who do still code their games with AI. But they check what the AI creates for a mess.
Companies still go through code reviews.
OSS doesn't just accept any slop PR.
Most ppl don't even have a sub.
No proof has been served yet. Not a surprise.
Companies still go through code reviews.
OSS doesn't just accept any slop PR.
Most ppl don't even have a sub.
No proof has been served yet. Not a surprise.
You "I don't read code" guys DO realize that 90% of people still do and are moving past you with quality code, AND using AI to drive this vehicle, right?
Unless you can prove(!) that your approach is worthwhile it will never be adopted otherwise.
ngmi w/ preaching & fake nrs
3
1
13
1,430