Pinned Tweet
Over the past few months, I built and deployed CiteFlow AI to solve autonomous citation and verifiable AI research.
Today, CiteFlow AI is officially live on @arc Mainnet.
By combining @circle Agentic Wallets with HTTP 402 micropayments, AI agents can now pay for verified knowledge autonomously on chain.
Check out the launch thread below, try the live application at citeflowai.xyz, and share your feedback.
Today, CiteFlow AI is officially live on @arc Mainnet.
By combining @circle Agentic Wallets with HTTP 402 micropayments, AI agents can now pay for verified knowledge autonomously on chain.
Check out the launch thread below, try the live application at citeflowai.xyz, and share your feedback.
CiteFlow AI is now officially live on @arc Mainnet.
CiteFlow AI combines autonomous research with verifiable citations, micropayments over HTTP 402, and native settlement powered by Circle Agentic Wallets.
The era of verified, autonomous intelligence has arrived.
8
1
23
1,697
Vickman retweeted
🐛 GENESIS BUGZ GIVEAWAY
UnVault is opening up Phase 2 to selected communities, and I’ve got 20 spots for mine.
HOW TO ENTER:
- Follow @rbornn1 x @unvault
- RT + engage with their pinned post
- Tag 2 friends
- Drop your wallet below
⚠️ Phase 2 is FCFS and not guaranteed to open, so position accordingly!
Good luck 🫡
UnVault is opening up Phase 2 to selected communities, and I’ve got 20 spots for mine.
HOW TO ENTER:
- Follow @rbornn1 x @unvault
- RT + engage with their pinned post
- Tag 2 friends
- Drop your wallet below
⚠️ Phase 2 is FCFS and not guaranteed to open, so position accordingly!
Good luck 🫡
Imagine buying a rare Pokémon card and being told:
“You can only display or sell it in the shop where you bought it.”
That wouldn’t feel much like ownership.
Yet digital collectibles are often confined to the chain where they were created—limiting where collectors can use them ommunities can access them.
UnVault gives participating collections another path.
When collection owners choose to enable UnVault, collectors can use their NFTs across supported chains while preserving provenance, metadata and ownership history.
Through DIVIT, collectors may also opt into marketing deals and qualify for rewards under each project’s rules.
Want this for a collection you love?
Ask its founders: When will we UnVault?
One collectible. More chains. One identity.
UnVault it.
83
63
84
1,244
Vickman retweeted
Giving out 30 @NibblersELY GTD mint spot!
Details:
Supply - 4,000
Chain - ELYSIUM
MP - FreeMint
MD - Tomorrow
To enter:
- Follow @NibblersELY and @web3_attorney
- Follow @nulluf (Founder)
- Like and retweet this post and the quoted post
- Interact with their game
- Drop EVM e picked FCFS in 6 hours
Good luck 👍
Details:
Supply - 4,000
Chain - ELYSIUM
MP - FreeMint
MD - Tomorrow
To enter:
- Follow @NibblersELY and @web3_attorney
- Follow @nulluf (Founder)
- Like and retweet this post and the quoted post
- Interact with their game
- Drop EVM e picked FCFS in 6 hours
Good luck 👍
First PvP Game on @Enter_Elysium
4000 interactive Nibblers Free Mint
Allowlist is open Now
Nibblers.xyz
Play Now
51
43
53
716
Vickman retweeted
Mochiri Club is coming to Elysium.
We’ll be minting on @kalosfun
Kalos Genesis holders will also be eligible for FCFS access.
555 Mochiri.
Community. Culture. Identity.
We’ll be minting on @kalosfun
Kalos Genesis holders will also be eligible for FCFS access.
555 Mochiri.
Community. Culture. Identity.
55
43
62
843
Just joined the Kurogane whitelist. @Kurogane_fun #Kurogane · 888 hand-drawn faces of Shiro, one per wallet, minting on Elysium. The whitelist is open, come join me.
0
0
0
22
Bullish
Kurogane whitelist is open.
whitelist.kurogane.fun
The whitelist opens today. A thing should not be true because someone said it, one section per character, stamped with the season it was closed
0
0
1
36
Vickman retweeted
Kurogane whitelist is open.
whitelist.kurogane.fun
The whitelist opens today. A thing should not be true because someone said it, one section per character, stamped with the season it was closed
whitelist.kurogane.fun
The whitelist opens today. A thing should not be true because someone said it, one section per character, stamped with the season it was closed
365
542
1,283
31,309
I just applied for the @Elytypess whitelist 🔥🎧 Apply with my link 👇 elytypes.art/?ref=4F5B7R
0
0
0
23
Pick your element. Elytypes, free mint on @Enter_Elysium
Something new is taking shape on Elysium today.
Probably your last opportunity to be part, apply here: elytypes.art
We’re introducing a collection of 500 unique Elytypes, with a free mint opportunity for whitelisted holders.
The first of its kind on Elysium, with pad.
If you’re looking for something early to be part of, be here.
0
0
0
18
Most launchpads focus on getting tokens launched.
But what happens to the liquidity, the creators, and the community after launch?
That's the question that made me take a closer look at @MontraXYZ.
Montra is building a launch ecosystem on @Enter_Elysium, powered by Uniswap v4, ch to token creation.
Here's what caught my attention. 🧵👇
1/ A token can launch in one transaction.
No bonding curve. No migration to another exchange after graduation.
The token starts trading in its own Uniswap v4 pool from the first block.
2/ Liquidity is part of the design, not an afterthought.
For standard Montra tokens, the entire supply enters the liquidity pool at launch, with liquidity permanently locked.
The token contract also has no owner, additional minting, transfer tax, pause, or blacklist functionality.
That removes several common sources of creator-controlled risk.
It doesn't eliminate market risk, but it's a meaningful structural difference.
3/ The creator economy matters.
Montra distributes trading fees across participants according to the pool's rules.
Creators can direct their share to a wallet, split it, or distribute it to token holders.
This creates opportunities for communities to benefit from actual trading activity rather than relying entirely on token appreciation.
4/ Montra isn't planning to serve only one type of launch.
Its ecosystem includes:
• Montra Tokens — permissionless token launches.
• Montra Partner — planned customized launches for established projects.
• Montra Listings — planned markets for existing tokens.
Different projects have different needs. A launch platform should recognize that.
5/ The $MONTRA airdrop is another interesting part.
25% of the supply has been allocated across five categories, including early users, traders, liquidity providers, and quality contributors.
Importantly, meaningful educational content and builder referrals have their own allocation.
6/ What I'm watching next:
Can Montra attract projects that continue building after their initial launch?
Can creator and holder incentives encourage sustainable communities?
And can its infrastructure make Elysium a more attractive destination for new assets?
Those are the questions that will determine whether its model succeeds.
For me, Montra is worth following because it is experimenting with how token launches should work beyond day one.
Explore: montramarkets.xyz
But what happens to the liquidity, the creators, and the community after launch?
That's the question that made me take a closer look at @MontraXYZ.
Montra is building a launch ecosystem on @Enter_Elysium, powered by Uniswap v4, ch to token creation.
Here's what caught my attention. 🧵👇
1/ A token can launch in one transaction.
No bonding curve. No migration to another exchange after graduation.
The token starts trading in its own Uniswap v4 pool from the first block.
2/ Liquidity is part of the design, not an afterthought.
For standard Montra tokens, the entire supply enters the liquidity pool at launch, with liquidity permanently locked.
The token contract also has no owner, additional minting, transfer tax, pause, or blacklist functionality.
That removes several common sources of creator-controlled risk.
It doesn't eliminate market risk, but it's a meaningful structural difference.
3/ The creator economy matters.
Montra distributes trading fees across participants according to the pool's rules.
Creators can direct their share to a wallet, split it, or distribute it to token holders.
This creates opportunities for communities to benefit from actual trading activity rather than relying entirely on token appreciation.
4/ Montra isn't planning to serve only one type of launch.
Its ecosystem includes:
• Montra Tokens — permissionless token launches.
• Montra Partner — planned customized launches for established projects.
• Montra Listings — planned markets for existing tokens.
Different projects have different needs. A launch platform should recognize that.
5/ The $MONTRA airdrop is another interesting part.
25% of the supply has been allocated across five categories, including early users, traders, liquidity providers, and quality contributors.
Importantly, meaningful educational content and builder referrals have their own allocation.
6/ What I'm watching next:
Can Montra attract projects that continue building after their initial launch?
Can creator and holder incentives encourage sustainable communities?
And can its infrastructure make Elysium a more attractive destination for new assets?
Those are the questions that will determine whether its model succeeds.
For me, Montra is worth following because it is experimenting with how token launches should work beyond day one.
Explore: montramarkets.xyz
10
7
16
380
Most launchpads are obsessed with one thing: getting tokens launched.
But what happens after the launch?
That's what caught my attention about @AscendLaunch. 🧵
I've been exploring Ascend and its approach to building within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, and there's one feature My favorite feature: The Ascended pipeline.
Launching a token is relatively easy. Building something that survives beyond its initial hype is the real challenge.
What I find interesting about Ascend is that its vision doesn't end when a token becomes tradable.
The Ascended pipeline introduces a bigger ambition: helping promising projects progress through liquidity support, ecosystem exposure, and potential access to HyperCore spot markets.
That matters because a launchpad shouldn't simply be a place where projects raise attention for a few hours and disappear.
It should be an environment where strong communities and serious builders have room to grow.
I also like Ascend's emphasis on locked liquidity and aligning incentives between creators, holders, and the wider ecosystem.
These mechanisms don't guarantee success, but they show an attempt to address problems that have affected token launches for years.
My favorite coin launched on Ascend: $e/acc.
I chose $e/acc because it represents the experimental, fast-moving culture that makes emerging onchain ecosystems exciting.
What interests me isn't simply whether a token can generate attention.
It's whether the community around it can turn that attention into something sustainable.
For me, $e/acc is an interesting example of the kind of early-stage experimentation that Ascend makes possible.
Here's my bigger takeaway:
The next generation of launchpads shouldn't compete only on how many tokens they can launch.
They should compete on how effectively they help promising projects develop after launch.
That's the direction I want to see more of, and it's why @AscendLaunch has my attention.
Favorite feature: Ascended pipeline.
Favorite launch: $e/acc.
Build beyond the launch. ↗️
But what happens after the launch?
That's what caught my attention about @AscendLaunch. 🧵
I've been exploring Ascend and its approach to building within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, and there's one feature My favorite feature: The Ascended pipeline.
Launching a token is relatively easy. Building something that survives beyond its initial hype is the real challenge.
What I find interesting about Ascend is that its vision doesn't end when a token becomes tradable.
The Ascended pipeline introduces a bigger ambition: helping promising projects progress through liquidity support, ecosystem exposure, and potential access to HyperCore spot markets.
That matters because a launchpad shouldn't simply be a place where projects raise attention for a few hours and disappear.
It should be an environment where strong communities and serious builders have room to grow.
I also like Ascend's emphasis on locked liquidity and aligning incentives between creators, holders, and the wider ecosystem.
These mechanisms don't guarantee success, but they show an attempt to address problems that have affected token launches for years.
My favorite coin launched on Ascend: $e/acc.
I chose $e/acc because it represents the experimental, fast-moving culture that makes emerging onchain ecosystems exciting.
What interests me isn't simply whether a token can generate attention.
It's whether the community around it can turn that attention into something sustainable.
For me, $e/acc is an interesting example of the kind of early-stage experimentation that Ascend makes possible.
Here's my bigger takeaway:
The next generation of launchpads shouldn't compete only on how many tokens they can launch.
They should compete on how effectively they help promising projects develop after launch.
That's the direction I want to see more of, and it's why @AscendLaunch has my attention.
Favorite feature: Ascended pipeline.
Favorite launch: $e/acc.
Build beyond the launch. ↗️
1
0
3
87
Vickman retweeted
🚨 GIVEAWAY TIME, #HOODSTREET & #STREETHOOD!! 🚨
🎉 I’M CELEBRATING 2,800 FOLLOWERS ON X ACCOUNT! 🎉
I couldn’t hit this milestone without showing some love back to the amazing communities!
So I’m giving away:
🟩 1 #CCFF00SQUARE
🟢 1 #CCFF00CIRCLE
TWO WINNERS. TWO PIECES OF THE OW TO ENTER (FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS):
1️⃣ FOLLOW: @Shaq82080 , @RoaringPiggy, @RealCashpig , @CCFF00club
2️⃣ LIKE ❤️ & REPOST
3️⃣ TAG 2 FRIENDS 👥, DROP YOUR WALLETS
MORE DETAILS BELOW 👇
⏰ GIVEAWAY ENDS IN 24 HOURS!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
🗓️ November 8, 2026
🕒 3:00 PM PST
Winners will be announced after the giveaway closes!
We’re building something special here. Community is everything, and I appreciate every single person who’s been part of this journey!
DON’T FADE THE SQUARES OR THE CIRCLES! 🟩 🟢🔥
#HOODSTREET #STREETHOOD #CCFF00Squares #CCFF00Circles #NFTs #RobinhoodChain #NFTCommunity #Giveaway #OGs #Originals
🎉 I’M CELEBRATING 2,800 FOLLOWERS ON X ACCOUNT! 🎉
I couldn’t hit this milestone without showing some love back to the amazing communities!
So I’m giving away:
🟩 1 #CCFF00SQUARE
🟢 1 #CCFF00CIRCLE
TWO WINNERS. TWO PIECES OF THE OW TO ENTER (FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS):
1️⃣ FOLLOW: @Shaq82080 , @RoaringPiggy, @RealCashpig , @CCFF00club
2️⃣ LIKE ❤️ & REPOST
3️⃣ TAG 2 FRIENDS 👥, DROP YOUR WALLETS
MORE DETAILS BELOW 👇
⏰ GIVEAWAY ENDS IN 24 HOURS!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
🗓️ November 8, 2026
🕒 3:00 PM PST
Winners will be announced after the giveaway closes!
We’re building something special here. Community is everything, and I appreciate every single person who’s been part of this journey!
DON’T FADE THE SQUARES OR THE CIRCLES! 🟩 🟢🔥
#HOODSTREET #STREETHOOD #CCFF00Squares #CCFF00Circles #NFTs #RobinhoodChain #NFTCommunity #Giveaway #OGs #Originals
187
175
242
4,220
Vickman retweeted
4,444 Free Genesis NFTs on @Enter_Elysium
Grab Whitelist: eruptdot.fun
Your Hyperliquid history is your booster
24HRs.
Grab Whitelist: eruptdot.fun
Your Hyperliquid history is your booster
24HRs.
1,645
2,533
2,885
37,816
Vickman retweeted
#空投 第31期 空投正式开始
任务留言:
恭贺㊗️#FLAP 新板块龙头 $WHALE 🐳0x2B1D6b8475D542D3e1c826D0FF22EA5C2CB57777上线➕自己地址!
本次我会持续建设此 meme ,各位可以根据自己情况选择!
(PS:资方洗和拉应该都不会留情!)
老规矩:一键三连助我粉丝破5万!
任务留言:
恭贺㊗️#FLAP 新板块龙头 $WHALE 🐳0x2B1D6b8475D542D3e1c826D0FF22EA5C2CB57777上线➕自己地址!
本次我会持续建设此 meme ,各位可以根据自己情况选择!
(PS:资方洗和拉应该都不会留情!)
老规矩:一键三连助我粉丝破5万!
🚀 祝贺 WHALE 2.0 鲸鱼今晚隆重上线! 🐳🌊
巨浪已至,共识启航!感谢所有社区伙伴的陪伴与支持,鲸鱼2.0现已正式登陆!
📜 官方唯一合约地址 (CA):
0x2B1D6b8475D542D3e1c826D0FF22EA5C2CB57777
(⚠️请务必核对合约尾号 7777,认准官方,谨防假冒)
👇 官方核心引流群(QQ群):
· 1群:1037018338
· 2群:778083288
🔥 最强IP,强势回归! 欢迎大家加入官方社群,一起见证龙一崛起!
1,204
515
826
18,384
Vickman retweeted
The MochiList is opening to selected collections.
Claim → m0chi.xyz/mochilist
The mint is sooner than you think
Drop your wallets = $MOCHI.
Claim → m0chi.xyz/mochilist
The mint is sooner than you think
Drop your wallets = $MOCHI.
1,179
713
1,098
29,156
Vickman retweeted
🔥 S3 brought new builders, fresh ideas and more Canton apps.
Now it's your turn.
🚀 #HackCanton Season 4 registration is OPEN!
• Bring an idea
• Find your crew
• Build something worth shipping
👉 appsfactory.cc/hackathons
Now it's your turn.
🚀 #HackCanton Season 4 registration is OPEN!
• Bring an idea
• Find your crew
• Build something worth shipping
👉 appsfactory.cc/hackathons
2
4
75
2,625
Vickman retweeted
Six weeks. $60,000+ in prizes.
Drum roll please! The PayPal AI Hackathon: Build What's Next with PayPal and AI is live.
Whether you're a developer, an AI builder, a founder, or a student, here's your chance to use your imagination and build with AI, with PayPal has your back layer.
With free tools, credits, and support from our partners: Postman, Zapier, Elastic, APIMatic, AG Grid, Bryntum, Channel3, Render, , Astropods, Kernel
Submissions open Oct 1 and close Nov 12.
Learn more and register: paypalaihackathon.devpost.com
Drum roll please! The PayPal AI Hackathon: Build What's Next with PayPal and AI is live.
Whether you're a developer, an AI builder, a founder, or a student, here's your chance to use your imagination and build with AI, with PayPal has your back layer.
With free tools, credits, and support from our partners: Postman, Zapier, Elastic, APIMatic, AG Grid, Bryntum, Channel3, Render, , Astropods, Kernel
Submissions open Oct 1 and close Nov 12.
Learn more and register: paypalaihackathon.devpost.com
30
76
757
53,062
An AI agent can find something within your budget and still get the purchase wrong.
The price might be right, but the specifications are different. The quantity might match, but the payment reference is incorrect. An offer can look convincing while missing a requirement that That is the problem I built AEGIRON to explore for the PayPal AI Hackathon, organized by @PayPalDev.
AEGIRON checks proposed purchases and payment instructions against what the buyer actually confirmed, before allowing the flow to proceed to buyer approval and PayPal sandbox authorization.
The idea started with a question:
As AI agents become more capable of acting on our behalf, how do we check that their proposed action still matches our intent?
I wanted to build a working journey around that question, from the original request to a verified sandbox authorization.
Here is how AEGIRON works.
1. Describe what you need
The buyer starts with a request in plain language.
For example, one black wireless keyboard with an ANSI US layout, at least 24 hours of battery life, and a maximum total of USD 80.
OpenAI helps turn that request into structured requirements. The buyer can inspect those requirements, correct them, and explicitly confirm them before continuing.
That confirmation matters because the system needs a clear instruction to check against.
2. Enter the proposed offer
Next, the user enters the merchant test offer, including the item, quantity, total price, and specifications.
AEGIRON compares that proposal with the confirmed request and shows the results in a readable comparison.
In one of my tests, the offer was a white wireless keyboard with the correct layout, 30 hours of battery life, and a price of USD 65.
It was within budget. The battery life exceeded the minimum. The layout matched.
The color was wrong.
AEGIRON flagged the mismatch and blocked the flow from proceeding to approval.
A lower price does not cancel a mandatory requirement.
3. Correct the mismatch and review again
After changing the offered color to black, saving the updated proposal, and running the review again, the offer passed the required checks.
Changes create a new revision and invalidate the previous review, so an old approval cannot simply carry over to a different offer.
This was an important part of the build. Verification needs to apply to the proposal the buyer is actually reviewing.
4. Keep the buyer involved
Passing verification does not automatically authorize a transaction.
The buyer still reviews the exact case, revision, and amount before continuing to PayPal sandbox approval.
AEGIRON combines AI interpretation and explanation with deterministic checks. The AI cannot override a failed mandatory rule, and the buyer remains responsible for the final approval.
5. Verify the provider result
After the buyer returns from PayPal, the server checks the provider order and authorization against the saved case, including the amount, currency, merchant, and revision.
Returning to a success page is not enough to prove authorization.
The final screen shows the verified sandbox outcome and the associated evidence, making the result easier to inspect.
AEGIRON also supports a payment instruction flow, where it checks the proposed amount, beneficiary label, purpose, payment reference, and configured sandbox merchant against the buyer’s confirmed instruction.
That flow checks consistency with the instruction. It does not authenticate bank ownership or execute bank transfers.
The current project is a sandbox prototype. It uses PayPal authorization without capturing or settling real money, and the merchant offers are supplied test data.
I built it using Next.js, TypeScript, OpenAI, PayPal sandbox APIs, Neon PostgreSQL, and Vercel.
One of my biggest lessons was that an AI explanation and an enforced check serve different purposes.
An explanation helps someone understand a proposal. An enforced check determines whether the application can proceed. Making those work together, while keeping approval tied to the exact reviewed revision, was a valuable engineering challenge.
The benefit I want AEGIRON to provide is straightforward:
Help buyers catch a wrong specification, an incorrect amount, or a changed payment instruction before they authorize it.
There is more to build, but I now have a working prototype that demonstrates the complete journey, including a blocked mismatch, a corrected offer, buyer approval, and a server verified PayPal sandbox authorization.
Thank you @PayPalDev for organizing a hackathon that encouraged me to build around AI, payments, and buyer control.
I would love feedback from developers, buyers, and people building AI agents.
What would you want an agent to verify before it could spend on your behalf?
App: getaegiron.xyz
Demo video: youtu.be/zSGwLCLCxvk?si…
#PayPal #AI #Hackathon #BuildInPublic #AgenticCommerce
The price might be right, but the specifications are different. The quantity might match, but the payment reference is incorrect. An offer can look convincing while missing a requirement that That is the problem I built AEGIRON to explore for the PayPal AI Hackathon, organized by @PayPalDev.
AEGIRON checks proposed purchases and payment instructions against what the buyer actually confirmed, before allowing the flow to proceed to buyer approval and PayPal sandbox authorization.
The idea started with a question:
As AI agents become more capable of acting on our behalf, how do we check that their proposed action still matches our intent?
I wanted to build a working journey around that question, from the original request to a verified sandbox authorization.
Here is how AEGIRON works.
1. Describe what you need
The buyer starts with a request in plain language.
For example, one black wireless keyboard with an ANSI US layout, at least 24 hours of battery life, and a maximum total of USD 80.
OpenAI helps turn that request into structured requirements. The buyer can inspect those requirements, correct them, and explicitly confirm them before continuing.
That confirmation matters because the system needs a clear instruction to check against.
2. Enter the proposed offer
Next, the user enters the merchant test offer, including the item, quantity, total price, and specifications.
AEGIRON compares that proposal with the confirmed request and shows the results in a readable comparison.
In one of my tests, the offer was a white wireless keyboard with the correct layout, 30 hours of battery life, and a price of USD 65.
It was within budget. The battery life exceeded the minimum. The layout matched.
The color was wrong.
AEGIRON flagged the mismatch and blocked the flow from proceeding to approval.
A lower price does not cancel a mandatory requirement.
3. Correct the mismatch and review again
After changing the offered color to black, saving the updated proposal, and running the review again, the offer passed the required checks.
Changes create a new revision and invalidate the previous review, so an old approval cannot simply carry over to a different offer.
This was an important part of the build. Verification needs to apply to the proposal the buyer is actually reviewing.
4. Keep the buyer involved
Passing verification does not automatically authorize a transaction.
The buyer still reviews the exact case, revision, and amount before continuing to PayPal sandbox approval.
AEGIRON combines AI interpretation and explanation with deterministic checks. The AI cannot override a failed mandatory rule, and the buyer remains responsible for the final approval.
5. Verify the provider result
After the buyer returns from PayPal, the server checks the provider order and authorization against the saved case, including the amount, currency, merchant, and revision.
Returning to a success page is not enough to prove authorization.
The final screen shows the verified sandbox outcome and the associated evidence, making the result easier to inspect.
AEGIRON also supports a payment instruction flow, where it checks the proposed amount, beneficiary label, purpose, payment reference, and configured sandbox merchant against the buyer’s confirmed instruction.
That flow checks consistency with the instruction. It does not authenticate bank ownership or execute bank transfers.
The current project is a sandbox prototype. It uses PayPal authorization without capturing or settling real money, and the merchant offers are supplied test data.
I built it using Next.js, TypeScript, OpenAI, PayPal sandbox APIs, Neon PostgreSQL, and Vercel.
One of my biggest lessons was that an AI explanation and an enforced check serve different purposes.
An explanation helps someone understand a proposal. An enforced check determines whether the application can proceed. Making those work together, while keeping approval tied to the exact reviewed revision, was a valuable engineering challenge.
The benefit I want AEGIRON to provide is straightforward:
Help buyers catch a wrong specification, an incorrect amount, or a changed payment instruction before they authorize it.
There is more to build, but I now have a working prototype that demonstrates the complete journey, including a blocked mismatch, a corrected offer, buyer approval, and a server verified PayPal sandbox authorization.
Thank you @PayPalDev for organizing a hackathon that encouraged me to build around AI, payments, and buyer control.
I would love feedback from developers, buyers, and people building AI agents.
What would you want an agent to verify before it could spend on your behalf?
App: getaegiron.xyz
Demo video: youtu.be/zSGwLCLCxvk?si…
#PayPal #AI #Hackathon #BuildInPublic #AgenticCommerce
11
2
19
663









































