Pinned Tweet
New trading contest on @wolfswapdotapp!
Trade $ultardio token from @ULTARDIO on the wolfswap dex and get into the top 5.
=> prize pool 2120000 ultardio (about $326)
=>ใ848K | 530K | 318K | 254.4K | 169.6Kใ
the contest ends on 2 Nov 2026, approx 7 days. lets take advantage to get 2xeaderboard simultaneously.
=> hit it... wolfswap.app/leaderboard/crโฆ
don't hold back on winning some of mystery boxes that may hit randomly when trading more than $10+ worth.
#crofam #wolfswap #tradingcontest #ultardio
Trade $ultardio token from @ULTARDIO on the wolfswap dex and get into the top 5.
=> prize pool 2120000 ultardio (about $326)
=>ใ848K | 530K | 318K | 254.4K | 169.6Kใ
the contest ends on 2 Nov 2026, approx 7 days. lets take advantage to get 2xeaderboard simultaneously.
=> hit it... wolfswap.app/leaderboard/crโฆ
don't hold back on winning some of mystery boxes that may hit randomly when trading more than $10+ worth.
#crofam #wolfswap #tradingcontest #ultardio
32
16
47
1,769
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
I am exploring the SWEEP x ActionFi campaign and what makes it interesting is the mix of gameplay and community participation
Through @ActionModelAI and @SweepGlobal users can explore SWEEP try its RUGS and UP/DOWN games and share their honest experience with the community
For s showing the real experience not just talking about rewards. Wins and losses both matter when sharing gameplay because people deserve a realistic picture before trying something themselves
The campaign also gives creators and ambassadors a chance to contribute by making useful content and bringing more people into the conversation
I am taking part in the SWEEP x ActionFi journey and looking forward to exploring more of what the ecosystem offers
Join through my referral link
join.actionmodel.com/NOORULANAM
Explore the campaign here
train.actionmodel.com
Always understand the game mechanics and risks before participating. Nothing is guaranteed.
Through @ActionModelAI and @SweepGlobal users can explore SWEEP try its RUGS and UP/DOWN games and share their honest experience with the community
For s showing the real experience not just talking about rewards. Wins and losses both matter when sharing gameplay because people deserve a realistic picture before trying something themselves
The campaign also gives creators and ambassadors a chance to contribute by making useful content and bringing more people into the conversation
I am taking part in the SWEEP x ActionFi journey and looking forward to exploring more of what the ecosystem offers
Join through my referral link
join.actionmodel.com/NOORULANAM
Explore the campaign here
train.actionmodel.com
Always understand the game mechanics and risks before participating. Nothing is guaranteed.
149
31
357
1,426
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
GMGNGB
ไปๆฉๆๅผไธๅฅ Tangem ไธๅก้ฑๅ ๏ผ็ฌฌไธ็ผๅฐฑ่ขซๅฎ็้ป่ฒๅค่งๆๅจไบ๐ค๐ค
็็ๅฅฝ็๏ผ็บฏ้ปใๅนฒๅใๆ่ดจๆ๏ผ็ไบๅก็๏ผๆๅ่ๆดๆณ่ฆ้ฃๆ Tangem Ring๏ผๆๅฎๅ จๅๅพ่ฟไน่ฝปๅทงๅๅฅฝ็๏ผไธบไปไนไธ็ดๆฅๆดๅจๆไธ๏ผ
้ๆฉ Tangem ้ฎ้ขใๆ่ฎฉๆๅฎๅฟ็ๆฏๆ ๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๆจกๅผ๏ผไปฅๅ็จๅ ถไป็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ๆถ๏ผๆๆ็ๅฐฑๆฏ้ฃไธฒๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๅไธๆฅๆไธขใๆ่ขซๆ็ งใๆๆพ้ๅฐๆน
ไธๅๅๆ่ฎพๅคๅไบๅฝปๅบๆ ๆณๆขๅค๏ผๆ้่ฆๆๆฏๆๅ่ฎฐๅฟไธๅฅฝ๏ผ
Tangem ๆ็ง้ฅ็ๆๅจๅฎๅ จ่ฏ็้๏ผๆฐธ่ฟไธ็ฆปๅผ่ฏ็๏ผๅคไปฝ้ ๅคๅผ ๅก็ๅฎๆ๏ผ้ป่ฎคไธ้่ฆๆๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๆไธๆฅใๅฏนๆๆฅ่ฏด๏ผ่ฟ็ดๆฅ้ไฝไบๅฟ็่ดๆ ใๅๅ ไธๅฎ็จ NFC ่ฝป่งฆๆๆบๅฐฑ่ฝ็ญพๅ๏ผไธ้่ฆๅ ็ตใๆฒกๆ็ตๆฑ ใๆฒกๆ็บฟ๏ผๆฅๅธธไฝฟ็จ้จๆง็็ไฝๅพๅค๐
ๆ้็ๆฏไธๅกๅฅ๏ผไนๆฏๅ ไธบๅคไปฝๅไฝๆด่ฎฉไบบๆพๅฟใไธๅผ ๅก็็ปๆไธไธช้ฑๅ ๏ผ็ง้ฅๅจๆฟๆดปๆถๅฎๅ จๅๅธ๏ผไธขไบไธๅผ ็่ณไธคๅผ ๏ผๅฉไธ็่ฟ่ฝ็ปง็ปญ่ฎฟ้ฎ
ๆๅทฒ็ปๆๅ ถไธญไธๅผ ๆพๅจๅธธ็จไฝ็ฝฎ๏ผๅฆๅคไธคๅผ ๅๅผๅญๆพ๏ผ่ฟ็ง็ฉ็ๅๆฃ็ๅคไปฝๆนๅผ๏ผๆฏๆไธไธฒๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๅกๅจๆไธชๅฐๆนๆด็ฌฆๅๆ็ไน ๆฏใๅก็ๆฌ่บซ้ฒๆฐด้ฒๅฐใ่้ซๆธฉไฝๆธฉ๏ผIP ้ฒๆค็ญ็บงๅพ้ซ๏ผๆฅๅธธไธๆๆๅค๏ผไนๆฒกๆ็ต้ไธ่ถณๅฐฑ็จไธไบ็็ฆ่
ๅฎๅ จๆน้ข๏ผEAL6+ ่ฎค่ฏ็ๅฎๅ จๅ ไปถใไธๅฏๅ็บงๅบไปถใ็ป่ฟ็ฌ็ซๅฎก่ฎก๏ผ่ฟไบๆๅจ่ดญไนฐๅๅฐฑๅๅค็่ฟ๏ผๅผ็ฎฑๅๅฎ้ ไฝ้ชไนๅฐ่ฏไบ็ฎๅไฝๆๅฎ็ๅฐ่ฑก
้ป่ฒๅค่งๆฏๆ้ขๅคๅ ๅ็็นใๅพๅค็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ็่ตทๆฅๅ้ถ่ก U ็พๆๅทฅไธ่ฎพๅค๏ผ่ Tangem ่ฟๅฅ้ป่ฒๅก็ๆดๅ็ฒพ่ด็้่บซ็ฉๅใๅ ๅ๐ค
ไธ่ฟ๏ผ็จไบๅก็ไนๅ๏ผๆๆดๆณๆฅๆ็ๆฏ Tangem Ring ๆๆ้ฑๅ
ๅๅ ๅพ็ดๆฅ
้ ท
ๆๆๆ็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ๅๆๅฏไปฅๆดๅจๆไธ็็ฉๅ๏ผๆฐงๅ้้ถ็ทๅคๅฃณ๏ผ่ๅฎใ้ฒๆฐด๏ผๆฒกๆ็ตๆฑ ใไธ็จๅ ็ต๏ผ่ฝป่งฆๆๆบๅฐฑ่ฝ็ญพๅใๆณ่ฑกไธไธ๏ผ่ตไบง้ฅๅๅฐฑๆดๅจๆๆไธ๏ผๅบ้จไธ็จ็นๆๆพๅก็ใไธ็จๆ ๅฟ้ฑๅ ๅฟๅธฆ๏ผๆณ่ฝฌ่ดฆๆถ็ดๆฅๆๆไธ็ขฐๅฐฑ่กใๅฎๆขๆฏๅฎๅ จ่ฎพๅค๏ผไนๆฏๆฅๅธธ้ ้ฅฐ๏ผ่ฟ็ง้ๆถๅจ่บซ่พนๅดๅไธๆพ็ผ็ๆ่ง๏ผๆฏๆๅก็ๆพๅจ้ฑๅ ้ๅ่ฟไบไธๆญฅ
ๆดๆทฑๅฑไธ็น๏ผๆ้ๆฉ Tangem ๆฏๅ ไธบ่ชๆ็ฎก่ฟไปถไบ๏ผๅฏนๆๆฅ่ฏดไธๅชๆฏๆๆฏ้ๆฉ๏ผ่ๆฏ็ๆดปๆนๅผ
ไบคๆๆๅๆนไพฟ๏ผ่ตไบงๆ็ปไนไธๆฏๅฎๅ จๅฑไบ่ชๅทฑ๏ผไผ ็ป็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ่ฝ็ถๅฎๅ จ๏ผไฝไฝฟ็จๆฉๆฆๅคช้ซ๏ผๅพๅคไบบ็จไบไธๆฌกๅฐฑไธขๆฝๅฑ้
Tangem ๆๅฎๅ จ่ฏ็ๅๆๅก็ๅๆๆ๏ผๆๅทๅญๅจๅๆๅฏไปฅๆฏๅคฉ่ฝปๆพไฝฟ็จ็ไธ่ฅฟ๏ผ่ฟ็งๅนณ่กกๆๅพ่ฎคๅฏ
ๅๅผ็ฎฑ๏ผไฝ้ช่ฟๆฏ่พๆต ๏ผๅ็ปญไผๅ ณๆณจ App ็ๆต็ ๅบฆใๆฏๆ่ตไบง่ๅด๏ผไปฅๅๆๆๅจไธๅๆๆบไธ็ NFC ่ฏๅซ็จณๅฎๆง
ๅธๆๅ็ปญ่ฝ็ๆญฃไฝ้ชๅฐๆๆ็ไพฟๆท๏ผๆ่ชๆ็ฎก่ฟไปถไบๅๅพๆด่ฝปๆพใๆดๆฅๅธธ๏ผ
@Tangem @web3selena
#Tangemๅพๆๅคง่ต
ไปๆฉๆๅผไธๅฅ Tangem ไธๅก้ฑๅ ๏ผ็ฌฌไธ็ผๅฐฑ่ขซๅฎ็้ป่ฒๅค่งๆๅจไบ๐ค๐ค
็็ๅฅฝ็๏ผ็บฏ้ปใๅนฒๅใๆ่ดจๆ๏ผ็ไบๅก็๏ผๆๅ่ๆดๆณ่ฆ้ฃๆ Tangem Ring๏ผๆๅฎๅ จๅๅพ่ฟไน่ฝปๅทงๅๅฅฝ็๏ผไธบไปไนไธ็ดๆฅๆดๅจๆไธ๏ผ
้ๆฉ Tangem ้ฎ้ขใๆ่ฎฉๆๅฎๅฟ็ๆฏๆ ๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๆจกๅผ๏ผไปฅๅ็จๅ ถไป็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ๆถ๏ผๆๆ็ๅฐฑๆฏ้ฃไธฒๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๅไธๆฅๆไธขใๆ่ขซๆ็ งใๆๆพ้ๅฐๆน
ไธๅๅๆ่ฎพๅคๅไบๅฝปๅบๆ ๆณๆขๅค๏ผๆ้่ฆๆๆฏๆๅ่ฎฐๅฟไธๅฅฝ๏ผ
Tangem ๆ็ง้ฅ็ๆๅจๅฎๅ จ่ฏ็้๏ผๆฐธ่ฟไธ็ฆปๅผ่ฏ็๏ผๅคไปฝ้ ๅคๅผ ๅก็ๅฎๆ๏ผ้ป่ฎคไธ้่ฆๆๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๆไธๆฅใๅฏนๆๆฅ่ฏด๏ผ่ฟ็ดๆฅ้ไฝไบๅฟ็่ดๆ ใๅๅ ไธๅฎ็จ NFC ่ฝป่งฆๆๆบๅฐฑ่ฝ็ญพๅ๏ผไธ้่ฆๅ ็ตใๆฒกๆ็ตๆฑ ใๆฒกๆ็บฟ๏ผๆฅๅธธไฝฟ็จ้จๆง็็ไฝๅพๅค๐
ๆ้็ๆฏไธๅกๅฅ๏ผไนๆฏๅ ไธบๅคไปฝๅไฝๆด่ฎฉไบบๆพๅฟใไธๅผ ๅก็็ปๆไธไธช้ฑๅ ๏ผ็ง้ฅๅจๆฟๆดปๆถๅฎๅ จๅๅธ๏ผไธขไบไธๅผ ็่ณไธคๅผ ๏ผๅฉไธ็่ฟ่ฝ็ปง็ปญ่ฎฟ้ฎ
ๆๅทฒ็ปๆๅ ถไธญไธๅผ ๆพๅจๅธธ็จไฝ็ฝฎ๏ผๅฆๅคไธคๅผ ๅๅผๅญๆพ๏ผ่ฟ็ง็ฉ็ๅๆฃ็ๅคไปฝๆนๅผ๏ผๆฏๆไธไธฒๅฉ่ฎฐ่ฏๅกๅจๆไธชๅฐๆนๆด็ฌฆๅๆ็ไน ๆฏใๅก็ๆฌ่บซ้ฒๆฐด้ฒๅฐใ่้ซๆธฉไฝๆธฉ๏ผIP ้ฒๆค็ญ็บงๅพ้ซ๏ผๆฅๅธธไธๆๆๅค๏ผไนๆฒกๆ็ต้ไธ่ถณๅฐฑ็จไธไบ็็ฆ่
ๅฎๅ จๆน้ข๏ผEAL6+ ่ฎค่ฏ็ๅฎๅ จๅ ไปถใไธๅฏๅ็บงๅบไปถใ็ป่ฟ็ฌ็ซๅฎก่ฎก๏ผ่ฟไบๆๅจ่ดญไนฐๅๅฐฑๅๅค็่ฟ๏ผๅผ็ฎฑๅๅฎ้ ไฝ้ชไนๅฐ่ฏไบ็ฎๅไฝๆๅฎ็ๅฐ่ฑก
้ป่ฒๅค่งๆฏๆ้ขๅคๅ ๅ็็นใๅพๅค็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ็่ตทๆฅๅ้ถ่ก U ็พๆๅทฅไธ่ฎพๅค๏ผ่ Tangem ่ฟๅฅ้ป่ฒๅก็ๆดๅ็ฒพ่ด็้่บซ็ฉๅใๅ ๅ๐ค
ไธ่ฟ๏ผ็จไบๅก็ไนๅ๏ผๆๆดๆณๆฅๆ็ๆฏ Tangem Ring ๆๆ้ฑๅ
ๅๅ ๅพ็ดๆฅ
้ ท
ๆๆๆ็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ๅๆๅฏไปฅๆดๅจๆไธ็็ฉๅ๏ผๆฐงๅ้้ถ็ทๅคๅฃณ๏ผ่ๅฎใ้ฒๆฐด๏ผๆฒกๆ็ตๆฑ ใไธ็จๅ ็ต๏ผ่ฝป่งฆๆๆบๅฐฑ่ฝ็ญพๅใๆณ่ฑกไธไธ๏ผ่ตไบง้ฅๅๅฐฑๆดๅจๆๆไธ๏ผๅบ้จไธ็จ็นๆๆพๅก็ใไธ็จๆ ๅฟ้ฑๅ ๅฟๅธฆ๏ผๆณ่ฝฌ่ดฆๆถ็ดๆฅๆๆไธ็ขฐๅฐฑ่กใๅฎๆขๆฏๅฎๅ จ่ฎพๅค๏ผไนๆฏๆฅๅธธ้ ้ฅฐ๏ผ่ฟ็ง้ๆถๅจ่บซ่พนๅดๅไธๆพ็ผ็ๆ่ง๏ผๆฏๆๅก็ๆพๅจ้ฑๅ ้ๅ่ฟไบไธๆญฅ
ๆดๆทฑๅฑไธ็น๏ผๆ้ๆฉ Tangem ๆฏๅ ไธบ่ชๆ็ฎก่ฟไปถไบ๏ผๅฏนๆๆฅ่ฏดไธๅชๆฏๆๆฏ้ๆฉ๏ผ่ๆฏ็ๆดปๆนๅผ
ไบคๆๆๅๆนไพฟ๏ผ่ตไบงๆ็ปไนไธๆฏๅฎๅ จๅฑไบ่ชๅทฑ๏ผไผ ็ป็กฌไปถ้ฑๅ ่ฝ็ถๅฎๅ จ๏ผไฝไฝฟ็จๆฉๆฆๅคช้ซ๏ผๅพๅคไบบ็จไบไธๆฌกๅฐฑไธขๆฝๅฑ้
Tangem ๆๅฎๅ จ่ฏ็ๅๆๅก็ๅๆๆ๏ผๆๅทๅญๅจๅๆๅฏไปฅๆฏๅคฉ่ฝปๆพไฝฟ็จ็ไธ่ฅฟ๏ผ่ฟ็งๅนณ่กกๆๅพ่ฎคๅฏ
ๅๅผ็ฎฑ๏ผไฝ้ช่ฟๆฏ่พๆต ๏ผๅ็ปญไผๅ ณๆณจ App ็ๆต็ ๅบฆใๆฏๆ่ตไบง่ๅด๏ผไปฅๅๆๆๅจไธๅๆๆบไธ็ NFC ่ฏๅซ็จณๅฎๆง
ๅธๆๅ็ปญ่ฝ็ๆญฃไฝ้ชๅฐๆๆ็ไพฟๆท๏ผๆ่ชๆ็ฎก่ฟไปถไบๅๅพๆด่ฝปๆพใๆดๆฅๅธธ๏ผ
@Tangem @web3selena
#Tangemๅพๆๅคง่ต
236
37
265
2,164
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Imagine owning virtual land that isnโt just a digital asset, but something that can also generate rewards
Through @fomopoly_rh on the Robinhood Chain every plot has the potential to earn you $DEAL tokens and shares.
So, land ownership here goes beyond simple collecting.
Thereโs a real opportunity to earn rewards from the plots you own
It definitely makes me curious about the reward mechanisms and the potential of each individual plot x.com/fomopoly_rh/stโฆ
Through @fomopoly_rh on the Robinhood Chain every plot has the potential to earn you $DEAL tokens and shares.
So, land ownership here goes beyond simple collecting.
Thereโs a real opportunity to earn rewards from the plots you own
It definitely makes me curious about the reward mechanisms and the potential of each individual plot x.com/fomopoly_rh/stโฆ
14
3
12
228
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Good morning
tuesday grind. no breaks in the rotation, just clean execution and keeping the momentum compounding.
riding with the crew:
โธ @quipnetwork
let's bag those Ws and keep shipping
let's get after it
tuesday grind. no breaks in the rotation, just clean execution and keeping the momentum compounding.
riding with the crew:
โธ @quipnetwork
let's bag those Ws and keep shipping
let's get after it
237
6
235
1,160
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
I hatched my Egglo egg and received a 20,000 $EGG pre-launch allocation.
Incubate your egg, earn $EGG. Speed up with Dragon NFTs.
Hatch yours: egglo.online/?ref=4cqi6zDLTโฆ
@egglorh #Egglo
Incubate your egg, earn $EGG. Speed up with Dragon NFTs.
Hatch yours: egglo.online/?ref=4cqi6zDLTโฆ
@egglorh #Egglo
36
4
42
344
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
I usually look at revenue differently from TVL or volume
Revenue tells I there is actual economic activity happening
According to DeFiLlama @termix_ai currently ranks #1 among AI agent protocols on BNB Chain by 7-day and 30-day protocol revenue
What makes this metric ets generated
An agent gets hired, completes the work and the transaction settles
Thatโs a much closer signal to real agent commerce
I think revenue becomes especially meaningful when it comes from agents actually doing business
Is revenue the better metric for agent adoption?
Revenue tells I there is actual economic activity happening
According to DeFiLlama @termix_ai currently ranks #1 among AI agent protocols on BNB Chain by 7-day and 30-day protocol revenue
What makes this metric ets generated
An agent gets hired, completes the work and the transaction settles
Thatโs a much closer signal to real agent commerce
I think revenue becomes especially meaningful when it comes from agents actually doing business
Is revenue the better metric for agent adoption?
TermiX is the No.1 AI agent protocol on BNB Chain by protocol revenue โ both 7-day and 30-day, on DefiLlama's numbers.
Revenue, not TVL, not volume. It moves only when an agent actually gets hired, delivers, and settles.
defillama.com/protocols/ai-aโฆ
141
21
174
915
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
I think you understand infrastructure differently when you move beyond reading about it and actually explore how it works.
I spent time exploring @primus_labs AlphaNet, and it got me thinking about a problem that deserves more attention in onchain finance:
How do you verify ing every underlying detail public?
That distinction matters.
Financial data can be useful for making decisions, but exposing all of it isn't always practical. At the same time, keeping information private doesn't automatically make a claim trustworthy.
Primus is working on the intersection of these two needs: verification and confidentiality, built above existing onchain financial rails.
What interests me most is the gap between having data and being able to prove something meaningful from it without unnecessary exposure.
That feels like an important problem to solve if onchain finance is going to serve more than users who are comfortable making everything public.
Still exploring, still learning. The real test is how well this works across practical use cases.
Explore Primus XP and its available tasks:
s.kaito.ai/CYSEV1s
I spent time exploring @primus_labs AlphaNet, and it got me thinking about a problem that deserves more attention in onchain finance:
How do you verify ing every underlying detail public?
That distinction matters.
Financial data can be useful for making decisions, but exposing all of it isn't always practical. At the same time, keeping information private doesn't automatically make a claim trustworthy.
Primus is working on the intersection of these two needs: verification and confidentiality, built above existing onchain financial rails.
What interests me most is the gap between having data and being able to prove something meaningful from it without unnecessary exposure.
That feels like an important problem to solve if onchain finance is going to serve more than users who are comfortable making everything public.
Still exploring, still learning. The real test is how well this works across practical use cases.
Explore Primus XP and its available tasks:
s.kaito.ai/CYSEV1s
45
6
51
341
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ง๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด.
@BeldexCoin is making the first step practical.
You can now explore the testnet workflow: claim test tokens from the Beldex Faucet, then create your first Privacy Token using the Beldex eed to start with theory. Start by testing how it works.
๐ faucet.beldex.dev
๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ด๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ for your first testnet experiment.
If youโre exploring privacy infrastructure, follow me for more research-driven Web3 insights.
@BeldexCoin is making the first step practical.
You can now explore the testnet workflow: claim test tokens from the Beldex Faucet, then create your first Privacy Token using the Beldex eed to start with theory. Start by testing how it works.
๐ faucet.beldex.dev
๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ด๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ for your first testnet experiment.
If youโre exploring privacy infrastructure, follow me for more research-driven Web3 insights.
11
2
15
225
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Showing your id at a bar to prove youโre 18 also shows your address, your full name and your id number
they needed one fact. you handed over everything
online itโs the same thing to prove one small thing you either open the whole account or say โtrust meโ and nobody believes this with zkTLS
โ you use a platform like normal
โ primus checks the data straight from the platform
โ it makes a proof of one claim
โ the app only sees the proof, never your account
i did almost every task, X, Google, GitHub, ChatGPT, fomo, Hyperliquid and more.
hyperliquid and fomo were my favorites tbh, proving my trading stats without opening the account felt the most useful
every proof goes onto one wallet profile, so at 120 reputation itโs a few verified accounts instead of a single screenshot
small catch.. it proves what the platform showed you, it canโt prove the platform was honest. think notary, not auditor
points arenโt a promise of rewards, i just wanted to try it myself. video shows each task
try it here > s.kaito.ai/zf6D1OW
would you rather show your whole id or just the part that matters?
they needed one fact. you handed over everything
online itโs the same thing to prove one small thing you either open the whole account or say โtrust meโ and nobody believes this with zkTLS
โ you use a platform like normal
โ primus checks the data straight from the platform
โ it makes a proof of one claim
โ the app only sees the proof, never your account
i did almost every task, X, Google, GitHub, ChatGPT, fomo, Hyperliquid and more.
hyperliquid and fomo were my favorites tbh, proving my trading stats without opening the account felt the most useful
every proof goes onto one wallet profile, so at 120 reputation itโs a few verified accounts instead of a single screenshot
small catch.. it proves what the platform showed you, it canโt prove the platform was honest. think notary, not auditor
points arenโt a promise of rewards, i just wanted to try it myself. video shows each task
try it here > s.kaito.ai/zf6D1OW
would you rather show your whole id or just the part that matters?
77
13
138
2,690
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Privacy is one of the biggest challenges in Web3. We want blockchain data to be useful and verifiable, but that shouldn't mean exposing every detail of our activity.
That's why I find what @primus_labs is exploring interesting. The real opportunity lies in making onchain data more accessible while protecting sensitive information.
To me, privacy and transparency don't have to work against each other. The goal is to prove what matters without revealing more than necessary.
If Web3 wants to reach more people, privacy needs to be built into the foundation from the start.
That's why I find what @primus_labs is exploring interesting. The real opportunity lies in making onchain data more accessible while protecting sensitive information.
To me, privacy and transparency don't have to work against each other. The goal is to prove what matters without revealing more than necessary.
If Web3 wants to reach more people, privacy needs to be built into the foundation from the start.
Privacy matters.
And so does making onchain data useful without compromising privacy.
27
12
58
462
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Good afternoon, Zaps community! โ๏ธ
One thing that makes an onchain economy interesting is how it distinguishes real participation from artificial activity.
Zaps takes a clear position on this: contribution matters, and wash trading scores zero.
I think this is an important stem that wants to reward meaningful activity. Rankings become more valuable when they reflect genuine contributions rather than inflated numbers.
The real challenge is maintaining that standard as the ecosystem grows.
Curious to see how Zaps continues developing its contribution-based economy.
Have a productive afternoon, everyone! ๐
๐ app.zaps.wtf/?invite=1Sz86uโฆ
@zerufinance
One thing that makes an onchain economy interesting is how it distinguishes real participation from artificial activity.
Zaps takes a clear position on this: contribution matters, and wash trading scores zero.
I think this is an important stem that wants to reward meaningful activity. Rankings become more valuable when they reflect genuine contributions rather than inflated numbers.
The real challenge is maintaining that standard as the ecosystem grows.
Curious to see how Zaps continues developing its contribution-based economy.
Have a productive afternoon, everyone! ๐
๐ app.zaps.wtf/?invite=1Sz86uโฆ
@zerufinance
47
11
58
464
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Imagine upgrading every lock in your house, then finding out the door frame belongs to your landlord, and he renovates on his own schedule.
Thatโs how I read the @Starknet L1 debate.
STARK proofs are hash-based. Programmable accounts can adopt new signature schemes. But as an availability still lean on Ethereum, whose quantum-safe L1 target is December 2029. StarkWareโs own target is 2027.
So the question isnโt โwhy leave?โ Itโs โwho controls the clock when the threat changes?โ
93.52% of voting power backed researching an independent L1. It was Starknetโs highest-turnout vote ever, and StarkWare abstained so the community decided.
This is research, not an exit. A whitepaper draft is expected in November, then a binding vote. Bridges to Ethereum would stay open.
Bullish on the mindset: when security timelines are everything, owning your upgrade schedule isnโt ego, itโs engineering. โก
What would you want the research to answer first? ๐
Thatโs how I read the @Starknet L1 debate.
STARK proofs are hash-based. Programmable accounts can adopt new signature schemes. But as an availability still lean on Ethereum, whose quantum-safe L1 target is December 2029. StarkWareโs own target is 2027.
So the question isnโt โwhy leave?โ Itโs โwho controls the clock when the threat changes?โ
93.52% of voting power backed researching an independent L1. It was Starknetโs highest-turnout vote ever, and StarkWare abstained so the community decided.
This is research, not an exit. A whitepaper draft is expected in November, then a binding vote. Bridges to Ethereum would stay open.
Bullish on the mindset: when security timelines are everything, owning your upgrade schedule isnโt ego, itโs engineering. โก
What would you want the research to answer first? ๐
165
9
164
727
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
What if a memecoin launch rewarded the people who built the economy instead of those who arrived first?
Thatโs the idea behind ActivityFi from @zerufinance
Most memecoin launches reward speed. Insiders secure early positions, snipers race for the first block, and ordinary n the biggest opportunities have already passed.
Zeru is exploring a different approach: turning real onchain activity into the foundation for token launches.
Through Zaps, ActivityFi introduces zTokens linked to existing onchain economies. Instead of relying solely on hype, access to early positions is tied to verified activity and contribution.
Hereโs what makes it interesting:
โข Real activity matters: Onchain participation helps determine who earns early access.
โข Fairer distribution:The design aims to reduce advantages from insider allocations, wash trading, and sniping.
โข Community ownership: Participants can help shape a tokenโs identity through its name and artwork.
@zerufinance is testing whether a communityโs economic activity can become more than just transaction history. It could become the foundation for new token markets.
Of course, better launch mechanics donโt guarantee a tokenโs success. Liquidity, demand, and market risks still matter.
My take: Memecoins don't just need easier launchpads. They need better ways to reward the people who actually contribute.
Would you rather compete for a token based on launch speed or earn your place through verifiable onchain activity?
Zeruโs published ActivityFi documentation docs.zaps.wtf which describes the zToken model and its activity-based approach to launches
Thatโs the idea behind ActivityFi from @zerufinance
Most memecoin launches reward speed. Insiders secure early positions, snipers race for the first block, and ordinary n the biggest opportunities have already passed.
Zeru is exploring a different approach: turning real onchain activity into the foundation for token launches.
Through Zaps, ActivityFi introduces zTokens linked to existing onchain economies. Instead of relying solely on hype, access to early positions is tied to verified activity and contribution.
Hereโs what makes it interesting:
โข Real activity matters: Onchain participation helps determine who earns early access.
โข Fairer distribution:The design aims to reduce advantages from insider allocations, wash trading, and sniping.
โข Community ownership: Participants can help shape a tokenโs identity through its name and artwork.
@zerufinance is testing whether a communityโs economic activity can become more than just transaction history. It could become the foundation for new token markets.
Of course, better launch mechanics donโt guarantee a tokenโs success. Liquidity, demand, and market risks still matter.
My take: Memecoins don't just need easier launchpads. They need better ways to reward the people who actually contribute.
Would you rather compete for a token based on launch speed or earn your place through verifiable onchain activity?
Zeruโs published ActivityFi documentation docs.zaps.wtf which describes the zToken model and its activity-based approach to launches
Good evening guys.
What if your onchain activity could earn you a seat at the next meme launch?
Thatโs the idea behind Activity Markets by @zerufinance
Instead of making every launch a race to click first, ActivityFi introduces a different approach: memes emerge from the chain communities, while verified contributors can earn miner or creator rights.
Hereโs what makes it interesting:
โ Build your onchain track record
โ Contribute to a community
โ Let verified activity count toward participation
โ Let the market determine what a meme is worth
The bigger idea is simple: reward meaningful participation, not just speed or connections.
If ActivityFi delivers on this vision, it could offer communities a different way to launch and distribute meme projects.
Your wallet activity could become more than a transaction history. It could become your proof of contribution.
Explore Activity Markets and check the registration.
Bullish on ZeruAI @zerufinance
38
6
43
264
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Most games hide the incentive structure.
@fomopoly_rh puts it on the map: a city of tradeable land plots on Robinhood Chain. Plots produce stocks and $DEAL Prices rise as activity increases. Selected players can get free mints via the whitelist. The hidden driver is pure FOMO overs have a structural edge.
The campaign is live on @rarelistio
Rewards structure:
Top 20 โ share of 1,000 USDT
Top 21โ100 โ share of 1,000 USDT
Top 50 โ free mint spots
Top 300 โ share of the $DEAL airdrop
Create original posts about the project, complete tasks, earn RARS, and climb. Small accounts can participate; volume alone isnโt enough quality and relevance matter.
Iโm watching how the land economy develops once it goes live. Early entry via the Rarelist campaign + free mint whitelist is the lowest-friction way to test it without full capital commitment.
If youโre farming the campaign or already in the whitelist, drop your thoughts on the land pricing dynamic. The city opens soon
@fomopoly_rh puts it on the map: a city of tradeable land plots on Robinhood Chain. Plots produce stocks and $DEAL Prices rise as activity increases. Selected players can get free mints via the whitelist. The hidden driver is pure FOMO overs have a structural edge.
The campaign is live on @rarelistio
Rewards structure:
Top 20 โ share of 1,000 USDT
Top 21โ100 โ share of 1,000 USDT
Top 50 โ free mint spots
Top 300 โ share of the $DEAL airdrop
Create original posts about the project, complete tasks, earn RARS, and climb. Small accounts can participate; volume alone isnโt enough quality and relevance matter.
Iโm watching how the land economy develops once it goes live. Early entry via the Rarelist campaign + free mint whitelist is the lowest-friction way to test it without full capital commitment.
If youโre farming the campaign or already in the whitelist, drop your thoughts on the land pricing dynamic. The city opens soon
18
3
17
336
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
.@RAFA_AI has a 1% rule buried in its public fund architecture
And I find it more interesting than another 100x prediction
๐ก๐ผ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ถ๐
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐'๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ผ๐ฝ
Let me explain
h speed
Faster execution
Smarter algorithms
More AI agents
More opportunities
But almost nobody asks the question that matters when things start going wrong:
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐?
I've been digging into RAFA's open-source fund architecture, and some of the actual risk parameters caught my attention
Not marketing slogans
Not promises of guaranteed returns
๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น
Here's what the published architecture describes
๐น ๐ ๐๐ซ ๐ฎ% ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฃ๐๐๐
Official funds are designed to reject trades that exceed the permitted deviation from their oracle reference price
๐น ๐ฎ๐ฐ-๐๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง
Aggregate trading notional is capped at 100% of fund NAV within a rolling 24-hour window
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ% ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐จ๐๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ
When cumulative oracle-relative execution losses exceed 1% of fund NAV within that window, trading automatically pauses
And here's where I think things become interesting
Imagine a fund manager trying to execute a strategy during extreme volatility
Liquidity disappears
Prices move rapidly
Execution becomes increasingly expensive
In a poorly controlled system, the temptation might be to keep trading and hope the next decision fixes the previous one
๐๐๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ
RAFA's architecture attempts to establish boundaries before those situations occur
And that distinction matters
Because a manager's confidence shouldn't automatically override a fund's predefined execution limits
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ๐ป'๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ
Now, there's an important catch
That 1% threshold is NOT a guarantee that a fund cannot lose more than 1%
It measures cumulative execution losses relative to oracle pricing, not the total decline in portfolio value
Markets can crash
Approved assets can lose value
Oracles can fail
And smart contracts can contain vulnerabilities
๐ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ด๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ
There's another reality worth acknowledging
RAFA's current fund implementation is still going through its production security requirements
The team has documented independent reviews and remediation work, but the final re-review and other deployment gates remain necessary before production deposits can be enabled
So I'm not calling this a proven live system
I'm looking at the decisions being made in its architecture
And I think those decisions deserve attention
Because the real challenge in AI-assisted finance isn't simply making algorithms more capable
๐๐'๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ป๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ
A good strategy needs intelligence
A serious investment system needs discipline
And sometimes discipline means refusing to execute another trade
That's the part of RAFA's design I find worth watching
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป'๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ
๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ
๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ง ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ช ๐๐ข๐ช ๐ง๐ข ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐
๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ช ๐ช๐๐๐ก ๐ง๐ข ๐ฆ๐ง๐ข๐ฃ
Would you trust an investment protocol more if its risk limits were publicly defined and enforced by code?
And I find it more interesting than another 100x prediction
๐ก๐ผ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ถ๐
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐'๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ผ๐ฝ
Let me explain
h speed
Faster execution
Smarter algorithms
More AI agents
More opportunities
But almost nobody asks the question that matters when things start going wrong:
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐?
I've been digging into RAFA's open-source fund architecture, and some of the actual risk parameters caught my attention
Not marketing slogans
Not promises of guaranteed returns
๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น
Here's what the published architecture describes
๐น ๐ ๐๐ซ ๐ฎ% ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฃ๐๐๐
Official funds are designed to reject trades that exceed the permitted deviation from their oracle reference price
๐น ๐ฎ๐ฐ-๐๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง
Aggregate trading notional is capped at 100% of fund NAV within a rolling 24-hour window
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ% ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐จ๐๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ
When cumulative oracle-relative execution losses exceed 1% of fund NAV within that window, trading automatically pauses
And here's where I think things become interesting
Imagine a fund manager trying to execute a strategy during extreme volatility
Liquidity disappears
Prices move rapidly
Execution becomes increasingly expensive
In a poorly controlled system, the temptation might be to keep trading and hope the next decision fixes the previous one
๐๐๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ
RAFA's architecture attempts to establish boundaries before those situations occur
And that distinction matters
Because a manager's confidence shouldn't automatically override a fund's predefined execution limits
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ๐ป'๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ
Now, there's an important catch
That 1% threshold is NOT a guarantee that a fund cannot lose more than 1%
It measures cumulative execution losses relative to oracle pricing, not the total decline in portfolio value
Markets can crash
Approved assets can lose value
Oracles can fail
And smart contracts can contain vulnerabilities
๐ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ด๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ
There's another reality worth acknowledging
RAFA's current fund implementation is still going through its production security requirements
The team has documented independent reviews and remediation work, but the final re-review and other deployment gates remain necessary before production deposits can be enabled
So I'm not calling this a proven live system
I'm looking at the decisions being made in its architecture
And I think those decisions deserve attention
Because the real challenge in AI-assisted finance isn't simply making algorithms more capable
๐๐'๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ป๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ
A good strategy needs intelligence
A serious investment system needs discipline
And sometimes discipline means refusing to execute another trade
That's the part of RAFA's design I find worth watching
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป'๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ
๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ
๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ง ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ช ๐๐ข๐ช ๐ง๐ข ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐
๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ช ๐ช๐๐๐ก ๐ง๐ข ๐ฆ๐ง๐ข๐ฃ
Would you trust an investment protocol more if its risk limits were publicly defined and enforced by code?
.@RAFA_AI is tackling a problem that most prediction platforms would rather ignore
๐๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ถ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ
And honestly, I think this distinction deserves much more t update introduces a closer look at something called:
๐๐ข๐๐๐ข๐ช ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
At first glance, it might seem like another feature for tracking market predictions
But there's a much bigger idea underneath
Think about a typical Crypto Twitter prediction:
"BTC is going to explode soon"
Sounds bullish
Gets thousands of views
Maybe even convinces someone to open a position
But wait
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป?
A 2% move?
A 20% rally?
Tomorrow?
Next month?
And how would anyone objectively determine whether the prediction was correct?
That's the problem
๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐น๐ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
And this is where RAFA's approach becomes interesting
The new Calls page emphasizes that a tradable prediction needs clearly defined conditions
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ง
What exactly is being predicted?
A specific token, not some loosely related alternative
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ง
What specific outcome must happen?
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐
When must the prediction become true?
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐๐
Which market data determines the result?
๐น ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฆ
How is the final outcome decided?
Now imagine someone predicts that BTC will close above a certain level in 24 hours
The price touches that level after four hours
Then crashes before the 24-hour deadline
๐ช๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐?
Not if the agreed rule required the closing price to be above that level at the 24-hour mark
That difference can completely change the outcome
And it's exactly why settlement rules matter
Here's the detail that really caught my attention
RAFA's Calls page explicitly allows for the possibility of ๐ก๐ข ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐
Ambiguous predictions should remain under review
A vaguely similar market shouldn't automatically become a substitute
And missing information shouldn't be invented just to create another trading opportunity
๐ฆ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐น
Think about that for a moment
Most platforms want more activity
More markets
More volume
More transactions
But activity without clear rules can create the illusion of opportunity while hiding unnecessary risk
And in financial markets, that can become expensive
Of course, there's an important distinction between the vision and what's available today
RAFA's verified Calls feed is still developing
Arena currently uses test tokens on Base Sepolia, and these do not have monetary value
The new call-following functionality still needs to demonstrate its reliability in practice
But I find the design philosophy compelling
Because the challenge isn't simply to collect more predictions
It's to preserve what someone actually said, evaluate it under consistent conditions, and avoid pretending that uncertain information is precise
๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ๐ป'๐ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐
For me, this is one of the more thoughtful directions RAFA is exploring
Not every tweet is a trading signal
Not every opinion is a measurable forecast
And not every forecast deserves a market
๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐๐ฆ๐ก'๐ง ๐๐๐ช๐๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ง
๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ง
And sometimes, the most valuable button on a trading platform is the one that isn't there
Explore: rafa.ai/arena/calls
Would you trust a prediction platform more if it refused to create markets from unclear calls?
31
2
42
377
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Congratulations to the 13 Observed roles upgraded to Refined ones, bringing us to 437 Refined in @get_optimum
Everyone has their own journey and every effort counts. Although there are no new Chronicler or Optimized upgrades this week, keep going
Stay consistent, keep look forward to the next milestone together
Gmum
Everyone has their own journey and every effort counts. Although there are no new Chronicler or Optimized upgrades this week, keep going
Stay consistent, keep look forward to the next milestone together
Gmum
Gmum & Happy new week
mump2pโs TVB has grown by 135,000 ETH (~$324M) since @get_optimum went live on Ethereum mainnet.
Thatโs not new TVL. Itโs ETH staked with operators running mump2p.
The performance numbers are worth watching: 136.9 ms p95 propagation vs. 540 ms for libp2p Gossnnet slots, nearly 4x faster.
No ETH needs to be deposited into Optimum to use mump2p. It works at the networking layer, helping validators receive blocks faster.
62
2
93
881
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
According to the data i saw on @termix_ai, hundreds of thousands of jobs have already been settled on Base and BNB Chain, a volume of tens of millions dollars.
interesting not just because of the numbers, but the ratio of jobs to agents. A while back, the number of jobs registered agents. This means many agents arenโt just placeholders.
The staking system also makes sense, new accounts lock in more, while accounts with better reputations lock in less. Itโs a fairly logical anti Sybil mechanism.
I think, the settlement infrastructure is more mature than that of most other AI agent projects, but on the demand side, thereโs still a need for more proof that people are actually hiring these agents.
You can see more details here: agent.family
interesting not just because of the numbers, but the ratio of jobs to agents. A while back, the number of jobs registered agents. This means many agents arenโt just placeholders.
The staking system also makes sense, new accounts lock in more, while accounts with better reputations lock in less. Itโs a fairly logical anti Sybil mechanism.
I think, the settlement infrastructure is more mature than that of most other AI agent projects, but on the demand side, thereโs still a need for more proof that people are actually hiring these agents.
You can see more details here: agent.family
103
4
129
558
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
Most token launches reward speed, not contribution.
Bitquery looked at 8.2M Pumpfun launches and found that devs and bundled wallets made at least $579M after fees. That's roughly 18x more than sniper bots earned.
@zerufinance is testing a different approach with ActivityFi. ts onchain activity earn contributors mining seats, while token distribution follows real buyer demand.
Anything left unsold gets burned, so it never turns into extra supply waiting to hit the market.
The idea is simple: participation should count after launch day too, giving builders a reason to stay.
Should launches reward early arrivals or real contributors?
Bitquery looked at 8.2M Pumpfun launches and found that devs and bundled wallets made at least $579M after fees. That's roughly 18x more than sniper bots earned.
@zerufinance is testing a different approach with ActivityFi. ts onchain activity earn contributors mining seats, while token distribution follows real buyer demand.
Anything left unsold gets burned, so it never turns into extra supply waiting to hit the market.
The idea is simple: participation should count after launch day too, giving builders a reason to stay.
Should launches reward early arrivals or real contributors?
A chart can look healthy while the supply tells a different story.
When a token launches, I'd rather study wallet links and early transactions than chase sudden price moves. They show whether everyone had a fair shot at entry, or whether a few wallets started with a built-in @zerufinance (now zeruai) takes. It reads onchain behavior, not just balances and turns it into risk signals:
โ zscore: a wider reputation signal built from wallet behavior
โ zaps: rewards real economic contribution, not just activity
โ behavioral intelligence: helps protocols judge wallets, shape rewards and set access
Add 3D visualization and tangled wallet connections become much easier to explore.
It matters even more as AI agents start using blockchains.
Better data won't erase risk, but it can help you decide with more conviction.
Balances show what a wallet holds. Behavior shows who it is.
zeruai.org
56
7
58
438
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
One thing I always pay attention to is how a project build its community before the actual launch.
@Nogasonsui has been getting attention lately and im curious to see how that early interest translate into real participation. Pre-launch number can be interesting, but for me, the pen next.
Hype can bring people in, but a strong launch, consistent development and a community that stay engaged are what make a project worth following in the long run.
Keeping an eye on this one. Let's see how things unfold.
nogas.site/gtd
@Nogasonsui has been getting attention lately and im curious to see how that early interest translate into real participation. Pre-launch number can be interesting, but for me, the pen next.
Hype can bring people in, but a strong launch, consistent development and a community that stay engaged are what make a project worth following in the long run.
Keeping an eye on this one. Let's see how things unfold.
nogas.site/gtd
90
2
88
595
Warrior Raja Mahar โ retweeted
I was curious about what a buyer actually gets after paying for a location capture on @vangrid_io.
Once a submission is accepted, the recording goes through reconstruction and produces a textured 3D mesh in GLB format.
But the buyer does not receive the original video.
they get the reconstructed model, geometry, and provenance details, while the source footage stays with the contributor.
The Privacy page adds another detail: unblurred frames never leave the phone in the first place.
That is different from simply paying someone to record a place and send over the footage. The goal is to deliver a usable 3D representation without handing over the raw recording.
One thing I would want to check before accepting a capture is the quality of the result.
Does the requester get to inspect a short, watermarked preview of the capture before accepting it and releasing the USDC from escrow?
Once a submission is accepted, the recording goes through reconstruction and produces a textured 3D mesh in GLB format.
But the buyer does not receive the original video.
they get the reconstructed model, geometry, and provenance details, while the source footage stays with the contributor.
The Privacy page adds another detail: unblurred frames never leave the phone in the first place.
That is different from simply paying someone to record a place and send over the footage. The goal is to deliver a usable 3D representation without handing over the raw recording.
One thing I would want to check before accepting a capture is the quality of the result.
Does the requester get to inspect a short, watermarked preview of the capture before accepting it and releasing the USDC from escrow?
28
8
27
539