Pinned Tweet
I helped build Facebook's like button. It was meant to spread a little positivity. It became an engine for addiction, because addiction is more profitable than connection.
That wasn't a design failure. It was an economic one. And we're about to repeat it with AI.
That wasn't a design failure. It was an economic one. And we're about to repeat it with AI.
6
6
31
1,629
No amount of traditional philanthropy will solve runaway AI, hunger, affordability, or climate change, because they’re symptoms.
But philanthropy *can* cure the disease. I spoke with @Alliancemag about how:
But philanthropy *can* cure the disease. I spoke with @Alliancemag about how:
2
2
7
530
Anthropic just committed 5% of its shares to a new Public Benefit Fund. It hasn't said yet who will decide how that money is spent. My suggestion: the public.
3
2
6
569
AI wealth is built on humanity's collective inheritance: the knowledge, code, and public infrastructure these systems learn from. So a share should go back to the public, and the public should decide how it's spent.
1
2
2
244
Can ordinary people decide this well? Yes. Participatory budgeting has put $400M+ in residents' hands across dozens of US cities. Anthropic itself asked ~1,000 Americans to help write Claude's principles in 2023.
What would you want this fund to support?
What would you want this fund to support?
0
1
3
216
The system isn't failing; it's succeeding at the wrong goal.
AI will supercharge whatever economy we put it in. Once a business model locks in, it's brutally hard to unwind.
I talked with Gastón Wright about what philanthropy can do now in @Alliancemag. Link in the comments.
AI will supercharge whatever economy we put it in. Once a business model locks in, it's brutally hard to unwind.
I talked with Gastón Wright about what philanthropy can do now in @Alliancemag. Link in the comments.
2
1
6
415
I have a bold suggestion for America’s next AI Czar: Put the people in charge of AI’s future.
1
3
18
1,032
Justin Rosenstein retweeted
This is incredible. 100% endorse JR for AI Czar.
The President is choosing an AI Czar, and I'm throwing my hat in the ring (dark horse though I may be). From developing Google Drive to founding Asana and One Project, I've spent a career helping people collaborate on hard problems. Collaborating to steer the future of AI is our hardest problem yet.
AI will supercharge whatever goals we give it. It could cure diseases, create industries, and make life more affordable for everyone. But if we aim its enormous power at the wrong goals, even unintentionally, the results could be catastrophic. I saw it happen after I helped create Facebook's Like button.
This isn't a partisan issue. We don't have to choose between the President's vision of "building America's Golden Age" and protecting human wellbeing. They're one and the same. As AI Czar, I would:
1. Let Americans decide what to do with the money AI generates.
President Trump wants Americans to share in AI's success, calling it "a partnership with the American public." He's right. A share of AI's wealth should go to the public: we, the people, whose cultural output is the resource these companies mine, and whose lives they'll disrupt. But if AI does all the work, and only a few people own it, a dividend check alone leaves the rest of us with no leverage at all. And handing the money to political appointees ties it to politics. Instead, I'd push for participatory budgeting, where Americans decide together how to invest it. In Columbus, Ohio, residents are practicing it to decide how to spend $9 million.
2. Give Americans a governing stake in major AI companies.
Senator Sanders has proposed the U.S. take a governing stake in the labs. I'd go one step further and put it in the hands of the American people, through a citizens' assembly on AI, not another Washington commission.
3. Lead the world toward international cooperation, like we did with nuclear safety.
The President has said, "Whoever wins AI, wins." But if AI puts humanity in danger, everyone loses. Just as America pioneered nuclear safety protocols and then led the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency, we can lead on democratic control of AI, with citizens' assemblies of everyday Americans, chosen by lottery and supported by experts, proposing the goals AI must serve and the guardrails it must honor. Washington would have to adopt each proposal or publicly explain why not. Assemblies are already shaping AI policy in the UK, Belgium, and Taiwan. Ours would also lend democratic legitimacy to U.S. proposals in talks like the ones Secretary Bessent recently began with China.
President Trump is optimistic about the future of AI, and I want to be too. As AI Czar, I would do what I do best: help people collaborate. Together, we can prevent the worst and realize the full promise of AI: a stronger, healthier, more prosperous America, and world.
If you agree that Americans deserve a say in AI's future, please share this, and share your ideas (or feedback on mine) in the comments.
0
1
2
579
The President is choosing an AI Czar, and I'm throwing my hat in the ring (dark horse though I may be). From developing Google Drive to founding Asana and One Project, I've spent a career helping people collaborate on hard problems. Collaborating to steer the future of AI is our hardest problem yet.
AI will supercharge whatever goals we give it. It could cure diseases, create industries, and make life more affordable for everyone. But if we aim its enormous power at the wrong goals, even unintentionally, the results could be catastrophic. I saw it happen after I helped create Facebook's Like button.
This isn't a partisan issue. We don't have to choose between the President's vision of "building America's Golden Age" and protecting human wellbeing. They're one and the same. As AI Czar, I would:
1. Let Americans decide what to do with the money AI generates.
President Trump wants Americans to share in AI's success, calling it "a partnership with the American public." He's right. A share of AI's wealth should go to the public: we, the people, whose cultural output is the resource these companies mine, and whose lives they'll disrupt. But if AI does all the work, and only a few people own it, a dividend check alone leaves the rest of us with no leverage at all. And handing the money to political appointees ties it to politics. Instead, I'd push for participatory budgeting, where Americans decide together how to invest it. In Columbus, Ohio, residents are practicing it to decide how to spend $9 million.
2. Give Americans a governing stake in major AI companies.
Senator Sanders has proposed the U.S. take a governing stake in the labs. I'd go one step further and put it in the hands of the American people, through a citizens' assembly on AI, not another Washington commission.
3. Lead the world toward international cooperation, like we did with nuclear safety.
The President has said, "Whoever wins AI, wins." But if AI puts humanity in danger, everyone loses. Just as America pioneered nuclear safety protocols and then led the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency, we can lead on democratic control of AI, with citizens' assemblies of everyday Americans, chosen by lottery and supported by experts, proposing the goals AI must serve and the guardrails it must honor. Washington would have to adopt each proposal or publicly explain why not. Assemblies are already shaping AI policy in the UK, Belgium, and Taiwan. Ours would also lend democratic legitimacy to U.S. proposals in talks like the ones Secretary Bessent recently began with China.
President Trump is optimistic about the future of AI, and I want to be too. As AI Czar, I would do what I do best: help people collaborate. Together, we can prevent the worst and realize the full promise of AI: a stronger, healthier, more prosperous America, and world.
If you agree that Americans deserve a say in AI's future, please share this, and share your ideas (or feedback on mine) in the comments.
AI will supercharge whatever goals we give it. It could cure diseases, create industries, and make life more affordable for everyone. But if we aim its enormous power at the wrong goals, even unintentionally, the results could be catastrophic. I saw it happen after I helped create Facebook's Like button.
This isn't a partisan issue. We don't have to choose between the President's vision of "building America's Golden Age" and protecting human wellbeing. They're one and the same. As AI Czar, I would:
1. Let Americans decide what to do with the money AI generates.
President Trump wants Americans to share in AI's success, calling it "a partnership with the American public." He's right. A share of AI's wealth should go to the public: we, the people, whose cultural output is the resource these companies mine, and whose lives they'll disrupt. But if AI does all the work, and only a few people own it, a dividend check alone leaves the rest of us with no leverage at all. And handing the money to political appointees ties it to politics. Instead, I'd push for participatory budgeting, where Americans decide together how to invest it. In Columbus, Ohio, residents are practicing it to decide how to spend $9 million.
2. Give Americans a governing stake in major AI companies.
Senator Sanders has proposed the U.S. take a governing stake in the labs. I'd go one step further and put it in the hands of the American people, through a citizens' assembly on AI, not another Washington commission.
3. Lead the world toward international cooperation, like we did with nuclear safety.
The President has said, "Whoever wins AI, wins." But if AI puts humanity in danger, everyone loses. Just as America pioneered nuclear safety protocols and then led the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency, we can lead on democratic control of AI, with citizens' assemblies of everyday Americans, chosen by lottery and supported by experts, proposing the goals AI must serve and the guardrails it must honor. Washington would have to adopt each proposal or publicly explain why not. Assemblies are already shaping AI policy in the UK, Belgium, and Taiwan. Ours would also lend democratic legitimacy to U.S. proposals in talks like the ones Secretary Bessent recently began with China.
President Trump is optimistic about the future of AI, and I want to be too. As AI Czar, I would do what I do best: help people collaborate. Together, we can prevent the worst and realize the full promise of AI: a stronger, healthier, more prosperous America, and world.
If you agree that Americans deserve a say in AI's future, please share this, and share your ideas (or feedback on mine) in the comments.
1
2
12
1,328
The economy is an optimization system, just like AI. Its reward function is profit.
Profit has some relationship to people’s lives better (I grow a tomato, you buy it, we’re both better off). But the gap between profit and human welfare is vast.
We’ve had superintelligences (corporations) “reward hacking” that gap for hundreds of years, and it’s the cause of most of the world’s problems: climate change, addictive technology, sensationalist media, the opioid crisis, endless other problems.
This was already the most important root cause to address to improve life on Earth. But now transformative AI will supercharge this optimization to an extreme (including AI swarms building companies with no human conscience to slow them down).
*Aligning the economy* with human welfare may sound impossible, but we already have the tools to do it, and we need to do it now.
Profit has some relationship to people’s lives better (I grow a tomato, you buy it, we’re both better off). But the gap between profit and human welfare is vast.
We’ve had superintelligences (corporations) “reward hacking” that gap for hundreds of years, and it’s the cause of most of the world’s problems: climate change, addictive technology, sensationalist media, the opioid crisis, endless other problems.
This was already the most important root cause to address to improve life on Earth. But now transformative AI will supercharge this optimization to an extreme (including AI swarms building companies with no human conscience to slow them down).
*Aligning the economy* with human welfare may sound impossible, but we already have the tools to do it, and we need to do it now.
2
0
4
533
Imagine if companies got money based on how much good they were doing.
Imagine if our economy rewarded the right things.
In a world where we fund what matters, technology improves your life instead of stealing your time. Healthcare prevents disease instead of profiting from sickness. Neighborhoods get better without pricing people out. Companies compete to restore the planet. The media reports truth, not clickbait. Teachers, nurses, and artists get paid what they deserve. People’s basic needs are met, insulin is cheap, oceans are clean, and our children inherit a better world.
Imagine if our economy rewarded the right things.
In a world where we fund what matters, technology improves your life instead of stealing your time. Healthcare prevents disease instead of profiting from sickness. Neighborhoods get better without pricing people out. Companies compete to restore the planet. The media reports truth, not clickbait. Teachers, nurses, and artists get paid what they deserve. People’s basic needs are met, insulin is cheap, oceans are clean, and our children inherit a better world.
1
0
7
586
It’s possible, and, in an AI world, it’s urgent. I wrote about how to get there in @techpolicypress: techpolicy.press/the-like-butto…
0
0
4
155
In today's NYT, my colleague Aaron Tanaka argues that we the people should set AI's guardrails, through citizens' assemblies of everyday people, rather than leaving it to corporations and governments alone. “If A.I. shapes all our lives, all of us deserve a say in shaping its future."
Democratizing AI governance is a key part of the future we’re working toward at One Project, an economy whose rules and incentives are steered by the people, for the people.
nytimes.com/2026/09/17/opi…
Democratizing AI governance is a key part of the future we’re working toward at One Project, an economy whose rules and incentives are steered by the people, for the people.
nytimes.com/2026/09/17/opi…
0
0
4
408
AI will supercharge whatever economy we put it in. Let's put it in one governed by and for the people.
1
0
1
111
Full piece in @TechPolicyPress: techpolicy.press/the-like-butto…
0
0
3
106
Regulation is necessary and not enough. Corporations have routed around rules since the Gilded Age, and AI will help them reward-hack the economy faster.
The durable fix is economic alignment: reward what people want and need, and let the public decide what that is.
The durable fix is economic alignment: reward what people want and need, and let the public decide what that is.
1
0
1
90
This isn't hypothetical. Democratic economic alignment is already working in 11,000+ communities: participatory budgets, community land trusts, worker-owned companies.
1
0
1
46