The salmon was real. 🐟
A dead fish appeared to show brain activity in an fMRI scanner.
The catch? The apparent activity was no longer statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.
More to come - check game.qedscience.com
0
0
0
273
A dead salmon and a preserved octopus walk into a brain scanner. 🐟🐙
Only one made it into a real paper.
Can you spot it faster than Reviewer 2?

game.qedscience.com
Post your score 👇
3
2
7
3,151
Replying to @qedScience
Real science can surprise you. What else might you be missing?
QED’s Insights Feed helps you discover research relevant to your work, including findings you’d never think to search for.
Explore: qedscience.com/blog/insights-…
0
0
0
129
What if the most relevant paper for your research is one you'd never think to search for?

Dr Andrew Baker (University of Cambridge) uses QED’s Insights Feed to discover papers and preprints he might otherwise miss.

See how it fits into his research routine 👇
2
0
4
975
Replying to @qedScience
Try QED Science here: qedscience.com
0
0
0
209
Replying to @qedScience
Discover research worth your attention. Read more here: qedscience.com/blog/insights-…
0
0
0
45
After countless readings, it can be hard to see your own manuscript clearly.

We’re working with Wiley to help at that moment: authors at selected Wiley journals are now invited to use QED Science to strengthen their manuscripts before submission.
1
0
1
285
Replying to @qedScience
As submissions grow and reviewer capacity struggles to keep pace, we’re exploring how scientific AI can help authors strengthen work before peer review.

Thank you to @KlugYoel , @latwec and the Wiley team.
1
0
0
81
Replying to @qedScience
More about the pilot:
wiley.com/en-us/insights…
0
0
0
37
Replying to @qedScience
QED examines claims, evidence and reasoning, flagging gaps and inconsistencies. Authors decide what to change.The pilot is optional and independent of Wiley’s editorial review. Manuscripts and reports stay private to the author.
1
0
0
37
Replying to @qedScience
As submissions grow and reviewer capacity struggles to keep pace, we’re exploring how scientific AI can help authors improve work before peer review.

Thank you to @KlugYoel, @latwec and the Wiley team.

More about the pilot:
wiley.com/en-us/insights…
0
0
0
48
Researchers don't need to search harder. They need the right paper to find them.

How biomechanist Dr. Sauvik Das Gupta went from prompting an LLM to having a continuously updated Insights Feed that learns what matters to his work.
1
2
7
508
Replying to @qedScience
Dr. Sauvik's "The Thirteen Minutes" blog: qedscience.com/blog/the-thirt…
0
1
3
145
It's official: Insights Feed is here! 🎉

The most useful finding for your research might be hiding in a paper you'd never think to search for.

Meet QED Science's Insights Feed: personalized research recommendations, each explaining "Why you should care."

Discover what matters ://t.co/CfvmKvwYyD
0
4
10
597
“We’re supposed to be standing on the shoulders of giants, but the scientific corpus is unreliable.”

At the STS Forum in Kyoto, our co-founder @OdedRechavi raised a critical question for AI-driven science:
If AI learns from an incomplete, unreliable scientific record, what is it really building on?
0
4
11
881
What happens to my unpublished work when I upload it to AI?
Fair question.
Researchers trust us with manuscripts, grants, and ideas that may represent years of work. They should know where that work goes and how it’s protected.
At QED Science:
• Your work stays private unless • We do not train or fine-tune models on your research
• We use enterprise-grade security, including encryption at rest and in transit, least-privilege access, monitoring, vulnerability scanning, and independent penetration testing
• We have completed a SOC 2 Type II audit and are ISO 27001 certified.
Different AI tools handle sensitive data in different ways. The important thing is knowing what happens to your work.
That should be easy to find out. qedscience.com/security#DataP…

#ResearchSecurity #AIinScience
0
0
6
473
🧠 Happening TODAY: Our CSO, Prof. Oded Rechavi, speaks at the joint SfN - FENS webinar "AI and the Making of Neuroscientific Knowledge" - a session about the ethical questions surrounding AI, its impact on scientific publishing, and how it may shape the future direction of neuroscience research.

📅 Today, 22 September | 17:00–18:00 CEST
📷 Learn more and register: buff.ly/sDZ00Gz

@SfNtweets @FENSorg @OdedRechavi
0
0
0
352
Thanks @InVivoPodOnX for pointing @paulbloomatyale our way. QED takes a different approach: rather than asking AI to review a paper as a whole, it breaks the paper into individual claims and interrogates the evidence for each. We’d love for Paul to try it.
@paulbloomatyale Dr. Bloom, may I suggest my chat regarding this exact topic with @OdedRechavi who runs @qed (AI review platform). youtu.be/Vhj3s4Dha8g
1
0
3
901
QED Science retweeted
Replying to @paulbloomatyale
@paulbloomatyale Dr. Bloom, may I suggest my chat regarding this exact topic with @OdedRechavi who runs @qed (AI review platform). youtu.be/Vhj3s4Dha8g
2
1
9
2,143