Pinned Tweet
In the Quran's own words:
Disbelievers (kāfirūn / alladhīna kafarū)
98:6. “Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.”
8:55. “Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not [ever] believe.”
8:12. “[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, ‘I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.’”
47:4. “So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens.”
9:5. “And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way.”
9:29. “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture — [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”
9:73. “O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.” (Repeated at 66:9.)
4:56. “Indeed, those who disbelieve in Our verses — We will drive them into a Fire. Every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted in Might and Wise.”
4:89. “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.”
2:191. “And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing.”
3:151. “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.”
22:19–22. “Those who disbelieved will have cut out for them garments of fire. Poured upon their heads will be scalding water by which is melted that within their bellies and [their] skins. And for [striking] them are maces of iron. Every time they want to get out of it from anguish, they will be returned to it, and [it will be said], ‘Taste the punishment of the Burning Fire.’”
33:64. “Indeed, Allah has cursed the disbelievers and prepared for them a Blaze.”
Jews
5:82. “You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the believers [to be] the Jews and those who associate others with Allah.”
5:51. “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you — then indeed, he is [one] of them.”
5:60. “Say, ‘Shall I inform you of [what is] worse than that as penalty from Allah? [It is that of] those whom Allah has cursed and with whom He became angry and made of them apes and pigs and slaves of Taghut. Those are worse in position and further astray from the sound way.’”
5:64. “And the Jews say, ‘The hand of Allah is chained.’ Chained are their hands, and cursed are they for what they say. … And We have cast among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection.”
2:65. “And you had already known about those who transgressed among you concerning the sabbath, and We said to them, ‘Be apes, despised.’” (Same transformation at 7:166.)
9:30. “The Jews say, ‘Ezra is the son of Allah’; and the Christians say, ‘The Messiah is the son of Allah.’ That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?”
4:46. “Among the Jews are those who distort words from their [proper] usages … and [who] say, ‘We hear and disobey’ … and curse them for what they say.”
5:13. “So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages.”
Christians
5:72. “They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary’ … Indeed, he who associates others with Allah — Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire.”
5:73. “They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the third of three.’ And there is no god except one God. … the disbelievers among them will have a painful punishment.”
5:17. “They have certainly disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary.”
9:30. Christians are grouped with the Jews in the line “May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?” for calling the Messiah the son of Allah.
4:171. “O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah … So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, ‘Three’; desist — it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son.”
Disbelievers (kāfirūn / alladhīna kafarū)
98:6. “Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.”
8:55. “Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not [ever] believe.”
8:12. “[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, ‘I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.’”
47:4. “So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens.”
9:5. “And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way.”
9:29. “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture — [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”
9:73. “O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.” (Repeated at 66:9.)
4:56. “Indeed, those who disbelieve in Our verses — We will drive them into a Fire. Every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted in Might and Wise.”
4:89. “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.”
2:191. “And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing.”
3:151. “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.”
22:19–22. “Those who disbelieved will have cut out for them garments of fire. Poured upon their heads will be scalding water by which is melted that within their bellies and [their] skins. And for [striking] them are maces of iron. Every time they want to get out of it from anguish, they will be returned to it, and [it will be said], ‘Taste the punishment of the Burning Fire.’”
33:64. “Indeed, Allah has cursed the disbelievers and prepared for them a Blaze.”
Jews
5:82. “You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the believers [to be] the Jews and those who associate others with Allah.”
5:51. “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you — then indeed, he is [one] of them.”
5:60. “Say, ‘Shall I inform you of [what is] worse than that as penalty from Allah? [It is that of] those whom Allah has cursed and with whom He became angry and made of them apes and pigs and slaves of Taghut. Those are worse in position and further astray from the sound way.’”
5:64. “And the Jews say, ‘The hand of Allah is chained.’ Chained are their hands, and cursed are they for what they say. … And We have cast among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection.”
2:65. “And you had already known about those who transgressed among you concerning the sabbath, and We said to them, ‘Be apes, despised.’” (Same transformation at 7:166.)
9:30. “The Jews say, ‘Ezra is the son of Allah’; and the Christians say, ‘The Messiah is the son of Allah.’ That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?”
4:46. “Among the Jews are those who distort words from their [proper] usages … and [who] say, ‘We hear and disobey’ … and curse them for what they say.”
5:13. “So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages.”
Christians
5:72. “They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary’ … Indeed, he who associates others with Allah — Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire.”
5:73. “They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the third of three.’ And there is no god except one God. … the disbelievers among them will have a painful punishment.”
5:17. “They have certainly disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary.”
9:30. Christians are grouped with the Jews in the line “May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?” for calling the Messiah the son of Allah.
4:171. “O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah … So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, ‘Three’; desist — it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son.”
1
1
3
223
Yeetie retweeted
BREAKING: Binance responds to ongoing situation regarding a suspected potential $2.8 billion hack.
Full Statement Below:
Full Statement Below:
BREAKING: Tether has frozen $971 million worth of USDT which has been linked to a suspected Binance hack.
This comes just minutes after Binance wallets saw a $2.8 billion outflow across five blockchains.
Binance has yet to comment on the situation.
56
194
1,533
224,051
Yeetie retweeted
EXCLUSIVE: From Russia’s military to Silicon Valley.
A Russian businessman whose company developed secure communications technology for the Russian military owns a $72 million property near sensitive American technology facilities in Silicon Valley.
A Congressman is raising national security concerns. thenewsground.com/yusufov-silico…
A Russian businessman whose company developed secure communications technology for the Russian military owns a $72 million property near sensitive American technology facilities in Silicon Valley.
A Congressman is raising national security concerns. thenewsground.com/yusufov-silico…
13
207
350
16,955
Yeetie retweeted
Ryan is doing God's work trying to educate the Right on an extremely important topic
The KGB spent only 15% on spying. The other 85% was aimed at your mind. #KGB #Disinformation
2
16
47
1,509
Yeetie retweeted
Ngo investigates: I've been able to find out the real identity of the trans violent extremist accused of attacking a @uofutah conservative student after wishing for mass deadly violence.
"Amber Grace" is the alias of Robert Jefferson Tulley. He's a Roblox game developer who has 's gaming projects.
He works at @gamefamstudios in Salt Lake City. ngocomment.com
"Amber Grace" is the alias of Robert Jefferson Tulley. He's a Roblox game developer who has 's gaming projects.
He works at @gamefamstudios in Salt Lake City. ngocomment.com
“I think Republicans should be shot in the street.”
Video recorded at @uofutah captured an alleged attack by a far-left trans militant who uses the name “Amber Grace.” The victim was a College Republicans member. The trans person, a man, is facing charges of assault and property damage.
Far-left groups immediately said that “Amber” was the victim of the attack by being recorded and that he shouldn’t face any legal accountability.
The chilling call to leftist violence from the trans militant follows a pro-trans gunman allegedly assassinating Charlie Kirk on an Utah campus. x.com/Rylieparis05/s…
551
5,899
15,421
196,820
Yeetie retweeted
🤨
Rules-Based Warfare: A Higher Form of Hybrid Warfare Game
Source: PLA Daily
Author: Jun Tan
Date: 2026-07-16 06:52:28
Link(not secure): 81.cn/yw_208727/1647…
In today's world, the once-in-a-century changes are accelerating, the international order is undergoing profound adjustments, and the great power competition is escalating across the board. In the eyes of some countries and militaries, international rules are not only the bottom line for restraining war, but have themselves become weapons in the game. Rules-based warfare, as a new and advanced form of combat that breaks through traditional paradigms of violence and cognitive boundaries, has emerged on the historical stage and become a crucial variable in shaping the global landscape. Essentially, it represents a systemic reconstruction of the global interest distribution system, governance rules system, and the logic of great power competition during the transition from the old to the new international order. Mastering the dominance of rules has become key for great powers to gain the initiative in long-term strategic competition.
Rules-based warfare refers to a hybrid form of confrontation in which certain countries or groups of countries use international rules as a weapon to vie for institutional dominance, legal legitimacy, and moral high ground by formulating, utilizing, reshaping, deconstructing, circumventing, and creating various game rules, thereby restricting the freedom of their opponents, amplifying their own advantages, and reducing their own costs. This confrontation covers multiple dimensions, including trade, technology, law, cyberspace, climate, military, and cognition, and is the result of the interplay of multiple factors, such as the evolution of the international landscape, the profound adjustment of globalization, the driving force of technological revolution, the transformation of the logic of great power competition, and the reform of the global governance system.
Distinctive features of rules-based warfare
Rules-based warfare differs from traditional warfare aimed at territorial occupation, resource plunder, and military annihilation. It is an asymmetric, high-level confrontation based on rules, standards, and institutional systems, profoundly changing the winning mechanisms and competitive logic of international strategic games.
A de-violent form of confrontation. Rules-based warfare completely breaks away from the path dependence of traditional warfare on military violence. It centers on rules, standards, and institutional systems as the core of the game, achieving strategic suppression through flexible means such as sanctions, compliance reviews, standard exclusivity, system decoupling, and monopolizing the right to interpret rules. At the same time, rules-based warfare exhibits a distinct asymmetry. Hegemonic powers rely on their existing rule-based hegemony to exert pressure, while developing countries can achieve "cornering checks and balances" through local rule innovation, the creation of new standards, and multilateral cooperation, forming a pattern of "breaking hegemony with institutions and changing the old order with new rules," profoundly reshaping the power dynamics of modern warfare.
A competitive landscape of pervasive influence. The rules-based war completely breaks down the limitations of time, space, and domain, achieving a normalized game across all domains, all times, and all coverage. In terms of domains, it comprehensively penetrates all areas of national survival and development, including trade and finance, technology industries, data networks, arms control, and global governance. Any field regulated by international rules or industry standards becomes an arena for this rules-based war. In terms of time and space, the game transcends peacetime and wartime, front lines and rear lines, embedding itself within daily international cooperation, trade, and technological exchanges, presenting a pervasive situation where "peacetime is wartime, and everywhere is a battlefield," possessing extremely strong extensibility.
A legal yet covert form of competition. All confrontational actions in this rules-based war rely on international conventions, industry standards, compliance systems, and multilateral mechanisms. Under the guise of "legality and compliance," they are actually carrying out strategic containment, possessing strong moral rhetoric and institutional concealment. The initiating party often controls the interpretation, discretion, and enforcement of existing rules, packaging unilateral sanctions, technological blockades, systemic exclusion, and standard barriers as "compliance governance," "market rules," and "international practices." This model institutionalizes, standardizes, and legitimizes certain hegemonic behaviors, trapping the passive party in a dilemma of "violation equals restriction, compliance equals being controlled," a situation that conventional game theory methods struggle to break.
The competition is characterized by a long-term, gradual pace of confrontation. Rules-based warfare is a long-term, low-intensity, and normalized gradual game with no clear start or end point. The construction, revision, subversion, and reconstruction of the rule system are long-term processes; the implementation, popularization, and iteration of standards require time to accumulate; and the change of order and the transfer of power depend on the accumulation of long-term game experience. Rules competition will not be decided by short-term games, but rather by a strategic tug-of-war lasting for years or even longer. Both sides, through continuous revision of rules, iteration of standards, construction of new systems, and dismantling of the old order, gradually squeeze the opponent's development space, accumulate their own strategic advantages, and ultimately achieve the reconstruction of order and the change of power, exhibiting the characteristics of a long-term confrontation that is "subtle and gradual, achieving success over time."
The game model of systemic confrontation. Rules-based warfare is a comprehensive, end-to-end, and systemic structural confrontation, a contest of a nation's overall institutional construction capabilities, standard-setting capabilities, system integration capabilities, and international mobilization capabilities. The main players are no longer a single military or domain, but rather the entire institutional, standard, and governance systems of nations and even alliances. The game encompasses all stages, including rule creation, standard output, system adaptation, multilateral binding, and risk hedging. The stronger party implements comprehensive and systematic containment by constructing a closed-loop, exclusive rule system; the weaker party's effective breakthroughs also rely on building its own rule system, collaborating with multilateral partners, and adopting new governance systems to achieve system-level checks and balances. This is a typical confrontation model of "systemic victory and order-based triumph."
The core of victory lies in rules. Rules-based warfare reconstructs the logic of victory, with the power to define rules, set industry standards, exert international influence, and dominate the order becoming core winning factors. Under this paradigm, military hard power serves as the ultimate guarantee. Whoever can first define new rules of competition, industry standards, and value paradigms, lead the revision, interpretation, and implementation of international rules, and build multilateral consensus to promote their own institutional system, will control the underlying logic of global competition. Mastering the power to define rules allows for setting industry barriers, defining boundaries of interests, and guiding governance, achieving the strategic goal of "constraining opponents with rules, controlling advantages with standards, and maintaining dominance with order." This is the most fundamental logical characteristic that distinguishes rules-based warfare from traditional warfare.
The diverse forms of rule-based warfare
As the focus of international competition shifts towards the interplay of institutional rules, the battle of rules has deeply penetrated key areas of national development, evolving into a comprehensive and systemic confrontation characterized by integrated peacetime and wartime measures, covert and gradual action, cross-domain collaboration, and long-term competition.
In the economic and trade sphere, this manifests as the forefront of the distribution of benefits. This is the most frequent, far-reaching, and directly impactful form of rules-based warfare. Its core logic lies in manipulating, modifying, and even abusing international trade, investment, and financial rules to systematically disrupt the economic and trade ecosystem of target countries, disrupt the modernization of industrial and supply chains, and implement deep-seated economic suppression. Certain major powers often use "rule compliance" as a pretext to carry out unilateral containment, which is essentially a fierce struggle for dominance in global economic and trade governance and the discourse power of the value chain. This high-intensity, normalized, and all-encompassing confrontation poses a severe challenge to the stability of the global economic and trade order.
In the field of science and technology, this manifests as the core hub of technological dominance. This is a silent battle for control over technological rules, the key to victory in a rules-based war. Its core lies in controlling core technology standards, industry norms, patent layouts, and certification systems, creating a technology path lock-in effect. The aim is to compress the target country's space for independent innovation and industrial upgrading, and to control the global technological high ground. This operation spans the entire chain of rules, including technology research and development, patent layout, product access, industry norms, and technology export controls, striving to achieve strategic suppression through high-standard barriers. Its high technological content makes it the most fundamental and long-term form of rules-based warfare.
In the legal and judicial field, this manifests as a precise tool in rule-based warfare. This rule-based warfare is highly covert, precise, and professional. Using international and domestic law as "weapons," it employs the instrumentalization of judicial procedures, the complication of legal reasoning, and the politicization of compliance reviews to deliver precise "soft kills" to target entities in specific countries. Essentially, it weaponizes the judiciary, selectively applying the law, maliciously manipulating procedures, and abusing extraterritorial jurisdiction to breach the principle of sovereignty and conduct transnational legal encirclement. Its core objective is to seize the right to interpret and administer international law. Under the guise of professional expertise, its strategic containment nature is often concealed.
In the digital realm, this manifests as a new high ground in governance. With the digital economy and cyberspace becoming core areas of strategic competition, cyberspace has rapidly emerged as a new main battlefield. Data sovereignty, cybersecurity, platform regulation, and algorithm ethics are core issues, with the goal of vying for global dominance in network and digital governance. The struggle revolves around defining digital sovereignty, rules governing the flow of critical data, norms of state behavior in cyberspace, and the construction of a new digital trade system, aiming to delineate boundaries through rules and control the lifeline of digital economic development. This directly relates to national digital sovereignty, development space, and future strategic position.
In the ideological sphere, this manifests as a hidden front in the value-based struggle. This is a form of rule-based warfare extending deeply into the cognitive and value domains. Packaged under specific value concepts, it employs systematic ideological infiltration, manipulation of international public opinion, and shaping of narratives to launch cognitive attacks, aiming to weaken the target country's institutional identity, confidence in its path, and international image. Essentially, it distorts value issues such as human rights into political tools, constructing multiple standards and vying for the moral high ground and ideological dominance by monopolizing the right to define discourse, manipulating public opinion trials, and exporting values. This battle profoundly erodes the target country's public opinion environment, social consensus, and the foundation of its soft power, exhibiting extreme concealment, deception, and long-term nature.
In the military and security field, this manifests as a key area of strategic deterrence. This represents a strategic extension of rules-based warfare into traditional security domains, reflecting a deepening of great power military competition towards rules-based containment. It revolves around arms control mechanisms, military codes of conduct, alliance treaty systems, and security rules in emerging fields. Its core objective is to vie for the right to formulate and interpret international rules in the military and security field, aiming to restrict the development of other countries' military power and compress their strategic security space. Using international military law, arms control treaties, the law of armed conflict, and alliance rules as vehicles, it constrains adversaries' capacity building, restricts freedom of action, and constructs exclusive security architectures through leading rule-making, unilateral modifications, selective compliance, or malicious withdrawal from treaties. This "rules-based deterrence" supplements or even partially replaces traditional military deterrence. This battle directly concerns core national security interests and military sovereignty, representing the most strategically deterrent form of rules-based warfare, and its outcome profoundly impacts global strategic stability and the international security landscape.
The Intrinsic Mechanism of Rules-Based Warfare
Compared to the traditional hot wars that rely on the logic of winning through physical force, the rules-based war is a high-level game at the systemic, institutional, and cognitive levels. Its outcome depends on the ability to control power at the source, the ability to dominate standards, the ability to apply systems, the ability to construct systems, the ability to shape discourse, and the ability to reshape order.
Rule-based domain control: Achieving dimensional suppression through standard definition. The fundamental winning logic in rule-based warfare lies in the power to define standards. The dominant party often restructures the competitive landscape and locks in the dimensions of the game by setting entry standards in areas such as technology, trade, security, and compliance, achieving "pre-battle victory." This is because standards have strong exclusivity and anchoring power; once they become internationally accepted paradigms, they form rigid barriers. Technology patents, digital algorithms, trade access, and the definition of security behavior are all essentially benchmarks for the game. The party that controls the definition of standards, by unifying technological paths, evaluation systems, and entry barriers, makes its own model the "only legitimate paradigm," forcing opponents to either passively adapt and be constrained or be excluded. The power to define standards is superior to power advantage; this is the core dimensional suppression winning logic of rule-based warfare.
Institutional Regulation: Forming Systemic Constraints Through Multilateral Mechanisms. The fundamental confrontational form of rules-based warfare is a contest of systemic potential. The key to victory lies in transforming unilateral advantages into multilateral institutional advantages. This is achieved by building alliances, regional agreements, and industry organizations to construct institutionalized communities of interest and rule networks, thereby suppressing individual strengths with systemic potential. The dominant party often packages its demands as international public rules by controlling international organizations, revising multilateral conventions, and constructing regional rule systems, thus forming institutionalized and legitimate binding forces. On the one hand, this positively binds most countries into its system, forming large-scale alliances; on the other hand, it uses institutional sanctions and compliance reviews to precisely restrict and isolate its opponents. The core of this mechanism lies in solidifying advantages through institutions and dissolving opponents through the system, transforming short-term strength disadvantages into long-term institutional advantages.
Discourse Shaping: Dominating the Moral High Ground Through Cognition. The battle of rules is a combination of legal and cognitive games, with victory largely dependent on international acceptance. The power of discourse, interpretation, and characterization constitute its soft, winning core, directly determining the legitimacy and enforceability of the rules. The implementation and effectiveness of international rules require the support of value narratives and moral definitions. The dominant party consistently controls public opinion, academic definitions, and the international evaluation system, monopolizing standards of right and wrong, good and evil, and legality and illegality. This allows them to portray their own governance as "compliant" and characterize the legitimate development of their opponents as "illegal," achieving cognitive-level suppression. The essence of this mechanism is cognitive dominance and legal victory; narrative and legal dominance can have a long-term impact on the opponent's international legitimacy and development space.
Systemic Control: Building a Global Balance of Power Through Rule-Based Interaction. Rule-based warfare is characterized by multi-layered nesting and global linkage. The key to victory lies in constructing a rule matrix that links multiple fields such as trade, technology, finance, security, and data, forming a global balance of power. Rules in various fields are mutually reinforcing: technical standards are tied to trade rules, financial rules sanction the real economy, security rules interfere with technological cooperation, and data rules reshape the industrial landscape. The dominant party frequently relies on the rule system to form a closed-loop network of checks and balances, launching precise cross-domain strikes against the opponent's weaknesses, achieving systemic constraints where "one violation leads to global restrictions." Compared to traditional single-front military confrontation, this mechanism represents an upgrade from single-point competition to global control, amplifying effectiveness through rule-based linkage.
Iterative Victory: Opening Up New Tracks Through Rule Innovation. Winning in the rules-based war lies in continuously iterating rules and seizing new domains of rules. Technological revolutions and global governance reforms have given rise to emerging governance gaps in areas such as space, artificial intelligence, quantum information, biotechnology, and digital trade. These tracks are free from the constraints of old rules and the solidification of traditional hegemony, representing incremental battlefields in the rules-based game. The weaker party must proactively intervene in the governance of these emerging fields, taking the lead in exporting new solutions, rules, and standards, building a new, self-controllable rules-based system, and gradually offsetting, replacing, and transforming the old rules-based system. This mechanism embodies the characteristics of incremental breakthroughs and iterative victory in the rules-based war: maintaining a righteous stance in existing tracks, seizing the initiative in incremental tracks, and gaining the upper hand in hybrid warfare through continuous innovation, system upgrades, and paradigm shifts.
0
2
2
138
Yeetie retweeted
@thestustustudio I think about this photo. A lot.
Coincidentally, the student in the FRSO shirt just threatened Cam Higby last week at Wayne State.
Coincidentally, the student in the FRSO shirt just threatened Cam Higby last week at Wayne State.
3
3
12
497
Yeetie retweeted
Arrived in #Pyongyang 🇰🇵
#Switzerland will open a diplomatic office to maintain direct contact with the DPRK from Pyongyang and support our #GoodOffices.
#Dialogue remains essential for peace and stability in the region.
#Switzerland will open a diplomatic office to maintain direct contact with the DPRK from Pyongyang and support our #GoodOffices.
#Dialogue remains essential for peace and stability in the region.
126
525
3,852
335,914
Yeetie retweeted
Zhang Shengmin received a promotion to the Politburo. The Central Military Commission remains unchanged, retaining only Shengmin and Xi as a two-person group within a six-person body. The fifth plenum saw the lowest turnout in the post-Mao period, with more than a quarter of expected attendees absent. At Xi’s direction, Shengmin removed most of those missing.
To Liuzhi they likely go. Zhang Shengmin has been busy.
The Central Military Commission has had massive turnover in the last few years.
If Youxia is removed, then both vice chairmans of the CMC will have been replaced in the last 3 months(Shengmin replaced He Weidong a few months ago)
0
1
4
182
Yeetie retweeted
Guys, i don't think they just want healthcare.
A protester holds a sign reading "F*** him right in the neck hole" in front of the "Pick Up the Mic" event with Alex Stein at the University of Oregon, mocking Charlie Kirk's assassination.
Charlie was assassinated last year at Utah Valley University during his American Comeback was launched after his death to carry on his campus debates.
@TaylerUSA | @TPUSA
206
1,051
14,436
123,537
Yeetie retweeted
A Baghdad court on Thursday sentenced three French nationals to life imprisonment over their alleged affiliation with the Islamic State (ISIS), state media reported, days after another batch of French jihadists were sentenced.
thenewregion.com/posts/6953
thenewregion.com/posts/6953
0
2
6
1,541
Yeetie retweeted
BREAKING: Sickening footage shows a Trump supporter STABBED with a knife left in his back outside the Ohio rally tonight. Police have one suspect in custody.
The violence against our movement must STOP. The media won't cover this, but we won't stay silent.
Pray for this patriot! x.com/DerekMyers/sta…
The violence against our movement must STOP. The media won't cover this, but we won't stay silent.
Pray for this patriot! x.com/DerekMyers/sta…
894
7,347
15,002
484,369
Yeetie retweeted
And there we have it...
Even mentioned Mike Benz
Even mentioned Mike Benz
BANNON: Russ Vought vehemently disagrees with me on USAID. But Breitbart reported that all you did was shift the operations over to the State Department.
We've cut virtually nothing out of USAID. The entire Serbian operation is still being funded. The gutless Rs on Capitol Hill he administration didn't want to cut it.
I don't need to be lectured by OMB. Open up the books. Bring Mike Benz forward and show us what's still being funded under different names.
The cuts have been performative. We need to shut it all down.
1
7
32
766
Yeetie retweeted
I did fine in school but I would fail the ideological purity test that the CCP is trying to exert with respect to Mbappe calling Mao a dictator. Spare me the struggle session I have no Chinese endorsements.
History shows Mao was an ideological driven dictator who forced hinese society. Mao forced people to live on communes where they worked steel mills that couldn’t produce steel, the crude furnaces could barely melt iron.
This state media reporter below exclaims Mao as a hero. She claims he uplifted farmers, I agree. Mao uplifted them from their farms to communes where they likely starved to death. Instead of tending to their farms, farmers were forced to build the crude furnaces for the commune’s steel mills. They melted down household tools and silverware in order to build these furnaces. Ripe crops rotted in the fields because there was no one to tend to the crops. Crop shortages ensued and the accompanying food quotas did not help.
A few years later Mao would expand his persecution to sparrows. Millions starved before the sparrows and millions more after. The CCP chalks this up as a great win that transformed the country, the campaign that lead to most of the starvation was branded as “The Great Leap Forward.”
By 1962, Mao’s policy was an outright failure. Other party leaders took the reins of the daily economy but by 1966 Mao resenting the loss of control would persecute those party leaders who came in to attempt to fix his mess.
Mao’s Red Guard would go on to destroy Confucius’ tomb during the cultural revolution in pursuit of complete ideological subordination to the party. Confucius and Confucianism was/were the spiritual, philosophical, ethical, political, and social foundation of China prior to the party’s coming to power. You don’t see Confucius on China’s currency or a massive Confucius shrine in Tiananmen Square today. You also don’t see Chinese children in school reading “Quotations from Confucius.”
Mao focused on changing the “consciousness of Chinese society.”
Mao completely purge the academics who taught or espoused ideas that were deemed threatening to the party’s rule. He replaced them with conforming intellectuals.
The party was and is to be the supreme moral/ethical/political authority in all walks of life. People’s identities got fused to the party. Any criticism of the party became an attack one’s self. You can see that behavioral pattern with the quoted post. Mao is a prime symbol and figure of the party. To the point Mao’s effectively a prophet and Maoism is the religion. They call this the cult of personality and the little red book was/is the bible.
The facts don’t change just because the CCP gets butthurt when people call their favorite dictator a dictator.
Mao was no hero, he was a dictator who’s decisions resulted in some of the greatest numbers of loss of human life ever recorded. So much human life was unnecessarily lost in pursuit of the application of Marxist theory.
Communists will lie to your face and to themselves. They will shame you for not subscribing to their characterizations of reality even when the empirical truth is obvious or common sense.
Mao held unchallenged and absolute power. He had 0 judicial or constitutional restraints, he persecuted party rivals, banned and put political opposition in hard labor camps, purged academia and industry, seized people’s property, banned freedom of speech, and censored state media. Calling him anything other than a dictator would be disrespectful to the definition of the word dictator itself.
History shows Mao was an ideological driven dictator who forced hinese society. Mao forced people to live on communes where they worked steel mills that couldn’t produce steel, the crude furnaces could barely melt iron.
This state media reporter below exclaims Mao as a hero. She claims he uplifted farmers, I agree. Mao uplifted them from their farms to communes where they likely starved to death. Instead of tending to their farms, farmers were forced to build the crude furnaces for the commune’s steel mills. They melted down household tools and silverware in order to build these furnaces. Ripe crops rotted in the fields because there was no one to tend to the crops. Crop shortages ensued and the accompanying food quotas did not help.
A few years later Mao would expand his persecution to sparrows. Millions starved before the sparrows and millions more after. The CCP chalks this up as a great win that transformed the country, the campaign that lead to most of the starvation was branded as “The Great Leap Forward.”
By 1962, Mao’s policy was an outright failure. Other party leaders took the reins of the daily economy but by 1966 Mao resenting the loss of control would persecute those party leaders who came in to attempt to fix his mess.
Mao’s Red Guard would go on to destroy Confucius’ tomb during the cultural revolution in pursuit of complete ideological subordination to the party. Confucius and Confucianism was/were the spiritual, philosophical, ethical, political, and social foundation of China prior to the party’s coming to power. You don’t see Confucius on China’s currency or a massive Confucius shrine in Tiananmen Square today. You also don’t see Chinese children in school reading “Quotations from Confucius.”
Mao focused on changing the “consciousness of Chinese society.”
Mao completely purge the academics who taught or espoused ideas that were deemed threatening to the party’s rule. He replaced them with conforming intellectuals.
The party was and is to be the supreme moral/ethical/political authority in all walks of life. People’s identities got fused to the party. Any criticism of the party became an attack one’s self. You can see that behavioral pattern with the quoted post. Mao is a prime symbol and figure of the party. To the point Mao’s effectively a prophet and Maoism is the religion. They call this the cult of personality and the little red book was/is the bible.
The facts don’t change just because the CCP gets butthurt when people call their favorite dictator a dictator.
Mao was no hero, he was a dictator who’s decisions resulted in some of the greatest numbers of loss of human life ever recorded. So much human life was unnecessarily lost in pursuit of the application of Marxist theory.
Communists will lie to your face and to themselves. They will shame you for not subscribing to their characterizations of reality even when the empirical truth is obvious or common sense.
Mao held unchallenged and absolute power. He had 0 judicial or constitutional restraints, he persecuted party rivals, banned and put political opposition in hard labor camps, purged academia and industry, seized people’s property, banned freedom of speech, and censored state media. Calling him anything other than a dictator would be disrespectful to the definition of the word dictator itself.
To us Chinese, Mao Zedong is our hero.
Mao uplifted farmers and the working class in China, united the Chinese people, led us to defeat foreign invaders, and founded an independent country so we could all live with dignity.
Mao supported the heroic struggle of the African ism and colonialism.
He was one of the greatest leaders in world history, and one of the most demonized by the West.
1
1
3
263
Yeetie retweeted
ISLAMIZATION OF FLORIDA - YES, THIS VIDEO IS REAL!
One resident walked into the Pinellas County hearing in a burqa and started blasting the adhan. All hell broke out. Staff cut her off, told her the meeting was for public comment, not a recording, and escorted her out.
While uestion a shadowy mosque expansion, the county paperwork never called it a mosque; one person used her three minutes to play the supremacist adhan - showing Floridians a glimpse of their future.
Residents are fighting back.
The Federal government continues to remain silent!
One resident walked into the Pinellas County hearing in a burqa and started blasting the adhan. All hell broke out. Staff cut her off, told her the meeting was for public comment, not a recording, and escorted her out.
While uestion a shadowy mosque expansion, the county paperwork never called it a mosque; one person used her three minutes to play the supremacist adhan - showing Floridians a glimpse of their future.
Residents are fighting back.
The Federal government continues to remain silent!
RED STATE FLORIDA - IS FIGHTING BACK!
They tried to slip a mosque expansion through Pinellas County without ever calling it a mosque. The town showed up and said HELL NO! Even a burqa-clad resident came out!
Most people in Pinellas County had never heard of 2577 Keystone arcel on a quiet, scenic stretch outside Tarpon Springs.
The property has operated as Masjid Al Rahman for years, a mosque in a converted house. The owners applied to expand it. County agenda materials and staff reports never used the word “mosque.” They described the project only as a “community assembly facility.”
That was the Islamic trick.
The applicant’s own plans identified it as Masjid Al Rahman and a place of worship. Churches in the same county get named as churches in official documents.
This one did not.
When the final map amendment came up, Commissioner Vince Nowicki was the only one who asked the obvious question on the record: Why are we describing this as a generic assembly building when the plans say mosque?
Staff pointed to federal religious land-use law and a 2019 code change that forces neutral language. The amendment still passed 4-3. Why, America, are we working against ourselves...we are HELPING Islam take us over!
Then the town showed up. Even one in Burqa playing Islamic "prayers....
This was not just a handful of people who came out. A packed hearing full of residents from Tarpon Springs, Palm Harbor, and Dunedin who said they never got clear notice.
Speakers called out the minimal mailings, the sign posted on the side street instead of Keystone Road, and the newspaper ads almost no one reads.
Several said the whole thing was kept quiet until after the earlier votes were already locked in.
Those who attended the meeting discussed traffic on a rural corridor, precedent, separate Sharia men’s and women’s entrances, no-trespassing signs on a site being sold as a “community” facility, and the long-term Islamization patterns these troubling projects follow.
Almost everyone demanded the process be reopened with plain language so the public actually knew what was being approved.
Staff’s answer was that every legal minimum had been met and the case is complete. The window for certain abutting owners to appeal is still open.
This is how it works. Not with a big dramatic takeover. With euphemisms that hide the actual use, minimal notice, and the assumption that residents won’t notice or won’t bother showing up.
Florida voters keep electing people who talk about protecting the state. At the local level, the same quiet bureaucratic softening keeps happening, until enough people get angry enough to force the actual word into the record.
Thank you to all the Patriots who showed up. They spoke their minds. They challenged the trick of never saying “mosque” in public. Whether the rest of Pinellas County treats that as a warning or a done deal is the next fight.
520
3,315
7,468
414,550
Yeetie retweeted
France before and after is a warning. The chaos, looting, and destruction we’re watching is exactly the future radical Democrats are pushing for America.
Is this the future you want?
Is this the future you want?
2,090
4,697
19,890
972,756
Yeetie retweeted
Breaking: After @ryanmauro’s reporting on Russia’s new intelligence-linked propaganda organization, the International Club of National Unity (MKNE), FIR has learned that Stanislav Krapivnik—an MKNE member previously linked to fundraising for a Russian drone facility—has received a new sponsorship from a mining company with stakes in tungsten projects critical to U.S. and Canadian national defense.
@Restitutor_ @eyepatch_man
Full details on the Western Star Resources Inc. and PanAm Marketing relationship with Stanislav Krapivnik👇
@Restitutor_ @eyepatch_man
Full details on the Western Star Resources Inc. and PanAm Marketing relationship with Stanislav Krapivnik👇
7
49
99
8,715
