The same people that seethe about the changes in the special editions will tell you with a straight face this should be edited into A New Hope.
Imagine watching the original Star Wars trilogy with 2026 visual effects.
The younger generations deserve to experience this (and the older ones too).
@Disney @starwars, make it happen!
37
50
752
11,277
I've said it before but the problem with TCW is they took the Anakin from the opening of ROTS and made him like that throughout the majority of the show. This was due to the backlash against Anakins inner turmoil in the prequels which people just unfairly dismissed as whininess.
As much as I love The Clone Wars, I don’t think their interpretation of Anakin Skywalker has aged well with me because I just don’t find it believable that CW Anakin would become Darth Vader.
Clone Wars Anakin and movie Anakin feel like two completely different characters.
13
10
167
3,548
Absolutely horrendous list. So many up and coming overrated directors but no Clive Barker, Mario Bava, Terence Fisher, Frank Henenlotter, Larry Cohen, Tom Holland, Sergio Martino, Michele Soavi, Kôji Shiraishi, Takashi Shimizu, Rob Zombie or Eli Roth? What a joke.
IndieWire’s 50 Best Horror Directors of All Time
indiewire.com/lists/best-hor…
11
7
160
6,603
Will plan trusters be showing their true loyalty by committing seppuku tonight? Don't be a panican!
1
2
30
883
The best Paul Anderson is back to gift us kino once more
Are you up for more cosmic horror from Paul W.S. Anderson? Well, you're in luck!
The EVENT HORIZON director is heading back into deep space to adapt two sci-fi horror novels, NETHER STATION and NETHER VORTEX.
The story follows a young scientist whose deep-space expedition ruins and a discovery that could change everything.
Are you excited for these? 👀
2
0
18
658
You could argue that most of John Carpenters films should have a higher average but genre films like these have always been rated lower. What matters most if they're all iconic classics that are still loved and talked about all these years later.
i do not like how the average for halloween (1978) has been steadily dropping over the past few years
1
2
22
654
This is a recurring occurrence with larpers and nu fans that infiltrate a fanbase and claim "erm everything old is bad and the new stuff is good." Now obviously in Godzillas case the new stuff is actually great but to pretend it was never good is just ridiculous and ignorant.
>watch podcast where Chris Gore reviews Godzilla Minus Zero
>"I'm a life long Godzilla fan but the films are cheap and fake and Minus One proves you can actually make them good."
5
25
177
3,212
Anakin already did the equivalent of selling his soul in the previous scene though. He's already fully committed and unshakable in his commitment and belief that serving Palpatine and destroying the jedi will save Padmé and that he's at the point of no return.
0
2
63
945
That's a whole lot of nonsense from a midwit that clearly missed the point of the prequels and everything Lucas was going for.
You are on topic about the prequels... but I do not grant them the rank of masterpiece.
Why not?
Because, in the final analysis, they were written by a retarded boomerlib. And retarded boomerlibs have a perfectly inverted moral compass. Whatever they call good is actually evil. And they will call evil what is actually good.
Millenials and GenZ are correct to identify in Anakin Skywalker what the boomers have done to them. But the films were not written to point this out.
They were written, instead, as a defense of boomerlib morals and boomerlib theology.
Consider the religion of the jedi. It is lifted, chapter and verse, from a bowdlerized versions of eastern religion sold to the flower children of the 60s by Indian grifters.
Don't want things, do not work to achieve goals, do not have ambitions, do not desire. Instead, empty yourself, numb your passions, achieve nothing, move in no direction, simply exist where you are, content and at peace even if the world burns around you.
Refer to all your responsibilities as "attachments" and seek to shed them. Be attached to nothing. Be an atomized individual with no sense of duty or loyalty.
Your moral worth consists not of your deeds, but your inner feelings.
This is chaos religion. It is religion for people for people in crapsack societies, where everyone is an 85 IQ retard, and the guy who happens to have a triple digit IQ, the guy who's smart enough to invent a religion, just looks around him and gives up. Fuck it, he says, there's no hope of ever fixing this, I'm just going to stop wanting things and veg out.
The sith, by contrast, represent, not any Western religion in particular, but just vaguely Western values in general. Except they represent those values as seen through the eyes of someone who hates them.
So, not just work, achieve, ascend, hone yourself, pursue excellence, be passionate about something, and gain power, but also kick some kittens along the way so George Lucas and his fellow retarded boomerlibs can feel good about hating you.
See, that's the problem with the whole story. It's a story anti-trope called "debate and switch". A work of fiction sets up a moral dilemma or other painful choice, then finds a way to resolve it without actually addressing the issue it raised.
In this case, the Star Wars prequels set up these two opposing philosophies, sith and jedi, but Lucas never actually makes any arguments about why the jedi are right. He just has it pre-inserted into the already-written story that the sith are gonna blow up a planet or two, slaughter some innocent kids, and kick a basket of kittens, therefore bad.
And that is the big problem with the prequels.
The underlying story, if it were tightened, purged of stupid cameos from characters who aren't supposed to be in it yet, had some plot holes patched, and was written by someone with better dialogue skills and without an inverted moral compass, could have been a good Greek-style tragedy.
But the whole point of the story, the whole anvilicious point, inserted repeatedly with all the subtlety of a giraffe in dark glasses trying to get into a polar-bears-only nightclub, is that ANAKIN IS BAD, GUYS, MMKAY?
What millenial viewers may not understand, and GenZ viewers certainly won't, is that a lot of the dialogue is actually an extremely hamfisted midwit commentary on the exact political climate of the time.... post 9/11, GWOT, Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.
It's all George's stupid boomerlib sentiments that republicans are bad, and muzzie terrorists who blow up our people aren't.
So, the movies sucked, and we all thought so at the time.
The reason you find them relatable now, and you are right to do so, is that George's moral compass is so perfectly inverted that he accidentally wrote everything his generation was going to do to the young men, without even realizing it was a confession rather than a manifesto.
He thought, he still thinks, that everything the Republic was doing was basically fine, with a little unfortunate collateral damage, and everything would have been great if Anakin had just played along.
Just as he and his retarded boomerlib compatriots think that you and your entire generation are acceptable collateral damage in the hippie-Buddhist post-ethnic end-of-history world they wanted to build on the ashes of the West.
The dead giveaway for this is how he models the sith... there are always two, the master and the apprentice. This models how Western civilization works. Elders train up youths and pass on their knowledge, skill, and power. Teacher to student, father to son.
Except Lucas wrote this as the apprentice treacherously killing the master to usurp his place.
In the story, it makes no sense. Why would sith Lords train apprentices, if sith history was one constant stream of murder-succession?
But outside the story it makes perfect sense. To a healthy father, being succeeded, and then exceeded, by his son is the definition of victory. He is proud of his son, he loves his son, his son is the product not only of his hands and care, but of his very selfhood. Any victory of the child belongs also to the father, and there is no greater joy.
But to the retarded boomerlib, such as Lucas, to be succeeded by your son is to be murdered and usurped. Why? Because he cannot stand to take pride in being part of something greater than himself... a lineage, a tribe, a nation, a heritage.
He desires to remain forever the main character.
It is not insignificant that George Lucas did not leave the Star Wars intellectual property as a legacy for his children to manage and develop, writing their own stories.
Instead, he groomed a retarded midwit girlboss for the role, who did not rise even to his modest level of talent. Someone who would never exceed him, would never become more famous and loved for her Star Wars stories than Lucas was for his.
And then he sold the whole thing to Disney to cash in.
And it should not pass without notice that, while some boomers are out there being parents and grandparents, the majority are liquidating every system of prosperity they ever built or inherited, and spending all the money on an old person's definition of hedonism.
Bumper stickers on luxury Airstreams that read "Spending the kids' inheritance".
The Star Wars prequels are just the ravings of a delusional anti-civilization nutter who thinks all this is a good thing.
So by all means deconstruct the prequels. By all means point out that the jedi are evil, because they are. By all means point out that the sith are good, because if the author wasn't making them kick the dog, they would be.
I will cheer for all this.
Hell, rewrite it with AI movie tools built for you by GenX techbros, to point out that Anakin and Palpatine are right all along. THAT will be a masterpiece if you do it well enough.
But don't try to rehabilitate Lucas. He doesn't deserve it.
Peace is a lie. There is only Passion.
Through Passion, I gain Strength.
Through Strength, I gain Power.
Through Power, I gain Victory.
Through Victory my chains are Broken.
The Force shall free me.
2
1
48
764
