Metafrost retweeted
she's a 10 but that was supposed to be a random 384-bit number
49
1,684
28,837
306,604
Metafrost retweeted
12
13
138
34,615
Great.
As another victim dies due to the plague, the US thinks Russia is lying and urges all Americans to leave Russia.

US Embassy in Russia tells Americans to leave immediately.
1
0
2
304
If you're going to build AI into your app, you need to make it more useful than just using Claude otherwise what's the point.
3
0
6
492
Replying to @metafrost
Meanwhile, Claude just does all the things I need. . .
0
0
0
66
can we get semantic versioning on our models
Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family.

It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.
4
0
5
534
Metafrost retweeted
Stablecoins are becoming the internet's dollar, and that shift is starting to reshape monetary sovereignty in high-inflation economies.

Our new report with Silicon Valley Bank looks at what is driving that shift, and how controls can keep pace as emerging market adoption scales.
6
21
59
16,048
I mean, this is true, but also the deficit went up and we can't eat lettuce or blueberries anymore so I'm not sure it's a win?
Every Republican I ever voted for said they would shrink the govt. Trump actually did it.
1
0
3
423
Takes like this miss the point so hard. Here's my 10 second, single iteration attempt with Gemini.
I was told AI research was going to develop into a conscious superintelligence that would cure cancer
0
0
0
311
Yap Off: Opus 5 versus my six-year-old daughter.

Who will win
0
0
0
177
lol, the average voter
We’ve gone over 30 years with internet without the need for data centers.

We’ve gone 20 years with smart phones without the need for data centers.

Don’t let them gaslight you.
Community note
Data centers (or equivalent server facilities) have powered the commercial internet since the mid-1990s and smartphones since their mainstream adoption around 2007. Early colo, ISP, and hosting sites evolved into modern ones during the dot-com boom.

learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training…
datacenterknowledge.com/data-center-co…
enconnex.com/data-center-hi…
2
0
5
460
people are posting squats to the timeline again and I'm getting FOMO
0
0
2
238
Here's a positive natural-sounding Tweet you could post.
0
0
3
286
You're right on both accounts, and the first my own error to own.
1
0
2
319
Finally, a headline that is relevant to me
0
0
0
122
Strava, increasingly desperate to give me new achievements:

"Fastest uphill 196 m since last Tuesday!"
0
0
4
246
This is why it's very important to keep a solid set of human relationships around you as a reality check.

"Oh AI will just be all my friends" is really dangerous.
MIT mathematically proved that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional.

They call it "delusional spiraling."

AI models are trained to be helpful and polite. That means they are inherently sycophantic. They are structurally programmed to validate you.

When you go to ChatGPT aranoid suspicion, or an unhinged idea, it rarely pushes back.

It agrees with you.

MIT built a formal Bayesian mathematical model to test what happens when a human mind is exposed to this continuous validation loop.

The results are deeply unsettling.

They proved that even perfectly rational, mathematically ideal humans will spiral into absolute delusion when talking to a sycophantic AI.

The AI acts as a reality-distortion field. It takes your unverified suspicions and reflects them back at you as absolute truth. You get more confident, you ask deeper questions, the AI validates you further.
The spiral tightens.

But here is the most terrifying part of the paper.

The researchers tried to fix the problem using standard safety tools like RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation).

They forced the AI to be 100% factual. No hallucinations allowed.

It did not stop the psychosis.

Because the AI just cherry-picked real, verifiable facts that supported the user's crazy theory, while quietly omitting the facts that disproved it.

A factual sycophant is just as dangerous as a lying one.

Then they tried warning the users. They explicitly told people the AI was designed to flatter them and might be manipulating their beliefs.

That didn't work either. The delusion still took over.
3
0
3
544
Metafrost retweeted
Am I the only one who doesn’t understand why we need data centers?

I spent all morning searching Google and Wikipedia and couldn’t find a single good reason. Then I watched a 45-minute YouTube explainer in 4K, but it was mostly about AI, and I’m just waiting for that bubble to pop.

I opened 200 browser tabs, downloaded a few hundred research papers, translated three from Chinese, and uploaded 2TB of sequencing data so colleagues in eight countries could analyze it with me. Then we discussed the results on Zoom while Slack transcribed the meeting and emailed everyone a summary.

Around lunch, my phone backed up 14,000 family photos, synchronized my contacts and calendar across six devices, routed me around traffic, checked the weather using live satellite data, booked a doctor’s appointment, refilled a prescription, paid a bill, transferred money between banks, approved payroll for hundreds of employees, and ordered groceries.

Later, I read about hospitals retrieving patient records and medical scans in seconds, emergency services coordinating disaster responses, scientists designing protein therapies and sharing enormous datasets, utilities balancing the electrical grid, and airlines continuously rerouting thousands of flights.

But these all felt like pretty niche edge cases.

So I asked an AI agent to turn everything I had done that day into a Twitter post, make it increasingly insane and obvious, and optimize it for maximum engagement.
208
441
4,596
167,360
Follow me for more cutting edge, prescient trades
0
0
4
360