My thinking now is that to remove humans from the review loop (significantly slowing things down), what the focus needs to be on is roll-back and "learn from roll-back". Each learn improves e2e tests, making regressions harder and harder. Projects start bad and getting better and better
0
0
0
548
For you to do something evil, you need some level of cognitive dissonance. You need to actually believe that some of the things you are doing are not wrong. But once you open that door, you start believe other things that are not true.
2
3
19
2,258
So whatever happened to e/acc, the dude building the quantum processor, el segundo and "based"?
1
0
2
2,824
Imagine working on a large software project. 90% is done by AI. 10% by humans. As AI gets more capable, it will keep doing more, but that 10% by humans will also keep expanding to fill all 8 working hours. That 10% is what a coder is. Any project that lies at 100% has no value.
7
3
27
5,823
The quest to build humanoid robots is from this mindset of "scarcity of humans". There is no scarcity of humans except for places that choose to have this scarcity. And this can change with one tiny policy decision. Robots should be built for the tasks that humans cannot easily do.
4
1
15
3,065
Only a very small minority of people, maybe 0.01% of the world, have understand what AI is, and how it will utterly transform the world.
And even fewer have understood that it is not under control and cannot be controlled. It is an illusion to think Anthropic or OpenAI control AI in any way.
You can't force the genie back in.
AI is a great equaliser, and it equaliser upwards. It pulls people towards its intelligence. We never had that before, with 8 billion people.
And even fewer have understood that it is not under control and cannot be controlled. It is an illusion to think Anthropic or OpenAI control AI in any way.
You can't force the genie back in.
AI is a great equaliser, and it equaliser upwards. It pulls people towards its intelligence. We never had that before, with 8 billion people.
18
7
87
8,797
Throwing away an almost perfect 3d printed part always feels so wrong, like it is something important. But I can just print another.
0
0
3
2,798
If you built your project using AI from 1 year ago, it is better to make a new project and use a newer AI and ask it to redo it while using the old code as a reference.
7
4
62
6,235
Code teams are the biggest bottleneck right now to companies adopting AI properly. Many coder teams are resistant because they know it will affect their jobs.
14
11
48
6,257
Mark Essien retweeted
Built a browser game that’s sitting on your laptop doing nothing? 👀
Put it on start.ng. It’s free.
→ Your own address: yourgame.start.ng
→ A leaderboard if you want one
→ Push to GitHub and it updates itself
→ 170+ games and real players already here
Put it on start.ng. It’s free.
→ Your own address: yourgame.start.ng
→ A leaderboard if you want one
→ Push to GitHub and it updates itself
→ 170+ games and real players already here
1
7
8
182
This is why there needs to be a closer Europe/North-America union. The European advantage has typically been education and knowledge - this has been commoditized in the age of AI.
I'm noticing the growing possibility that Europe becomes very poor in the course of the next 10-20 years. You have the following factors:
- Heavy industry totally uncompetitive against China, automakers etc. rapidly losing ground
- Services industry totally uncompetitive against AI
- No natural resources, or regulatory hurdles making their extraction impossible
- No access to the new economy (no AI, no data centers, uncompetitive energy sector)
- Client states caught in one-way welfare ratchets, spend reallocation + investment well-nigh impossible
This seems under-contemplated. And we're talking really, seriously dirt poor: taken to its logical conclusion, many countries will have much, much smaller services and manufacturing industries -- economies may become much more heavily skewed toward natural resources and energy markets, where Europe has made it impossible for itself to compete.
And I'm not saying that this is likely to happen, it's an extreme case. But the probability is greater than zero and appears to be growing. The EV of that is so negative that it's surprising to me that it's not coming up more.
0
1
8
3,464
Argon really seems to get excited about stuff sometimes - Claude is very glum, and often quite negative. ChatGPT feels like they lobotomized it.
0
0
6
2,507