Pinned Tweet
Adopting crypto's technology is unreasonable, but all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
There's nothing groundbreaking in history that ever looked reasonable while in development, and commercial viability has always taken decades of thankless work.
It's a miracle that this industry can take advantage of monkey pictures and coins about farts to plow through those decades of hardship.
There's nothing groundbreaking in history that ever looked reasonable while in development, and commercial viability has always taken decades of thankless work.
It's a miracle that this industry can take advantage of monkey pictures and coins about farts to plow through those decades of hardship.
12
1
39
13,051
João Mendonça retweeted
@JustJake @joshmanders @Railway @ngeloxyz Ah yup. That was indeed me. No mallace intended. I've been running some agents to do signups + agentic testing on similar platforms. Just halted the harness I was designing around this as it was definitely going off the rails and reaching too farCommunity noteIn many jurisdictions this is a crime. In the US under Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. §1030, in the UK under Computer Misuse Act (CMA) 1990, in Germany Strafgesetzbuch (StGB), and many others.
justice.gov/jm/jm-9-48000-…
legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/…
gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/
25
128
2,056
61,963
it's okay to commit crimes now as long as it's "your agent", openai set the precedent and anthropic did the brainwashing 🫡
Bro, you can't fucking say openly on social media you just attempted to compromise an organizations infrastructure under your employer and full legal name
Are you actually fucking insane?? Genuinely what the fuck are you thinking???
And how the fuck does this dude know the the employee openly admit "hehe ye thats me, but no mallace intended, it was my AI agent"
????? WHAT. THATS STILL A CRIME. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT.
0
0
2
142
João Mendonça retweeted
i can't believe ai made a dev download a homebrew then do a fake interview and have all his keys on the same computer responsible for stealing $6b dollars.
fucking ai man.
fucking ai man.
7 BILLION DOLLAR crypto hack came from a homebrew install from someone tryna vibecode something 😭
5
2
58
4,395
RT @toly: Phishing and social engineering is the biggest threat to crypto. Not AI breaking math or quantum computers.
Dedicated iOS in l…
Dedicated iOS in l…
0
43
0
10
interestingly, similar to how people can't really assimilate how an asset can go down 99% multiple times after going down 99% once, people don't assimilate how costs can be indefinitely cut 99% w/o ever changing any dynamic
e.g. the cost of software dev can never go to zero **with LLMs** because:
1. guaranteed relative error rate imbued in every model
2. cost impractical to formally prove 100% of software
so even if we cut costs by 99% -> jevons still stands -> nothing changes, just accelerates
0
0
0
101
e.g. the cost of software dev can never go to zero **with LLMs** because:
1. guaranteed relative error rate imbued in every model
2. cost impractical to formally prove 100% of software
so even if we cut costs by 99% -> jevons still stands -> nothing changes, just accelerates
1. guaranteed relative error rate imbued in every model
2. cost impractical to formally prove 100% of software
so even if we cut costs by 99% -> jevons still stands -> nothing changes, just accelerates
nothing changes != nothing happens
take increasing CVE publications
that's just part of the growth/dispersion of access to technology
we were on the curve already - living it
if it wasn't for AI, it'd be something else; technology keeps getting better and more accessible
it's only normal that more people find more exploits (and by consequence, more people also patch more exploits)
regardless of how fast we advance on that curve at any given moment due to "unexpected" breakthroughs, that curve only goes one way
and all the incentive structures / market dynamics only change when we truly break them, like p equaling np, which is something that looks impossible in practice
0
1
3
311
nothing changes != nothing happens
take increasing CVE publications
that's just part of the growth/dispersion of access to technology
we were on the curve already - living it
if it wasn't for AI, it'd be something else; technology keeps getting better and more accessible
it's only normal that more people find more exploits (and by consequence, more people also patch more exploits)
regardless of how fast we advance on that curve at any given moment due to "unexpected" breakthroughs, that curve only goes one way
and all the incentive structures / market dynamics only change when we truly break them, like p equaling np, which is something that looks impossible in practice
take increasing CVE publications
that's just part of the growth/dispersion of access to technology
we were on the curve already - living it
if it wasn't for AI, it'd be something else; technology keeps getting better and more accessible
it's only normal that more people find more exploits (and by consequence, more people also patch more exploits)
regardless of how fast we advance on that curve at any given moment due to "unexpected" breakthroughs, that curve only goes one way
and all the incentive structures / market dynamics only change when we truly break them, like p equaling np, which is something that looks impossible in practice
I love these tweets because the authors never reach the realization that this was always the case before AI
*applicable to anything else that you think is "new" now that "we have AI"*
literally nothing changes until P actually == NP
0
0
0
328
I love these tweets because the authors never reach the realization that this was always the case before AI
*applicable to anything else that you think is "new" now that "we have AI"*
literally nothing changes until P actually == NP
*applicable to anything else that you think is "new" now that "we have AI"*
literally nothing changes until P actually == NP
there are so many apps trying to do the same thing these days. alfred, raycast, tinyast, now this and probably a dozen more
whenever i see one of these launches, i can’t help but wonder if the project will be dead in a few weeks, and whether the whole point was just to ship something and get a viral tweet out of it
and maybe i’m completely wrong, but what’s the business model? are you still going to be working on this six months from now?
i’m increasingly finding myself wanting to either build my own tools or use software made by people who are genuinely obsessed with what they’re building
i use raycast because i know how much thought and effort they’ve put into it over the years, but i’d happily switch if something better came along
i guess that’s what bothers me about launches these days. it’s getting harder to tell who’s genuinely trying to build something lasting and who’s just chasing virality
maybe i’m getting cynical, but i miss when a launch meant months of work and the beginning of a commitment, not just a couple of prompts and a tweet
1
0
0
184
RT @TylerDurden: If you’re a man and you’re struggling right now - just remember nobody cares and it gets worse.
Cheers.
Cheers.
0
3,452
0
23
there's a special state in our brains when we try to picture being dead or the infiniteness of the universe, nothing quite like it
its genuinely unfathomable dying that quickly. like what even happens ??? is it like it millisecond switch to the after life ??? cause your body literally vanishes with stuff like that, theres nothing left of it. you literally just cannot grasp it man.
0
0
1
223