Jaswinder Singh retweeted
Charlie Kirk said Texas would never vote for Democrats in his lifetime.
He was right! 😂
He was right! 😂
978
14,149
229,347
4,036,743
Alright guys, this might be a game changer.
I had @instinct refresh my YT feed, make some new playlist and it is genuinely so much better. I am so surprised.
I had @instinct refresh my YT feed, make some new playlist and it is genuinely so much better. I am so surprised.
1
0
2
170
In Amsterdam for 3 days.
Hit me up if you want to get coffee and talk about confidential payments on-chain, running 10+ AI agents in parallel (in cloud), the Dutch history ( mostly to teach me lol).
Hit me up if you want to get coffee and talk about confidential payments on-chain, running 10+ AI agents in parallel (in cloud), the Dutch history ( mostly to teach me lol).
0
0
0
62
i am not sure how i feel about it but i think agents are going to get rid of capital letters from the language, i mean do we really need them when we have punctuations? i mean sure we do but do we?
i don't know.
i don't know.
0
0
1
45
I asked my niece what she wants for her birthday and she said just wish me.
Am I overthinking or is that too low bar?
I kind of feel bad.
Am I overthinking or is that too low bar?
I kind of feel bad.
0
0
0
83
You can use your favourite wallet on @pingpay_io now.
Had a lot of fun, building this feature.
Thanks to @auroraisnear Intents to make this super easy.
Had a lot of fun, building this feature.
Thanks to @auroraisnear Intents to make this super easy.
Idea 2 is live.
Universal checkout from Ping: one button, pay from any asset, any chain, any wallet. Settled confidentially via @near_intents.
Already powering credit top ups on @near_ai Cloud and product purchases on @nearmerch.
0
2
7
462
Not using confidential Intents?
NGMI
NGMI
💥 Big Swap Alert 💥
2,000,000.00 USDT(@trondao) ➡️ 23.31 $BTC(OMNI)(@Bitcoin)
🔍 explorer.near-intents.org/transactions/T…
Powered by @near_intents ✅
0
0
0
58
A feedback I have been getting from my System Design rounds in the job interviews is that "It took a bit of prompting to get the answer out."
Interesting. I am on the other end sitting thinking, wow I answered all the questions, they were expecting me to talk about all this without asking.
This realisation kind of really hit me and I am hoping to do better next time.
Basically just explain as much as you can. Make them prompt you less.
Interesting. I am on the other end sitting thinking, wow I answered all the questions, they were expecting me to talk about all this without asking.
This realisation kind of really hit me and I am hoping to do better next time.
Basically just explain as much as you can. Make them prompt you less.
0
0
1
52
People running Voice AI at scale for use cases like restaurant reservations:
What kind of costs are you seeing?
For 1,000 calls/month at an average of 3 mins/call, my agent is estimating ~$500/month, with most of that coming from ElevenLabs minutes + LLM extraction.
I’m trying to use Jev for cheaper extraction, but am I missing something obvious/naive here?
Realistically, reservation calls probably won’t average 3 mins — more like 1.5 mins.
Still, if that puts us anywhere near $250–500/month for handling ~30 calls/day, I’m not sure restaurants in Spain will pay that. They could probably hire someone for ~€1,400/month who works all day and handles calls along with their other tasks.
What kind of costs are you seeing?
For 1,000 calls/month at an average of 3 mins/call, my agent is estimating ~$500/month, with most of that coming from ElevenLabs minutes + LLM extraction.
I’m trying to use Jev for cheaper extraction, but am I missing something obvious/naive here?
Realistically, reservation calls probably won’t average 3 mins — more like 1.5 mins.
Still, if that puts us anywhere near $250–500/month for handling ~30 calls/day, I’m not sure restaurants in Spain will pay that. They could probably hire someone for ~€1,400/month who works all day and handles calls along with their other tasks.
1
0
1
84
Next time someone asks why @NEARProtocol has a new product every 6 months.
This is why.
Team is shipping rapidly and testing what works.
That’s how you get something like @near_intents and @near_ai
and a fast scalable chain under it all.
Not a lot or blockchain companies can say that.
This is why.
Team is shipping rapidly and testing what works.
That’s how you get something like @near_intents and @near_ai
and a fast scalable chain under it all.
Not a lot or blockchain companies can say that.
The vast majority of large companies survive purely by launching things and discovering what works by Process of Elimination.
There is no rhyme or reason -- or conviction -- in anything they do.
1
0
30
1,450
Its game over for many big exchanges when @near_intents near.com launch their native mobile apps.
0
0
11
244
Use @near_ai for private inference and pay using @pingpay_io which now uses confidential payment via Near Intents.
The stack is there. You just have to use it.
Be the sovereign individual you always wanted to be.
The stack is there. You just have to use it.
Be the sovereign individual you always wanted to be.
Massive spike in sign ups for @near_ai cloud as people realize they need to encrypt their prompts.
Keeping your AI private is as critical for businesses as having op sec. Cat is out of the bag and everyone needs to position accordingly.
0
0
1
91