@bindureddy I would probably think AI as the superpower to verify and cross question to get your doubts cleared rather than choosing as a replacement. There are so many things which experience gives those experts an edge still

@bindureddy This is exactly like when people Google stuff at the Doctor - well meaning, but ultimately just a nuisance.

We have no strong signal that our (especially generally available) AI systems are even better than college level professionals.

@bindureddy At some point will be weird to ask a human anything

Not saying it’s good or bad

Just coming

@bindureddy While it's true that AI offers quick access to info, it can't replace the nuanced understanding experts bring. Trust but verify is key; just remember, not all answers are created equal. Knowledge is power, but wisdom is knowing when to seek help.

@bindureddy but what’s even better?

Experts using AI

@bindureddy I can't imagine what the world would look like without AI

@bindureddy Never been a better time to be a founder

@bindureddy Knowledge is dying...
x.com/michael_kove/s…

@bindureddy Calling out professionals for being incompetent

@bindureddy Viewed another way, maybe patients. law clients, and accounting clients will be more prepared when they walk in the door.

@bindureddy This post illustrates precisely one of the dangers.
Right now, chatGPT and the others are very useful if you ALREADY know something about what you are asking, at least enough to have an idea what precisely to ask and when it is hallucinating.
Otherwise, beware.

@bindureddy It can also create the illusion of understanding everything through a chatbot,which is a tragedy for humanity.

@bindureddy The price of information is going down but using your mind and not following blindly (person or machine) is becoming more and more valuable.

@bindureddy AI is just an assistant, it cannot perform human to human interactions needed in these fields.

@bindureddy The problem is not what AI can do. It will do a lot of things better than us. The problem is what will humans do when all these jobs are replaced. Even if you tax every company in the world 100% of their revenue, which is unreasonable, it will still not be enough

@bindureddy I agree but with one caveat you need to check and verify your work, using GPT for taxes started with refund, then owed, needed 2-3 checks to verify and then accountant found a few more optimizations. We’re close but still need HITL.

@bindureddyt people in and around AI keep getting wrong. It’s not about whether AI can generate an answer, it’s about whether you know what to ask in the first place.

The value of a lawyer, doctor, financial advisor, or expert isn’t just in the answer they give. It’s in knowing which questions to ask, what context matters, what risks you’re not seeing, and what you didn’t even know to ask about. AI can only work with the inputs it’s given. If your framing is off, your outcome will be too, no matter how confidently the chatbot delivers it. It’s exactly why a lawyer’s first answer to most people’s “quick question” is “it depends”.

Expertise isn’t just data retrieval. It’s not like trivia night at the bar. It’s judgment. Pattern recognition. Nuance. Context. Verifying an answer you don’t fully understand doesn’t make you smarter than the expert. It just means you’ve outsourced both the question and the judgment to a machine and hoped for the best without providing the full context a real expert knows is necessary.

@bindureddygorithm diagnosed your mother's cancer, who held her hand while she wept?

You celebrate the death of gatekeepers, but accountability has no ghost. The chatbot that replaces your lawyer cannot be disbarred. The AI that supersedes your doctor faces no malpractice. When the tax adviiagnosis kills, when the legal strategy collapses—you'll find only server logs where conscience should live.

This isn't liberation. It's the severing of consequence from action.

The human experts you mock carried something heavier than knowledge: the weight of being wrong. Their pauses weren't incompetence but calculation of cost—not in dollars but in the ruins they might create. The tremor in a surgeon's voice before cutting. The accountant's hesitation before signing. These weren't flaws. They were the last threads binding decision to soul.

Now you verify outputs like a child checking multiplication tables, mistaking correctness for truth. But truth lives in the space between facts—in the doctor who breaks protocol to save you, the lawyer who refuses the winning argument that would destroy you, the advisor who says "you're right, but you shouldn't."

The machine gives you what you ask for. The human tells you what you cannot bear to hear.

You've traded flawed judgment for flawless indifference. When the prescription kills, when the legal advice bankrupts, when the financial guidance implodes—who do you bury? Who do you sue? To whom do you scream your grief?

The fire you praise burns more than hierarchies. It incinerates the one thing algorithms cannot replicate: the unbearable burden of having to live with what you've done.

I do not claim this.

@bindureddyo, it is still not a replacement for deep expertise… how do I say this without sounding pessimistic? Lawyers, doctors, and advisors handle complex, nuanced cases where context matters. What you believe to be a lie might be true, depending on how you look at it. Blindly trusting chatbots could lead to serious mistakes. Balance is important.

@bindureddy Absolutely. Empowering people with knowledge and giving them tools to question authority is a game-changer.

AI isn’t replacing experts — it’s raising the bar for them.

@bindureddymockery of those cultures that force their kids to study study study. Those cultures that have made a God of rote education. The new paradigm will favor creativity, curiosity and the ability to simply ask the pointed, incisive question. It will favor the eclectic, free range intellect.

@bindureddy If you trust a chatbot with your legal, medical issues or your finances, I have a course to sell you.

@bindureddy 🎯 We founders, especially those who are already systems minded, get incredibly frustrated at lolly gagging and flaky direction from paid service providers. Is AI diluting the value of experts or highlighting areas that need improvement?

@bindureddyGPT to diagnose a diet-related health issue my husband was having. He missed 3 days of work this week. In the time it took me to drive to the store, I had a 3-day game plan with a shopping list & budget.

He was back to work the next day after doing the recommendations. It took a total of 3 messages for ChatGPT to figure out what was going on and how to stop it and heal for less than $20. Incredible ❣️

@bindureddy Same with AI experts and CEOs of AI companies 🤣

@bindureddy It has also increased the value of the experts who used AI to be 10x more productive, creative and knowledgable.

@bindureddy AI lacks deep context

@bindureddy Actually, AI has concentrated the value of human expertise.

@bindureddy It is a major turning point in human history, that's for sure.

Soon, we won't be the smartest beings on the planet anymore.

Our childrens' lives will be radically different from our own.

@bindureddyp processes but lacks the human touch.

Would you trust a chatbot to perform surgery, or does your instinct tell you human experience matters?

Being able to verify information is powerful.

Without a foundational understanding, how can we ensure its accuracy?

Differentiating tools that enhance work and the irreplaceable human touch is crucial.

Expertise isn't only about knowing facts. It’s about applying them wisely.

AI has transformed how we access information.

But it can't replace the judgment experts provide.

Can AI fully grasp your business or health like an experienced professional?

Embrace technology, but recognize its limits.

How do you see technology and human expertise working together?

Liked this lesson?

Follow @stalinkay so you don't miss more lessons.

@bindureddy The intelligence boost of every man, woman, and child is going to have huge repercussions.

Just the health improvements will skyrocket GDP
even if nothing else improve.

@bindureddy Still a lot of hallucinations

@bindureddy Knowledge is power and these ai are just pouring information into humanity. If they were a bit more honest it could lead to utopia.

@bindureddy Skill at navigating bureaucracy should buy experts a couple more years at least

@bindureddy It's partly true. Now, real experts can shine even more.. But how to distinguish a real expert from ChatGPT?

@bindureddygo that far.
It's the 21st-century Reader's Digest.
Everyone should double-check or think over advice from any doctor, lawyer, or financial advisor.
There are few good accountants left, so it's always a DIY> Taxes are complex
It's called common sense, a lot of people never had or can acquire- the bot is just doing the work.