Everyone is trying to reverse engineer apps with AI right now.
To rebuild a SaaS, you do not need its binary. You need how it behaves: every screen, every rule, and every edge case.
I built RES, an open-source skill that turns a web product into a build kit. 🧵
To rebuild a SaaS, you do not need its binary. You need how it behaves: every screen, every rule, and every edge case.
I built RES, an open-source skill that turns a web product into a build kit. 🧵
2
1
8
419
People will ask about REA. It is a complement, not a competitor.
REA tells you what a product is built with (binaries, Electron, network).
RES tells you how it behaves for the user and what it takes to rebuild and launch. Different jobs. They work great together.
REA tells you what a product is built with (binaries, Electron, network).
RES tells you how it behaves for the user and what it takes to rebuild and launch. Different jobs. They work great together.
1
0
0
43
RES is MIT licensed and costs about 130 tokens per session until you call it.
To install:
claude plugin marketplace add alextnetto/res
claude plugin install res@res
Code here: github.com/alextnetto/res
Which SaaS would you run this on first?
To install:
claude plugin marketplace add alextnetto/res
claude plugin install res@res
Code here: github.com/alextnetto/res
Which SaaS would you run this on first?
0
0
1
41
I'm testing Devin after a while... and I'm surprised. @dabit3 is cookin
1
0
4
215
Governance incentives on DAOs are definitely weird, since large tokenholders (aka exchanges) could have legal liability by delegating or voting.
Retail ends up paying the bill.
Retail ends up paying the bill.
Incredible things going on in DAO land.
Remember when we thought DAOs were going to be paragons of pro-social governance?
2
0
10
683
Alex Netto (netto.eth) retweeted
Google just led a $20m round into a complete rip-off of my startup, Fastlane.
(skip to 55 seconds to skip context)
This isn’t something I’d normally talk about, but a line has been crossed. This disgusting and egregious behavior honestly makes me sick.
Fortunately, there is to stop us from winning. Especially not some unimaginative NPC’s. Good luck fellas.
(skip to 55 seconds to skip context)
This isn’t something I’d normally talk about, but a line has been crossed. This disgusting and egregious behavior honestly makes me sick.
Fortunately, there is to stop us from winning. Especially not some unimaginative NPC’s. Good luck fellas.
Today we’re introducing Relay
We raised $20M from Google, Point72 & the founder of Reddit to build it.
1) Drop your website
2) Relay will create your content
3) Automatically distributes to our network of 50,000 U.S. creators
4) Drive millions of views and insights for your branURL below and we’ll build your brand’s content library for free 👇Community noteThe post claims Relay raised $20M from Google, Point72 & Reddit's founder with a 50k US creator network, but the site describes a small-scale TikTok content tool with no such details or scale and no independent sources confirm the claims.
relaystudio.ai
Community note
The post claims Google led a $20M round into a real "Relay" rip-off of Fastlane, but no such funding or scaled competitor exists; it amplifies unverified hype for a basic tool contradicted by its site and community notes.
relaystudio.ai
x.com/klashsarma/sta…
doomers.ai/launches/relay
relaystudio.ai
x.com/klashsarma/sta…
doomers.ai/launches/relay
632
315
1,673
429,637
The year is 2026
You have a full-time YouTuber and researcher, to create a video about any topic you want to learn.
You have a full-time YouTuber and researcher, to create a video about any topic you want to learn.
We'll be spending a lot more time trying to understand the outputs of language models. A few thoughts, tips & tricks:
Writing. Something I've had success with: Ask your LLM to explain something in ASD-STE100, it's a controlled language specification originally developed for aeroentation. LLMs well-versed in this language and it comes with heavy constraints on clean writing style that I often find a lot more readable. Sometimes I've tried to soften it a bit e.g. ask for "80% of the way to ASD-STE100" because the spec is quite stringent. But even better:
Diagrams / images. Instead of writing, ask your LLM to create a diagram. These can be a lot easier to process, parse, and understand. But even better:
Web pages. Ask for output "in HTML" to get a beautiful, interactive webpage. LLMs are getting really good at frontend and can create beautiful experiences, animations, etc. But even better:
Explainer videos. The output format I am most bullish on is fully custom / bespoke explainer videos generated on any arbitrary topic. Experiment with things like "Create a 3b1b style video explainer on X. Use my ElevenLabs API key for audio narration". (you'd need an API key for the latter or you can ask your LLM to find you decent free alternatives that use your local compute). This is actually starting to work!
In summary:
- As LLMs get better, they will do more and more of the legwork autonomously, and a lot more of our work will rise up the abstractions into oversight and understanding.
- Luckily, LLMs can help here too because as intelligence and code are increasingly abundant, you can ask for large, custom, discardable software artifacts (e.g. web apps, video explainers) that would have never made sense to create before. Push the boundaries here and you'll be surprised.
0
0
0
197
Alex Netto (netto.eth) retweeted
Connect your agent to the Anticapture MCP and find governance data on the market's leading protocols, including @Uniswap, @Compound_xyz, @ENS_DAO and others listed on @anticapture.
Information on delegates, voting power, the share of tokens held by specific addresses and much gh the Anticapture MCP.
Thanks to @Uniswap for sponsoring this feature🦄
Watch this demo mande by our founder, @alextnetto 👇
Information on delegates, voting power, the share of tokens held by specific addresses and much gh the Anticapture MCP.
Thanks to @Uniswap for sponsoring this feature🦄
Watch this demo mande by our founder, @alextnetto 👇
1
6
17
645
Getting lunch with more amazing builders from the Silicon Island (Floripa, Brazil)!
@duborges @zanon1guilherme @theZeugh
@duborges @zanon1guilherme @theZeugh
5
2
40
1,377
Alex Netto (netto.eth) retweeted
Another abandoned governance is under attack - this time it's Rarible's.
@rarible was a well-known NFT marketplace between 2020 and 2022. It moved millions of dollars during the NFT frenzy. The protocol and its treasury are governed by $veRARI holders - locked $RARI - using power in the DAO, just like Curve does.
On September 20, a wallet bought 3.5 ETH worth of $RARI and locked it in Rarible's contracts, receiving 132,576 veRARI in voting power.
Moments later, the same wallet submitted a proposal from a supposed activist investor called Falcon. According to the proposal text, they would "unlock veRARI's value for its holders."
In practice, if approved, the proposal transfers ownership of all contracts to "Falcon." The voting period ends on September 25 at 08:53 UTC.
Rarible DAO has a Security Council, so it is able to block the attack, if it manages to get the multisig signers who control the Council to act in time.
The strangest part of this attack is that Rarible has only $368 in its treasury, yet the attackers spent $9,311 to capture its governance.
Like other attacks, they don't want money - they want control over what Rarible can do, such as:
- The ability to mint unlimited $RARI tokens on the market and sell them on the secondary market (while shorting it on an exchange)
- Stealing users' funds via $WETH, $USDC, and other token approvals (including NFTs) granted to Rarible's marketplace
- Draining all the tokens locked in the veRARI contract
These are just simple possibilities that let attackers extract profit without needing a treasury to steal from.
Over time, these attacks are getting more sophisticated, and the pool of potential victims keeps growing - even projects with no money worth stealing.
We recommend that anyone holding an address with approvals granted to Rarible revoke them, to avoid any trouble in case governance is indeed captured.
@rarible was a well-known NFT marketplace between 2020 and 2022. It moved millions of dollars during the NFT frenzy. The protocol and its treasury are governed by $veRARI holders - locked $RARI - using power in the DAO, just like Curve does.
On September 20, a wallet bought 3.5 ETH worth of $RARI and locked it in Rarible's contracts, receiving 132,576 veRARI in voting power.
Moments later, the same wallet submitted a proposal from a supposed activist investor called Falcon. According to the proposal text, they would "unlock veRARI's value for its holders."
In practice, if approved, the proposal transfers ownership of all contracts to "Falcon." The voting period ends on September 25 at 08:53 UTC.
Rarible DAO has a Security Council, so it is able to block the attack, if it manages to get the multisig signers who control the Council to act in time.
The strangest part of this attack is that Rarible has only $368 in its treasury, yet the attackers spent $9,311 to capture its governance.
Like other attacks, they don't want money - they want control over what Rarible can do, such as:
- The ability to mint unlimited $RARI tokens on the market and sell them on the secondary market (while shorting it on an exchange)
- Stealing users' funds via $WETH, $USDC, and other token approvals (including NFTs) granted to Rarible's marketplace
- Draining all the tokens locked in the veRARI contract
These are just simple possibilities that let attackers extract profit without needing a treasury to steal from.
Over time, these attacks are getting more sophisticated, and the pool of potential victims keeps growing - even projects with no money worth stealing.
We recommend that anyone holding an address with approvals granted to Rarible revoke them, to avoid any trouble in case governance is indeed captured.
🚨 @rarible - Attempted governance takeover (2026-09-20)
Token: $RARI @ $0.1066
Network: Ethereum
Type: Access Control (malicious governance proposal / DAO takeover)
Attacker "Falcon" (0x94223fcC…F04Ca, ~132.5K veRARI votes, above the 5,000 proposalThreshold) submitted proposal 3648869205…835338 to RariGovernor (0x859e1c00…2edca). The single action calls the DAO's delegatecall-executor 0xb23BCD4F…C5b5 with execute(0x36224b869…a722, write(slot,1)). Contract 0x36224 is a 4-line backdoor whose only function e2e52ec1 (write(uint256,uint256)) does a raw SSTORE; invoked via the executor's DELEGATECALL it writes 1 into an AccessControl role slot of the executor — granting Falcon a privileged role and full control of the DAO. The proposal text openly states YES "grants full control of the DAO to the activist investor group Falcon." No funds moved yet (vote open); execution would hand the DAO/treasury to the proposer.
TX: etherscan.io/tx/0xeaef75813…
Attacker: etherscan.io/address/0x9422…
Victim: etherscan.io/address/0x859e…
⏱️ Real-time alerts: defimon.xyz
2
3
19
1,457