Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @SweetcheeksReal
@SweetcheeksReal @solana Why is this getting so much attention? Only vague posting.
0
0
0
1,170
Replying to @callebtc
@callebtc @opencode Good question. I鈥檓 using Claude code by putting it in a tmux session and having a custom relay manage communication between a Matrix server and tmux. Also has some hooks and stuff in Claude code to make things work snappier. Not saying it鈥檚 the best but it works. 馃槄
1
0
0
197
Replying to @IngenAning86
@IngenAning86 @AndersWester1 Vad fasen har du f枚r r盲tt att s盲ga till n氓gon annan vad de f氓r och inte f氓r g枚ra med sitt eget liv.
0
0
1
45
Replying to @xumba
@xumba @JOBhakdi So it's a ploy to get as high SPCX/TSLA ratio as possible before a merger? Is that what you're saying?
0
0
0
Replying to @BritishHodl
@BritishHodl Not endorsing the JP Morgan 10% I presume. ;-)
0
0
0
56
Replying to @BritishHodl
@BritishHodl Would you stay in a 55 vol asset with only 10% CAGR?
2
0
4
97
Replying to @KeystoneWallet
@KeystoneWallet @amanpu85 So just more difficult? That鈥檚 not very reassuring given what has happened. At least with a ledger I can open the device myself to inspect it without bricking it.
0
0
1
18
Replying to @beausecurity
@beausecurity Suggestions for countries where the tax authorities make it illegal not to register your home address with them and at the same time that address information can be retrieved legally and is then put up on indexing sites completely legally?
0
0
0
1
Replying to @SatoshiNagonna
@SatoshiNagonna @Bitcoin_Cookie What is your suggested setup for minimizing risk?
0
0
0
2
Replying to @eskoropisov
@eskoropisov Why even include software hot wallets in the comparison? They're compromised as soon as the host device they run on get compromised by malware.
1
0
1
568
Replying to @eskoropisov
@eskoropisov You should probably divide by the amount of funds secured by each wallet manufacturers devices which isn't available so use number of customers instead. The larger and more popular the wallet the larger the target on its back.
1
0
0
507
Replying to @KeystoneWallet
@KeystoneWallet I wouldn't be able to trust your word on this, I'd need to know the technical details on how the anti tamper system works and then see if I believe it can't be circumvented. In a sense this design prevents hardware inspection by the user which is a drawback.
1
0
3
280
Replying to @ozsats256
@ozsats256 @asanoha_gold My guess exactly, but funny how they start blaming everyone but themselves as a gut reaction. For a company that is in the security business this is just embarrassing behavior.
0
0
1
16
Replying to @BitcoinNewsCom
@BitcoinNewsCom @COLDCARDwallet More plausible that the machine they're logged into X on has been compromised I think.
1
0
3
140
Replying to @west_linux
0
0
1
7
Replying to @BritishHodl
@BritishHodl Wouldn鈥檛 complain if you鈥檙e right. 馃殌
0
0
0
81
Replying to @BritishHodl
@BritishHodl Wouldn鈥檛 that give Bitcoin a MC that is 50% of those 900T? If you double it it comes 100% of those 900T? If my math is correct it seems a bit implausible.
2
0
1
392
Replying to @DavidCarbutt_
1
0
0
31
Replying to @RoundtableSpace
@RoundtableSpace Haha. This gets blocked all over the place when I use it at least. Did you actually try it?
0
0
0
1,026
Replying to @mert
@mert Fix the quantum vulnerability and soon before being confident about this.
0
0
1
38