This is new. About 15 years ago, it was normal for millennial guys to take gap years after college (or just for the summer) and either travel solo or with a couple friends though Europe and Asia, crashing at hostels. Nowadays, it seems that culture died out.
That’s because most men don’t travel. If you see a man traveling it’s either for work or he has a woman with him and she’s planned it. Y’all don’t have real hobbies and aren’t too curious about the world around you. Not to mention, you don’t have the funds to do so.
0
0
0
30
I believe one reason for some of the trans madness is that transwomen fill market niches. DEI strongly incentivizes hiring women, but women on average are not good at certain jobs (things that require physical strength, low-level coding, abstract math, etc). Hiring a transwoman was an easy way to get someone biologically male into a position where they'd be able to contribute, while also filling (and exceeding) investor diversity demands.
"We need more trans delivery drivers because real women are super weak and have no stamina"
LMFAO bruh
0
0
1
26
Every recipe for a stew: add a can of diced tomatoes and several tablespoons of tomato paste.
Every stew: tomato flavor overwhelms everything else
Every stew: tomato flavor overwhelms everything else
0
0
1
65
Scariest Uber ride I've ever been in with a high as f**k black driver. If I die, tell my family I said "hello."
0
0
3
78
TheShadowbanned retweeted
America is a Far left nation. America spends $5.5 trillion on social programs every year. Trump uses state power to control critical companies in tech, national security, energy, and public utilities. Trump used the state to steer and force the acquisition of TikTok and sale of CNN to Paramount SkyDance. America currently has no fault divorce, gay marriage, Gay adoption, Surrogacy, IVF, abortion, trans surgery, women’s right to vote, and Children using puberty blockers.
America is 52.5% White alone and its immigration and visa system doesn’t benefit its People and furthers the $566 B in annual fraud; the declining quality of life, and abysmal housing market conditions.
Maybe we should think about what “Far Left” really means and look in the mirror.
America is 52.5% White alone and its immigration and visa system doesn’t benefit its People and furthers the $566 B in annual fraud; the declining quality of life, and abysmal housing market conditions.
Maybe we should think about what “Far Left” really means and look in the mirror.
Hitler was a far left socialist. Literally in the name of his party!
7
38
419
4,477
TheShadowbanned retweeted
Welp. Finally went down the Malfoid rabbit hole.
I have come to the conclusion that we need 600,000 more data centers.
I have come to the conclusion that we need 600,000 more data centers.
103
128
2,761
52,363
TheShadowbanned retweeted
I note that a lot of people today are questioning Aboriginal history and culture.
So, here's some modern 'ancient' 'Truth-telling', some you may know, some not:
- Dot paintings were invented in 1971 by Geoffrey Bardon who then taught the style and technique to Aborigines.
- Ceremony was invented in 1976 by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley to welcome Maori performers.
- There is no Aboriginal word or phrase for Welcome to Country, unlike the Maoris’ welcome/wardance, the ‘haka’. As such, it cannot have been invented prior to colonisation and the introduction of English. How, in ancient times, would they have asked “Who’s doing the Welcome to Country Ceremony?” if there were no words in Aboriginal languages for it?
- The Acknowledgement of Country was invented in the 1990s
- There is no film or video evidence of any of these ceremonies existing at important events such as Royal Tours, the 1956 Olympics, etc. prior to the 70s.
- The not mentioning the name of deceased Aboriginal people or showing an image or providing a warning in an article is also modern. As recently as 2011 when boxer Lionel Rose died, not even the ABC did this.
- ‘Walkabout’ is now considered an offensive term, since it implies someone is late or lazy, despite it being an integral part of initiation ceremonies.
- ‘The oldest living culture’ is not just factually incorrect, it defies logic. The branch of the tree cannot be older than the tree itself. Humans evolved in Africa. There are African tribes that live almost exactly as they did 100,000+ years ago, without welfare, 4WDs, mobile phones, etc. Aborigines are descended from these tribes as humans moved out of Africa and around the world. As such, Aboriginal culture cannot possibly be older than the cultures from which they are derived. (See: diagram)
- Aborigines were never categorized or classified in Australia under the Flora and Fauna Act, despite Linda Burney and many others claiming this. This has been fact-checked and verified by the ABC as a complete and utter myth.
- The term ‘First Nations’ has been culturally appropriated from North American natives.
- The term ‘totem’ is used now widely. Many Aboriginal people adopt or are given a totem. But if this is, as claimed, an ancient tradition, what are the Aboriginal words, in any of the many languages, for ‘totem’ or ‘totems? ‘Totem’ is word from the Ojibwa tribe of North American natives. It is not an ancient Aboriginal word. It, too, is appropriated or 'stolen', ironically.
- ‘Deadly’ is not an Aboriginal word. It was a popular term in the 60s: ‘deadly good’. It was often used to describe a bicycle: ‘a deadly treadly’.
- Uluru (Ayers Rock) is, according to the area’s most senior elder, Paddy Uluru, of no cultural significance and is not sacred. Only recently has this been claimed to stop people climbing it.
- The Lake Bolac ‘eel’ rock arrangement required a machine to move the rocks. Which is more likely: that Aborigines arranged the 100+kg rocks 1,500 years ago or it was created more recently in the 20th Century to promote the Annual Eel Festival?
- Neologisms: ‘On country’; ‘Blak’; ‘First Nations’, ‘Blakfullah’, ‘Blak’, ‘First People’, ‘Welcome to Country Ceremony’, ‘Smoking Ceremony’, ‘Rainbow Serpent’ and ‘Dreamtime’ – all English-language-derived, not Aboriginal, such as ‘gangurru’ (kangaroo).
- Things that have fallen out of fashion: ‘Pointing the bone’; curses; photography stealing the soul.
- In almost every instance, the occurrence of a ‘massacre’ was settlers’ retribution for Aborigines stealing sheep, killing workers and/or raping wives and daughters. The notion that settlers or troops went out riding to kill Aborigines for ‘sport’ is a myth.
- The notion of a government-mandated, sanctioned or planned ‘genocide’ isn’t supported and the scale of Aboriginal deaths is widely disputed. Estimates vary so wildly that they cannot be replied upon: from over 1,000,000 to around 200,000 to 100,000 to just 10,000.
- Rainbow Serpent is not translated from any Aboriginal language. Similarly, ‘Dreamtime’ is not translated from any Aboriginal language. (See: diags)
So, what hasn't been made up in the past 50 years?
You tell me.
So, here's some modern 'ancient' 'Truth-telling', some you may know, some not:
- Dot paintings were invented in 1971 by Geoffrey Bardon who then taught the style and technique to Aborigines.
- Ceremony was invented in 1976 by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley to welcome Maori performers.
- There is no Aboriginal word or phrase for Welcome to Country, unlike the Maoris’ welcome/wardance, the ‘haka’. As such, it cannot have been invented prior to colonisation and the introduction of English. How, in ancient times, would they have asked “Who’s doing the Welcome to Country Ceremony?” if there were no words in Aboriginal languages for it?
- The Acknowledgement of Country was invented in the 1990s
- There is no film or video evidence of any of these ceremonies existing at important events such as Royal Tours, the 1956 Olympics, etc. prior to the 70s.
- The not mentioning the name of deceased Aboriginal people or showing an image or providing a warning in an article is also modern. As recently as 2011 when boxer Lionel Rose died, not even the ABC did this.
- ‘Walkabout’ is now considered an offensive term, since it implies someone is late or lazy, despite it being an integral part of initiation ceremonies.
- ‘The oldest living culture’ is not just factually incorrect, it defies logic. The branch of the tree cannot be older than the tree itself. Humans evolved in Africa. There are African tribes that live almost exactly as they did 100,000+ years ago, without welfare, 4WDs, mobile phones, etc. Aborigines are descended from these tribes as humans moved out of Africa and around the world. As such, Aboriginal culture cannot possibly be older than the cultures from which they are derived. (See: diagram)
- Aborigines were never categorized or classified in Australia under the Flora and Fauna Act, despite Linda Burney and many others claiming this. This has been fact-checked and verified by the ABC as a complete and utter myth.
- The term ‘First Nations’ has been culturally appropriated from North American natives.
- The term ‘totem’ is used now widely. Many Aboriginal people adopt or are given a totem. But if this is, as claimed, an ancient tradition, what are the Aboriginal words, in any of the many languages, for ‘totem’ or ‘totems? ‘Totem’ is word from the Ojibwa tribe of North American natives. It is not an ancient Aboriginal word. It, too, is appropriated or 'stolen', ironically.
- ‘Deadly’ is not an Aboriginal word. It was a popular term in the 60s: ‘deadly good’. It was often used to describe a bicycle: ‘a deadly treadly’.
- Uluru (Ayers Rock) is, according to the area’s most senior elder, Paddy Uluru, of no cultural significance and is not sacred. Only recently has this been claimed to stop people climbing it.
- The Lake Bolac ‘eel’ rock arrangement required a machine to move the rocks. Which is more likely: that Aborigines arranged the 100+kg rocks 1,500 years ago or it was created more recently in the 20th Century to promote the Annual Eel Festival?
- Neologisms: ‘On country’; ‘Blak’; ‘First Nations’, ‘Blakfullah’, ‘Blak’, ‘First People’, ‘Welcome to Country Ceremony’, ‘Smoking Ceremony’, ‘Rainbow Serpent’ and ‘Dreamtime’ – all English-language-derived, not Aboriginal, such as ‘gangurru’ (kangaroo).
- Things that have fallen out of fashion: ‘Pointing the bone’; curses; photography stealing the soul.
- In almost every instance, the occurrence of a ‘massacre’ was settlers’ retribution for Aborigines stealing sheep, killing workers and/or raping wives and daughters. The notion that settlers or troops went out riding to kill Aborigines for ‘sport’ is a myth.
- The notion of a government-mandated, sanctioned or planned ‘genocide’ isn’t supported and the scale of Aboriginal deaths is widely disputed. Estimates vary so wildly that they cannot be replied upon: from over 1,000,000 to around 200,000 to 100,000 to just 10,000.
- Rainbow Serpent is not translated from any Aboriginal language. Similarly, ‘Dreamtime’ is not translated from any Aboriginal language. (See: diags)
So, what hasn't been made up in the past 50 years?
You tell me.
105
479
2,708
88,496
They would not evolve language or prehensile limbs. This actually sounds like hell. To be a dog with an IQ of 100, able to reason and solve problems, but still be stuck in a fenced-in yard fetching balls and going on short walks.
Reasonable informed conservative estimates of dog IQ averages, heritabilities, & variances suggest that—if we unrealistically assume linearity holds indefinitely (eg no bottlenecks on birthing huge skulls)—9 breeding pairs of border collies could reach human IQs in 600 years.
In Gen1ce 2 10-pup litters, from which the smartest of each sex is selected (Male1a & Female1a); Male2 & Female2 do the same, & so forth, up to Male9 & Female9. 6 years later, Male1a breeds with Female2a, & Male2a breeds with Female3a, etc, to prevent in-breeding; this pattern continues for 100 generations, & voila! (Quicker with stronger selection, iterated embryo selection, gene editing, etc; slower with bottlenecks etc).
We owe this to them!
0
0
1
45
Hey, Groypers and other "entryisys": George Soros is foing what you want to do, only he has momey and connections and boots on the ground already. This is who's taking over the GOP - not based zoomers.
🚨 NEW: Inside the Neocons’ Secret Plan to Take the Republican Party Back.
A Republican organizing network backed by liberal foundation money held private meetings where participants discussed how to “retake the local party apparatus.”
A former Soros foundation grantmaker helped advise the effort.
The target was local Republican organizations. Their own report records one participant’s assessment that parties were:
“strong enough to still matter, but weak enough to be taken over.”
Participants in Kansas and Kentucky had already begun developing plans to rebuild local parties.
Johns Hopkins’ SNF Agora Institute and the R Street Institute organized the meetings: private dinners followed by full-day, off-the-record sessions. Rules prevented participants’ statements from being attributed to them individually.
Johns Hopkins named Brad Raffensperger among the project’s architects.
The funding includes:
• $1.85 MILLION from Hewlett for the Civic Right project.
• $500,000 from Carnegie for the Conservative Agenda for Democracy program.
These foundations’ support for conservative organizing fits a broader shift by liberal donors toward funding groups on the right.
The Soros connection: adviser Mark de la Iglesia previously awarded grants at George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. He also served in the Obama administration. Freedom House confirms his advisory role in this specific initiative.
By 2026, organizers reported Signal networks connecting statewide election officials and staff. Their next steps included state-by-state strategies and recruiting and preparing future candidates and public officials.
The same report explains that participants feared publicly confronting the administration could cost them seats and credibility.
Its wording:
“The challenge is to take effective action while not drawing unwanted attention.”
0
0
0
28
TheShadowbanned retweeted
Eric does the classic leftist thing of blaming the amorphous "billionaire class" while excusing the actual guilty individuals. It's a common tactic from leftists who understand that people want accountability but don't want actual accountability to happen. Instead they want to shift said accountability to their enemies while protecting their friends.
The people committing the crimes aren't the ones who are actually guilty you see they were FORCED to commit immigration fraud and then take kickbacks while mass importing their entire village. It was the "insert group who can never actually be held accountable" who is really responsible.
You saw the same thing with Bioware. It wasn't woke Bioware employees who have names and addresses who released woke trash and destroyed Bioware. It was "Private Equity". It's all just an op to wash their hands of responsibility so they can continue to destroy everything they touch without accountability.
The people committing the crimes aren't the ones who are actually guilty you see they were FORCED to commit immigration fraud and then take kickbacks while mass importing their entire village. It was the "insert group who can never actually be held accountable" who is really responsible.
You saw the same thing with Bioware. It wasn't woke Bioware employees who have names and addresses who released woke trash and destroyed Bioware. It was "Private Equity". It's all just an op to wash their hands of responsibility so they can continue to destroy everything they touch without accountability.
I seem to recall Eric Weinstein writing about how the H1B program was built on the basis of fraudulent "labour shortages" that amounted in practice to MBAs wanting to depress salaries within STEM fields, which subsequently devastated America's technical sector.
Indians are the primary human resource used by the H1B scammers.
It's pretty obvious why Americans have grown up dislike them.
Yet here he is pretending not to understand.
7
47
779
11,566
TheShadowbanned retweeted
🚨BREAKING🚨
My house was raided yesterday morning at 5.30am by Greater Manchester Police, one uniformed officer and three from CID, with a live arrest warrant out for me.
This is in relation to the attacks on migrant HMOs across Salford.
Absolute nonsense.
All I’ve done is in our communities using public council information and refused to condemn our own people.
I expect to be arrested in the next day or two.
I’ll keep you updated.
This is a stitch-up for telling the truth.
Never surrender 💪🏻🏴
My house was raided yesterday morning at 5.30am by Greater Manchester Police, one uniformed officer and three from CID, with a live arrest warrant out for me.
This is in relation to the attacks on migrant HMOs across Salford.
Absolute nonsense.
All I’ve done is in our communities using public council information and refused to condemn our own people.
I expect to be arrested in the next day or two.
I’ll keep you updated.
This is a stitch-up for telling the truth.
Never surrender 💪🏻🏴
1,331
10,396
38,600
541,012
> "Despite the ransacking of his store, Pierre affirms that he continues to support the students and youth"
F**king unfixable culture.
F**king unfixable culture.
🇫🇷🇯🇵🚨- « Le Goku français » : le gérant du Micromania qui a tenu tête aux casseurs voit sa cagnotte dépasser les 25 000€. Les donateurs l’encouragent à réaliser son rêve : emmener sa campagne au Japon.
Malgré le saccage de sa boutique, Pierre affirme continuer à soutenir les e, rappelant que les actes des casseurs ne doivent pas occulter les revendications portées par les jeunes.
La voix japonaise de Goku, Masako Nozawa, 90 ans, va dédicacer une figurine et un dessin à Pierre, le gérant du Micromania de Nice, surnommé le « Goku français » après avoir défendu courageusement sa boutique contre les casseurs.
(IMPORTANT concernant la cagnotte : Il y a quelques jours, Pierre, le gérant du Micromania, avait affirmé ne pas être au courant de l’existence des cagnottes et précisé que certaines étaient fausses. Le 19 octobre, il a lancé sa propre cagnotte avec Double Pixels. Sa déclaration officielle est disponible sur son compte Instagram.)
0
0
1
44
TheShadowbanned retweeted
Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men.
And they finally figured out why.
They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.
The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.
lusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.
When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."
It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.
But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.
The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.
Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.
They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.
A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.
Nobody explicitly coded these rules.
This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.
And they finally figured out why.
They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.
The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.
lusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.
When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."
It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.
But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.
The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.
Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.
They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.
A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.
Nobody explicitly coded these rules.
This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.
629
2,248
12,946
310,241
I just triggered DeepSeek's safety filters with this question: "What would it take for Q-Pop to be as internationally influential as K-Pop?"
What does the CCP know...?
What does the CCP know...?
0
0
0
18
TheShadowbanned retweeted
If this is the state of your civilization, then there is absolutely no point in talking about crimes at all.
Because if you lack the moral courage even to correctly describe the typical perpetrator, then you certainly lack the moral courage to actually hold perpetrators responsible.
Society, ultimately, is implemented by humans. Every law ever written is just so much wasted paper if the humans charged with giving meaning to those laws refuse to do so.
And for the last 75 years, that is what has happened. We have developed a political class that refuses to follow the intent of the law, or even its literal text, because if democrats started imprisoning thieves and murderers, we might have to notice that they're all African, and if republicans started deporting visa fraudsters, we might have to notice that they are all Indian.
There is an unwelcome truth behind all of this. Almost no one is particularly happy about it, but it divides the world into two groups... those who are willing to confront it, and those with their fingers in their ears screaming lalalalalalalalaIcantHEARyou.
Classical liberalism alone did not create or sustain Western Civilization. We know this because we have plenty of it, and it's not.
Christianity alone did not create or sustain Western Civilization. We know this because we have plenty of it, and it's not.
Western Civilization was created and sustained by the balance of three philosophies, not two, and it is the third philosophy that is missing.
This third philosophy does not come with a name, and it was never given a name until someone wanted to eradicate it.
Why does it not have a name? Because, unlike the other two philosophies, it has no point of origin. It did not have to be invented.
It predates both classical liberalism and Christianity. It predates the human race. Bees practice it, wolves practice it, dolphins practice it and so do lions.
It is the default state of all life.
Without it, the liberal notion of human rights, and the Christian notions of the good Samaritan and the imago d.e.i. become nothing more than suicide pacts.
Both classical liberalism and Christianity are leftist, socialist, and universalist in nature, and they only ever worked as modifiers on the basic right wing philosophy of all life.
It can be best described by one word.
Empiricism.
That isn't the word you thought I'd use, is it? But it's the word that fits, because it's the word that means believing what you see right in front of you.
Regardless of whether it hurts anyone's feelings, or contradicts your abstract principles about Jesus or the rights of humans.
It is the philosophy of preferring the welfare of your family to the welfare of infinity shrimp. It is the philosophy of not ignoring the blindingly fucking obvious.
It is the philosophy of all of us admitting that women who look like Diane Yap do not need to be followed around by security inside the store.
They need to be followed around by the Highway Patrol once they leave.
Because if you lack the moral courage even to correctly describe the typical perpetrator, then you certainly lack the moral courage to actually hold perpetrators responsible.
Society, ultimately, is implemented by humans. Every law ever written is just so much wasted paper if the humans charged with giving meaning to those laws refuse to do so.
And for the last 75 years, that is what has happened. We have developed a political class that refuses to follow the intent of the law, or even its literal text, because if democrats started imprisoning thieves and murderers, we might have to notice that they're all African, and if republicans started deporting visa fraudsters, we might have to notice that they are all Indian.
There is an unwelcome truth behind all of this. Almost no one is particularly happy about it, but it divides the world into two groups... those who are willing to confront it, and those with their fingers in their ears screaming lalalalalalalalaIcantHEARyou.
Classical liberalism alone did not create or sustain Western Civilization. We know this because we have plenty of it, and it's not.
Christianity alone did not create or sustain Western Civilization. We know this because we have plenty of it, and it's not.
Western Civilization was created and sustained by the balance of three philosophies, not two, and it is the third philosophy that is missing.
This third philosophy does not come with a name, and it was never given a name until someone wanted to eradicate it.
Why does it not have a name? Because, unlike the other two philosophies, it has no point of origin. It did not have to be invented.
It predates both classical liberalism and Christianity. It predates the human race. Bees practice it, wolves practice it, dolphins practice it and so do lions.
It is the default state of all life.
Without it, the liberal notion of human rights, and the Christian notions of the good Samaritan and the imago d.e.i. become nothing more than suicide pacts.
Both classical liberalism and Christianity are leftist, socialist, and universalist in nature, and they only ever worked as modifiers on the basic right wing philosophy of all life.
It can be best described by one word.
Empiricism.
That isn't the word you thought I'd use, is it? But it's the word that fits, because it's the word that means believing what you see right in front of you.
Regardless of whether it hurts anyone's feelings, or contradicts your abstract principles about Jesus or the rights of humans.
It is the philosophy of preferring the welfare of your family to the welfare of infinity shrimp. It is the philosophy of not ignoring the blindingly fucking obvious.
It is the philosophy of all of us admitting that women who look like Diane Yap do not need to be followed around by security inside the store.
They need to be followed around by the Highway Patrol once they leave.
They like to pick a professional looking Asian woman to be the face of whatever crime, because they know if they make it realistic, people will screech about racism.
73
182
2,281
38,697