Replying to @Tristan87952605
@Tristan87952605 Smooth brain maxing.
1
0
0
Been oil painting all day and just saw this.
In China, the AI bubble has already burst reut.rs/48foPk1
4
56
863
But wait, I thought China loved AI?

Took a hundred people 2 years and $1.5 million to earn less than $200k in its opening weekend, with over 10,000 screenings opening day. That's something like 23,000 people out of 1,400,000,000.

I guess you slop, you flop.
Chinaโ€™s first AI-generated theatrical feature has flopped, earning just $181,000 in its first weekend.

By contrast, the scrappy โ€˜Niu Laiโ€™ turned its crude animation into a viral attraction, grossing nearly $10 million a couple of months ago.
cartoonbrew.com/box-office-repโ€ฆ
12
38
362
Replying to @JohnHalogj4k
@JohnHalogj4k @Bunagayafrost Lmao, 2500 replies just sucking off AI.
1
0
1
Replying to @wiretransfer
1
0
9
Is this a good thing?
13
14
181
Replying to @tomfgoodwin
@tomfgoodwin "Better than ever."
0
0
5
Replying to @mramazingyt
0
0
0
Replying to @jag_99
@jag_99 Do you live in reality, cause I do.
4
0
30
Replying to @codewithstefan
@codewithstefan Look at all this profit.
3
0
88
Replying to @IsThisA3DModel
0
0
12
Replying to @z_e_silver
@z_e_silver He literally did?
0
1
55
Replying to @BlueBoxDave
0
0
12
Replying to @joannamrod
0
0
5
Replying to @tedcruz
0
0
49
Replying to @RaBawmjs
@RaBawmjs Why indeed.
0
0
12
Replying to @antwain48
@antwain48 Humans are apes.
1
0
11
This about sums it up, lol.
30
84
1,365
Replying to @BlisteredSkies
@BlisteredSkies @BenjaminPDixon "Thatโ€™s the problem with haters you know nothing about creativity, productivity, or imagination."

What's all this then.
3
1
91
Replying to @DiscussingFilm
@DiscussingFilm The only pack of biopic tickets I'd ever buy is for this crew.
0
2
56
AI has crafted a convincing illusion for a lot of people that suggests you can have all three. It's a lie that's propping up the biggest bubble in history.
4
14
113
Replying to @IsThisA3DModel
@IsThisA3DModel Weird, I don't know why we were uninvited.
0
0
10
Like Digger, You Can See Everything has more layers than an onion and has a narrative twist partway through that by the end completely reframes everything. Audible gasps and 'what the fucks' throughout, incredible.
6
1
70
Replying to @slavoartist
@slavoartist Yes I do, but frankly, it doesn't even matter because you're the one who when challenged on their AI views, is apparently happy people are losing their jobs. You're just like the guy you called a dumbass. Exactly like him actually.
1
0
10
Replying to @synaesthesiajp
@synaesthesiajp @MikeDrucker Matt deserves the vitriol.
0
0
37
Ah yes, the "real devs" who DON'T code and DON'T make art. Makes total sense.
50
103
1,879
Disgusting, this should be illegal.
They fired the design team today
12
383
3,103
Replying to @Rahll
0
0
12
Byeee forever, f*ck you very much!
This AI company bankruptcy is a significant collapse in the narrative/belief system that Large Language Models were the pathway to AI superintelligence.

Character AI even claimed "We started Character AI to bring personalized superintelligence to everyone on Earth."
3
43
475
Replying to @davidHashelhoff
0
0
11
Replying to @filmdweeb
@filmdweeb @nopamts So why did the phone materialize into his hand two shots later right before he drops it.
1
0
0
Replying to @nopamts
@nopamts Do YOU have eyes? No phone, and 2 shots later he's dropping it.
0
0
14
Replying to @unusual_whales
0
0
26
Replying to @jonahweiner
0
0
4
Ben Affleck's AI company developed a model to deal with visual logic and editorial consistency, and yet you can watch his empty hand in one shot go to dropping a phone two quick shots later.

Also, it can apparently help with inconsistent lighting which this has in spades. Weird.
New scene from Ben Affleck's ANIMALS is causing CONTROVERSY
22
52
588
Replying to @keywordnovelist
@keywordnovelist @realJaredGilman I assume it's a costume in the movie or something, cause he's got fake muscles and tattoos too, lol.
1
0
1
Replying to @LukeBarnett
@LukeBarnett When Rotten Tomatoes hits you with that 36%.
0
0
0
"Yet because they used AI visuals to cut costs, haters dismiss the entire production."

It's a visual medium tho.

For example, if an author is selling an AI written book, am I supposed to ignore that simply because they may have hired a cover illustrator, editor, and researcher?
17
18
266
Replying to @Yin_NGMI
@Yin_NGMI "I have no idea what I am doing."

True.
1
0
800
Replying to @Forbes
@Forbes So which is it?
8
13
469
Replying to @Nomadhidinghere
1
0
36
Replying to @TheThird_Mind
@TheThird_Mind I don't know what I'm talking about?
4
0
12
Replying to @inyourshitpal
@inyourshitpal Right, artists having their work stolen to power machines that directly compete with them definitely doesn't affect them. How silly of me.
1
0
9
Replying to @editordlwatson
@editordlwatson @dyiapanis No, I did not provide reference images, feel free to read the article.
2
0
24
Replying to @dyiapanis
2
1
193
Replying to @bigmanskeeter
@bigmanskeeter @LaurenWalshArt You got any other social media?
1
0
1
Replying to @Rahll
The poor baby called me a slur and blocked me.
0
0
24
Replying to @Variety
0
0
25
Replying to @IntCyberDigest
0
0
4
Hey Jason! Can you explain why you think it's okay to rip off Art by Karla with AI?
9
227
4,267
Replying to @ArturoWolff1
0
0
16