Right, so that's why it seems so engineered.
They allow themselves to be seen, enter the zeitgeist, influence our culture, our movies, fuel debate between skeptics and believers alike...
But, at the same time, they only allow corporations and governments to have smoking gun evidence.
I'm confident there is funny business going on.
They allow themselves to be seen, enter the zeitgeist, influence our culture, our movies, fuel debate between skeptics and believers alike...
But, at the same time, they only allow corporations and governments to have smoking gun evidence.
I'm confident there is funny business going on.
@PostDisclosure not sure I buy the narrative that NHI somehow want to remain hidden from the general population
seems that they have knowingly shown themselves to random people many, many times
Oct 18, 2026 · 6:21 PM UTC
8
4
36
4,682
@PostDisclosure “We want you to believe in us…but not too much.”
1
0
1
47
@liteshaper2 That's a great way of putting it. Weird.
1
0
1
74
@PostDisclosure See idk about that far. Is it ur thinking then that if we had the exact detection equipment the military had & had (somehow) nukes around, those exact sensors wouldn't work for us but they'd show up on the military sensors setup in the same area? No to this guy, yes to this guy?
1
0
1
82
@MusicAndTruthtical that would change the power balance so it doesn't really compute. Maybe they don't want to give it to the common man.
But either way - think of all the times the common man's sensors have failed - such as w/ photography....
I am not convinced it's always the technology that's inadvertently making it so hard to document.
Look at NIDS. Yes, LOOK AT NIDS. They didn't get one damn smoking gun. MAYBE because the phenomena knew if they did they would have shared it with the world....
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
But either way - think of all the times the common man's sensors have failed - such as w/ photography....
I am not convinced it's always the technology that's inadvertently making it so hard to document.
Look at NIDS. Yes, LOOK AT NIDS. They didn't get one damn smoking gun. MAYBE because the phenomena knew if they did they would have shared it with the world....
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
1
0
0
69
@PostDisclosure Proverbial landing on the White House lawn?
0
0
1
59
@PostDisclosure Is it not just that corps/govs have more sophisticated tech capable of capturing smoking gun evidence of them? If I had an F35 with signals support from an aircraft carrier I bet I could get good evidence too
0
0
0
7
@PostDisclosure Exactly, the ET could at any moment disclose their presence to greater humanity but instead they choose to remain in the shadows operating clandestinely.
0
0
0
39
@PostDisclosure Non human intelligence, takes every form, when we treat and depict anything in Fiction or Science fiction they are entirely real scenarios real characters, but they are reflections and ripples of the truth, because the characters within those stories exist more than we know.
0
0
0
39
@PostDisclosure Engineered visibility is a sharp framing. If the sightings are staged, what would unstaged evidence look like to you?
0
0
0
43
