🎥The Agenda: Their Vision - Your Future (2025) | Full Documentary

Support this project here: theagendafilm.com

Oh Hello … Poland’s PM Donald Tusk is demanding further restrictions on the internet to tackle “blatant abuse of freedom on the internet.”

Poland adopted the UN Global Digital Compact and is implementing the EU Digital Services Act.

This new legislation will expect regulators to order online content to be blocked and websites added to a register.

And compulsory age verification for social media, using Poland’s digital ID app or the EU Digital Identity Wallet.

Poland’s President has warned that Tusk’s legislation could remove opinions that don’t align with the PM or European Commission.

He compared officials deciding what people may say online to Orwell’s Ministry of Truth, giving the state the power to silence opposition to the approved narrative.

You will only speak freely if you agree with the Government.
x.com/darekwiewiorka…

🚨 Right, let’s get back to this! … tomorrow at COP31 the UN is launching Natural Capital.

For millions of years on planet Earth forests, plants, grass and the oceans have absorbed carbon, the soils store it and rivers have carried water. No one owns this output! its life force is free for all living creatures on the planet. A God given gift.

But the UN and its massive network want to give those natural processes financial values, convert them into credits and trade them on international markets.

A company can already buy credits linked to a forest’s carbon absorption to offset its own emissions. Banks, investors, brokers and project developers can make money from arranging and trading those credits.

This addition to the system is called NATURAL CAPITAL … It puts a financial value on biodiversity, forests, wetlands and the services nature and God provides for free.

It creates opportunities for enormous private wealth from natural processes that none of these institutions created. And not one citizen has voted on this, nor will they be able to.

No one has the moral authority to turn what belongs to all on the Earth into profit for the UN and financial institutions. But they are doing it anyway. 🚨

‼️ Paraguay adopted the UN Agenda 2030 in 2015. And then in 2020 strengthened the program, including 16.9 … legal identity for all.

On 9 November 2026, Jorge Luis Schreiner, m president of Paraguay's Central Bank,
claimed that the real business behind the collapsed Ueno Bank was not banking at all.

It was collecting the BIOMETRIC DATA of millions of people to build a database of the population and then profit from it.

See 🚨

CBBC has a new brainwashing show called “Climate Change and Me: Future Council”

“Eight children go on the ultimate school excursion: a road trip across Europe to meet with powerful leaders and find solutions to the greatest environmental challenges.”

The bullshit is obvious: an assertion of clarity followed by a colon followed by a dubious scientific statement in support of an even more dubious policy is the work of green blob funded outfits lobbying a bankrupt local government against addressing real issues.

🚨BREAKING🚨 Freedom Research presents an exclusive documentary, "No Boiling Planet: A Climate of False Alarm"

Are we really living through an unprecedented climate crisis? We asked the scientists.

From the history of Earth's changing climate to CO₂, extreme weather, and the olar energy, the film offers perspectives that question prevailing climate narratives and invites viewers to examine the arguments and draw their own conclusions.

Watch and share widely!

Scientists and experts featured in the film:

William Happer – Physicist, Professor Emeritus, Princeton University

Richard Lindzen – Atmospheric physicist, Professor Emeritus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Judith Curry – @curryja is a climatologist, former Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology; Professor Emerita

Samuel Furfari – Professor Emeritus of Geopolitics and Energy Policy, Université libre de Bruxelles; former senior official at the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Energy

Lars Schernikau – Dr. Lars Schernikau is an energy economist, commodity trader, entrepreneur and author. @lars_schernikau believes that energy should not be a political matter. His conclusions are based on how energy systems actually work, what they cost and what is needed to keep them running reliably. These views are not influenced nor do they change, regardless of one’s views on “anthropogenic global warming” (AGW). Providing reliable and affordable energy is a necessity, not a political angle.

Valter Kiisk – Associate Professor, Institute of Physics, University of Tartu

Arne Ader – Biologist and renowned nature photographer

How can the BBC be a ‘balanced’ & unbiased national broadcaster if you are committed to advancing one political ideology?”

It’s own Director’s Report states:

“Our work advances and amplifies global efforts to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals” 2030

@Aerdec 5th Anniversary State of the Nation

Good question

“You can vote for a different party, but the agenda never changes.”

Bernie Spofforth takes aim at the UN’s unelected influence, arguing that politicians carry out its agenda while voters are shut out @Artemisfornow

A blistering speech which everyone needs to take notice of. Watch in full 👇

I’m not joking! … Yesterday the UK Government started the process, exactly as I warned you it would.

Straight from the UN and into U.K. legislation, to turn nature into a financial asset class that makes huge returns for investors.

Forests, rivers, soil, biodiversity,… will all be measured, certified, packaged and sold as investment products.. to banks corporations and institutional investors.

And the Government will force regulation and make taxpayers create the demand.

The UN calls it “natural capital”. I call it theft of earths produce

x.com/antonioguterre…

🧵🚨 WHO is officially rebranding the failed “climate change” narrative as a formal health emergency

Just as the UN and its surrogates quietly dropped the Armageddon/doomsday scenarios that defined years of messaging, WHO is pivoting hard.

…what an odd thing to say.

The World Bank, ID4D digital wallet is another link in the chain of digital ID-related schemes, from vaccine passports to internet passports; from carbon footprint tracking to social credit scoring sociable.co/government-and… via @thesociable @TimHinchliffe

I'm growing increasingly impatient with Canadian institutions and bodies that are meant to protect Canadians. This is a coup and no one seems to care.

Sunlight-as-a-Service these people are out of their damn minds collapselife.com/p/sunglasses-a…

UN, Gates 50-in-5 campaign awards Benin, Brazil, Indonesia for digital ID, DPI initiatives sociable.co/government-and… @thesociable @TimHinchliffe

Brian Gerrish reports on his recent visit to The Netherlands, where he attended a crucial civil litigation court case involving 6 individuals who are taking Bill Gates, Rutte, The Dutch Government and more to court over vaccination and lockdown damages.

Stay tuned for more to stay up to date, head to our website:
ukcolumn.org

To watch the full news broadcast, click the link:
ukcolumn.org/video/uk-colum…

#COVID19 #Lockdown #Netherlands #CourtCase #Vaccination

Migration and the 2030 Agenda.

This is probably nothing. Keep fighting amongst yourselves.

🔥BESTSELLER! My book charting vaccine disasters back to smallpox is NO 1! It's not just number 1, it's ahead of the biggest pro-vaxxers in the business. Guardian columnist Ben Goldacre and Dame Sarah Gilbert. The same Dame Sarah who is Professor of Vaccinology at Oxford epartment of Medicine. She initiated the project and led the development team producing one of the most injurious vaccines in history - AstraZeneca's Covid-19 jab.

The Club of Rome was founded in the late 1960s by a core of disenchanted scientists, rich industrialists and bureaucrats.

They were the embryo of today's familiar climate activism aims, blaming unchecked population growth, industrial expansion and resource consumption for an ivilisation within a century.

Their 1972 report, The Limits to Growth, popularised the concept of finite planetary boundaries and the perceived necessity of global growth management. This same core ideology drives the supranational climate agenda today.

In 1951, the UN incorporated the World Meteorological Organization, and in 1988 it created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These twin agencies became the chief architects of an ongoing environmental crisis narrative. Both operate with explicit political mandates: providing governments with curated scientific rationale to justify top-down climate mandates.

The underlying aim was always to frame human development - driven by energy use and population - as an existential threat. While IPCC assessment reports themselves were often selectively edited, UN leadership routinely amplified only the most radical, worst-case projections, distilling complex data into slogans of 'global boiling' or a 'code red for humanity'.

The result has been a feedback loop of escalating rhetoric, artificial urgency and public hysteria - language not supported even by the underlying technical documents. Meanwhile, dissent was quietly neutralised; scientific careers were bypassed, funding diverted and academic tenure denied to those who questioned this orthodoxy.

The core scientific claim relies on the premise that human emissions - roughly 3 to 4% of the total annual carbon flux - are overwhelming a naturally stable cycle. Yet Earth has experienced multiple sustained warm periods throughout the current Holocene interglacial; temperatures were 1 to 2°C warmer than today during the Holocene Climatic Optimum 8,000 to 5,000 years ago.

The previous warm interglacial period, the Eemian, was 2°C warmer than today; African megafauna lived in the Thames Valley. CO₂ played no part.

Furthermore, satellite observations confirm the planet has greened dramatically since the 1980s, expanding leaf-area index by an area equivalent to twice the continental United States - primarily driven by CO₂ fertilisation (NASA 2016, 2019; Zhu et al, Chen et al).

While adding atmospheric CO₂ produces warming, it does so on a diminishing logarithmic scale. The critical debate, therefore, has never been basic physics, but rather the magnitude of warming, the balance of real-world harms, and whether the mandated policy remedies are worse than the disease.

After four decades of warning and trillions of dollars in subsidies, wind and solar still supply only about 6% of global primary energy, while dense hydrocarbon fuels generate 82% (Statistical Review of World Energy 2024).

Western economies have been rushed into rapid, capital-intensive energy transitions for which grid infrastructure was never designed, driving systemic price spikes and manufacturing off-shoring. Strategic dominance over supply chains has shifted, with China now manufacturing over 90% of the world’s solar panels and wind turbines.

Meanwhile, annual COP summits have evolved into the world’s most extravagant traveling public relations circus - generating an estimated 100,000 tonnes of CO₂ at COP26 alone from fleets of private jets and five-star accommodations - to broker sweeping pledges that developing nations have little capacity or intention to fulfill.

That the climate debate touches on legitimate environmental questions is to be expected. But the overarching policy response has been shaped from its genesis by the same impulse that birthed the Club of Rome: restrict energy use, limit economic growth, and dilute national sovereignty.