Ambire Mobile is back on iOS & Android. Same accounts as the extension via encrypted QR sync, clear signing, Gas Tank, Safe multisig, and Ledger signing over Bluetooth on iPhone. Finally the full @ambire wallet in my pocket.
Invite code: ambirecallin
blog.ambire.com/ambire-mobile-…
Invite code: ambirecallin
blog.ambire.com/ambire-mobile-…
1
2
8
252
kryptomartin retweeted
In Konkurs gehen lassen oder mit Förderungen retten? Diese Frage haben wir @FranzSchellhorn zum Ardo-Werk in Groß-Enzersdorf gestellt, wo gestern rund 300 Beschäftigte gegen die geplante Schließung protestiert haben.
Die Antwort fällt deutlich aus. Und Ardo ist leider kein Einzelfall.
Die Antwort fällt deutlich aus. Und Ardo ist leider kein Einzelfall.
10
23
120
4,275
NymVPN v2026.15 is live: anti-censorship bridges that switch automatically when a network blocks VPNs, steadier connections, and better battery life because data usage is now counted on the device. Longer battery life is always a win. Nice work @nymproject
nym.com/de/blog/nymvpn…
nym.com/de/blog/nymvpn…
0
0
0
30
Owning $WALLET means owning @ambire: 100% of swap, bridge & Gas Tank fees go to open-market buybacks, staking pays 2% APY with fee discounts, and stakers govern the treasury. Real revenue, real utility. Proud long-term holder & staker.
blog.ambire.com/wallet-token-v…
blog.ambire.com/wallet-token-v…
0
2
8
310
kryptomartin retweeted
Owning $WALLET means owning Ambire.
But what does that actually look like? Read it all in the latest blog post:
blog.ambire.com/wallet-token-v…
But what does that actually look like? Read it all in the latest blog post:
blog.ambire.com/wallet-token-v…
5
8
41
3,789
kryptomartin retweeted
Know what you sign with @Trezor in the Ambire extension and mobile app. Here's how it works:
3
5
36
1,880
kryptomartin retweeted
Man will mir also erklären, dass der Schundfunk Daten von Einwohnermeldeämtern abrufen kann, um GEZ-Verweigerer zu jagen, wir aber per Haftbefehl gesuchten Schwerverbrechern Bürgergeld überweisen, weil es keinen Datenabgleich zwischen Polizei und Arbeitsagentur geben darf?
Was bitte?
Was bitte?
138
1,931
9,747
63,375
kryptomartin retweeted
Sí, es verdad. El diputado iraní Ahmad Bakhshayesh Ardestani (Comisión de Seguridad Nacional) lo declaró a Euronews: si EE.UU. usa sus bases en Europa (Italia, Alemania u otras), Irán lanzará misiles hacia allí. Medios estatales iraníes advierten que un nuevo conflicto podría llegar al “corazón de Europa”. Son amenazas recientes de parlamentarios y prensa hardline.
6
36
208
53,008
kryptomartin retweeted
1/ Starknet is the only network to pass all 8 cryptographic agility checks.
It's also in the lower-exposure, lower-friction group on our post-quantum migration map.
But it's not fully quantum-safe yet. Here's what's ready and what's missing 🧵
It's also in the lower-exposure, lower-friction group on our post-quantum migration map.
But it's not fully quantum-safe yet. Here's what's ready and what's missing 🧵
10
24
134
5,985
kryptomartin retweeted
On Tuesday, over 200 @Bitpanda colleagues joined a session on Vision Chain, a blockchain built on the OP Stack with the Optimism team, using OP Enterprise.
Goal: explain the WHY and the HOW, in plain language.
The WHY
For a regulated platform, a blockchain is a balancing act.
you control but nobody to transact with, a public chain gives you reach but someone else sets the rules.
And regulators must be able to verify the chain without trusting the operator.
Vision Chain is an Ethereum layer 2: everything is posted to Ethereum for anyone to verify.
Through OP Enterprise, Optimism runs and upgrades the infrastructure underneath as a fully managed deployment. Bitpanda, as co-owner and core developer, focuses on the products built on top.
The HOW: 5 basics from session 1
1) A blockchain is a shared database that everyone can verify.
2) A rollup is fast thanks to one operator, and verifiable because everything lands on Ethereum.
3) The operator puts transactions in order, but can’t sign them for you or change your balance.
4) Anyone can run a node, even on a decent laptop.
5) A token only records who holds how much. Who issues it really matters.
Which blockchain basic would you want explained next? Spoiler: I’m already working on an educational video series :D
Big thanks to the @Optimism team (shoutout @ZakAyesh , @parkerjayp & @GregBresnitz)
Goal: explain the WHY and the HOW, in plain language.
The WHY
For a regulated platform, a blockchain is a balancing act.
you control but nobody to transact with, a public chain gives you reach but someone else sets the rules.
And regulators must be able to verify the chain without trusting the operator.
Vision Chain is an Ethereum layer 2: everything is posted to Ethereum for anyone to verify.
Through OP Enterprise, Optimism runs and upgrades the infrastructure underneath as a fully managed deployment. Bitpanda, as co-owner and core developer, focuses on the products built on top.
The HOW: 5 basics from session 1
1) A blockchain is a shared database that everyone can verify.
2) A rollup is fast thanks to one operator, and verifiable because everything lands on Ethereum.
3) The operator puts transactions in order, but can’t sign them for you or change your balance.
4) Anyone can run a node, even on a decent laptop.
5) A token only records who holds how much. Who issues it really matters.
Which blockchain basic would you want explained next? Spoiler: I’m already working on an educational video series :D
Big thanks to the @Optimism team (shoutout @ZakAyesh , @parkerjayp & @GregBresnitz)
18
30
168
6,298
kryptomartin retweeted
„Unvorhergesehene“ Entwicklung – Bundesagentur für Arbeit benötigt fünf Milliarden Euro mehr
„Unvorhergesehene“!!!!
welt.de/wirtschaft/art…
„Unvorhergesehene“!!!!
welt.de/wirtschaft/art…
213
472
2,648
31,518
kryptomartin retweeted
Introducing Ambire Ice: The hardware wallet built for @safe.
Private
Fully open-source
Quantum ready
Perfect clear signing
Ambire’s extension and mobile app, now with a dedicated hardware device.
Pre-order yours: ambire.com/ice
Private
Fully open-source
Quantum ready
Perfect clear signing
Ambire’s extension and mobile app, now with a dedicated hardware device.
Pre-order yours: ambire.com/ice
91
85
626
111,399
kryptomartin retweeted
NEW: Privacy enhancements for fee payments on @safe.
Ambire now defaults to a payer that reveals nothing new and warns you if you select a non-linked payer.
Fee payers are grouped by: Safe owners, linked, and not linked. Gas Tank is marked as the most private.
Ambire now defaults to a payer that reveals nothing new and warns you if you select a non-linked payer.
Fee payers are grouped by: Safe owners, linked, and not linked. Gas Tank is marked as the most private.
4
4
73
3,147
kryptomartin retweeted
Last night, my lawyers moved to sanction World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi for failing to disclose, until months into my litigation against the company, that it is a citizen of the UAE 🇦🇪 . #WLFI #USD1
For those who are new to this dispute, I was one of World Liberty’s earliest and largest investors. In November 2024, I agreed to buy $30 million of $WLFI tokens under a Token Purchase Agreement with World Liberty, and I later increased my total investment to $45 million.
In April, I sued World Liberty, alleging that the company induced my investment through fraud and then unlawfully froze my tokens.
My Token Purchase Agreement gives me the right to bring my claims in either California federal or state court.
I chose federal court.
Federal courts can hear a case like mine only when the two sides come from different places. Foreign plaintiffs like me can sue an American defendant in federal court, but foreign plaintiffs generally cannot sue a foreign defendant there. For these purposes, a company like World Liberty takes on the citizenship of each of its owners, so a single foreign owner makes the company foreign.
In other words, so long as World Liberty and all of its owners were American, my case could be heard in federal court.
The federal court’s rules required World Liberty to file a disclosure at the start of the case identifying every one of its owners and where each is a citizen. World Liberty’s disclosure identified only one entity—World Liberty itself—and listed Florida as its sole citizenship. Its lawyers certified that they were unaware of anyone else who needed to be disclosed.
World Liberty then moved to compel arbitration, seeking to pull my case out of open court and into secret arbitration proceedings.
I opposed that motion, and my lawyers spent months and hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting it. At a hearing in August, the Court signaled that it was not persuaded that my claims belonged in arbitration. Instead, the Court ruled that certain of my claims should stay in open court, and certain claims should be sent to arbitration, and ordered the parties to meet and confer to come up with a proposed agreement on which claims stay in open court and which ones go to arbitration.
Less than a week later, World Liberty suddenly “corrected” its disclosure. Where it had previously listed only one member in its ownership chain, it now listed 22, and claimed citizenship in Florida, Delaware, Puerto Rico, and the UAE.
World Liberty now says that the federal court has no jurisdiction over my case, since its UAE citizenship means there are foreign parties on both sides of the case.
The irony is hard to miss. World Liberty’s gold paper declares that “[b]y design, World Liberty Financial is not organized offshore,” and that it is “an American, tax-paying, corporation that aims to bring DeFi to its rightful home—America.” It promises a “US-based decentralized platform” built on “American ideals of liberty, privacy, and freedom to transact,” calls private, intermediary-free transactions “a core American value,” and boasts that “[r]ather than shying away from the United States, World Liberty Financial embraces the United States as the future CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE PLANET.”
World Liberty was proudly American 🇺🇸 when it was selling tokens. It discovered its UAE 🇦🇪 roots only when it needed a way out of an American federal courtroom.
World Liberty presumably always knew who its owners were. Its lawyers claim that they learned about the company’s UAE citizenship only after they filed the original disclosure.
As my motion explains, if that is true, then either World Liberty’s lawyers failed to conduct appropriate diligence, or World Liberty did not give its lawyers a straight answer. When we asked how this happened, World Liberty refused to tell us.
Token holders deserve to know whether the projects they invest in are telling the truth, both to the public and to courts. I am filing this motion to hold World Liberty and its lawyers accountable for what I believe was a misleading disclosure to the Court, and to make sure that the cost of World Liberty’s gamesmanship falls on them, not on me.
And after my sanctions motion is resolved in federal court, I will re-file my lawsuit against World Liberty in California state court.
I will keep fighting for the transparency this community deserves.
For those who are new to this dispute, I was one of World Liberty’s earliest and largest investors. In November 2024, I agreed to buy $30 million of $WLFI tokens under a Token Purchase Agreement with World Liberty, and I later increased my total investment to $45 million.
In April, I sued World Liberty, alleging that the company induced my investment through fraud and then unlawfully froze my tokens.
My Token Purchase Agreement gives me the right to bring my claims in either California federal or state court.
I chose federal court.
Federal courts can hear a case like mine only when the two sides come from different places. Foreign plaintiffs like me can sue an American defendant in federal court, but foreign plaintiffs generally cannot sue a foreign defendant there. For these purposes, a company like World Liberty takes on the citizenship of each of its owners, so a single foreign owner makes the company foreign.
In other words, so long as World Liberty and all of its owners were American, my case could be heard in federal court.
The federal court’s rules required World Liberty to file a disclosure at the start of the case identifying every one of its owners and where each is a citizen. World Liberty’s disclosure identified only one entity—World Liberty itself—and listed Florida as its sole citizenship. Its lawyers certified that they were unaware of anyone else who needed to be disclosed.
World Liberty then moved to compel arbitration, seeking to pull my case out of open court and into secret arbitration proceedings.
I opposed that motion, and my lawyers spent months and hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting it. At a hearing in August, the Court signaled that it was not persuaded that my claims belonged in arbitration. Instead, the Court ruled that certain of my claims should stay in open court, and certain claims should be sent to arbitration, and ordered the parties to meet and confer to come up with a proposed agreement on which claims stay in open court and which ones go to arbitration.
Less than a week later, World Liberty suddenly “corrected” its disclosure. Where it had previously listed only one member in its ownership chain, it now listed 22, and claimed citizenship in Florida, Delaware, Puerto Rico, and the UAE.
World Liberty now says that the federal court has no jurisdiction over my case, since its UAE citizenship means there are foreign parties on both sides of the case.
The irony is hard to miss. World Liberty’s gold paper declares that “[b]y design, World Liberty Financial is not organized offshore,” and that it is “an American, tax-paying, corporation that aims to bring DeFi to its rightful home—America.” It promises a “US-based decentralized platform” built on “American ideals of liberty, privacy, and freedom to transact,” calls private, intermediary-free transactions “a core American value,” and boasts that “[r]ather than shying away from the United States, World Liberty Financial embraces the United States as the future CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE PLANET.”
World Liberty was proudly American 🇺🇸 when it was selling tokens. It discovered its UAE 🇦🇪 roots only when it needed a way out of an American federal courtroom.
World Liberty presumably always knew who its owners were. Its lawyers claim that they learned about the company’s UAE citizenship only after they filed the original disclosure.
As my motion explains, if that is true, then either World Liberty’s lawyers failed to conduct appropriate diligence, or World Liberty did not give its lawyers a straight answer. When we asked how this happened, World Liberty refused to tell us.
Token holders deserve to know whether the projects they invest in are telling the truth, both to the public and to courts. I am filing this motion to hold World Liberty and its lawyers accountable for what I believe was a misleading disclosure to the Court, and to make sure that the cost of World Liberty’s gamesmanship falls on them, not on me.
And after my sanctions motion is resolved in federal court, I will re-file my lawsuit against World Liberty in California state court.
I will keep fighting for the transparency this community deserves.
570
389
3,819
1,590,324
kryptomartin retweeted
Isn’t it beautiful... Every swap and limit order on @CoWSwap is easy to read and understand.
4
11
85
3,241