QueenOfShrimps🦐#BIP110 #FreeAssange #FreeRoss@IsabelSydow

1h

Candace Owens

@RealCandaceO

21h

@KarlWuckertthe money” and look what I found? A high stakes professional poker player.

I’m noticing a distinct gambling trend amongst all of these chaos agents. Is it possible they have debts with casinos and are not operating in good faith?

Think we’re going to need a deep dive.

QueenOfShrimps🦐#BIP110 #FreeAssange #FreeRoss@IsabelSydow

1h

Candace Owens

@RealCandaceO

Oct 24

@BEmpress1984it never happen, but when I asked Leah for information to verify that claim specifically, that she was asked not to name Peter Thiel, she accused me of focusing in on Peter Thiel out of “confirmation bias”.

I’m not sure she knows what confirmation bias means.

She then did a 3ampresenting our private DM conversation, because she was upset I told her there were obvious errors in her glacier app substack. She called me an ai bot and an idiot for trying to explain to her that some of the stuff she is suggesting is conspiracy is literal federal law compliance.

I normally never share private DMs, but since she completely misrepresented what I said to her privately and then publicly called me a shill, I will share the below. I have since given her my explicit permission to drop the entirety of our conversation because I have nothing to hide. I had dinner with Shawn Ryan once— meeting him ahead of our interview. Keep in mind my interview where we discussed Peter Thiel was dropped the very same week she’s claiming she was not allowed to utter his name.

So what actually happened? My honest take is that if anyone questions Leah’s credentials or research she flies off the handle and tries to take them down with shoddy AI research presented as a deep dive.

From having looked into matter (by contacting a person who Leah told me would back up her claims and was present) I am confident stating that she misrepresented what happened.
It seems that after receiving producer notes, Shawn genuinely thought her research was dogshit. The producer then went and tried to politely and awkwardly see if he could find something of more interest for her to talk about beyond what anyone could easily find on google. In doing this, Leah genuinely believed that she was being censored because her research was SO controversial. It was the exact opposite.

What then transpired was effectively a really bad and awkward first date. Shawn was upset she was booked at all and that no one had done their due diligence enough to have prevented the occurrence of seating someone before him who claimed to be an economist with backgrounds in finance and accounting, but didn’t know what the petrodollar was.
A decision was made to shelve the interview. Shawn then made (in my opinion) a bad decision to refer to the shelved interview on another podcast—because even though the public did not to whom he was referring to, Leah did and she got angry. Out of that anger, she concocted a narrative, (again with publicly available information on LinkedIn), that she was actually censored because he was protecting his assets with Peter Thiel and Andreeson Horowitz, names that she knew would easily trigger the conspiracy crowd into believing the deep state was after her research.
Next came her targeting the glacier app— with more pithy, scraped research meant to make people think Shawn was colluding with the NSA and the Mossad to steal their data. Again, an easy sell with the conspiracy crowd, especially given Shawn’s background with the CIA.
All of this said, I would be happy to join Leah on her own podcast to explain to her more thoroughly why her substack research is tremendously flawed and at points, wholly dishonest. Truth doesn’t fear introspection and as always, I have nothing to hide.

₿itcoin ₿ombadil@BitcoinBombadil

10h

Key and Chain | Bitcoin Blake2b@keyandchain21

14h

The people willing to flex from 45 days to 180 will cave to anything. They’re paper tigers who don’t matter.

HOLD THE LINE on 1-year and the obedient sheep will follow.

I AM RIGHT ABOUT THIS.

Make them obey those with AGENCY!

PR-476 one YEAR ROLLING

youtu.be/l7zPnndsI_Y?si…

QueenOfShrimps🦐#BIP110 #FreeAssange #FreeRoss@IsabelSydow

2h

Seahaven Shatter

@Leto_Elessar

21h

@leahfiles @RealCandaceOs@NihiloXing to forgot that Shawn Ryan started all of this. Attacked her, posted the interview with seven minutes cut and never even denied his pre-recording redaction stipulations?

Candace and Baron both jumped in way too early missing that point entirely.

And their biggest gotcha is claiming her in depth substacks are just ai regurgitation?

What did Leah lie about? You have to go back to that. The answer is nothing.

So is it true that members of Ryan’s team left over the way he handled Leah? Not confirmed yet, but that’s a big question.

I don’t think enough people heard exactly what Leah told Stew Peters on exactly what she was censored on. It wasn’t just Peter Thiel.

So Leah has been dragged through this, Shawn was a dick, Baron was uncharacteristicly glitchy. And by time Leah started talking with Candace she was fed up with these smears lacking any substance.

I hope Candace has her on now, hopefully it’s not too late.

But this still looks horrible on Ryan, and it’s not a good look for Candace either.

She completely missed the fact that her buddy didn’t even deny restricting Leahs interview and he confirmed he invested in the enemy of the people.

If TPUSA did something like that she would be all over it.

I’m still giving Candace a pass for a variety of reasons, but people who read the Leah Files know she’s on the team.

Pride and blind loyalty muck things up. And it all starts with Shawn Ryan.

Hopefully Leah and Candace clear things up, but it’s going to have to go back to what really happened with Shawn Ryan, Sarah Adams and this producer who reportedly quit.

Also his drug filled trip to Mexico? There’s a lot of shadiness in this story and the spotlight needs to get off the spat between Candace and Leah and back on the core of this entire controversy.

Tony | thebitcoinway.com

@V4BTC

21h

Wide Awake Media

@wideawake_media

Oct 24

Former BlackRock portfolio manager Ed Dowd predicts a rogue AI cyber attack will be used as a pretext to roll out CBDCs, granting authorities unprecedented control over financial transactions.

He warns that these technologies will ultimately enable governments to impose chases through AI surveilled programmable money.