đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
By seeking and accepting UK 'permission' and process, you are acceding to a British claim to 'territorial integrity' it does not lawfully possess. You are accepting a constructive secession from a territory of which Scotland does not form part; divorce from a non-existent marriage. By holding a de facto referendum, you do precisely the same.
Do you realise the implications? What they will demand of us? We have heard you say that, in the end, independence will be negotiated with decent Westminster chaps, probably over a glass of malt. Well, at what price to us Scots, when you have not lifted a finger to fight for our ancestor's sovereign rights the English lied about honouring? When they demand compensation for the alleged dismemberment of 'their' territory? What percent of oil, gas and renewables fields will be the price? What slice of our fisheries? What share of debt will they demand? A debt in reality THEIR debt to US for the $1.5 trillion of oil and gas they stole over 50 years from OUR sovereign Crown territories.
Sorry to say, but neither you nor the SNP have thought this through, or are ignoring it, seemingly happy to take the booby prize of a section 30 or your own preferred de facto referendum "victory". Take your pick. Both are equally Pyrrhic.
This is the second reason why it is critically important to prosecute among the international community the facts of Scotland's annexation and right to recovery of suspended sovereignty â as Liberation Scotland is doing.
It's time for all nationalist politicians to face up to this and support the international inititiative to debunk this bogus union and expose the territorial alienation of Scotland. You politicians are desperately short- changing the Scottish nation.
Do you realise the implications? What they will demand of us? We have heard you say that, in the end, independence will be negotiated with decent Westminster chaps, probably over a glass of malt. Well, at what price to us Scots, when you have not lifted a finger to fight for our ancestor's sovereign rights the English lied about honouring? When they demand compensation for the alleged dismemberment of 'their' territory? What percent of oil, gas and renewables fields will be the price? What slice of our fisheries? What share of debt will they demand? A debt in reality THEIR debt to US for the $1.5 trillion of oil and gas they stole over 50 years from OUR sovereign Crown territories.
Sorry to say, but neither you nor the SNP have thought this through, or are ignoring it, seemingly happy to take the booby prize of a section 30 or your own preferred de facto referendum "victory". Take your pick. Both are equally Pyrrhic.
This is the second reason why it is critically important to prosecute among the international community the facts of Scotland's annexation and right to recovery of suspended sovereignty â as Liberation Scotland is doing.
It's time for all nationalist politicians to face up to this and support the international inititiative to debunk this bogus union and expose the territorial alienation of Scotland. You politicians are desperately short- changing the Scottish nation.
1
10
12
256
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
đđđđđ
By seeking and accepting UK 'permission' and process, you are acceding to a British claim to 'territorial integrity' it does not lawfully possess. You are accepting a constructive secession from a territory of which Scotland does not form part; divorce from a non-existent marriage. By holding a de facto referendum, you do precisely the same.
Do you realise the implications? What they will demand of us? We have heard you say that, in the end, independence will be negotiated with decent Westminster chaps, probably over a glass of malt. Well, at what price to us Scots, when you have not lifted a finger to fight for our ancestor's sovereign rights the English lied about honouring? When they demand compensation for the alleged dismemberment of 'their' territory? What percent of oil, gas and renewables fields will be the price? What slice of our fisheries? What share of debt will they demand? A debt in reality THEIR debt to US for the $1.5 trillion of oil and gas they stole over 50 years from OUR sovereign Crown territories.
Sorry to say, but neither you nor the SNP have thought this through, or are ignoring it, seemingly happy to take the booby prize of a section 30 or your own preferred de facto referendum "victory". Take your pick. Both are equally Pyrrhic.
This is the second reason why it is critically important to prosecute among the international community the facts of Scotland's annexation and right to recovery of suspended sovereignty â as Liberation Scotland is doing.
It's time for all nationalist politicians to face up to this and support the international inititiative to debunk this bogus union and expose the territorial alienation of Scotland. You politicians are desperately short- changing the Scottish nation.
0
2
4
105
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
The Butcherâs Granddaughter has been employed to lead MI6, and her Nazi-Ukrainian legacy places her firmly against Scotlandâs Liberation and Decolonisation. caltonjock.com/2026/11/09/the⌠via @twowittwo
0
12
11
188
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
Here's what BBC 'InDepth' won't tell you - Scotland's resources provide far more energy than its people can use, and the only reason they pay some of the highest energy bills in the world is that our energy is controlled by England (trading as 'the UK') and its corporate pals.
1
22
34
446
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
Yes, it is true. In late September 2018 off Morro Bay, commercial eel fishermen Sam Synstelien and Nicholas Taron on the vessel Persistence found a roughly 40-foot humpback whale entangled in rope and a buoy. After radioing the Coast Guard (help hours away), Synstelien jumped in with a knife, climbed onto the whale, and cut it free. The original video went viral; they later appeared on The Ellen DeGeneres Show. NOAA praised the outcome but warned the method is extremely dangerous.
3
2
12
801
RT @SeannachaidhS: And so we come full circle.
Just as the Falklands were named as English when first claimed by Commodore Byron, they arâŚ
Just as the Falklands were named as English when first claimed by Commodore Byron, they arâŚ
0
8
0
1
RT @SeannachaidhS: "The English Union"
England face Argentina and we are told that Scots are "disgusting" for supporting Argentina over EnâŚ
England face Argentina and we are told that Scots are "disgusting" for supporting Argentina over EnâŚ
0
167
0
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
The pharmaceutical industry spends more on lobbying than any other sector in America.
More than defense. More than oil. More than finance.
Every year, reliably, comprehensively, they purchase enough of the legislative process to ensure that the United States remains the only wealthy country on earth where insulin, a century-old drug that costs roughly $6 to manufacture, can be sold for $300.
People ration insulin in America.
People die rationing insulin in America.
The legislative response to this is, most years, nothing.
This is not because American legislators are unaware of it.
They are very aware of it.
They have received, in aggregate, hundreds of millions of dollars to remain aware of it and do nothing about it.
This is not a failure of democracy.
It is democracy operating exactly as the people who funded its current architecture intended.
More than defense. More than oil. More than finance.
Every year, reliably, comprehensively, they purchase enough of the legislative process to ensure that the United States remains the only wealthy country on earth where insulin, a century-old drug that costs roughly $6 to manufacture, can be sold for $300.
People ration insulin in America.
People die rationing insulin in America.
The legislative response to this is, most years, nothing.
This is not because American legislators are unaware of it.
They are very aware of it.
They have received, in aggregate, hundreds of millions of dollars to remain aware of it and do nothing about it.
This is not a failure of democracy.
It is democracy operating exactly as the people who funded its current architecture intended.
7
173
392
5,110
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
đ¨Mientras tanto, el vĂdeo que saliĂł a la luz â ď¸
George Søros HA ESTADO PLANEANDO ESTO DURANTE AĂALES:
Hacer colapsar la economĂa... ÂĄpara tomar el control global ecĂłnomico!
LA PANDEMIA, EL CAMBIO CLIMĂTICO... TODO ES PARTE DE UN PLAN đđĽ
George Søros HA ESTADO PLANEANDO ESTO DURANTE AĂALES:
Hacer colapsar la economĂa... ÂĄpara tomar el control global ecĂłnomico!
LA PANDEMIA, EL CAMBIO CLIMĂTICO... TODO ES PARTE DE UN PLAN đđĽ
93
1,450
1,921
18,941
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
Niger đłđŞ Rebukes the European Union đŞđş: âWe Don't Need Brussels' Permission" After EU Seeks Answers on Algeria Military Pact and Troop Deployment
___
Niger has summoned the European Unionâs acting chargĂŠ dâaffaires, accusing the bloc of interfering in its sovereign relations with ommuniquĂŠ from Nigerâs Ministry of Foreign Affairs, broadcast on national television, said the EU representative was called to Prime Minister Ali Mahamane Lamine Zeineâs office on Monday, November 9. The move followed comments by EU spokesperson Anouar El Anouni seeking clarification about a recent military cooperation agreement between Niger and Algeria, including the deployment of Algerian troops.
Niger called the EUâs remarks âcondescending and unacceptable,â saying the military protocol is intended to promote peace, security, stability, and development in both countries and across the region. âNiger does not receive injunctions from any country or institution,â the communiquĂŠ said. Niamey added that it âdoes not need the permission of Brussels for the exercise of its sovereigntyâ and called on the EU to explain what it described as repeated interference.
At the center of the dispute is Algeriaâs decision to deploy military units to Nigerâthe countryâs first overseas troop deployment since 1973. Approved by Algeriaâs parliament, the deployment is presented by both governments as a way to protect shared energy and economic interests under a bilateral defense agreement signed in October 2026.
Algeria has also rejected any suggestion of European oversight, saying it received no formal request for clarification and stressing that the agreement between the two neighbors is a sovereign matter.
___
Niger has summoned the European Unionâs acting chargĂŠ dâaffaires, accusing the bloc of interfering in its sovereign relations with ommuniquĂŠ from Nigerâs Ministry of Foreign Affairs, broadcast on national television, said the EU representative was called to Prime Minister Ali Mahamane Lamine Zeineâs office on Monday, November 9. The move followed comments by EU spokesperson Anouar El Anouni seeking clarification about a recent military cooperation agreement between Niger and Algeria, including the deployment of Algerian troops.
Niger called the EUâs remarks âcondescending and unacceptable,â saying the military protocol is intended to promote peace, security, stability, and development in both countries and across the region. âNiger does not receive injunctions from any country or institution,â the communiquĂŠ said. Niamey added that it âdoes not need the permission of Brussels for the exercise of its sovereigntyâ and called on the EU to explain what it described as repeated interference.
At the center of the dispute is Algeriaâs decision to deploy military units to Nigerâthe countryâs first overseas troop deployment since 1973. Approved by Algeriaâs parliament, the deployment is presented by both governments as a way to protect shared energy and economic interests under a bilateral defense agreement signed in October 2026.
Algeria has also rejected any suggestion of European oversight, saying it received no formal request for clarification and stressing that the agreement between the two neighbors is a sovereign matter.
7
67
191
4,753
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
A beautiful end to a mid November day here in Stirling, looking over the top of the town up to the castle & the sun setting low around the mountain range @VisitScotland @Scottish_Banner @BBCScotWeather @stirlingcastle #StirlingCastle @HistEnvScot @WhatOnStirling
3
5
19
557
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
AS30 Open Franchised Riggerrendum,is not Scotlands Right to Self Determination Under the UN Charter,its the Anglo British Colonialists Version of it!!!.
0
3
5
34
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
You just need to look at the franchise it was carried out under, ie everyone and his dog allowed a vote, to realise it was a waste of time....
0
3
5
36
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
Since the Covenant in 1951 Westminster has denied every attempt to restore Scotland
They move the goalposts, change the rules, redefine the timelines
They are not to be trusted, which is why it has been named Perfidious Albion since 1793
They lied to every colony & wont stop now
They move the goalposts, change the rules, redefine the timelines
They are not to be trusted, which is why it has been named Perfidious Albion since 1793
They lied to every colony & wont stop now
0
3
6
64
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
But it was designed to do the opposite, Angus. Like devolution itself it was designed to give us the illusion of a way out of the choke hold, something to make us believe and buy into passionately with no clue it was set up to close the door if not permanently then at least semi permanently. Itâs a beautiful trap - we believe and chase and try and as we do, failure whittles away the will of those who put their hearts and souls into an already captured dream. Until eventually the great movement will settle down and, largely, give up.
And we get older and more and more tired and nothing about the cry for independence captures the imagination of an (actually pro-indy), younger generation. Why should it? Once upon a time an SNP led government free of Westminster control was an inspiring prospect. Today that thought is a hard barrier to any widespread Scottish demand for independence. Oh you can say all you like that a different party would be elected after independence but thatâs not a real answer. âWeâll get the right ones in when weâre freeâ just rings hollow. âAye, and whoâll make sure they listen to the people, theyâll not bend to the war mongers and the corporations and the backhanders?â
There are two related issues here. First the game will be no more than a Westminster designed cup-de-sac as long as Westminster sets the rules. While we chase their hare and maybe just miss but never catch it, weâre captured.
Thereâs a way to change the game and itâs not by playing by their rules. We go around them. We remove the one and only hold they have - that any unilateral move towards independence will be treated as invalid and unlawful under international law (no recognition/independence) at the end by establishing the case for self determination under international law. There is huge progress being made towards this result. One example. Weâve now had a P5 member announce at the Security Council meeting in September, that the UN Secretariat needs to investigate the constitutional positions of Scotland, N. Ireland and Wales. That was the result of two years of exhausting lobbying either directly or through lines of communication that work across the members of the C24. and it is like a front page headline on the newspaper that all UN delegates read. If thatâs what a group of volunteers can achieve what on earth keeps Scottish, elected representatives from seeing that progress and saying how can we help?
Second, we need to offer a vision of independence that answers the sense of disempowerment, cynicism and rejection of the present political system - with the resulting disengagement - and speaks to the anger and disgust people are feeling about the *system* which the SNP ignored at best, in which obscene profit is generated from unmanageable energy bills, where we can be dragged into wars we donât want, where the wealthy get richer and the politicians make empty promises, where civil rights, including the right to justice, are disappearing and there is no recourse or accountability. What that vision can be is surely what we should focus on. We have a starting point in the entrenched Scottish constitution which, believe it or not, is much more than popular sovereignty. It addresses many of the burning issues with very specific rights and measures some of which need no adaptation at all. And what a rallying point for a national consciousness. But we are not even having that conversation across many groups working to restart a powerful movement.
Sorry this is long. I hope youâll give it some consideration.
And we get older and more and more tired and nothing about the cry for independence captures the imagination of an (actually pro-indy), younger generation. Why should it? Once upon a time an SNP led government free of Westminster control was an inspiring prospect. Today that thought is a hard barrier to any widespread Scottish demand for independence. Oh you can say all you like that a different party would be elected after independence but thatâs not a real answer. âWeâll get the right ones in when weâre freeâ just rings hollow. âAye, and whoâll make sure they listen to the people, theyâll not bend to the war mongers and the corporations and the backhanders?â
There are two related issues here. First the game will be no more than a Westminster designed cup-de-sac as long as Westminster sets the rules. While we chase their hare and maybe just miss but never catch it, weâre captured.
Thereâs a way to change the game and itâs not by playing by their rules. We go around them. We remove the one and only hold they have - that any unilateral move towards independence will be treated as invalid and unlawful under international law (no recognition/independence) at the end by establishing the case for self determination under international law. There is huge progress being made towards this result. One example. Weâve now had a P5 member announce at the Security Council meeting in September, that the UN Secretariat needs to investigate the constitutional positions of Scotland, N. Ireland and Wales. That was the result of two years of exhausting lobbying either directly or through lines of communication that work across the members of the C24. and it is like a front page headline on the newspaper that all UN delegates read. If thatâs what a group of volunteers can achieve what on earth keeps Scottish, elected representatives from seeing that progress and saying how can we help?
Second, we need to offer a vision of independence that answers the sense of disempowerment, cynicism and rejection of the present political system - with the resulting disengagement - and speaks to the anger and disgust people are feeling about the *system* which the SNP ignored at best, in which obscene profit is generated from unmanageable energy bills, where we can be dragged into wars we donât want, where the wealthy get richer and the politicians make empty promises, where civil rights, including the right to justice, are disappearing and there is no recourse or accountability. What that vision can be is surely what we should focus on. We have a starting point in the entrenched Scottish constitution which, believe it or not, is much more than popular sovereignty. It addresses many of the burning issues with very specific rights and measures some of which need no adaptation at all. And what a rallying point for a national consciousness. But we are not even having that conversation across many groups working to restart a powerful movement.
Sorry this is long. I hope youâll give it some consideration.
1
57
85
1,050
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
đđđđđđđ
But it was designed to do the opposite, Angus. Like devolution itself it was designed to give us the illusion of a way out of the choke hold, something to make us believe and buy into passionately with no clue it was set up to close the door if not permanently then at least semi permanently. Itâs a beautiful trap - we believe and chase and try and as we do, failure whittles away the will of those who put their hearts and souls into an already captured dream. Until eventually the great movement will settle down and, largely, give up.
And we get older and more and more tired and nothing about the cry for independence captures the imagination of an (actually pro-indy), younger generation. Why should it? Once upon a time an SNP led government free of Westminster control was an inspiring prospect. Today that thought is a hard barrier to any widespread Scottish demand for independence. Oh you can say all you like that a different party would be elected after independence but thatâs not a real answer. âWeâll get the right ones in when weâre freeâ just rings hollow. âAye, and whoâll make sure they listen to the people, theyâll not bend to the war mongers and the corporations and the backhanders?â
There are two related issues here. First the game will be no more than a Westminster designed cup-de-sac as long as Westminster sets the rules. While we chase their hare and maybe just miss but never catch it, weâre captured.
Thereâs a way to change the game and itâs not by playing by their rules. We go around them. We remove the one and only hold they have - that any unilateral move towards independence will be treated as invalid and unlawful under international law (no recognition/independence) at the end by establishing the case for self determination under international law. There is huge progress being made towards this result. One example. Weâve now had a P5 member announce at the Security Council meeting in September, that the UN Secretariat needs to investigate the constitutional positions of Scotland, N. Ireland and Wales. That was the result of two years of exhausting lobbying either directly or through lines of communication that work across the members of the C24. and it is like a front page headline on the newspaper that all UN delegates read. If thatâs what a group of volunteers can achieve what on earth keeps Scottish, elected representatives from seeing that progress and saying how can we help?
Second, we need to offer a vision of independence that answers the sense of disempowerment, cynicism and rejection of the present political system - with the resulting disengagement - and speaks to the anger and disgust people are feeling about the *system* which the SNP ignored at best, in which obscene profit is generated from unmanageable energy bills, where we can be dragged into wars we donât want, where the wealthy get richer and the politicians make empty promises, where civil rights, including the right to justice, are disappearing and there is no recourse or accountability. What that vision can be is surely what we should focus on. We have a starting point in the entrenched Scottish constitution which, believe it or not, is much more than popular sovereignty. It addresses many of the burning issues with very specific rights and measures some of which need no adaptation at all. And what a rallying point for a national consciousness. But we are not even having that conversation across many groups working to restart a powerful movement.
Sorry this is long. I hope youâll give it some consideration.
0
3
4
75
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
They won't teach you this in school, the is what the Arab slave trade looked like; the slave trade was accompanied by the spread of Islam and the castration of several male slaves. You can see that most of the Arab slave traders were Black Arabs.
9
109
195
7,550
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
Yes, how many of Scotland's MPs, MSPs and former politicians & leaders who are blocking our road to self-determination have been influenced and corrupted by the British American Partnership, the IVLP and other programmes designed to promote "empire".
3
33
44
691
RT @SSalyers2: @SeannachaidhS The description of the colonisation of the Malvinas, entirely based on English authority and referring to theâŚ
0
13
0
đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó żExploitedNationđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż retweeted
The Europeans and British arent in the room at the trilateral Peace negotiations in Abu Dhabi. đˇđş đşđ¸ đşđŚ
Why?
Well, their "Diplomatic Chief" Kallas is widely renowned as an idiot, and they and the Brits have no desire to seek Peace
Why?
Well, their "Diplomatic Chief" Kallas is widely renowned as an idiot, and they and the Brits have no desire to seek Peace
86
714
2,602
24,748