Pinned Tweet
Ron Paul was booed at the Republican debate for saying Iran didn't have a weapon (they didn't).
Then he made one of my all time favorite debate moments:
"If they're so determined to go to war, the only thing I plead with you for if this is the case, is do it properly. Ask the people and ask the Congress for a declaration of war. This is war! People are gonna die and you gotta get a declaration of war!" x.com/GoodAMLiberty/…
Then he made one of my all time favorite debate moments:
"If they're so determined to go to war, the only thing I plead with you for if this is the case, is do it properly. Ask the people and ask the Congress for a declaration of war. This is war! People are gonna die and you gotta get a declaration of war!" x.com/GoodAMLiberty/…
26
169
1,798
239,014
lol
Trump endorses an amnesty deal with Democrats, saying immigration maximalists are on the “pretty far right” and suggesting that illegals who have been in the US for 10-15 years should have an opportunity to stay.
Follow: @AFpost
0
0
8
414
Good Morning Liberty retweeted
Loyalty to the Republican Party
is not loyalty to the republic.
Loyalty to the Democratic Party
is not loyalty to democracy.
Loyalty to the Libertarian Party
is not loyalty to liberty.
is not loyalty to the republic.
Loyalty to the Democratic Party
is not loyalty to democracy.
Loyalty to the Libertarian Party
is not loyalty to liberty.
15
15
135
2,538
My shortlist for POTUS in 2028. Thomas Massie or Rand Paul? Not sure who else to add to the list.
281
32
421
11,251
Witkoff did not say they were 10 days away from having 11 nuclear warheads. He said they had enough uranium at 60% that (after enriched to 90%) would be enough to make 11 nukes. That enrichment process is estimated to take 10 days.
But enriched uranium is not a nuclear warhead. US Intel suggested a nuke would take 9–12 months or more because of damage to facilities(Midnight Hammer), loss of operational capacity, and other steps for weaponization.
So yes, Levin is lying again because he knows the truth wouldn't scare his audience enough.
But enriched uranium is not a nuclear warhead. US Intel suggested a nuke would take 9–12 months or more because of damage to facilities(Midnight Hammer), loss of operational capacity, and other steps for weaponization.
So yes, Levin is lying again because he knows the truth wouldn't scare his audience enough.
If you're such a low IQ moron that you opposed President Trump taking military action against the Islamist-terrorist regime in Iran when he was told (by them to his envoy) that they were 10-days away from having 11-nuclear warheads and had already enriched weapons grade uranium for more bombs, I don't ever want you to open your big mouth, show your contorted face, or write your asinine comments here or anywhere ever again! This would be the same Islamo-Nazi regime that has killed and maimed thousands of Americans over the last 47-years and has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of innocent young people and tried to assassinate our president and other top American officials. Your propaganda undermines the president, our military, and no doubt gave talking points to the Democrats during this election. Protecting our country is America first, fools. Just shut the hell up and crawl back under your rock.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.Community noteEven CENTCOM doesn’t have information on an Iranian nuclear program and have offered a reward for information about it
x.com/centcom/status…
2
4
30
665
Good Morning Liberty retweeted
The last neocon power grab resulted in 8 years of “Hope and Change” and a rapid and irreversible descent into communism. An unprecedented loss of both houses should surprise no one and blaming the loss on the people who told you this would happen won’t get your credibility back.
48
136
1,392
20,819
Hey @grok did Trump's envoy report that the Iranian Regime said it would have 11 nuclear warheads in 10 days?
Just to be clear, the Democrats and isolationists are telling us repeatedly that even if the Iranian regime declared that it would have 11 nuclear warheads in 10 days, they literally would have done absolutely nothing. Is that ok with everyone?
President Trump said, after half a century of this regime murdering and terrorizing Americans, and threatening to destroy our country, and when his envoy reports to him that the regime declared it would have 11 nuclear warheads in 10 days, that he had to act swiftly and decisively. But the Democrats and the isolationists would have done NOTHING!
I will never vote for suicidal ideologues and political opportunists/cowards who, in the face of such a reality, would sit on their asses and pretend such a genocidal threat by a fundamentalist terror regime does not exist. If our government is responsible for anything, it is our security as a people, not the price of sh*t.
1
1
19
1,280
Deport
I am watching all the back-and-forth on this site. Much of it is nasty, petulant, dishonest, and vile. Among the worst of it are posts from washed up politicians, self-aggrandizing podcasters, website writers, etc. It's pointless to repeatedly engage each of them and their obsessive slapdash posts. It does nothing to advance the ideals of our country and only encourages their vile behavior. If I wanted to ask thousands of my patriotic supporters to come here, most of whom don't bother with this site or even know the names of those who applaud the destruction of conservatism here, I could. But to what end or purpose? It's pointless and a waste of time.
The fact is that the mid-term elections were disastrous. The Woke Reich is gleeful. Their aim has been to defeat the Republicans and claim victory over those who've supported the President and his agenda. This includes his decision to respond to the Iranian regime’s “Death to America,” its decades of terrorism and killing/maiming of Americans, and its pursuit of nuclear weapons. They ignore the reality of Iran’s nuclear threat. In this, they parrot the Democrats and push the same ideological agenda. But President Trump had to deal with reality -- that is, when Steve Witkoff informed the President that the regime told him they were 10-days away from having 11 nuclear warheads, the isolationists wanted Trump to stand down. Even before the President acted, they began their campaign to undermine any military action and him. They soon began pushing for an “off-ramp” instead of victory. The media ate it up. It's they who extended the war up to and through the mid-terms and leak incessantly against the President and his supporters.
The Woke Reich should be patting itself on the back. They sought the defeat of the Republican Party and want to remake it into some kind of socialist-lite/isolationist/regressive - political entity. In other words, they seek to undermine this country and the MAGA movement – Making America Great Again - the President works on every day.
The mid-terms were not lost over a single issue. And anybody with a functioning brain knows that. The party not in the White House traditionally wins, some of our candidates were weak, and the messaging was confusing. Despite a robust economy, affordability remained an issue -- health care, housing, energy, etc. - and prolonging the defeat of the Iranian terrorist regime, all contributed to the results, as did the Woke Reich.
There needs to be an honest and thoughtful evaluation of events. We will do that, and we will not be dragged into some ideologically driven agenda based on fringe operators, Jerry Springer-like performers, and shock-jock loudmouths. While those people will never support a strong, pro-America First agenda or a unified opposition to the radical Democrats and their Marxist-Islamist agenda, including their war on the Constitution and capitalism, we will. And we will do what we have to do to save this country in spite of them.
0
1
28
669
For years I’ve been told Republicans can’t make the big changes that would be good for America because those changes are too unpopular and they’d lose their jobs.
Funny that doesn’t stop them from doing other extremely unpopular things that are bad for America and cost them oodnight
Funny that doesn’t stop them from doing other extremely unpopular things that are bad for America and cost them oodnight
1
15
67
880
Trump Had a Winning Coalition. Then He Blew It. youtu.be/DeUSDtFMImA?is…
1
2
14
473
Good Morning Liberty retweeted
Ron Paul was booed at the Republican debate for saying Iran didn't have a weapon (they didn't).
Then he made one of my all time favorite debate moments:
"If they're so determined to go to war, the only thing I plead with you for if this is the case, is do it properly. Ask the people and ask the Congress for a declaration of war. This is war! People are gonna die and you gotta get a declaration of war!" x.com/GoodAMLiberty/…
Then he made one of my all time favorite debate moments:
"If they're so determined to go to war, the only thing I plead with you for if this is the case, is do it properly. Ask the people and ask the Congress for a declaration of war. This is war! People are gonna die and you gotta get a declaration of war!" x.com/GoodAMLiberty/…
26
169
1,798
239,014
MAGA’s outright refusal to criticize anything Trump did over the last two years led Republicans to this moment.
Trump abandoned the coalition that elected him and instead gauged his popularity by the support of a self-declared group most known for supporting everything he does. e Fox News Boomers while the 18-29 demographic shifted +43pts toward Democrats.
He listened to the Grahams, Levins & Shapiros when those people clearly have an aim other than what’s best for America.
What a complete waste. They got what they deserved, and America, which keeps pushing for or allowing the continuous growth of the State, will get what it deserves, too.
Trump abandoned the coalition that elected him and instead gauged his popularity by the support of a self-declared group most known for supporting everything he does. e Fox News Boomers while the 18-29 demographic shifted +43pts toward Democrats.
He listened to the Grahams, Levins & Shapiros when those people clearly have an aim other than what’s best for America.
What a complete waste. They got what they deserved, and America, which keeps pushing for or allowing the continuous growth of the State, will get what it deserves, too.
3
9
34
801
Trump leading the campaign to oust Thomas Massie was the final nail in the coffin for me.
America had one Representative in Congress that fought for limited & constitutional government.
He’s the true representative of the 2024 coalition that got Trump elected (MAHA, America First, Libertarians, etc.).
Fought against funding the programs that produce the Nick Shirley fraud videos MAGA gets so up in arms about.
Introduced legislation to abolish the Education Department multiple times (Trump campaign promise. Congress fully funded the ED after Trump signed an EO “abolishing” it, and Trump signed off on that funding).
Fought against glyphosate immunity (RFKJ should like this, but he backed Trump’s Defense Production Act immunity for glyphosate manufacturers).
Has been trying to get legislation passed to help ranchers and farmers produce the beef needed to get prices back down (by getting the federal government out of the way).
Fought consistently against unconstitutional war (and this war is unconstitutional, the founders were abundantly clear on this).
He was taken out for pushing the Epstein Files, another Trump campaign promise. Republicans were told for years by the Republicans in this administration that they would release the files. They didn’t. Tried to sweep it under the rug. Massie forced it and made them look bad. To them this was unforgivable.
As I’ve said multiple times before, for me it wasn’t about Massie himself. It’s about what he tried to represent in Congress. This administration and Republicans in Congress officially came out against those things when they went after Massie.
They don’t deserve to win. You can be mad at me if you want but this was Trump’s choice.
America had one Representative in Congress that fought for limited & constitutional government.
He’s the true representative of the 2024 coalition that got Trump elected (MAHA, America First, Libertarians, etc.).
Fought against funding the programs that produce the Nick Shirley fraud videos MAGA gets so up in arms about.
Introduced legislation to abolish the Education Department multiple times (Trump campaign promise. Congress fully funded the ED after Trump signed an EO “abolishing” it, and Trump signed off on that funding).
Fought against glyphosate immunity (RFKJ should like this, but he backed Trump’s Defense Production Act immunity for glyphosate manufacturers).
Has been trying to get legislation passed to help ranchers and farmers produce the beef needed to get prices back down (by getting the federal government out of the way).
Fought consistently against unconstitutional war (and this war is unconstitutional, the founders were abundantly clear on this).
He was taken out for pushing the Epstein Files, another Trump campaign promise. Republicans were told for years by the Republicans in this administration that they would release the files. They didn’t. Tried to sweep it under the rug. Massie forced it and made them look bad. To them this was unforgivable.
As I’ve said multiple times before, for me it wasn’t about Massie himself. It’s about what he tried to represent in Congress. This administration and Republicans in Congress officially came out against those things when they went after Massie.
They don’t deserve to win. You can be mad at me if you want but this was Trump’s choice.
52
256
2,164
24,932
You can be against wasteful military spending and needless wars while also realizing that we spend 13% of our budget on “defense.”
You could cut this out entirely and that $965 billion cut would still leave us with a $1 trillion deficit.
Cutting military by half would still leave us borrowing $1.5 trillion more each year.
Even the most charitable projections say a program like Bernie’s wealth tax would collect $400 billion each year.
And when politicians are advocating for that tax they don’t say we could lower the deficit. They list off $800 billion worth of new programs it will pay for.
We won’t fix this by cutting one program slightly while increasing taxes and adding new programs.
Taxation is not the issue. We’re taxing enough that with a government the size it was right before Covid- we’d have a balanced budget.
The left wants to cut military but keep/increase welfare & entitlements. The right wants to keep military and my god don’t even talk about touching the biggest entitlements.
Everything must be cut. It’s that or collapse. Those are your options.
You could cut this out entirely and that $965 billion cut would still leave us with a $1 trillion deficit.
Cutting military by half would still leave us borrowing $1.5 trillion more each year.
Even the most charitable projections say a program like Bernie’s wealth tax would collect $400 billion each year.
And when politicians are advocating for that tax they don’t say we could lower the deficit. They list off $800 billion worth of new programs it will pay for.
We won’t fix this by cutting one program slightly while increasing taxes and adding new programs.
Taxation is not the issue. We’re taxing enough that with a government the size it was right before Covid- we’d have a balanced budget.
The left wants to cut military but keep/increase welfare & entitlements. The right wants to keep military and my god don’t even talk about touching the biggest entitlements.
Everything must be cut. It’s that or collapse. Those are your options.
Your taxes aren’t high because struggling families need food stamps or poor children need school lunches.
They’re high because Washington spends billions on wars while handing massive tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy.
14
24
162
3,575
Every American should rise up and make it 100% clear this is what we want because it’s actually America First.
That way it doesn’t happen.
That way it doesn’t happen.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
13
6
57
1,672

















