Pinned Tweet
🎬🧵VIDEO THREAD

(Re-creating due to videos being corrupted)

Explaining how #Ethereum is a con game to enrich the biggest #ETH holders/stakers at the expense of users

📺 #1: Pre-Sale 📺

“Not sold for speculative purposes & started decentralized”

-Joe Lubin / ETH Foundation
116
391
1,096
687,476
Richard “Dick” Whitman (🌎/21M) retweeted
280
455
4,485
259,911
Nobody even asks “who’s selling bitcoin” anymore when the price drops.

….cause it’s just the same old exchange fraud & leveraged futures bullshit
2
0
16
709
“Ethereum treasury company”
3
0
28
2,067
That tard Tom Lee also signed the Ethereum foundation suicide pledge…

…he made a career suicide pledge
0
0
14
713
“Optimizing eth for store of value”

After years of saying bitcoin was a store of value & eth was for other things…

…while also telling that idiot Tom Lee to not buy any more cause it might make it not decentralized

“store of of value”

Eth is a complete house of cards
3. Optimizing for ETH as SoV is aligned with decentralization and CROPS

Whenever I ask what people appreciate the most about Ethereum (as opposed to either other blockchains, or anything outside the blockchain world), the most common answer is: decentralization and CROPS (censorship and capture resistance, open source, privacy and security).

Decentralization and CROPS have a lot of value, even to institutions. For individuals, privacy is often viewed as an abstract ideology. For institutions, it's prudent risk management, data protection law compliance, and a number of other things. Likewise for security. And likewise for running your own node (enterprise buzzword: "on-prem deployment").

But what about for the ETH holder? Well, it depends why you're an ETH holder. If you want ETH to optimally chase financial trends and collect fees from them, then you want a Fearless Leader™ who bravely shouts on the socials that Ethereum loves [insert opportunity here] and will pragmatically reconfigure itself to give it explicit protocol support.

But if your primary reason to hold ETH is as an SoV, then you will be judging ETH by SoV-ish metrics. And what is the first and most important SoV-ish metric?

To survive.

That's what a big chunk of this last Devcon was about ("post-quantum and post-AI"). You want a chain that is taking conservative tradeoffs ("hash-only security, all formally proven, >3x more rounds than known to be necessary for security"). You want a chain that is aiming for at least partial ossification, where the great balance of work will move to higher levels of the stack once the core is complete. You want a chain that aims to minimize protocol politics, by having a very high bar before it accepts either precompiles that bloat the protocol or new kinds of in-protocol rewards that could get captured.

What other SoV'ish metrics?

The ability to easily hold it safely (hence, work on multisigs).
The ability to hold it privately (hence, kohaku work).
The ability to hold it privately *and* safely (hence, 8288 and private-AA workstreams already starting).
The guarantee that if you have coins, you can send them, and block builders can't stop you (FOCIL)
Minimized infrastructure dependence (basically the whole decentralization roadmap, including the fact that I am able to currently run a node on this laptop, and it synced in < 6 hours and takes up only 1/8 of my hard drive - better stats than in 2019!)

Now, are there "adoption" goals that are highly synergistic with SoV?

Very much so.

The more assets there are natively issued on L1, including both RWAs and native decentralized assets, the larger a set of things you can "do" with your ETH, the better. Being able to easily (including safely, trustlessly) convert back and forth between ETH and other assets, use ETH as collateral to do things with other assets, etc, all forms part of the utility of holding ETH.

There are still some conflicts between serving these use cases and decentralization (eg. we want to be careful about fast slots and impact on centralization), but on the whole much less than what you get if you maximize fees.

Conclusion:

The best social reason to care about Ethereum is because it makes decentralization and CROPS properties a reality for more people and uses.

The best private reason to hold ETH is its SoV properties, which are a direct consequence of that decentralization and CROPS.
8
3
41
1,313
Replying to @GhostofWhitman
These can’t be real people, right?
0
0
1
106
Super intelligence
Damn they’re giving the AI interviewers some personality now

(from itsnickreid on TikTok)
0
0
13
1,203
Oof
🚨 ETHEREUM FOUNDATION SUED OVER MANDATE REQUIRING EMPLOYEES TO PLEDGE TO “TAKE HIS OR HER OWN LIFE WITH A SWORD”

Former Ethereum Foundation employee Kayleen Fulton alleges she was fired just 13 days after disclosing her ovarian cancer diagnosis and 12 days after organizing ation’s controversial Mandate.

According to the lawsuit:

• The Mandate contained a pledge to commit suicide with a sword for violating its terms.

• 79 employees voted to remove the provision, but the Foundation published it unchanged.

• Vitalik Buterin allegedly promised “significant changes” before the document was permanently inscribed on Ethereum.

• 53 employees signed a letter opposing forced affirmation of the Mandate. Both organizers were subsequently fired.

• The plaintiff alleges she was fired just 13 days after disclosing her cancer diagnosis and 12 days after organizing the protest.

The lawsuit alleges disability discrimination and retaliation. The allegations have not been proven in court.
2
0
19
952
Turns out the VC podcaster circle jerk propaganda is the essentially same thing as the mainstream media. Who knew?
All In realizes they’ve lost “the podcast bros”

All your bros is gone to us
4
3
38
1,780
Nvidia CEO, Jensen Huang falling for a Chinese Spy honeypot.

Nothing to see here.

Sell your bitcoin &amp; buy AI stonks.
2
3
39
1,405
Don’t forget that this week is open enrollment for health insurance!
10
0
54
1,541
Sheesh. Thai shit just popped up on my feed &amp; Peter McCormack appeared in the video. Dude looks like hell 😆
27
2
93
9,508
Same
My cell is infested with cockroaches and ants. I kill all roaches.

Ants I leave alone, I like their teamwork. Unless they’re walking on the walls then I kill them.

I don’t like show-offs.
0
0
2
1,175
The US government:
drone drone drone drone drone drone drone drone drone drone dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne drone drone dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne drone drone dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne dr0ne drone drone drone drone drone drone drone drone.....
0
0
8
819
Seeing a lot of clips of whores on podcasts on lately.
5
0
19
2,345
Replying to @GhostofWhitman
Whores on podcasts
Abella Danger explains why one OnlyFans video does not make you a porn star

“No fuck you. I’ve been on set for like 12 hours fucking 35 guys and once I earned that title, you went on OnlyFans one night and you’re a porn star now? Fuck you”

“If I started OnlyFans tomorrow and put up a single video of me fucking around, I’m a porn star? … You don’t feel like you have to earn it”

“I think you have to have done anal too. There are plenty of popular women who have filmed themselves having sex on camera for money, they’re not porn stars. You gotta go the extra mile”

“Mia Khalifa never did anal. She’s not a porn star. Don’t get me started on Mia Khalifa. That’s a girl who hated being associated with it… Why do you still use your porn name? Why do you still profit off it? Change your name, change your look, get face surgery, go work at McDonald’s. Have a normal job”

“I actually think the OnlyFans revolution will be really important for the porn industry… Your best friend is doing OnlyFans and it’s like, well you love that person… it’ll change a lot of people’s minds”
x.com/wandermist/sta…
Community note
The quotes in this clip criticizing OnlyFans creators and Mia Khalifa are spoken by the interviewer, not Abella Danger. She responds more inclusively and states that the OnlyFans revolution will be important for the porn industry.
youtube.com/watch?v=WfdmjR…
1
0
0
191
Richard “Dick” Whitman (🌎/21M) retweeted
Jack explains why Bitcoin's proof of work began as a 1997 plan to put spammers out of business:
4
16
128
10,609