As usual, rAma gives a 100 unimportant reasons for this incident as well embedding the actual reason in his statements indirectly.😄

दीर्घकालोषिता हीयं रावणान्तःपुरे- This is the cause of her deserving agni pariksha. But why did this even happen? I think many know now.
You people should read scriptures before peddling nonsense. Rama’s stated reason is public credibility and the conviction of the three worlds, not simply that he personally wanted to clear any possible doubt about Sita. (Yuddha Kand, Sarga 118)
0
0
2
109
Firstly, bhagavAn has no karma.

Secondly, what do you even think "karma" is? bhagavAn's pleasure creates puNya. His displeasure creates pApa. So what is this new independent "karma tattva" for bhagavAn you are blabbering about?+
So what is written in the screen shot? Is it not from valimiki ramayana?
What about the story of death of Krishna being karma for vali's death? Is that wrong?
2
5
40
735
Replying to @DefiledGod
Thirdly, vAli attained paramapada, all his puNya & papa had cleared, hence nothing was accrued by even sugrIva, let alone bhagavAn who is immune.

So what karma is there now to disseminate and for whom?+
1
1
11
149
Replying to @DefiledGod
Fourthly, krishna allowed the arrow to hit him since durvAsa's pAyasa covered the rest of his form, as explained before.

As the condition of this pAyasa is to keep his form from disappearing off the Earth, he couldn't simply "unmanifest" to respect durvAsa's tapas.//
1
1
9
131
Oshi No Ko is a well-written anime. The characters are all so engaging with respect to their motivations.

And they manage to pack every episode with enough meaningful scenes to move the plot while giving a slice of life perspective as well.
1
0
8
291
MB gives 3 reasons for Krishna choosing to accept Sara's arrow:

लोकस्थितिपालनार्थं - As long as he stays, kali yuga will not set in. So he left to allow for the natural yuga cycle.

दुर्वासवाक्यप्रतिपालनार्थम् - To make the words of durvAsa true, due to the latter's tapas+
Let me explain in this thread, why Krishna allowed Jara to shoot him in the foot.

The first thing to note is that, this was an outcome of two things – durvAsa’s prediction and gAndhArI’s curse+
1
7
45
1,722
Replying to @DefiledGod
देवोऽपि संदेहविमोक्षहेतोर् - Though he is the one with a radiant, eternal form (देव), he used jarA as a vyAja to give up the temporary non-material form (संदेह).

संदेह does not mean doubt, but means the auspicious form of Krishna that is an aggregate of shuddha-sattva shaktis//
0
3
13
333
Let me explain in this thread, why Krishna allowed Jara to shoot him in the foot.

The first thing to note is that, this was an outcome of two things – durvAsa’s prediction and gAndhArI’s curse+
2
10
38
3,778
Replying to @DefiledGod
About the deer analogy now – rAma who gave mukti to vAli chased after an illusory deer, getting separated from sIta (a devotee) in the process.

jarA who gained mukti chased after bhagavAn’s foot thinking it was a deer and attained union with bhagavAn in the process+
1
2
9
193
Replying to @DefiledGod
It was his sankalpa to chase an illusory deer for separating from sIta & also to create an illusion of a deer with his foot, to enable jarA’s union with bhagavAn in mukti.

Some claim Ananda rAmAyaNa equates jarA and vAli. Not true. I will explain the relevant shlokas later.//
2
2
12
246