The best coding AI costs up to $500 a month.
We made it free.
DeepAI Code: Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 in your free daily allowance. Fast models free, no limits. No card. No API key.
deepai.org/chat/ai-code
We made it free.
DeepAI Code: Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 in your free daily allowance. Fast models free, no limits. No card. No API key.
deepai.org/chat/ai-code
162
200
3,106
Website Builder is here.
Describe your site in one sentence. DeepAI writes the copy, designs the pages and makes the images. Edit by chatting. Publish in minutes.
No code. No designers. Beta for Pro users.
Try it: deepai.org/website-builder
Describe your site in one sentence. DeepAI writes the copy, designs the pages and makes the images. Edit by chatting. Publish in minutes.
No code. No designers. Beta for Pro users.
Try it: deepai.org/website-builder
32
3
121
I'm gonna bring back a purple gorilla and give it AGI!
pretty interesting that the category is converging on the same visual grammar almost comically fast too.
you’ve got a blob, a face, some “eyes”, you gotta give it some soft geometry, add in some emotions via animations, & of course a very friendly affect.
0
0
0
If you can imagine it, you can generate it on deepai.org!
TOMMY TUBERVILLE WARNS THAT “MANY” PILOTS, FLIGHT ATTENDANTS AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ARE FURRIES: “Lord help us. It’s terrifying when you think about this.”
Tuberville claimed on the Senate floor that airline workers being part of the furry community poses a danger to lot “could have a deranged fetish of dressing up like an animal.”
0
0
0
You text it. It handles it.
Book the table, call the place, sort the details. All from iMessage.
No waitlist. No invites. Works today.
Text "Hi" to +1 (628) 789-6836
deepai.org/imessage-ai
Book the table, call the place, sort the details. All from iMessage.
No waitlist. No invites. Works today.
Text "Hi" to +1 (628) 789-6836
deepai.org/imessage-ai
0
0
1
Your most useful contact isn’t a person.
Meet DeepAI in iMessage.
Text it to research something, create images, or build your website. Send a voice note. Give it a call. No new app!
Just text “Hi” to +1 (628) 789-6836.
deepai.org/imessage-ai
Meet DeepAI in iMessage.
Text it to research something, create images, or build your website. Send a voice note. Give it a call. No new app!
Just text “Hi” to +1 (628) 789-6836.
deepai.org/imessage-ai
6
3
9
We are now serving Fugu Ultra! Available to all of our pro subscribers starting now. Mythos level intelligence at half the price is no fable; it's reality now.
Introducing Sakana Fugu: A full multi-agent orchestration system accessible via a single model API.
Our ‘Fugu Ultra’ model matches the performance of Fable and Mythos, delivering frontier capability without the risk of export controls.
Try it: sakana.ai/fugu 🐡
1
0
2
You can totally imagine these headlines in the background of some singularity sci-fi film while the main characters have a single bite of toast before heading to work, leaving a full spread of bacon, eggs, pancakes, fresh fruit, orange juice, and coffee completely untouched
0
0
1
Only 5 days left in our contest, with exactly ONE (1) entrant so far who will win the grand prize by default! Hurry up and post a video!!!
DeepAI is offering ONE THOUSAND dollars for the best AI video!
You don't have to make an ad; we want you to make a the most compelling video you can with AI tools (including but not limited to DeepAI).
We want everyone to have fun and create with AI! Official rules below...
7
1
11
Turns out this works in humans too
🚨 MIT proved you can delete 90% of a neural network without losing accuracy.
Researchers found that inside every massive model, there is a "winning ticket”, a tiny subnetwork that does all the heavy lifting.
They proved if you find it and reset it to its original state, it he giant version.
But there was a catch that killed adoption instantly..
you had to train the massive model first to find the ticket. nobody wanted to train twice just to deploy once. it was a cool academic flex, but useless for production.
The original 2018 paper was mind-blowing:
But today, after 8 years…
We finally have the silicon-level breakthrough we were waiting for: structured sparsity.
Modern GPUs (NVIDIA Ampere+) don’t just “simulate” pruning anymore.
They have native support for block sparsity (2:4 patterns) built directly into the hardware.
It’s not theoretical, it’s silicon-level acceleration.
The math is terrifyingly good: a 90% sparse network = 50% less memory bandwidth + 2× compute throughput. Real speed.. zero accuracy loss.
Three things just made this production-ready in 2026:
- pruning-aware training (you train sparse from day one)
- native support in pytorch 2.0 and the apple neural engine
- the realization that ai models are 90% redundant by design
Evolution over-parameterizes everything. We’re finally learning how to prune.
The era of bloated, inefficient models is officially over. The tooling finally caught up to the theory, and the winners are going to be the ones who stop paying for 90% of weights they don’t even need.
The future of AI is smaller, faster, and smarter.
0
2
7
Harry Harlow’s 1950s monkey doll studies revealed that infant rhesus monkeys prioritize comfort and warmth over food-driven sustenance. When given a choice, monkeys clung to a soft cloth doll rather than a wire doll providing milk
This is crazyCommunity noteThe video is AI-generated, as indicated by garbled, nonsensical text on signs (e.g., "KRTECH," "NRTEL") that do not match any real companies or events, along with other visual inconsistencies. x.com/procesor_x_cor… youtube.com/shorts/aV-FG8f…
1
1
3
@StealthQE4 Adjusted for inflation oil prices have been higher before now... you're being a bit dramatic
0
0
1
DeepAI is offering ONE THOUSAND dollars for the best AI video!
You don't have to make an ad; we want you to make a the most compelling video you can with AI tools (including but not limited to DeepAI).
We want everyone to have fun and create with AI! Official rules below...
You don't have to make an ad; we want you to make a the most compelling video you can with AI tools (including but not limited to DeepAI).
We want everyone to have fun and create with AI! Official rules below...
We're going to launch a video generation contest soon, and unlike Grok's it won't be rigged!
Stay tuned...
10
0
11
Socrates predicted this. And he was right! But, it's complicated, because he was also wrong.
🚨BREAKING: MIT hooked people up to brain scanners while they used ChatGPT.
What they found should concern every single person reading this.
ChatGPT users showed 55% weaker brain connectivity than people who didn't use it. Not after years. After just four months.
Here's how le were split into three groups: one used ChatGPT to write essays, one used Google, and one used nothing but their own brain. They wore EEG monitors that tracked their brain activity in real time across four sessions over four months.
The brain-only group built the strongest, most widespread neural networks. Google users were in the middle. ChatGPT users had the weakest brains in the room. Every time.
Then the memory test hit. Participants were asked to recall what they'd just written minutes earlier. 83% of ChatGPT users couldn't quote a single line from their own essay. They wrote it. They couldn't remember it. The words passed through them like they were never there.
It gets worse. In the final session, ChatGPT users were told to write without AI. Their brains were measurably weaker than people who never used AI at all. 78% still couldn't recall their own writing. The damage didn't go away when the tool was removed.
Meanwhile, brain-only users who tried ChatGPT for the first time? Their brains lit up. They wrote better prompts. They retained more. Their brains were already strong enough to use AI as a tool instead of a crutch.
The researchers also found that every ChatGPT essay on the same topic looked almost identical. More facts, more dates, more names. But less original thinking. Everyone using ChatGPT produced the same generic output while believing it was their own.
MIT gave this a name: cognitive debt. Like financial debt, you borrow convenience now and pay with your thinking ability later. Except there's no way to pay it back.
The question isn't whether ChatGPT is useful. It's whether the price is your ability to think without it.
0
0
2
a key takeaway is that vibe coding is still skill-gated. a lot of technical people drastically underestimate how much of their skills and background knowledge they bring to the table when they use AI, and therefore think it is more disruptive today than it is.
A non technical s prompt. They just don't know how!
A non technical s prompt. They just don't know how!
It is hard to communicate how much programming has changed due to AI in the last 2 months: not gradually and over time in the "progress as usual" way, but specifically this last December. There are a number of asterisks but imo coding agents basically didn’t work before December and basically work since - the models have significantly higher quality, long-term coherence and tenacity and they can power through large and long tasks, well past enough that it is extremely disruptive to the default programming workflow.
Just to give an example, over the weekend I was building a local video analysis dashboard for the cameras of my home so I wrote: “Here is the local IP and username/password of my DGX Spark. Log in, set up ssh keys, set up vLLM, download and bench Qwen3-VL, set up a server endpoint to inference videos, a basic web ui dashboard, test everything, set it up with systemd, record memory notes for yourself and write up a markdown report for me”. The agent went off for ~30 minutes, ran into multiple issues, researched solutions online, resolved them one by one, wrote the code, tested it, debugged it, set up the services, and came back with the report and it was just done. I didn’t touch anything. All of this could easily have been a weekend project just 3 months ago but today it’s something you kick off and forget about for 30 minutes.
As a result, programming is becoming unrecognizable. You’re not typing computer code into an editor like the way things were since computers were invented, that era is over. You're spinning up AI agents, giving them tasks *in English* and managing and reviewing their work in parallel. The biggest prize is in figuring out how you can keep ascending the layers of abstraction to set up long-running orchestrator Claws with all of the right tools, memory and instructions that productively manage multiple parallel Code instances for you. The leverage achievable via top tier "agentic engineering" feels very high right now.
It’s not perfect, it needs high-level direction, judgement, taste, oversight, iteration and hints and ideas. It works a lot better in some scenarios than others (e.g. especially for tasks that are well-specified and where you can verify/test functionality). The key is to build intuition to decompose the task just right to hand off the parts that work and help out around the edges. But imo, this is nowhere near "business as usual" time in software.
3
1
5
