Pinned Tweet
You can now trade pre-IPO perpetuals on Monad. 馃憖
Get exposure to the price movements of private companies before they go public, without owning their actual shares.
An interesting development for @LeverUp_xyz and the direction onchain trading is heading.
But this might only ou're not paying attention to what's coming next on leverup, you might want to start.
Stay close. The next chapter could be interesting.
LeverUp on Monad. 馃煟
Get exposure to the price movements of private companies before they go public, without owning their actual shares.
An interesting development for @LeverUp_xyz and the direction onchain trading is heading.
But this might only ou're not paying attention to what's coming next on leverup, you might want to start.
Stay close. The next chapter could be interesting.
LeverUp on Monad. 馃煟
101
53
137
6,878
The @IPXExchange 脳 Orange County Choppers Originals (OCCO) AMA covered much more than the upcoming token launch. There were some interesting discussions about entertainment, creators, fan participation and what IPX is building.
Here are some of the key things discussed:
1. OCCO collaborations.
2. Token-holder benefits and exclusive production access.
3. IPX's approach to artist revenue and its 10% success fee.
4. Smart-contract transparency and how users can verify project information.
5. ALFRED and its role in helping creators develop projects.
6. IPX's Creator OS, talent discovery and production support.
7. IP acquisition, independent filmmaking and project financing.
8. FAN SZN, AURA rewards and upcoming creative competitions.
9. IPX Studios and opportunities for film and entertainment distribution.
One part I found particularly interesting was the discussion about OCCO token-holder benefits.
The team explained that OCCO holders could receive different experiences depending on their holding levels.
At 100 OCC, the Garage Pass tier was described as offering weekly drops, original Clip Raw artwork and editing access.
At 1,000 OCC, the proposed benefits include access to Raw Build Daily, where holders can follow production content, comment and share their thoughts, alongside exclusive merchandise and a 1.25x FAN SZN value-contribution multiplier.
The higher tiers go further. The team discussed premiere screenings, monthly private Q&As with Paul Sr., production call sheets and participation in a 5% reward pool.
Other proposed experiences include visiting the shop, participating in a bike build, getting your name in an episode's credits and IMDb listing, and attending VIP bike unveilings.
At the highest level, the team even discussed a one-on-one bike design session with Paul Sr., having a custom bike built and featured in an episode, and getting a naming plaque on the bike. This tier was also described as offering a 2x rewards multiplier.
Beyond the rewards, the team also discussed bringing production closer to the community through live streams and multi-camera control-room access. This would allow holders to follow the process behind the show instead of only seeing the finished episodes.
They also announced plans for OCCO Season 2 to be on-chain and aired on Amazon Prime Video, with celebrity bike builds involving Ja Rule, Busta Rhymes and Ozuna.
What stood out to me is that the OCCO model is exploring ways to give fans more than access to a finished show. It is looking at how they can become part of the experience surrounding its production.
The team clarified that these reward tiers and benefits are still subject to change before the on-chain launch, and that each IPX project will have its own reward structure.
A very informative session. Looking forward to seeing how these plans develop.
My IPX referral link:
fanszn.ipx.exchange/i/FAN-96NV
Here are some of the key things discussed:
1. OCCO collaborations.
2. Token-holder benefits and exclusive production access.
3. IPX's approach to artist revenue and its 10% success fee.
4. Smart-contract transparency and how users can verify project information.
5. ALFRED and its role in helping creators develop projects.
6. IPX's Creator OS, talent discovery and production support.
7. IP acquisition, independent filmmaking and project financing.
8. FAN SZN, AURA rewards and upcoming creative competitions.
9. IPX Studios and opportunities for film and entertainment distribution.
One part I found particularly interesting was the discussion about OCCO token-holder benefits.
The team explained that OCCO holders could receive different experiences depending on their holding levels.
At 100 OCC, the Garage Pass tier was described as offering weekly drops, original Clip Raw artwork and editing access.
At 1,000 OCC, the proposed benefits include access to Raw Build Daily, where holders can follow production content, comment and share their thoughts, alongside exclusive merchandise and a 1.25x FAN SZN value-contribution multiplier.
The higher tiers go further. The team discussed premiere screenings, monthly private Q&As with Paul Sr., production call sheets and participation in a 5% reward pool.
Other proposed experiences include visiting the shop, participating in a bike build, getting your name in an episode's credits and IMDb listing, and attending VIP bike unveilings.
At the highest level, the team even discussed a one-on-one bike design session with Paul Sr., having a custom bike built and featured in an episode, and getting a naming plaque on the bike. This tier was also described as offering a 2x rewards multiplier.
Beyond the rewards, the team also discussed bringing production closer to the community through live streams and multi-camera control-room access. This would allow holders to follow the process behind the show instead of only seeing the finished episodes.
They also announced plans for OCCO Season 2 to be on-chain and aired on Amazon Prime Video, with celebrity bike builds involving Ja Rule, Busta Rhymes and Ozuna.
What stood out to me is that the OCCO model is exploring ways to give fans more than access to a finished show. It is looking at how they can become part of the experience surrounding its production.
The team clarified that these reward tiers and benefits are still subject to change before the on-chain launch, and that each IPX project will have its own reward structure.
A very informative session. Looking forward to seeing how these plans develop.
My IPX referral link:
fanszn.ipx.exchange/i/FAN-96NV
2
0
4
197
饾棖饾椏饾槅饾椊饾榿饾椉饾棫饾棽饾榾饾榿饾棽饾椏 retweeted
Category Labs has proposed MIP-21, which raises max contract size to 256 kb (currently 128 kb)
This is more complicated than simply changing a parameter, for two reasons:
1. Per-tx gas limit on Monad is 30M gas. 200 gas/byte * 256 kb would be 52M gas. In order to support this without raising the per-tx gas limit, MIP-21 introduces a way for the deployer to pay some of the MON in gas and some as a deposit
2. Cold code access currently has a flat price, whether the contract is tiny or 128 kb. MIP-20 (proposed simultaneously) makes the loading charge depend on code size. This fixes a mispricing which would get more severe with 256 kb contracts. If several contracts use the same bytecode, the code load cost only gets charged once
Hopefully this improves life for developers, while introducing an approach that threads the needle between DevEx and DoS-resistance
This is more complicated than simply changing a parameter, for two reasons:
1. Per-tx gas limit on Monad is 30M gas. 200 gas/byte * 256 kb would be 52M gas. In order to support this without raising the per-tx gas limit, MIP-21 introduces a way for the deployer to pay some of the MON in gas and some as a deposit
2. Cold code access currently has a flat price, whether the contract is tiny or 128 kb. MIP-20 (proposed simultaneously) makes the loading charge depend on code size. This fixes a mispricing which would get more severe with 256 kb contracts. If several contracts use the same bytecode, the code load cost only gets charged once
Hopefully this improves life for developers, while introducing an approach that threads the needle between DevEx and DoS-resistance
20
32
158
5,905
饾棖饾椏饾槅饾椊饾榿饾椉饾棫饾棽饾榾饾榿饾棽饾椏 retweeted
fable 5.2 is out now, and this dev went straight for the limit
100 single-file HTML experiments, 76 published
these are games, 3D scenes, interactive tools, all from one prompt each
@AnthropicAI did it again 馃敟 link to all files below
have you tested fable 5.2 yet? it's in your pro plan
100 single-file HTML experiments, 76 published
these are games, 3D scenes, interactive tools, all from one prompt each
@AnthropicAI did it again 馃敟 link to all files below
have you tested fable 5.2 yet? it's in your pro plan
46
6
122
1,589
饾棖饾椏饾槅饾椊饾榿饾椉饾棫饾棽饾榾饾榿饾棽饾椏 retweeted
person go dey survive on loan, una go dey beg am for money馃槕
28
7
43
483
饾棖饾椏饾槅饾椊饾榿饾椉饾棫饾棽饾榾饾榿饾棽饾椏 retweeted
the rate at which Category Labs and Monad Foundation team is shipping is insane!
I can't keep up 馃槶
I can't keep up 馃槶
6
4
47
1,857
A crypto exchange can attract millions of traders, offer thousands of tokens and process billions in transactions. But none of that means much if it cannot properly manage the risks happening on its platform.
The recent situation involving MEXC is a reminder of how important become.
On November 6, the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced an order identifying MEXC Global as a primary money laundering concern.
According to FinCEN, MEXC allegedly facilitated at least $16 billion in transactions connected to sanctions evasion, cybercrime and other illegal activities between May 2021 and May 2026.
This is a serious matter, but MEXC is not the first crypto platform to face major regulatory action in the United States.
We've seen other examples:
- Bittrex: In 2022, FinCEN imposed a $29.28 million penalty for failures involving anti-money laundering controls and suspicious transaction reporting. Bittrex also settled a separate OFAC sanctions case for $24.28 million, with that payment credited against its FinCEN penalty.
- BitMEX: In January 2025, the exchange was fined $100 million for failing to establish and maintain an adequate anti-money laundering and customer verification programme.
- Paxful: In December 2025, FinCEN imposed a $3.5 million penalty after identifying more than $500 million in suspicious activity involving illicit actors. Paxful also admitted to violations of its anti-money laundering obligations.
These cases show that compliance failures have affected different parts of the crypto industry. They also show that having a popular platform and a large user base does not remove the responsibility to monitor transactions properly.
Now, what matters to me is how MEXC responds to its own situation.
MEXC has announced an independent review of its anti-money laundering and sanctions controls. It has also said it is reviewing the FinCEN order with its legal and compliance teams and intends to engage with the relevant authorities.
I consider these positive steps. MEXC deserves the opportunity to explain its position, address the allegations and demonstrate what it is doing to improve its compliance systems.
I also have a concern about how competitors approach situations like this.
An exchange should not automatically be considered more trustworthy simply because another platform is facing regulatory pressure. Competitors have their own histories and responsibilities, and they should be prepared to demonstrate that their compliance systems meet the required standards too.
I am not saying MEXC should escape scrutiny. I want the exchange to provide clear answers and follow through on its commitments. But I also want its competitors to face the same level of accountability.
My position is simple: give MEXC a fair opportunity to address the allegations, judge every exchange by its own actions, and don't confuse market reputation with proven compliance.
#mexc #Web3 #Security
The recent situation involving MEXC is a reminder of how important become.
On November 6, the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced an order identifying MEXC Global as a primary money laundering concern.
According to FinCEN, MEXC allegedly facilitated at least $16 billion in transactions connected to sanctions evasion, cybercrime and other illegal activities between May 2021 and May 2026.
This is a serious matter, but MEXC is not the first crypto platform to face major regulatory action in the United States.
We've seen other examples:
- Bittrex: In 2022, FinCEN imposed a $29.28 million penalty for failures involving anti-money laundering controls and suspicious transaction reporting. Bittrex also settled a separate OFAC sanctions case for $24.28 million, with that payment credited against its FinCEN penalty.
- BitMEX: In January 2025, the exchange was fined $100 million for failing to establish and maintain an adequate anti-money laundering and customer verification programme.
- Paxful: In December 2025, FinCEN imposed a $3.5 million penalty after identifying more than $500 million in suspicious activity involving illicit actors. Paxful also admitted to violations of its anti-money laundering obligations.
These cases show that compliance failures have affected different parts of the crypto industry. They also show that having a popular platform and a large user base does not remove the responsibility to monitor transactions properly.
Now, what matters to me is how MEXC responds to its own situation.
MEXC has announced an independent review of its anti-money laundering and sanctions controls. It has also said it is reviewing the FinCEN order with its legal and compliance teams and intends to engage with the relevant authorities.
I consider these positive steps. MEXC deserves the opportunity to explain its position, address the allegations and demonstrate what it is doing to improve its compliance systems.
I also have a concern about how competitors approach situations like this.
An exchange should not automatically be considered more trustworthy simply because another platform is facing regulatory pressure. Competitors have their own histories and responsibilities, and they should be prepared to demonstrate that their compliance systems meet the required standards too.
I am not saying MEXC should escape scrutiny. I want the exchange to provide clear answers and follow through on its commitments. But I also want its competitors to face the same level of accountability.
My position is simple: give MEXC a fair opportunity to address the allegations, judge every exchange by its own actions, and don't confuse market reputation with proven compliance.
#mexc #Web3 #Security
5
0
8
1,191
饾棖饾椏饾槅饾椊饾榿饾椉饾棫饾棽饾榾饾榿饾棽饾椏 retweeted
Visa is expanding stablecoin settlement to Monad
every new announcement like this one, every blockchain upgrade, every ecosystem integration is part of the broader shift, financial infrastructure moving onto open, decentralized, always-on systems
every new announcement like this one, every blockchain upgrade, every ecosystem integration is part of the broader shift, financial infrastructure moving onto open, decentralized, always-on systems
25
14
142
1,721
This distinction matters:
FAN SZN organises fan engagement and participation.
IPX project tokens connect members to specific creative projects under defined membership terms.
They are different experiences, serving different purposes within the wider ecosystem.
FAN SZN organises fan engagement and participation.
IPX project tokens connect members to specific creative projects under defined membership terms.
They are different experiences, serving different purposes within the wider ecosystem.
1
0
1
6
One detail I think deserves attention: IPX is not treating every participant as if they have the same role.
Creators raise and produce.
Brands sponsor.
Fans participate.
Project members receive the benefits defined by their membership terms.
The real challenge is making these relationships work together transparently.
Creators raise and produce.
Brands sponsor.
Fans participate.
Project members receive the benefits defined by their membership terms.
The real challenge is making these relationships work together transparently.
0
0
1
5